Bandy X. Lee's Blog, page 11

Family Courts are the New Holocaust

I Cannot Publish All Letters that Come to Me — but This One Illustrates Why, like Germans under Nazism, Average Citizens are Unaware of Family Court Atrocities

Dear [U.K. Member of Parliament],

You may know that the following is an issue in family courts throughout almost all Western countries, where there have been protests, suicides, etc., for a long time with estimated millions of victims (several judges in the U.S. are in prison for taking about $50,000 cash per child custody from abusers, but generally investigations are not allowed regardless of evidence there, either)….

In my case that started 20 years ago after horrific abuse, there were over 100+ pieces of perjury over the years, some done by the judges and many by the CAFCASS [CPS in the U.S.] officer, likely corruption, like my abuser had always threatened he’d do as he had money. The amount of perjury was one of the worst ever seen in family court, many lawyers have told me, even a couple of judges….

I tried for many years to get justice, and all the judges closed ranks and told me to shut up or I may never see my now depressed young child again. It was torture, literally torture. Even Mark Potter, then Family Court President, saw me and admitted serious irregularities but said, “We are human, but you have to accept that we make mistakes and stop trying to expose it, or we can ban all contact with your son,” knowing that my young child was going from hand to hand while the father lived abroad!

I was all alone, terrified, and knew [the] only path forward was to die, as they had destroyed me in every way. I then had two children on my own, as I was too scarred to date but continued to fight for justice and my elder child, and the money I, we, were entitled to and that had been stolen from us while living in poverty.

The main judge who rubberstamped all the criminality told me he’d take my two young children into care, if I didn’t stop trying to expose him!

As for the stolen divorce settlement, many judges serially told me, “It happened, and so what?” Years of my being sadistically abused was again considered to be nothing, and I was told to accept it or would face severe consequences. It was literally like a cartel of criminals.

Then, after being kicked around by so many of them, intimidated, threatened, abused, my children abused, one district judge said he was beyond shocked by the case and the level of improprieties throughout and apologized on “my colleagues’ behalf” (two more lower judges also tried to intervene, saying that it was shocking what was being done to us, but senior judges always overrode them). He sent me to the police with the file, as it was all a criminal matter that warranted prosecution.

A detective read it and was gobsmacked himself, admitted all was a criminal matter, but “senior judges are involved, and they deliberately overlooked tons of perjury and staged so that that devious man win…. The district judge who sent you here is below them, and those senior judges who staged the case are even above the police. So, we will do nothing.” They were too scared, but I think the police failed my children and me by not acting on the action of that amazing judge….

I have never been allowed to even know the name of the barrister who stole my livelihood and forced me to sign off so much that I was entitled to, that used the social security [also Title IV Federal Funds in the U.S.] to basically pay for the abuser’s comfortable lifestyle, which is also illegal, while we suffered and struggled….

Now that my children are older, I have returned the matter to court myself, and a judge has thrown it out of court as it is years out of time. But I’d explained what they did to me when I was “in time,” for many years — threatened me very aggressively. Such nefarious criminality should have no deadline, just like so many historical abuses that we see in the media.

But this judge “accidentally” mentioned [the name of that barrister who] aggressively paced up and down the consulting room shouting at me to accept that I had no right to any of the money my abuser had earned during our marriages (large golden handshake, large bonuses, house sale private pension, etc…), as I had lost child custody,… again I believe due to corruption, though I was praised as a mother to the sky, even by the judge who gave the abuser custody….

I have written to the current Justice minister, who told me to take the matter back to court. But how, when they kicked me about for many years and now everyone is terrified to act, plus it is “out of time”….

Huge numbers of lives have been destroyed, children’s too, children pushed into poverty due to almost certain wide-spread corruption (according to many), domestic abuse victims re-abused and deprived of an education, the worst and the most immoral of parents, mothers and fathers, rewarded and encouraged to keep on abusing/conning more people, perjury treated as a virtue and serially committed by many of them on one case as it is “free for all,” children stolen from, deprived of hobbies, holidays, a lifestyle they are legally entitled to, foreign parents discriminated against and treated worse than animals. The fact that that institution has been on an illegal rampage for decades is truly shocking. I know that there are many lawyers, even judges, who want to have a voice about what they have been witnessing. I have spoken to many myself. Some even left their jobs, as “I believe in God and cannot be part of something like this any more.”

Many of us with older cases have noticed that the lawyers and judges who abused us the most, were dishonest, abusive, who didn’t care about the children, are now top judges, while those few who were shocked and tried to do something to rectify the injustice are still district judges….

This has been going on for over 50 years, and forever will, if something drastic is not done. I still see suicidal people who cannot stop the huge amount of perjury on their cases on the support forum. Life is so cheap. This has been going on as most MP’s [Members of Parliament] keep quiet as they do not seem to care challenge abusers of power despite 120+ MP’s and 80+ family lawyers and Victims commissioners, as well dozens of charities, academics, and journalists over the years demanding an inquiry in an open letter years ago, when Theresa May declined it….

The fact that the police are too scared to act on serious criminality (I have contacted top police chiefs, too, regarding my case and never got a reply) is truly sickening, despite the police in the stations across the country telling us regularly that they are inundated with family court victims bringing them perjury evidence. As you as an MP know, MP’s are also inundated with the same cases and have been for decades, yet the criminality circumnavigating all international laws and those of basic personal decency continue.

I have asked Baroness Falkner, Chair of Human Rights, for an independent inquiry, stating my case and mentioning many others similar ones. Tens of thousands like mine and thousands of resulting suicides. She started to scrape excuses, that her department was short of money…. Then I wrote an open letter/reply to her and sent it to many in the media. Have any of them contacted her? She needs to know that people are watching, albeit scared….

Thank you for caring for us and trying to help us get a breakthrough.

Regards,

[Name Redacted]

Here is my open letter:

Dear Baroness Falkner,

As the Chair of Equality and Human Rights of Britain, what do you think about the denial of an independent inquiry of family courts that was asked for by 123 MPs, 80+ lawyers and academics, a few journalists and hundreds of thousands of victims, including the families of those who have committed suicide as a result within the last 30+ years?

It is an open secret that those “courts” have been sadistically abusing their power over people and habitually and gratuitously breaching human and children’s rights to the point of complete life destruction.

Let me list a few out of many recurrent crimes perpetrated within those quasi courts: total bias towards a chosen party, often a promiscuous and negligent parent, but in some cases a batterer, convicted criminal, or even a paedophile; overt xenophobia and even racism where foreign parents married to British sociopaths are stripped of all dignity, rights, and worth before losing custody of their children, followed by deprivation of all the entitled-to matrimonial assets, likely due to corruption; battered mothers being thrown out on the dole, while the perpetrator gets all the matrimonial money, meaning that the social security is used by some in those so-called courts to fund the lifestyles of abusers and crooks and in some cases allegedly cover for the bribes taken, according to many victims; perjury treated as normal if perpetrated by court staff (fellow judges, CAFCASS officers, social workers, lawyers) and the pet parents — in some cases 30, 50, and over 100 pieces of perjury deliberately ignored, both by the initial set of judges and later in all the consequent tries of the victims to get justice; victims who fiercely seek justice that they are entitled to both according to national and international laws, and try to expose the crimes against them and their children get intimidated, threatened with never seeing their children again, and abused ceaselessly by the judges who obsessively close rank at the cost of all dignity, professionalism, and victims’ lives and livelihoods; corruption by monied abusers who obtain child custody, often by staging dangerous incidents that include young children to win, has been rumoured to be happening for decades; child rapists and fathers who severely abused and neglected their families are given full or 50–50% custody to avoid paying child support to their victims, devaluing marriage, children, and justice as parenthood starts at conception and not in court like fathers’ rights groups demand for their own selfish benefits; children have been ripped away from devoted sole carers and even adopted based on perjury in “expert” reports on a huge scale, with the victims gagged and the traumatised young children scarred for life, which is child abuse by the courts meant to protect them; family life is classed as unimportant in those ironically FAMILY courts, the monogamous are often persecuted, and parental promiscuity and sexual deviancy almost always comes before the children, devastating the lives of family-orientated parents and obliterating the stability of the whole society; the worst fathers imaginable, and even dangerous ones, have been granted contact with their scarred children, who are often dragged screaming to the ordered contact; devoted parents are routinely equalised with the most appalling, sociopathic ones who should never have had any children, the trend that incites sociopaths to serially produce families, cheat, move on, and shatter lives, while those who truly enjoy family life and have moral integrity are too scared to settle down (at all or again); even the most extreme forms of mental abuse of both children and adults is totally ignored and the abusers rewarded for their mental torture of their spouses and children while reaction to mental abuse/torture punished without mentioning the cause of it, which encourages abusers to keep on abusing; while there is an astonishing amount of regulations stifling the victims with deadlines, lack of adequate procedures, rights and Legal Aid lawyers, or lawyers daring to get involved with the most dubious of cases, the court staff seem to be bound by no legislations or duty to act according to the law to start with and at every following juncture; all whistleblowers are sacked; no complaints procedures work but are only decorative, meaning there is total anarchy and unaccountability despite an enormous quantity of documentary evidence for serious abuse of power and even criminality, often in a serial sequence per case; you know that the media are gagged and scared of reporting on these crimes despite thousands regularly writing to them for decades….

It seems to be that most people in power do not understand that with such power there should be basic decency and responsibility; otherwise, it is all fake, insipid, and shameful! That in a democracy civil servants need to be of far higher than average moral probity and not below the average bar, where they turn a blind eye to human suffering, injustice, and serious human rights abuses.

May I know what you are, as a person in charge of human rights in Britain, going to do regarding these horrific crimes against humanity, and if and when you are going to give the victims of the last 3-4 decades a voice that they are legally and democratically entitled to? With your title and in your role, turning a blind eye should never be an option….

Regards,

[Name Omitted]

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — Extreme Ethics Violator Appointed to an Ethics Committee

Evelyn Nissirios — Extreme Ethics Violator Appointed to an Ethics Committee

Like Child Predators Drawn to School Positions, or Criminals Drawn to Judicial Roles , Extreme Ethics Violators are Drawn to Ethics Committee Memberships

Extreme ethics violators such as Evelyn Nissirios being appointed to positions on ethics committees brings question to their actual role and undermines the credibility of attorney ethics committees everywhere. At a time when investigative reporting across the country has found too many legal oversight agencies to be nothing more than colleagues covering for other colleagues, Nissirios’ appointment is particularly disturbing. Her motives are clear, since she is all these rolled into one: child predator, criminal, and ethics violator.

But what are the motivations of the committee? Nissirios had received at least four ethics complaints by five individuals in just months leading up to her appointment (these are only the ones known to me; for comparison, medical professionals, too, are subject to their own ethics code, and I have spent a twenty-five-year career without a single complaint). The sheer number of complaints should have given the Ethics Committee pause — especially since she cleared none of them, as the Committee did not investigate them — but to appoint such a person to serve on the Committee raises questions about the Committee’s own selection criteria.

The dismissal of these complaints without an investigation is also interesting, since the Office of Attorney Ethics clearly states:

If the facts of the case reveal a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, the case will be investigated.

Reasons the case might not be accepted:

· If the facts of the case do not constitute unethical conduct, even if proven. For example, if the facts of the case show that the lawyer simply has been rude or did not pay a bill on time, the secretary will not docket the case.

· Substantial fee disputes will not be investigated by the district ethics committees. Fee disputes should be addressed through the Fee Arbitration Program.

· If the case involves pending civil or criminal litigation filed against the attorney, the secretary will not docket the case.

Yet, all of the above complaints each alleged multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, and none of them met the exclusion criteria. Instead:

· The facts of each case constituted highly injurious, egregious, and extremely unethical conduct.

· The complaints had nothing to do with fee disputes.

· There were no pending civil or criminal litigation at the time of these complaints.

None of the reasons given for dismissing all of the above complaints were listed on the web site.

A Family Court litigant recently submitted the following letter regarding her concerns about Evelyn Nissirios’ appointment. Revelations of dishonesty and sadism are astonishing. The letter was dismissed by the Ethics Committee in a derogatory manner, in a highly condescending tone — which in itself is revealing to a psychiatrist. Jason Saunders, first assistant ethics counsel of the Ethics Committee, only kept repeating, without explanation, some version of: “We will not be taking any action with regard to your submission.” Nevertheless, the following litigant’s letter with clear ethics violations is noteworthy for the public:

Dear Ethics Committee Chair,

I am writing to express my deep concerns about the recent appointment of Evelyn Nissirios to the Ethics Committee. My surprise stems from her well-documented inappropriate and unethical behavior within her community, which I believe merits careful consideration.

The attached article:

https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/bergen/saddle-river/2023/12/19/saddle-river-nj-school-board-appoints-defeated-incumbent-term/71961545007/

sheds light on her controversial return to the School Board, despite losing an election and resisting community demands for resignation. Additionally, she stirred controversy by orchestrating the cancellation of a school bus line, while conveniently excluding her own neighborhood. A recorded protest from community members further emphasizes the gravity of the situation:

https://youtu.be/2cAUXX5zqz4?si=U_ckOFn-Fs0zB6I1

Beyond these community matters, I am personally affected by Ms. Nissirios’ unethical conduct in the courtroom, as outlined in the attached sworn statement to the police, under prosecutor guidance. Her extensive fabrications and perjury, totaling almost three hundred (300) times, have led to the painful severance of my relationship with my children. They are now under the custody of an individual with a violent history, exposing them to severe danger.

Ms. Nissirios’ involvement in orchestrating the abduction of my children through false police reports, coupled with her psychological manipulation, claiming my abandonment, has exacerbated their suffering. Medical professionals unanimously characterized her behavior as “alarming” and “dangerous,” contributing to a notable decline in my children’s health and academic performance during her three-and-a-half-year tenure as their “guardian ad litem.”

She should not remain on an ethics committee but be subject to ethics committee sanctions for her continuous lying and collusion in child abuse.

To my knowledge, these vital committees are established to uphold the credibility of the courts through the implementation of checks and balances. I trust that this Committee has diligently conducted a comprehensive background check on Evelyn Nissirios and thoroughly assessed her contributions to the community. Her actions within the community suggest anything but ethical behavior.

Would the citizens of Bergen County agree with and respect this Committee’s decision? Ultimately, the test of ethical behavior is not what Ms. Nissirios says of herself, but how the community experiences her conduct. And her words do not match her actions. Why take the risk of tarnishing the hard-earned reputation of the Committee by having such a person of questionable character as a member? I implore the Ethics Committee to reevaluate Ms. Nissirios’ appointment, considering the severity of her actions and potential violations of ethical standards. I am prepared to provide additional evidence as required.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

[Name Redacted]

*This is the sixth of weekly articles devoted to the information I have been asked to provide the Saddle River community about a controversial member on its School Board. Initially, I planned a very short series, but the information keeps coming! The said source of controversy is also a central figure in the upcoming book, Judicial Violence: Anatomy of a Family Court Case. Those who have additional information to share can reach me here . Thank you!

[image error]

‘Mentally Ill, Incompetent, and Evil’

These are extremely concerning traits in a guardian ad litem and a member of a school board. Yet, this is how experts and students of mental health are describing Evelyn Nissirios. I personally describe her as dangerous, and this is why I feel the need to warn the public.

[image error]

In Family Court, Strong Women and Good Mothers are Targets for Sacrifice

The Mother Below Reached Out to Me in Desperation; Her Story Sounds Unbelievable, but in Family Court It is Typical

BATON ROUGE MOM GOING TO PARISH PRISON SATURDAY FOR FAILING TO PAY HER HUSBAND’S ATTORNEY FEES

By Woody Jenkins, editor, Central City News — BATON ROUGE

Katherine Diamond, a 55-year-old Baton Rouge mother of 13-year-old twins, has been ordered to report to the East Baton Rouge Parish Prison at 8 a.m. Saturday morning to begin serving five days of a 140-day prison sentence.

Her crime? Well, she actually hasn’t been convicted of a crime or even accused of one. The sentence comes from an order by Family Court Judge Erika Green that Ms. Diamond pay nearly $75,000 of her husband’s attorney fees in connection with their custody battle and for other costs.

Three years ago, Family Court Judge Pam Baker found that Ms. Diamond had committed child abuse. That was in a Family Court civil case, not in a criminal trial. However, a review of a video of the alleged child abuse — a video taken and edited by the ex-husband — shows that no abuse occurred. Yet, because of that video clip, which was not substantiated by an investigation, Ms. Diamond has not been allowed to see her children in more than two years.

Baton Rouge attorney Susan Raborn, who is not associated with the case, reviewed the video of the alleged child abuse for the Central City News. She said, “The video by the ex-husband was taken at a parking lot where they were scheduled to exchange the children from his vehicle to hers. The little girl resists getting into the mom’s vehicle for about 10 seconds. At no time does Ms. Diamond hit or hurt the child. She is simply trying to get her into the car. Meanwhile, the husband is in his truck filming and does nothing to get the children to cooperate with the transfer and get in the car with their mother. To call this child abuse is absurd. To convince the court to go along with such a story to destroy a mom and take her children from her is outrageous. After reviewing the video a number of times, I can say with certainty that this is not a case of child abuse.”

The allegation of abuse was made by Ms. Diamond’s ex-husband in their child custody case before Family Court. It was never investigated by the district attorney, law enforcement, or the Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services. No criminal complaint was ever made against Ms. Diamond. It was simply an accusation made by the husband in Family Court.

When Ms. Diamond’s previous attorney, Kathy Benoit, attempted to go into court to argue that Ms. Diamond’s ex-husband had been manipulating their case and keeping their children away from their mother, the ex-husband’s attorney said it was a frivolous allegation and asked the judge to hold both Ms. Diamond and Ms. Benoit in contempt of court, which the court did.

Ms. Raborn decried the weaponization of the courts to criminalize the work of attorneys, put them in fear of representing their clients, and destroy their client’s due process rights.

“Here we have a person being treated as a criminal but who was not afforded a criminal defense attorney,” Ms. Raborn said. “Family Court should not be able to put people in jail without affording them due process and proper criminal representation.”

Under Louisiana law, a party to a suit normally has to pay his own legal bills. However, in the Family Court, when an attorney for one party gets the judge to hold the other party in contempt of court, the person held in contempt can be forced to pay their spouse’s attorney bills and can be put in prison if they fail to do so.

While debtor’s prisons were done away with in the 1800’s, some people are still thrown into prison for nonpayment of fines for contempt of court.

Ironically, Ms. Diamond’s ancestor, Robert Morris, signer of the Declaration of Independence and one of the chief financers of the Revolution, lost his fortune, and was sentenced to debtor’s prison for three years until the passage of the Bankruptcy Act of 1801, which set him free.

Contrary to what was said in court, Ms. Diamond has in fact been out performing trash pickup weekend after weekend with petty criminals and people convicted of DWI and drug charges. All for allegations of child abuse which did not happen.

Ms. Diamond said she has no means to pay the $75,000 being demanded by the judge for her husband’s attorney fees, child support, and other costs.

Ms. Diamond said, “I have never abused my children in any way. This is a complete injustice. They have taken my children and everything I have. Now they expect me to pay my husband’s legal bills. I’m going to prison but I’m not a criminal. Isn’t there anyone who will help me and end this nightmare?”

At present, Ms. Diamond is facing a potential of 140 days in prison, more than 200 hours of community service, and nearly $75,000 in payment for her husband’s legal bills and other costs. She is hopeful a miracle will happen, that these contempt charges will be dropped by her ex-husband, and that he will allow their children to see their mother, so that no more time will pass or memories be lost and they will be reunited soon.

(Originally distributed via: https://www.facebook.com/story.php/?id=100064941001980&story_fbid=756657756508918.)

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — World-Renowned Torture Expert Confirms Child Abuse

Evelyn Nissirios — World-Renowned Torture Expert Confirms Her Child Abuse

Medical Report on Child Torture Sent to (and Ignored by) Former Saddle River School Board President and Current Saddle River School District Superintendent

The report below is published, because I would be remiss if I had neglected to inform a school board that it had among its ranks a child predator who regularly engages in child abduction, abuse, and torture. Similarly, a school board would be remiss if it refused to investigate serious alarms concerning its member — especially if it is a member who has clung to her seat despite being voted out, at great discontent to the community. Multiple members have asked that I inform the community if the Saddle River School Board continues to ignore this information regarding Evelyn Nissirios.

The official definition of torture requires that one is acting in a state capacity, as Nissirios has acted through her role as “guardian ad litem.” Also, child predators gravitate toward public positions so as to garner trust with the community, in order to continue or to expand their predatory activities. Nissirios’ extreme actions to hold onto a seat on the School Board, defying an election loss and intense public protest, may fit this characteristic tendency.

I had hoped that the former president of the Saddle River School Board, Jon Peros, and the current superintendent of the Saddle River School, Gina Cinotti, would review the reports when I wrote to them almost a year ago. Far from opening an investigation on Nissirios, they dodged my every attempt at communication, even though I am a legally-mandated reporter of child abuse.

In the case I presented, Nissirios suppressed ten medical reports to unconstitutionally imprison two children with their violent abuser, while severing all their contact with the caregiver and mother who singlehandedly raised them all their lives. Now, for almost two and a half years, Nissirios has blocked all communication, while inculcating in these children that their mother “abandoned” them. What is unthinkable for the average person is near-universal practice for Nissirios: whenever there is proof of child abuse, she suppresses evidence, obstructs investigations, intimidates witnesses, and perjures in court to effectuate a “custody reversal” for a price. And it is a profitable business: what perpetrator would not pay to escape felony prosecution, if he could instead detain the children he abused, continue his abuse, and extort “child support” to make up for his payments to her and more?

Below is one of the reports Nissirios suppressed, so that it could not be entered into court records. The author is a preeminent world authority in forensic psychiatry who has coauthored the United Nations Istanbul Protocol for documenting torture, teaches at Harvard Law School, and organizes amicus briefs for the U.S. Supreme Court. He examined over fifty pieces of medical evidence on the above children before concluding that they were being tortured:

Dear Ms. — ,

[The two Forensic Professionals who diagnosed your children’s father with psychopathy, a dangerous personality disorder that is a contraindication to parenting] have demonstrated the highest level of professionalism, given the application of their extensive knowledge, education, skill, training, and experience; and that the current situation of you and your children being subject to severe mental pain and suffering rises to the level of torture by international standards and is an immediate crisis requiring posthaste attention and remediation by the Family Court, Bergen County, Chancery, New Jersey.

[My recommendations] to the Court are that, on the face of it, the severe pain and suffering you and your children are being subject to by the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of [Evelyn Nissirios and others] acting in an official capacity require immediate correction…. the emergency situation arising from the information I have, on the face of it, warrants immediate correction of medically contraindicated and unsupportable behaviors thus far tolerated in that Court.

I have analyzed available and relevant information sources, as they relate specifically to the medical findings of your case [through] more than half century of my knowledge, education, training, and experience….

The Family Court, through acts of omission and acts of commission, including but not limited to process, proceedings, decisions, and orders, has exposed you and your children to torture by way of placing your children with [the dangerously abusive father].

My expert and authoritative opinion that these experiences constitute torture include, but are not limited to … medical findings, as enumerated [in a list of almost sixty statements of findings].

He concludes:

“Torture is a crime of specific intent to shatter human ties, bonds, and connections of shared social contract…. Torture, strictly defined, has caused Profound, severe, pervasive, past, ongoing and increasing, life-threatening physical and psychologic traumas and injuries of massive proportion of a loving mother and her two vulnerable children. It is extreme, potentially beyond remedy at this point.

It is intentional, concerted, and pervasive as perpetrated and perpetuated by known and visible public figures, [including Evelyn Nissirios], diametrically opposite to their sanctioned and authorized roles and behaviors.

When causes and conditions are sufficient, phenomena arise.

Torture has caused the suffering of [the protective mother and children]. The acts of omission and commission of the Family Court and its fellow travelers and Associates are on their face conscious and intentional, and coincide with the benefit and character traits of [the dangerously abusive father].

Basic common decency and the rule of law in a democracy demand halt of the torture, making whole the objects of the torture, and an end to impunity of the perpetrators and the demand of accountability.

B.H.R., M.D.

*This is the fifth of a short series of weekly articles devoted to the information I am providing the Saddle River community about a member on its School Board, begun at the request of a local official. Despite the many articles, this is still the tip of the iceberg, and more will be revealed in the upcoming book, Judicial Violence: Anatomy of a Family Court Case. Those who have additional information to share can reach me here. Thank you.

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — My Mandated Warning to the Saddle River School District Superintendent

Evelyn Nissirios — My Mandated Warning of Child Abuse to the Saddle River School District Superintendent

When the Saddle River School Board President Ignored My Mandated Warning Concerning Evelyn Nissirios’ Child Abuse, I Copied the Saddle River School District Superintendent

I am documenting the below at the request of Saddle River community members.

As a mandated reporter, I am legally required to continue reporting, warning, and protecting until the child abuse stops. By the time I wrote to the Saddle River School Board president regarding my concerns about Evelyn Nissirios’ abuse of children, for a third time without response, I copied the Saddle River School District superintendent, Gina Cinotti, and other Board members to the following letter:

March 6, 2023

Re: Concerns Regarding Board Member, Evelyn Nissirios

Dear Mr. Peros:

Please let me know if you have any questions, or if I could be of further assistance. This matter needs to be investigated, as the enabling of child abuse through lies and perjury, tampering of evidence, and interference with Child Protection Serivice investigations are serious offenses for a member on any School Board of Education.

Kind regards,

Bandy X. Lee, M.D., M.Div.

Forensic Psychiatrist and Violence Expert; Co-founder, Violence Prevention Institute; President, World Mental Health Coalition; Author of Textbook, Violence

Copied on the letter were: Gina Cinotti; Emily Kaufman; Yasmin Elshami; Elizabeth Salazer; Kaitlyn Lawler; and the Saddle River School District Business Office. As noted far below, at the end of the New Jersey Statutes, any person knowingly violating the statutes on child abuse, including the failure to report an act of child abuse, having reasonable cause to believe that an act of child abuse has been committed, is a chargeable offense. All the above persons were given medical evidence of the abuse of children by Evelyn Nissirios, which should have served as reasonable cause, and yet all failed to report.

--

Below are the selected New Jersey Statutes I attached to my letter, as pertaining to Evelyn Nissirios’ direct, indirect, or co-conspiracy to commit child abuse. The full statutes are available here. Statutes concerning child abuse are found under Title 9. Children — Juvenile and Domestic Relations Courts.

9:6–1. ABUSE, ABANDONMENT, CRUELTY AND NEGLECT OF CHILD; WHAT CONSTITUTES

Abuse of a child [by] (a) disposing of the custody of a child contrary to law;… (e) the performing of any indecent, immoral or unlawful act or deed, in the presence of a child, that may tend to debauch or endanger or degrade the morals of the child;… (g) using excessive physical restraint on the child under circumstances which do not indicate that the child’s behavior is harmful to himself, others or property….

Abandonment of a child [by] (b) failing to care for and keep the control and custody of a child so that the child shall be exposed to physical or moral risk without proper and sufficient protection….

Cruelty to a child [by] (b) inflicting upon a child unnecessary suffering or pain, either mental or physical; (c) habitually tormenting, vexing or afflicting a child; (d) any willful act of omission or commission whereby unnecessary pain and suffering, whether mental or physical, is caused or permitted to be inflicted on a child; (e) … exposing a child to unnecessary hardship, fatigue or mental or physical strains that may tend to injure the health or physical or moral well-being of such child.

Neglect of a child [by] (a) willfully failing to provide proper and sufficient food, clothing, maintenance, regular school education as required by law, medical attendance or surgical treatment, and a clean and proper home, (b) failure to do or permit to be done any act necessary for the child’s physical or moral well-being….

9:6–8.9. ABUSED CHILD; CHILD ABUSE DEFINED

[The perpetrator:]

b. Creates or allows to be created a substantial or ongoing risk of physical injury to such child by other than accidental means which would be likely to cause death or serious or protracted disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ….

d. Or a child whose physical, mental, or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired as the result of the failure of his parent or guardian, or such other person having his custody and control, to exercise a minimum degree of care (1) in supplying the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, education, medical or surgical care though financially able to do so or though offered financial or other reasonable means to do so, … (2) in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship, by unreasonably inflicting or allowing to be inflicted harm, or substantial risk thereof,… or by any act of a similarly serious nature requiring the aid of the court….

f. Or a child who … (2) has been willfully isolated from ordinary social contact under circumstances which indicate emotional or social deprivation….

9:6–8.10. REPORTS OF CHILD ABUSE

Any person having reasonable cause to believe that a child has been subjected to child abuse or acts of child abuse shall report the same immediately to DCF’s Child Protection and Permanency (CP&P) by telephone or otherwise….

9:6–8.13. PERSON MAKING REPORT; IMMUNITY FROM LIABILITY; ACTION FOR RELIEF FROM DISCHARGE OR DISCRIMINATION

Anyone acting pursuant to this act in the making of a report under this act shall have immunity from any liability, civil or criminal, that might otherwise be incurred or imposed….

9:6–8.14. VIOLATIONS INCLUDING FAILURE TO MAKE REPORT; DISORDERLY PERSON

Any person knowingly violating the provisions of this act including the failure to report an act of child abuse having reasonable cause to believe that an act of child abuse has been committed, is a disorderly person.

*This is the fourth of a short series of weekly articles devoted to the information I am providing the Saddle River community about a member on its School Board, begun at the request of a local official. Despite the many articles, this is still the tip of the iceberg, and more will be revealed in the upcoming book, Judicial Violence: Anatomy of a Family Court Case. Those who have additional information to share can reach me here. Thank you.

[image error]

Turning a Blind Eye to the Horrific Human Rights Abuses in Family Courts

I Have No Knowledge of the Person who Copied Me in this Letter, but I Vouch that All is True — Even Worse in the U.S.

Dear BBC journalist Dan Johnson and BBC Director General,

Having seen your segment on migrants complaining about unstable Wifi connection, etc., and you being super worried about it, may I ask why you and the BBC and all the other media have been ignoring the stomach-churning human rights abuses and corruption in secret family courts that have resulted in thousands committing suicide over several decades with their families, apparently, gagged?

Hundreds of thousands of us have been deprived of all rights — our children taken away from us due to corruption and fabricated “expert” reports, xenophobia, racism, our babies ripped away from us abused and battered mothers and given to abusers who likely paid bribe, some children have been taken into care and adopted based on totally fabricated or exaggerated reports. Many abused mothers, especially foreign ones, have been forced to sign off their entire divorce settlements and thrown out on the dole, childless and penniless, almost certainly as the lawyers who forced them into forgoing the money they are entitled to took huge chucks of that money as bribe depriving the victims, including children, of the basics and deliberately pushing them into abject poverty and some into suicides.

Some judges even fabricate facts in judgements to stage cases for monied abusers to win, again due to rumored bribe, CAFCASS [CPS in the U.S.] officers lie in reports and form very close relationships with manipulative abusers whose battered wives and children they then destroy and laugh at them.

Perjury by abusers, wife batterers, the most negligent fathers and by corrupt court staff is encouraged by judges and ignored, in some cases 50–150+ pieces of it per case! Yes, it is that bad and criminal!

Marital promiscuity is treated as a virtue and regularly rewarded, while the reaction of its victims to it is regularly punished to extremes, likely as the judges back up their own immorality and treatment of their own spouses and children.

Rights to religion or basic moral engagement in family life and monetary marital expectations are totally withdrawn, non-existent, as those who are capable of lying under oath to remove young children from their devoted parents or take bribe for that evil are the worst of atheists imaginable — truly sick people who believe they are God and must be worshipped.

It’s a never-ending revolving door of corruption, perjury en masse, sadistic retraumatisation of victims of domestic abuse, rewarding of the most extreme forms of immorality and spousal humiliation, rewarding of children being at the bottom of the pile for the pet parents, deliberate sadistic creation of extreme poverty the already-abused victims of DV are pushed into, the misuse of public funds so that abusers maintain their opulent lifestyles while their abused spouses and children go on the dole, breaches of all national and international laws and those of basic humanity.

All complaints procedures are fake and in reality do not exist. No matter what documentary evidence for criminality you provide, and in some cases it is 50+ documents, like in mine, all complaints procedures scrape excuses not to punish the criminals but support them — those for judges, CAFCASS officers, barristers, solicitors…. Even High court judges and President seem to fully back up the most horrific forms of abuses of power in those courts and almost never rectify anything, even if the children’s lives are clearly being shattered.

Many victims report intimidating and threatening behaviour by the most senior judges if they fight to expose child abuse and criminality in courts. They tell them that their other children will be taken into care or all contact with their children already given to abusers will be completely banned. Closing ranks and silencing the victims is always top priority as they know what has been going on and the scale of it.

The positions of Attorney general, Justice minister, Children’s minister, Mental health minister, etc., are also all decorative and they have been abetting these human rights abuses for many decades and even some have sacked top whistleblowers for “not working as a team.” So, one has to collectively abuse people and ignore what their corrupt and sadistic colleagues are doing while destructing all their conscience?

123 MPs (Members of Parliament), over 80 lawyers and scores of charities, academics and a few brave journalists have demanded an independent investigation of those torture chambers, just to be blocked, as always. It happens in other Western countries, as a globally-organized crime, with millions of protestors and campaigners, some of whom are judges themselves and who demand justice and the right to speak out.

Oceans of lives have been destroyed as a result of these anarchic and unaccountable institutions, and even the families of those who have committed suicide, apparently thousands in UK alone, can never get their voice as the media side with the abusers in power.

Even the police do not act to the files brimming in criminality, even when lower-court judges send the files to them. They seem to be scared and say that senior judges are too powerful and clearly allowed the criminality to occur and they are more powerful than the police. In the country that purports it is the paragon of human rights.

Like all your media colleagues and the BBC DG (Director General), you know all this already. It is an open secret, and you all cowardly turn a blind eye, so it makes your migrant laments hypocritical and unfair on us, too.

Some family-court victims have recently made fresh complaints against lack of complaints procedures and even against their police forces who never reacted to the criminality and likely bribe in their cases where babies were removed from their mothers on totally fictitious judgements, where their own legal teams stole their divorce settlements and pensions by deliberately siding with the abusers’ side likely due to being bribed, in some cases tens, in others hundreds, of thousands of pounds have been stolen, yet the police said they could not act as obviously judges allowed that to happen because they wanted it to happen. Well, we can guess the reason!

So, why your DG allows for the plight of migrants, who I have nothing against and wish them great futures, about Wifi connection to be reported upon and the government shamed while us hundreds of thousands of victims of serious crimes by the very people meant to deliver justice and implement human rights are always ignored, hence silenced? You are the watchdogs of human rights, yet abet the most extreme breaches of them to please those who should not come near any power over people, especially children.

Stop being self-serving hypocrites and do the long-overdue right thing.

Regards,

S.K.T.

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — My Letter to the Saddle River School Board President

Evelyn Nissirios — My Mandated Warning Letter to the Saddle River School Board President

As a Mandated Reporter, I am Legally Mandated to Continue Reporting, Warning, and Protecting until the Child Abuse Stops

“Legalized kidnapping” and child abuse for profit through the Family Courts, affecting tens of thousands of children per year, are increasingly coming to light. State-sanctioned child abuse relies on “officers of the court,” such as Evelyn Nissirios, who exploit oversight loopholes and escape prosecution by aggressively promoting “judicial immunity.” This makes the job of a mandated reporter of child abuse very challenging. At least a half-dozen loving parents whose children Nissirios unconstitutionally abducted or otherwise tortured through felony-level crimes, by transferring them to their abusers for lucrative returns, reached out to me in response to my public writing. Here is just one case:

That Nissirios as “the children’s guardian ad litem” from the start worked only for the monied child predator was apparent from the degree to which she had to perjure herself — over 177 documented times in one case, as reported to the police under prosecutor review. When the children asked to talk outside the earshot of their father, who continuously eavesdropped and threatened them with police and jail if they said the “wrong” thing, she refused. When the children started vomiting and becoming immobile with panic before visiting, in their words, “the scariest person” with a “black heart,” she increased their visits with him. When these children became suicidal, injured themselves, and tried to set the house on fire because going to their father was, in their words, “torture” and “worse than death,” she wholesale helped him kidnap them through a violent police raid. Now, he has them full-time, and the mother has not seen or heard from them in two-and-a-half years, even though he is the one with a history of a restraining order for almost killing them, not the mother. In order to achieve this illegal “custody switch,” Nissirios buried ten psychiatric evaluations reporting the father as a danger and the mother as fit, medical records of the father’s near-lethal injuries to his children and his wife, photographic evidence of his abuse, voice recordings of the children describing his abuse, the children’s suicide notes, the children’s attempts to set the house on fire in protest, the children’s emergency room visits for suicide attempts, the children’s emergency follow-up visits after suicide attempts, and the children’s letters to the Court asking to fire her — so that she could imprison them with the man they called, “that maniac!” These children are now rapidly deteriorating medically and academically, but she is now blocking access — including to concerned medical professionals — of all pediatric, psychiatric, and school records, so that only the abusive father has access.

The multiple reports allowed me to confirm a highly consistent pattern, in addition to a case that has documented Nissirios’ extreme child abuse in more than one thousand pages of medical and other documentary evidence, waiting for their day in court.

Many have asked me to publish my original letter to Jon Peros, president of the Saddle River School Board. He ignored my letter but resigned his position with a timing that would circumvent a special election but would give Nissirios a loophole to “step back in” — however offensively to the electorate who could not wait to vote her out, even without the above information, and did. Below is the letter:

February 27, 2023

Dear Mr. Peros:

I am writing to you as a lifelong academic and a great supporter of those who serve and promote education in society.

I do so because I have great concerns regarding a member of your Board, who is Ms. Evelyn Nissirios, [as a] third-party observer of her actions, which have been highly injurious to children. You will also find an affidavit [and a medical report by a coauthor of the United Nations Istanbul Protocol for documenting torture, and consultant to the U.S. Supreme Court, who examined the medical records of children under Ms. Nissirios’ “care” and determined that she is a participant in state-sponsored torture of children].

“Legalization” of child abuse does not negate the actual abuse. It is now well-established that childhood maltreatment, or exposure to abuse and neglect as children has devastating lifelong consequences. It increases the risk for mood and anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, antisocial and borderline personality disorders, and substance use disorders. It is also associated with several major medical disorders, including heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer. The net effect is a significant reduction in life expectancy.

Future risk can be estimated through Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) scores, and as a result of Ms. Nissirios’ direct interventions, the scores of [these children] jumped from 1 to 6, which forebodes lifelong psychological and physical problems and about two decades of loss of life. These children were of perfect emotional and physical health and were thriving academically prior to Ms. Nissirios’ removal of them from their loving mother to place them with their violent father…. The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner itself recently stated: “the failure to address intimate partner violence and violence against children in custody rights and visitation decisions is … a violation of the human rights to life and security that could amount to torture”….

I am therefore writing to you, because I do not believe that we as a civilized society should tolerate this level of contempt for and torture of our children. I wish I were contacting you under better circumstances. I cordially thank you for your kind attention and time.

Best regards,

Bandy X. Lee, M.D., M.Div.

[image error]

Who’s Afraid of Making a Ruling?

The Most Terrifying Thing for a Family Court is Exposure — and the Most Frightening Thing for a Family Court-Shielded Predator is to be Held Accountable

Family Courts rely on public presumptions to escape scrutiny. For example, something so benign-sounding as, “Family Court,” does not inspire inspection. People think of popular shows such as “Judge Judy” — nothing as dark as this entity actually is. The very name absolves it of any criminality! But what if it were named more closely to its actual function: “Children’s Slaughterhouse”? The same number of child deaths would stimulate far greater interrogation.

This is partly why Family Courts are terrified of the truth getting out. As of now, it defies public imagination that an entity called a “Court” would be breaking the law, much less be a criminal enterprise. It is difficult to consider that, hidden in a judicial system that is supposed to be a pillar of civilization, there lies an island of barbarism that rivals the worst genocidal camp. Most would find it inconceivable that court “seals”, claimed to be for the protection of children’s privacy, are in truth being used to hide their depraved crimes against children. Secrecy is precisely what makes the vulnerable easier prey.

Judges are assumed to be upstanding members of society, not ringleaders of criminal cartels. “Guardians ad litem” for children, furthermore, are perceived to be professional officers of the court, not hatchet jobs hired to harm — and sometimes kill — those under their “care”. But secrecy is precisely what allows Family Courts to get away literally with murder.

Therefore, when major magazines published my interviews on Family Court, Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca panicked. She immediately ordered that they be “unpublished” — which caused one outlet to take down the article for two days, and another to do so for two months. She eventually received a stern warning from their legal departments:

this order requires that the [referenced article] must “be immediately removed, deleted, and unpublished”…. I would appreciate hearing from you as to how the order possibly could apply to [Magazine], given that [Magazine] is not a party to this lawsuit, had no notice that such an order was being sought, and almost certainly is not subject to the court’s jurisdiction. In addition, it appears obvious to me that even if the order expressly covered the [Magazine] article, it would functionally be a presumptively unconstitutional prior restraint against ongoing publication.

Gallina-Mecca apparently never learned, despite becoming a subject of national ridicule when, in 2015, an author of the Washington Post reported on her extraordinary act of ordering the takedown of a newspaper article. The newspaper responded at the time:

While the Bergen Dispatch reviews its options we have confirmed that Bergen County does currently remain part of the State of New Jersey and that currently New Jersey is still part of the Union of states that is governed by the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. As such, Bergen County citizens continue to enjoy the right to freedom of speech and the right to a free press.

The newspaper editor sued Judge Gallina-Mecca, whose motion to dismiss was denied. Curiously, just two days after the denial of Gallina-Mecca’s motion to dismiss, the editor was found dead, after a sudden incarceration for “child neglect.” He had just won an award for “Courage under Fire” from the New Jersey Society of Professional Journalists.

Now, the same judge cannot seem to make a ruling in my sister’s case. An initial trial date was postponed from July 2023 to August, September, October, and November 2023, and now to mid-January 2024. Will it happen this time? We will have to see: terrified of exposure, she and her accomplice, Evelyn Nissirios, have also not been able to grant the children even one minute of visitation or phone call with their mother in two-and-a-half years, including a third Christmas for the Christian children to be with their Christian mother — even mass murderers have more parental rights than this model mother, once known as “the best mom”! They know that the crime of imprisoning these children with their violent, substance-abusing, and pornography-addicted father — not to mention duly-diagnosed psychopath and anti-Christian who used to scream at them for wanting Christmas decorations — will be explosively obvious within a half-minute of exposure to any adult who truly cares about them.

Draconian, airtight secrecy is how they disguise their child theft operation, and thus whenever evidence of abuse and trauma surfaces, the response of Gallina-Mecca and Nissirios is to tighten access to information further: one-half of days of school absences and drops in grade since the custody switch have led to a block in access to all school records for the mother; a failure to thrive, going from average height and weight to becoming the smallest in their classes, has led to a blockage of pediatric records and instructions to all other parents not to send photos to the mother; and notifications of repeated emergency room, orthopedic, and dental surgery visits have led to a complete overhaul of providers, so that the mother cannot even know whom the children are seeing. Here are the players in her case:

‘Child Therapist’ Barbara Maurer

As the Family Court-mandated children’s “therapist”, she charged the highest rates the mother has ever seen, with barely a non-social work master’s degree. Since the mother is well-versed in psychology — as a social psychology major, daughter of a child psychologist, and sister of a psychiatrist — she recognized that Ms. Maurer was not performing anything remotely resembling therapy, but could not reach her (she would not return calls, whereas any message from the father was answered within minutes). The children, who were suicidal because of the father’s abuse, became acutely more suicidal following each session. Finally, when the children refused her “therapy”, she locked them in her office and traumatized them. I reported her to her licensing board, which adjudged her guilty and removed her — only for the Family Court to mandate the children to another “therapist” — this time, sealing the identity of the new “therapist”. The goal? — to “reprogram” the children into accepting abuse and denouncing love (also called “brainwashing” under duress).

‘Guardian ad litem’ Evelyn Nissirios

More brutal than a street gangster, that this “children’s” guardian ad litem from the start worked only for “the best interests” of the monied child predator was apparent from the degree to which she had to lie — over 177 documented times on the record. When the children asked to talk outside the earshot of their father, who threatened them with police and jail if they said the “wrong” thing, she refused. When the children started vomiting and becoming immobile with panic before visiting, in their words, “the scariest person” with a “black heart,” she increased their time with him. When these children became suicidal, injured themselves, and tried to set the house on fire because going to their father was “torture” and “worse than death,” she wholesale helped him kidnap them through a violent police raid. Now, he has them full-time, and the mother has not seen or heard from them in two-and-a-half years. In order to achieve this illegal “custody switch,” Ms. Nissirios buried suicide notes, attempts to set the house on fire in protest, emergency room visits for suicide attempts, emergency follow-up visits after suicide attempts, and letters to the Court asking to fire her, so that she could send them to a man they called, “that maniac!”

‘Judge’ Jane Gallina-Mecca

That the Family Court “judge” was the orchestrator of these crimes is obvious from her extreme control of the narrative, as noted above. She also endlessly appointed needless actors, simply to increase the number of people parroting her concocted story. This included a guardian ad litem for the mother, Linda Schofel — despite nine psychiatrists and doctorate psychologists unanimously declaring that the mother had “excellent mental health” and did not need a guardian ad litem, whereas the father was deemed dangerous and in need of an urgent evaluation. First, Gallina-Mecca refused to hear any medical testimonies, and when one expert submitted his report anyway, she ordered it destroyed. Secondly, she obstructed three Child Protective Services (CPS) investigations by allowing the father to threaten them, after which they promptly closed down. Thirdly, she forbade the children from seeing a psychiatrist but mandated them to go only to the false “therapists” above. Fourthly, when two forensic psychiatrists tried to make a legally-mandated report of child abuse, she arrested them, in a form of witness intimidation. Lastly, she threw out nine reports by psychiatrists of national and international renown, but listened only to an unqualified, unlicensed “associate counselor,” Tara Devine, because the latter was willing to contradict all nine psychiatrists. Also involved was pediatrician Karen Wu, who retracted her statement that the children are being abused and falsified her medical records. When no true psychiatric expert would render an “assessment” to her liking, Gallina-Mecca even suggested that the mother be blindfolded and taken by chaperone to a third, clandestine location to see a no-name “psychiatrist” of Gallina-Mecca’s choice, whose identity and credentials would never be revealed, even to the mother’s lawyer — who is the crazy one here?

The Father

The father in this case is unhinged enough to jump at the chance of hiring Gallina-Mecca and Nissirios as his hitwomen, believing he would gain an edge in his divorce, and therefore not much needs to be said about him: abusers act as abusers — it is Family Court availing this “opportunity” that is anomalous. A corporate lawyer and student of Alan Dershowitz, this father thought he was being clever when he hid his extensive background of psychopathic abuse and neglect, in order to marry into a family he could exploit financially and that would improve his social standing. He attempted to murder his wife six times, twice with the hired help of the Gallina-Mecca/Nissirios duo. Incompetent in anything real, he is a criminal mastermind, having wiggled himself out of a financial fraud scheme he helped orchestrate, while his former boss was fined 38 million dollars. At home, he led a parasitic lifestyle, pleading poverty to extract money from his in-laws, while he stashed away 97 percent of his million-dollar salary. His mother and his sibling had debilitating disorders of psychosis. He himself has been diagnosed of psychopathy — the most dangerous and deceptive disorder known to psychiatry — and was on a restraining order for almost crushing the skull of his 7-year-old son, and nearly killing his daughter as an infant, shortly before he was permitted to “legally” kidnap both of them. He is now demanding six-figure “child support” from the mother — the real reason for his interest, and the Court’s interest, in these children.

*The father will be named in my upcoming book, The Dangerous Case of Family Courts, where several other accomplices in child endangerment, such as school officials, will also be named. Additionally, there will be a documentary and a television series designed to expose bad actors, where Family Court would rather assist them.

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — ‘Scrams’ from School Board Meeting, Giving Away Her Guilt

Evelyn Nissirios — ‘Scrams’ from School Board Meeting, Giving Away Her Guilt

‘She Took Off and Ran’ — ‘It is Like a Dictatorship’

Before a discussion could happen, according to witnesses: “She rushed into her car and took off so fast, it was obvious she was running from something!” These are the latest events surrounding Evelyn Nissirios and the controversy at the Saddle River School Board, which held another meeting a few days ago. Nissirios was set to face vehement opposition to her illegitimate clinging to power, despite losing an election, with the statement: “Appointment of Ms. Nissirios remains in protest until the Board can furnish correspondence to/from NJ State BOE confirming their actions were proper, ethical and above board.”

This piece is part of my short weekly series on Nissirios, documenting reports from others, by request. I started as an outside observer, because of an overwhelming response to my article about her saga at the Saddle River School Board, mirroring the inundation of complaints I received from her victims following my writing on her abuses in one Family Court case. Noted here are all fresh accounts on the Saddle River School Board scandal, as I will not repeat what I reported before: such as the Board’s refusal to acknowledge my physician’s mandated report about Nissirios’ predatory acts against children; and chronicles of Nissirios’ potentially unethical and illegal acts while on the Board.

Accounts made public are not defamation if they report the truth, and there is a grave need for discovery and prosecution. Until then, this series can be a depository for suspicious actions, and serve the purpose of the First Amendment in the first place: to fight tyranny.

Troubling signs keep mounting: this time, the School Board meeting ended after about fifteen minutes. There was an election of president and vice president before the new Board member — Kunal Bhatia — was even sworn in (interestingly, as a result, he could not vote, but Nissirios — the defeated and illegitimately reappointed incumbent — could). Bhatia was then sworn in, and an announcement was made that the Board would be “reading a book” this year. “And then it was over. It is like a dictatorship!”

Community members are at a loss as to how to deal with an out-of-control School Board that is unaccountable to the community it supposedly serves. This time, they were blindsided and furious that they were dispersed so early, while they were still waiting for the meeting to begin. “I guess they asked if there were any comments in the very beginning, but we were just arriving, and this never happened before — the Board meeting usually lasts hours!”

“The entire Board has got to go,” one angry parent aired, except the counterpart superintendent and principal of the school, Gina Cinotti, is up for reappointment, and she has been trying to ingratiate herself with the Board. Complaining to the Bergen County Board of Education has been contemplated, but Cinotti “has a family member on the County Board. Everyone is in bed with one another!”

I recalled having contacted Cinotti once, which was a surreal experience. Despite the seriousness of my report, she did not respond, either, and did not seem to find the lack of response from the School Board about all the medical evidence I gave them to be extraordinary.

“What is happening here [with the Board] is disturbing, but what we are learning about what is happening to these children is just terrible,” one reader of my articles remarked.

Yet, the public does not know half the story of Nissirios’ deliberate sacrificing of dozens of children by tearing them away from their loving parents for years and imprisoning them with their abusers, for no other reason than a seeming, sadistic delight — as she flaunts “judicial immunity” as guardian ad litem to fix the results (this “immunity” is currently being challenged, since child abduction, battery, and sexual slavery are not supposed to be included).

While abuses of elderly guardianship have reached the news, abuses of child guardianship remain hidden, even though the long-term trauma is much more severe, since children are at the beginning, not the end, of their lives. Nissirios is the most extreme among the guardians ad litem I have observed in my twenty-five year practice of psychiatry, gratuitously taunting the children she forcibly separated from their loving parent, by torturing them with lies that their loving parent “abandoned” them, no longer loves them, and wishes to have nothing to do with them. What would be unbearably sickening for the average person even to imagine is regular, daily practice for Nissirios.

Therefore, exasperated expressions of, “How could she show her face?” and “Does she have no shame?” — amid an uproar of angry people “respectfully saying, ‘Please step down’” — are understandable reactions. The community members I spoke to accurately assessed that she is not the type to step down — “even if someone put a gun to her head.” If she were capable of this, she would not be committing cruel and heartless actions against innocent children in the first place. This time, I also heard from the mother whose child the Board vindictively and permanently labeled as a “bully” — despite a disproving video and over the objections of the supposedly “bullied” child’s parent.

Nissirios knows that all that will matter in her world is power. All that will remain of this Board meeting is that a meeting was held, that she was there, and that the longer she simply sits and consolidates power, the harder it will be to oust her.

*This is the second of a short series of weekly articles devoted to the information I am receiving about Evelyn Nissirios’ danger to children, written at the request of a local official. This series is separate from my writings about Family Court , of which these events are a replay. All informants and whistleblowers will be kept anonymous for their protection, and I remain willing to testify at any time on the medical information that I have. Those who have other information to share can reach me  here .

[image error]