Library of Congress's Blog, page 72

June 12, 2019

New! The Library’s Cataloging Page for Publishers

It’s in (almost) every book you read, but you’ve probably paid little attention to it. The Library’s Cataloging in Publication (CIP) information — that copy-block on the reverse side of the book’s title page spelling out the author, title, subject, its International Standard Book Number, and other information — is an essential beginning to a book’s publication.


[image error]

The new-look Book Link page.


The Cataloging information provided by the Library allows publishers to get the book’s information relayed to libraries and booksellers months in advance of publication — ask any author how important that is — and keeps the publication process rolling. (It’s different from copyrights, although the Library does that, too.)


And now, for the first time in 16 years, the Library is rolling out an all-new CIP database. It’s called PrePub Book Link (PPBL), and it overhauls the sturdy-but-outdated 2003 system. Book buyers won’t notice any changes, but publishers and Library staff certainly will. The overhaul took more than one and a half years, involves more than 3,000 major scholarly and trade publishers and more than 50,000 books each year. The Library’s system for smaller publishing houses, the Preassigned Control Number Program, will be merged into PPBL, too.


“It’s a very significant milestone,” says Karl Debus-López, chief of the U.S. Programs, Law, and Literature Division, which oversees the program. “It’s a success story of collaborative work.”


[image error]

The PPBL’s leadership team: (l-r) Bob Shirley, Amy Swanson, Caroline Saccucci, Camilla Williams, Cat Eiche,  Karl Debus-López, Connie Pierce. Photo: Shawn Miller.


The CIP program has been around since 1971. It began as a way for the Library to find out about forthcoming publications to catalog and add to its collections.  The records created for those titles were sent to libraries nationwide.  Those libraries then knew about new titles to add to their collections and had records to use for their catalogs.  The publishers also benefitted in that the program helped to promote, market, and sell upcoming titles.  The program quickly became an industry standard.


In the beginning, it was all done manually, by mail, and was, let us say, very analog.


“Publishers would mail us a galley, or maybe the entire book, with a CIP application and it would literally be hand-carried from place to place,” says Caroline Saccucci, the Library’s CIP and Dewey program manager.


In 2003, the Library established an internal database that allowed publishers to take care of the process online, with electronic galleys attached. The system was clunky but reliable and, in the digital age, held on for 16 years.


Overhauling that system was complicated, as it had dozens of moving parts. More than 200 Library employees catalog CIP books. Thirty-one partner institutions – mostly academic institutions with university presses — also use the system to catalog their titles. Publishing houses, independent authors and small presses use it every day. At any one time, 4,000 or more books are in the pipeline.


Creating the new program took the efforts of more than 30 staffers, plus contractors, working across four departments. The new system is faster, allows publishers to log-in by multiple accounts and attach a PDF file for the book, and provides auto-filled data boxes to streamline the process.


“Everyone involved with the design, development, testing, and training of staff should be very proud,” Debus-López said.


So, the next time you look inside a book? You’ll feel smarter for knowing how complicated just one part of it is to pull together.


Subscribe to the blog— it’s free! — and the largest library in world history will send cool stories straight to your inbox.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 12, 2019 06:00

June 10, 2019

Her Vote at 100: Three Exhibits

This story is cross-posted on the blogs of the Library of Congress , National Archives , and Smithsonian’s American Women’s History Initiative .


When it came to advocating for women’s right to vote, creative communications tactics changed minds. Women demanded the vote by staging costumed tableaux at protest marches, organizing church committees, holding up handmade signs in front of the White House, getting arrested, publishing their own newspapers, and even walking 230 miles from New York City to Washington, D.C.


If social media had been available, these women would likely have leveraged it to organize and draw attention to the cause of woman suffrage. (A recent tweet from the National Archives tells us that “suffrage” comes from the Latin word “suffragium,” meaning the privilege to vote.)


But while women couldn’t tweet or post on Instagram at the turn of the 20th century, we can! As we approach the 100th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment — a critical milestone in women’s battle for the vote — we invite you to learn about this history through social media.


[image error]

Before the March 3, 1913, woman suffrage march in Washington, D.C., suffragists debated whether African American participants should walk in a segregated section. Suffrage leader Ida B. Wells joined the parade and marched alongside the all-white Illinois delegation. Sallie E. Garrity (ca. 1862–1907) Albumen silver print, ca. 1893. National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution. Learn more in the “Votes for Women” Google Arts & Culture online exhibition.


[image error]

In 1917, suffragists were arrested for picketing the White House. This suffragist is being escorted into a car to be taken to the police station. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/533776


[image error]

A diverse group of suffragists in 1916 demonstrates against President Woodrow Wilson along a street in Chicago. Library of Congress, National Woman’s Party Records. See more photographs, letters, records and scrapbooks from suffragists in the new exhibition Shall Not Be Denied: Women Fight for the Vote at the Library of Congress.


June 4: Meet real suffrage documents on Instagram


On the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment’s passage by Congress, the National Archives held an Instameet and took everyone behind the scenes with Rightfully Hers: American Women and the Vote exhibition curator Corinne Porter. You can still join in by following the hashtag #RightfullyHers on Instagram. You’ll see the original 19th Amendment; a 1910 patent drawing for a gendered “voting machine”; a 1946 affidavit from Julia Denetclaw, a Navajo Indian woman who was refused permission to register to vote; anti-suffrage material; and more.


June 4: Discover women’s history stories from around the U.S. on Twitter


Explore objects, stories, and resources from museums, libraries, and archives across the country with the hashtag #19thAt100. The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History is convening more than 50 organizations to share stories related to the past, present, and future of woman suffrage, with a particular focus on women’s stories that have been overlooked. It’s part of the Smithsonian’s American Women’s History Initiative.


June 20: March along with us on a social media tour


Telling the story of the largest reform movement in American history is a big job for any single exhibition, so we are bringing three exhibits to you! Social media guides from the Smithsonian, National Archives, and Library of Congress will visit our three exhibitions and share the highlights with you on Twitter and Instagram. Follow the hashtag #HerVote100 to meet the experts who worked on the exhibition and learn about the women who persisted in the fight for the vote. Don’t hesitate to ask questions. Stops on our social tour include:


Shall Not Be Denied: Women Fight for the Vote at the Library of Congress


Rightfully Hers: American Women and the Vote at the National Archives


Votes for Women: A Portrait of Persistence at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery


Throughout June: Get your weekly dose of women’s history


Celebrate the passing of the 19th Amendment with 19 weeks of amazing women in history with the @USNatArchives on Instagram. Starting on June 5, the National Archives will post a theme each week featuring a woman in history. Share the story of women who inspire you by using the hashtag #19forthe19th!


The Library of Congress also is exploring the stories of individual suffragists and their contributions to changing America each week through June. Follow along with #ShallNotBeDenied on Twitter and Instagram.


Here’s where you can find us on social media:



Library of Congress

Twitter: @LibraryCongress
Instagram: @LibraryCongress


National Archives

Twitter: @USNatArchives
Instagram: @USNatArchives


Presidential Libraries on Twitter: @OurPresidents
National Archives Foundation

Twitter: @ArchivesFdn
Instagram: @ArchivesFdn_


Smithsonian

Twitter: @Smithsonian
Instagram: @Smithsonian


National Portrait Gallery

Twitter: @SmithsonianNPG
Instagram: @SmithsonianNPG


National Museum of African American History and Culture

Twitter: @NMAAHC
Instagram: @NMAAHC


National Museum of American History

Twitter: @amhistorymuseum
Instagram: @amhistorymuseum



June will be a big month for women’s history, but it’s a theme we’ll explore throughout the year. Other recommended hashtags to browse: #BecauseOfHerStory, #HiddenHerstory, and #Suffrage100DC.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 10, 2019 06:00

June 7, 2019

Pic of the Week: 19th Amendment Edition

[image error]

Cast members of “19: The Musical” perform during the “Shall Not Be Denied” exhibition opening. Photo: Shawn Miller.


This week marked the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote and changed American life and politics. The Library, repository of the papers of many key players in the suffrage movement, opened a yearlong exhibit about that struggle, “Shall Not Be Denied,” with a gala on June 4, the anniversary of the amendment’s ratification by the U.S. Senate in 1919. Cast members from the upcoming musical, “19,” gave the crowd a taste of the drama in music.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 07, 2019 06:00

June 6, 2019

D-Day Journeys: The Story Map

This is a guest post by  Sam Meier, a Library technician, who writes about the curatorial and archival work that went into the Veterans History Project’s  “D-Day Journeys” Story Map.


In early May, the Veterans History Project released a Story Map titled “D-Day Journeys” which charts the course of four D-Day veterans before, during, and after June 6, 1944.


[image error]

Screenshot of an excerpt from “D-Day Journeys,” Story Map created by Samantha Meier and Megan Harris, Veterans History Project, 2019.


This Story Map began to take root in late fall of 2018, when Megan Harris, VHP’s Senior Reference Specialist, and I began reviewing VHP collections for potential inclusion in VHP’s new Experiencing War online exhibit in remembrance of D-Day. The wealth of visual materials in these collections sparked our interest in exploring the curatorial possibilities of the Story Map platform. We knew from our Story Maps training that the Cascade template would allow us to display photographs, artwork, and other visual materials in all their full-screen glory.


While VHP had previously participated in a Story Maps pilot project, the 75th anniversary of D-Day presented our first opportunity to create a Story Map which featured multiple stories from VHP’s collections. At first, we contemplated simply retooling a previous Experiencing War online exhibit to fit within the Story Map template. After some experimentation with various drafts and narrative approaches, it soon became clear that the interpretative possibilities of a Story Map were wholly different from our traditional online exhibits.


[image error]

A map version of VHP’s previous Experiencing War feature “D-Day: Beyond the Beach.” Created by Samantha Meier, January 2019.


After reviewing other Story Maps produced here at the Library of Congress, Megan had a flash of insight. Though we had both initially been drawn to the Cascade template for its lush presentation of visual materials, Megan realized that VHP collections are uniquely suited to digital storytelling in a map-based discovery environment. Story Maps allow users to learn new information about a subject spatially by engaging with interactive maps. What if we took advantage of this tool by mapping the service histories of individual veterans?


With Story Maps, we could show users where the veterans of D-Day had been instead of merely telling them. Rather than re-tread the sandy beaches of Normandy, France, we could situate the historic events of June 6, 1944 within the individual lives of the men who came ashore that day. We could map their journeys from basic training to the end of the war.


Our initial goal for these “journey maps” were modest. We hoped to identify mappable locations for a few key events in each veteran’s military service: where they underwent military training, or another stateside service-related location; where they were on D-Day itself; and where they found themselves at the end of the war, or any time before they left the military.


Next, we had to select four veterans to be featured in the Story Map. We scoured our holdings to find collections from veterans who had participated in D-Day. With hundreds of possibilities to choose from, we focused on selecting collections which contained ample visual material and compelling narratives.


We also needed the items in these veterans’ collections to contain rich location data, so that we could “pin” the veterans to a map. While some materials, such as diaries, often contained a great wealth of location data, other formats, such as oral histories, did not. This same disparity existed in the donor-submitted description about the collection materials. For example, while some donors provided locations and dates for their individual photographs, others did not.


Finally, we wanted our Story Map to include a variety of perspectives on the events of D-Day. We searched for veterans who served in different branches and in different roles, whose stories could tell us what it felt like to be on the beach, in the air, and out at sea.


CONNECTING THE DOTS


In the end, we selected these four veterans to include in the Story Map: Army veteran Preston Earl Bagent, a combat engineer; Army Air Forces veteran Robert “Bob” Harlan Horr, a glider pilot; Army veteran Edward Duncan Cameron, a rifleman; and Navy veteran John William “Bill” Boehne, III, a sailor.


[image error]

Screenshot of an excerpt from “D-Day Journeys,” Story Map created by Samantha Meier and Megan Harris, Veterans History Project, 2019.


As I started mining these collections for location data to create their corresponding “journey maps,” I found far more data than I had expected to find. Bagent’s letters to his wife mentioned many of the cities through which he traveled in Europe. Horr’s pilot’s log book contained location information for every training flight he took, starting September 26, 1942. Cameron, like so many other veterans, defied military regulations by routinely noting his location in his secret diary. And Boehne’s military papers filled in many specific geographic details that he omitted in his oral history interview. My “journey maps” ballooned from three or four data points per veteran up to 30 or 40 apiece.


Armed with all this data, I was ready to create detailed maps for our four veterans. But Megan and I still needed a way to ensure that readers could follow each veteran’s story. How could we structure our Story Map so people didn’t get lost in the details?


Luckily, I had an epiphany of my own. Long before coming to the Library, I worked as an editor and a writer for a digital media outlet. That experience informed my next idea. What if we thought of our Story Map as being less like an online exhibit, and more like multi-media journalism? We could give people options as to how they wanted to navigate the Story Map, letting them engage with the content in ways that made sense to them.


[image error]

My process notes illustrating how I could structure the D-Day Story Map. January 2019. Photograph by Samantha Meier.


I came up with a “choose-your-own-adventure” narrative structure which broke each of the three major sections of the Story Map—Before D-Day, On D-Day, and After D-Day—into sub-sections about each veteran’s experience. With a special assist from Tim St. Onge and Mike Bijou of the Library’s Geography & Map Division, we were able to create chapter links within the Cascade template. Now users could choose for themselves how these stories of D-Day would unfold.


As a researcher, I wanted our Story Map to show how rich VHP’s collections are for historical research. The platform allowed me to show my work by hyperlinking to primary source material in map pop-ups as well as in each veteran’s narrative. I embedded digital images of correspondence, diary entries, and other archival documents throughout the Story Map to show users how I knew what I knew about Bagent, Horr, Cameron, and Boehne.


[image error]

Screenshot of an excerpt from “D-Day Journeys,” Story Map created by Samantha Meier and Megan Harris, Veterans History Project, 2019. Diary excerpt from the Edward Duncan Cameron Collection, AFC2001/001/6555.


Of course, there were plenty of details that I didn’t know about what these four men did during the war. To fill in some of these gaps, I turned to other VHP collections. I leveraged the “Service Unit/Ship” field of VHP’s online database to find other veterans who belonged to the same service units as our four veterans.


These related collections provided me with new contextual information for Bagent, Horr, Cameron, and Boehne’s personal experiences. Reviewing the collections of men who served in the 149th Engineer Combat Battalion, I realized that the “Ray Kimm” mentioned in an October 1945 letter by Preston Bagent was none other than Raymond Calvin Kimm. The information provided in Kimm’s VHP collection helped me confirm key details of Bagent’s military service.


The biggest shock of all came when I realized that Bob Horr’s best friend “Buck Jackson” was not killed on D-Day, as Horr’s pilot’s log suggested. Though this discovery was surprising, one of the wonderful things about VHP’s vast archive of 100,000+ collections is that these kinds of connections are continually possible, waiting to be made by researchers.


In addition to discovering previously unknown connections between VHP collections, I also uncovered new information by intently scrutinizing Bagent, Horr, Cameron and Boehne’s own collection materials. Carefully poring over Bill Boehne’s scrapbook, I found photographs that had been literally hidden inside its pages. Duncan Cameron’s diary turned out to contain entries not only from 1944, as its cover suggests, but also entries from 1943 when Cameron was stationed in North Africa and Sicily.


Megan and I conceptualized the “On D-Day” section of our Story Map as its narrative center. June 6, 1944, was the day which united our four veterans in time and space. But they were far from the only men who participated in the invasion of Normandy that day. I wanted to make sure that the other stories of D-Day veterans in VHP’s collections were included in some way. I extended the potential for map-based discovery to include a map which would allow users to discover as many D-Day collections within VHP as possible.


As the “D-Day Journeys” Story Map notes, VHP has over 2,500 unique collections from veterans who participated in Operation Overlord, which began June 6, 1944, and ended on August 30, 1944. All of those collections are categorized as “Operation Overlord (D-Day Normandy Invasion)” in the “Battles/Campaigns” field of our database. This category includes both D-Day veterans AND veterans who did not participate in D-Day, but, rather, in the broader campaign.


To get an accurate list of the veterans in our collections who participated in D-Day, I spent over 60 hours reviewing donor-provided descriptions for over 1,500 unique collections. I checked to see whether they mentioned participating in the Normandy invasion on D-Day specifically, versus days to weeks after June 6, 1944, and where in France they said they were on that day. For most of these collections, there simply wasn’t enough data available to determine whether the veteran took part in D-Day, or their location that day. I was able to create data points for 238 veterans, but I suspect that VHP has hundreds more D-Day stories that I was not able to represent in our map.


Visualizing these 238 collections in a single map presented other problems. I wanted to both show trends within these collections and allow the user to access the stories of individual collection through the map. But a map with 238 data points was very difficult to interpret.


[image error]

Screenshot showing all the data points for the “On D-Day” map. From “D-Day Journeys,” Story Map created by Samantha Meier and Megan Harris, Veterans History Project, 2019.


Luckily, a GIS expert stepped in to save the day. Tim St. Onge, who had previously assisted us with the chapter links, suggested that we use the “Cluster Points” tool in Story Maps to improve the map’s legibility. Tim’s support was instrumental to our Story Maps project. He advised us on everything from filtering data points to creating transitional map scenes to developing more readable maps.


Thanks to his help, the final version of my “On D-Day” map not only shows our users the “hot spots” where most VHP veterans landed—namely, Omaha Beach, followed by Utah Beach—but also allows users to drill down to individual D-Day collections if they wish to do so.


[image error]

Detail from the “On D-Day” map showing a pop-up window for Norman Philip Swaney. From “D-Day Journeys,” Story Map created by Samantha Meier and Megan Harris, Veterans History Project, 2019.


In addition to connecting us with colleagues elsewhere in the Library, working on “D-Day Journeys” also engaged us with other divisions’ materials. I paid Tim’s colleagues a visit and traveled to the Geography and Map Reading Room to scan an American Red Cross map of London that VHP had previously transferred to that division from our collections. Megan and I sojourned to the Newspaper & Current Periodicals Reading Room to examine microfilmed obituaries for Bagent and Cameron. We utilized historic photographs and artwork from Prints and Photographs in our Story Map, consulting with them specifically regarding the use of Tracy A. Sugarman’s drawings. (Though his World War II-era artwork is held by Prints and Photographs, Sugarman also has a VHP collection.)


“D-Day Journeys” was unveiled to the world on Friday, May 10. After four months spent working on our Story Map, I not only knew Bagent, Horr, Cameron, and Boehne’s stories inside and out, but I had also learned far more about D-Day. While I cannot ever fully understand these veterans’ experiences during World War II, Story Map brings their records of those experiences—be they letters, log book entries, photographs, poems, or drawings—to life. “D-Day Journeys” demonstrates the richness of VHP’s collections. It visualizes the vast amount of information held within this participatory, community-driven veterans’ archive. It demonstrates how personal record-keeping can be, and how profound.


As Boehne inscribed in his scrapbook, quoting John Steinbeck,


“After the bare requisites to living and reproducing, man wants most to leave some record of himself, a proof, perhaps, that he has really existed. He leaves his proof on wood, on stone, or on the lives of other people.”

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 06, 2019 10:06

June 5, 2019

Digital Roundtable Conference: June 6, 7.

This is a guest post written by Kate Zwaard, Director of Digital Strategy.


A professor from California, an entrepreneur from Boston, an author from New York, and a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire all walk into a library…


Sounds like the start of a joke, right?  Instead, it’s some exciting news I have to share: all four are thought leaders in technology and digital innovation, and they are joining a dozen of their peers for the inaugural meeting of the Library of Congress Digital Strategy Roundtable on June 6 and 7, 2019.


The DSR, launched at the direction of the Librarian of Congress, will solicit expert perspectives on the digital transformation of the Library and help ensure that the Library’s plans are meeting industry standards. To do that, we have invited a group of thought leaders from libraries, academia, industry, media, and non-profits to help the Library.


We’re bringing in people like Wendy HallMaria ThomasJoichi Ito, and Paul Ford. They’ll work with the staff members who are leading our digital transformation.


The Library’s Digital Strategy, released in the fall of 2018, includes investing in new technologies to expand online access (for our users) and supporting an innovative culture (for our staff). We want our people to respond quickly to emerging technology and opportunities.


Of course, our plans will change over time to reflect contemporary best practices, so we’ll meet in person at least once per year and more often online. It’s one of the many ways the Library is engaging with the work of other institutions across industries and subject areas.


During the meeting, my team, including LC Labs, will discuss our ideas for the next three years. The Digital Strategy Working Group — a cross-Library team that helped draft the Digital Strategy — and other Library leaders will share digital initiatives. The DSR will also meet Library patrons to discuss their experiences.


In keeping with our goal to make experimentation a core practice in the Library, the Roundtable itself is an experiment. We have chartered the group for a two-year term, during which we’ll evaluate its effectiveness and determine the process for nomination and selection of members.


I am tremendously grateful for the generosity of the people mentioned below for sharing their time and talent with us to make the Library more digitally enabled. And a special thanks to Professor Dame Wendy Hall for co-chairing the meeting with me.


 


The 2019-2020 Library of Congress Digital Strategy Roundtable Members are:



Tony Ageh, Chief Digital Officer, New York Public Library
Christine Borgman, Distinguished Research Professor at UCLA and the author of more than 250 publications in communication, information studies, and computer science
Meredith Evans, President, Society of American Archivists
Paul Ford, CEO and Co-founder, Postlight
Joshua Greenberg, Director, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation’s Digital IT Program
Dame Wendy Hall, Professor of Computer Science, University of Southampton
Hrishikesh Hirway, Creator/Host, Song Exploder
Joichi Ito, Director, MIT Media Lab
Melody Kramer, Director of Communications, Carolina Demography, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Miriam Posner, Assistant Professor of Information Studies and Digital Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles
Mia Ridge, Digital Curator for Western Heritage Collections, British Library
Maria Thomas, Former Etsy CEO & NPR Digital SVP; Board of Directors at Pew Research Center
Jer Thorp, Artist/Writer
Victor Udoewa, Director of Strategy, 18F
George Westerman, Senior Lecturer, MIT Sloan School of Management and Faculty Director, Workforce Learning, MIT Jameel World Education Lab
Stacie Williams, Director, Center for Digital Scholarship, Regenstein Library, University of Chicago
Tim Young, Principal, Deloitte Consulting
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 05, 2019 09:20

Eisenhower’s Temporary White House

This is a guest post by Jennifer Davis, a collections specialist in the Law Library’s Collection Services Division. It originally appeared on the In Custodia Legis blog.






If you are visiting Pennsylvania, you should make a stop at Eisenhower Farm in Gettysburg. President and Mrs. Eisenhower gave the house, the farm and the grounds to the United States government in 1967, and after their deaths, the National Park Service opened the site for visitors. The Eisenhowers bought this farm in 1950 after his retirement from the military, and intended for it to be their first permanent home in their peripatetic marriage.



The Eisenhower House. Photo: Rebecca Raupach





However, a few years later, Eisenhower began the campaign for the first of his two terms as president. The farm was the Eisenhowers’ getaway during his presidency. They also used it for some of his second-term campaign events and to host some foreign dignitaries in a less formal, more relaxed setting. Eisenhower met with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev at the farm in 1959 as a break from a meeting at Camp David. He also hosted Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru of India, Prime Minister Winston Churchill of the United Kingdom, Chancellor Konrad Adenauer of the Federal Republic of Germany, and President Charles De Gaulle of France at various times. Marshal Montgomery stayed in their guest house for a time as well.



[image error]

The Eisenhowers launch his 1956 presidential campaign at their Gettysburg farmhouse. Photo: Thomas J. O’Halloran. Prints and Photographs Division.



In 1955, Eisenhower had a heart attack and returned to the Gettysburg farm to recuperate, using the place as his “temporary White House.” He signed numerous pieces of legislation at this desk in his office, making it a historical and legal artifact. It is made of timber salvaged from the White House during renovations made during the Truman administration, and is supposedly modelled on a desk President Washington used at his home in Mount Vernon. According to our tour guide at the farm, the president was sitting at this desk when he received the call in May 1961 about CIA Pilot Francis Gary Powers being shot down in a U-2 reconnaissance airplane over Russia. The office is the last stop on the house tour; it is a small room, but it is worth getting a picture of it to remember.



Eisenhower’s desk. Photo: Rebecca Raupach

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 05, 2019 06:00

June 4, 2019

Jeannette Rankin and “Shall Not Be Denied: Women Fight for the Vote”

This post is adapted from an upcoming article in the Library of Congress Magazine.



[image error]

Jeannette Rankin addresses a D.C. crowd just before her swearing in, April 2, 1917. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division


Montana’s Jeannette Rankin came to Capitol Hill as the first woman elected to Congress in the spring of 1917. She was 36, Republican, single, a trailblazing suffragist and lobbyist. Nearly 7,000 representatives had served in the House’s 128 years, all of them men. When she was sworn in on April 2, she got an enthusiastic round of applause from the gentlemen in the chamber, but she soon found Congress to be not particularly honest and beset by lousy reporters.



“No doubt you have read in the papers about my ‘red hair’ and ‘sending the fathers to war’ and other inventions of the eastern press,” she wrote in a letter to constituents on June 1, 1917. “I wish you were here to see Congress working and to know the true facts.”


[image error]

“Miss Jeanette Rankin.” Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division.


Some 102 years later, congressional complaints about D.C. dishonesty and problematic reporters remain pretty much the same.


Otherwise, a century after the 19th Amendment granted women the right to vote and altered American society, the political descendants of Rankin and other suffragists operate in a landscape their forebears could not have envisioned. The fundamental push of the suffrage movement was toward democracy, of opening the voting booth to millions of Americans, and that increased access to the ballot, over time, has fundamentally changed Capitol Hill.


A record number of women were sworn in as members of the 116th Congress – 102 in the House, 25 in the Senate. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) resides as the Speaker of the House. A woman won the popular vote for president in the 2016 election. Four female senators and one representative have so far announced they are running for the Oval Office in 2020.



Many of the incoming class wore white to their swearing-in ceremony, in homage to the suffragists who wore the color, often head-to-toe, to symbolize their purity and virtue. But the suffrage movement was dominated by white Christian women (racism was a consistent problem for the movement). Today, the women in Congress are as diverse as the nation they represent: staunchly conservative, fiercely liberal, moderates, white, black, brown, straight, lesbian, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Native American and so on. In 1989, when the youngest member, 29-year-old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), was born in the Bronx, the oldest member, 85-year-old Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), had already served as mayor of San Francisco, 3,000 miles away, for a decade.


Still, these women compose just 25 percent of Congress, roughly half of their presence in the electorate.  Of the 365 women who have served in Congress, 131 are current members.


“Not until 1990s were there enough women so that they could drive a legislative agenda,” says Matt Wasniewski, Historian of the House of Representatives and editor of “Women in Congress 1917-2006.” “About four-fifths of all women who have served in Congress were elected after 1970.”


Why that matters in a such a fundamental way became apparent in a series of oral histories Wasniewski and his staff conducted with women who had been legislators and staffers. They recalled the frustrations of being the only woman at one committee meeting or another and seeing their ideas ignored.


“Having a seat at the table mattered because, as so many of our interviewees pointed out, women brought their perspectives that in many cases the men had never even considered,” Wasniewski said.


The fight to get women the vote — the longest reform movement in American history — is chronicled in “Shall Not Be Denied: Women Fight for the Vote,” a year-long exhibition by the Library (along with a companion book by Rutgers University Press) that opens on June 4, the 100th anniversary of Senate passage of the 19th Amendment. The exhibit and book draw heavily on the Library’s records from icons such as Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Mary Church Terrell, the National Woman’s Party and the National American Woman Suffrage Association.


The suffragists, it has to be recalled, were not just battling for a ballot; they were also taking on deeply entrenched views of religion, social order and human genetics.


“First and foremost, what you see in the objections to suffrage is that it wasn’t God’s will,” says Aimee Hess, managing editor of the Library’s Publications Office and an editor of “Shall Not Be Denied.”  “Motherhood was to be a woman’s most important duty, and that was wrapped up in traditional and often religious ideals.”


When Rankin arrived in 1917, there was no concept of women holding serious political power, particularly on a national level. Several states allowed women to vote (including Montana), but the 19th Amendment wasn’t certified until 1920, when Rankin was already out of office.


She was such a novelty that, when she was elected, the Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne, Indiana, described her as “a grey-eyed, slender girl with the enthusiasm of a zealot, the simplicity of a child and the energy and fire of a race horse.”


[image error]

Rankin and fellow suffragists, circa 1909-1920. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division


Reporters tracked her every movement. She got endorsement deals, a column in a prominent paper in Chicago and a $500-per-gig speaking fee. The limelight, she later recalled, was “a great shock.”


But the handful of women elected to Congress over the next three decades mostly downplayed their gender and eschewed symbolic leadership. Alice Mary Robertson, a stern missionary from Oklahoma, was the second woman elected to Congress in 1921. She didn’t care for the suffrage movement or most of the women in it.  “I came here to Congress to represent my district,” she said, “not women.”


During these decades, it was mostly women who were spouses of powerful men – such as Eleanor Roosevelt – or their widows, often working in reform movements, who exercised the most influence in society, rather than women elected to Congress.


That only began to change in the 1970s, when women began to win local and state offices, setting the generational stage for the surge in women in Congress in the 1990s, which, in turn, laid the groundwork for the Congress that governs the nation today.


Subscribe to the blog— it’s free! — and the largest library in world history will send cool stories straight to your inbox.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 04, 2019 06:00

June 3, 2019

D-Day’s Top Secret Map

As the 75th anniversary of D-Day approaches, Ryan Moore, a cartographic specialist in the Geography and Map Division, writes about a top-secret map used in the invasion.


[image error]

The model of Utah Beach used to brief Eisenhower and Montgomery the night before D-Day. Photo: Shawn Miller.


On June 6, 1944, Allied landing crafts approached the French coast to commence D-Day. The troops aboard knew that murderous machine gun and artillery fire awaited them.


But the liberation of Europe would take more than overcoming the German military immediately before them. It required overcoming the terrain, too: the beaches, the heights above them, the marshes just inland and the open fields cut into rectangular sections by tall hedgerows.  It was the power of American mapping intelligence that helped the men in this momentous battle that became known as the “The Day of Days.”


The night before the invasion — dubbed Operation Overlord — Allied Supreme Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, British General Bernard Montgomery and other leaders gathered in Portsmouth, a port city on the English Channel, for a last briefing on everything from the weather to the terrain. One of the key presenters was U.S. Navy Lt. Commander Charles Lee Burwell, a 27-year-old Harvard graduate who, while being “scared to death,” nonetheless delivered a short talk on the tides and the thousands of star-shaped steel barbs called “Czech hedgehogs” that the Germans had dropped just offshore to wreck landing crafts.


[image error]

Charles L. Burwell, interview with the Library in 2003. 


The map Burwell and others were using for this top-level briefing was spectacular: a one-of-kind, three-dimensional model of Utah Beach, the code name for beaches near Pouppeville, La Madeleine, and Manche, France. The top-secret model, made of rubber on two 4×4 sections, depicted the beach and the interior pastures sectioned off by those hedgerows, a geographic feature that obstructed lines of sight and created conditions for deadly, close-quarter combat. Later that night, Burwell took the model aboard transport ships, showing the commanders and troops the same raised maps of the terrain they would see for the first time in a few hours.


“(The soldiers) identified with it, ‘That’s really a road I’m going to come next to a little forest, and woodland, a here’s a field,’ ” Burwell later told the Library in an interview. “I think it made a lot of difference. It was a technology worth developing.”


[image error]

Utah Beach model, detail. U.S. Navy, 1944. Photo: Shawn Miller.


Burwell hung onto the model after the war and donated it to the Library’s Geography and Map Division in 2003. You can see it by appointment.


But in mid 1944, the model, along with all other details of the invasion of Nazi-occupied France, was a closely guarded secret. It could only be unveiled once Eisenhower ordered the invasion to begin. Information on the map had come from life-threatening missions over enemy territory. Allied pilots had sortied over the Normandy beaches, under German fire, to make up-to-date, stereo aerial photographs, which provide the illusion of three dimensions to the viewer. American and British reconnaissance teams, who risked life and limb, had gathered information on sandbars and other features otherwise unobservable from photographs and maps.


This data was sent across the Atlantic to the Navy’s Special Devices Division in Camp Bradford, Virginia, which assembled the model. Just prior to the invasion, American pilots flew it back to Portsmouth, the staging ground for the invasion. There, Burwell and others used them in their briefings to Eisenhower and Montgomery.


“I would have preferred to go on one of those beaches,” Burwell said of his nerves that night, in the Library interview. He recalled the auditorium, that the models were elevated so that they could be clearly seen – and that Montgomery, the legendary British commander, was a dapper dresser. “He didn’t look like he was going to battle; he looked like he was going to Greenwich village night club.”


[image error]

Eisenhower giving final instructions to paratroopers before D-Day. U.S. Army photo. Prints and Photographs Division.


The crux of the D-Day plan was that Allied troops were to land between the Cotentin Peninsula and Le Havre and gain a secure foothold for reinforcements and supplies. The Americans were to take Utah Beach and Omaha Beach. The British and Canadians were to seize three beaches code named Gold, Sword, and Juno.  In order to execute the plan, the tides at Normandy had to be low, thereby exposing the star-shaped Czech hedgehogs, so that demolition teams could knock them out. The moon would have to provide ample light for paratroopers to drop in behind enemy lines the night before. Allied meteorologists predicted that between June 4 and June 6 that those conditions were likely to be met.


But foul weather intervened, delaying the invasion. The troops, having already been briefed and aboard transport ships, had to wait it out in rough seas, as commanders feared that if they returned ashore, they might let the secret slip.


The bad weather passed. The secret held. And on June 6, the invasion began.


Paratroopers dropped in behind enemy lines an hour or so after midnight. Infantry and tanks hit the beaches at dawn. On Utah Beach, the men rapidly overwhelmed the surprised defenders, suffering roughly 170 casualties. The scene at Omaha Beach was dramatically different. Some 24 miles away, the troops there endured withering fire from a determined German defense, leaving some 2,000 men as casualties.  Airborne troops suffered the worst, with 2,499 casualties. In all, more than 4,400 Allied troops were killed on D-Day.


[image error]

Overhead view of the entire map, showing English Channel, beaches, and inland fields. Photo: Shawn Miller.


Still, by mid-afternoon, tens of thousands of troops were coming ashore, along with tanks and transports and machinery. These reinforcements were needed to secure the beaches and to push inland.


“Just chaos,” Burwell said, recalling the number of broken-down jeeps in the sand on Utah Beach and the waves of troops and tanks still going forward. He had come ashore, just for a few minutes. He was standing on the real ground that the model had depicted, and the troops who had used it were now moving inland.


The liberation of Western Europe was underway. There would be many hard-fought battles before Nazi Germany surrendered 11 months later.  As Eisenhower said of D-Day, it wasn’t the end, but it was the beginning of the end.


Subscribe to the blog— it’s free! — and the largest library in world history will send cool stories straight to your inbox.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 03, 2019 06:00

May 31, 2019

Pic of the Week: Walt Whitman Birthday Edition

 


[image error]

Whitman autographed this photo by Alexander Gardner. Feinberg-Whitman Collection.


Walter Whitman (no middle name, thanks) was born on this day in West Hills, on Long Island in New York. Somewhere out there in the cosmos he loved, the man’s spirit is now 200. The Library has the world’s largest collection of his books, manuscripts, prints, photographs and related material. You can spend ages exploring it all, but here’s the short version:


His parents were of Dutch (mom, Louisa Van Velsor) and English (dad, Walter Sr.) ancestry. The family wealth, once respectable, was dwindling as the years passed; the family lived in a log cabin with a wooden fence around at the time of his birth. He was the second of eight children and his parents moved the family to Brooklyn when he was three. They were so poor that Walt had to leave school to work when he was 11, but his parents were nonetheless filled with a love of the nation. Proof: They named other sons George Washington Whitman, Thomas Jefferson Whitman and Andrew Jackson Whitman.


Walt went into the newspaper business, bless his heart, and was editor of the Brooklyn Eagle, a respectable outfit, at the age of 26. He liked to travel, write and observe the often brutal world around him. The beauty in it dazzled him. He wrote a book of poems called “Leaves of Grass” when he was 34. You may have heard about this.


Fame followed, though not necessarily fortune. He always had a job –  journalist, editor, government clerk — never married and seems to have lived a happy life with a series of male companions (likely romances) and created, through his poetry tied to the national sensibility, the mythology of the American ideal.


“I stand for the sunny point of view,” he once said, ” stand for the joyful conclusions.”


Today, we wish him one big barbaric yawp of birthday happiness. You can send along your wishes, perhaps, by transcribing some of his writings.


Subscribe to the blog— it’s free! — and the largest library in world history will send cool stories straight to your inbox.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 31, 2019 06:00

May 29, 2019

North Mississippi Home Place

 


[image error]

Michael Ford’s work in 1970s Mississippi was the foundation of his new book.


Heat. Molasses. Wooden houses, tin roofs. Grist mills. Mules, ears twitching. Metal on iron. Ice falling into a glass. Screen door hinges. Wind in the oaks. Eight-track music from the truck. Long orange sunsets that hang in the sky, a gloaming that gives way to a deep, penetrating darkness ruled by crickets and cicadas and four-legged animals that move, unseen, in the woods.


Northeast Mississippi’s hill country is a largely forgotten corner of the nation, peculiar in its mixing of Appalachian white culture and African American life more associated with the Delta on the western side of the state. It’s been one of Michael Ford’s artistic muses since the early 1970s, when he made “Homeplace,” a half-hour documentary that enshrined the place and time. A photographer and filmmaker, his subject was the vanishing culture of rural, agrarian America, where craftsmanship and self-reliance molded the shape of daily life. He was on point — one of the villages he filmed, Chulahoma, is now listed as an “extinct community,” and the general store he filmed and photographed there is long gone.


[image error]

M.R. Hall. Photo: Michael Ford.


This bittersweet perspective informs  “Northeast Mississippi Homeplace,” a book of Ford’s photography and writings published this month by the Library in association with the University of Georgia Press. It encapsulates Ford’s original work and a trip back to the same places a few years ago. The Library’s American Folklife Center acquired Ford’s Mississippi collection in 2014 — several hundred photographs, film reels, manuscripts and audio recordings — and the book grew out of that project.


North Mississippi “is a special place, a special part of America,” said Todd Harvey, a collections specialist in the AFC and curator of the Alan Lomax Collection, during a recent onstage conversation with Ford and Aimee Hess, the book’s editor.  The conversation, part of the Botkin Lecture Series, was at the Whitthall Pavilion, and launched the book’s publication to a full house.


Ford grew up in the northeast, but took his young family to Mississippi in the early 1970s to work on an in-depth exploration of the folkways of one of the poorest places in America. He apprentinced himself to blacksmith Marion Randolph Hall, whose shop in Oxford was just off the town square that William Faulkner had made so famous. He hung out at Hal Waldrip’s General Store in Chulahoma, watched A.G. Newson make molasses, went to Othar Turner’s barbecues (featuring fife and drum music) and studied how Riller Thomas made quilts.


“When I got to north Mississippi and went wandering  in late afternoon when it was first frost, I knew what I was seeing,” Ford said during the onstage conversation. “People were self-sufficient,without a lot of outside stuff.”


[image error]

Michael Ford discusses his work with Aimee Hess, managing editor of the Library’s Publications Office. Photo: Shawn Miller.


The first lesson Hall taught him about blacksmithing? When looking at a piece of metal in the shop, “spit on it to see if it’s hot.”


Mississippi is that kind of place — gut-bucket deep with labor, practicality and mother wit. Ford, new to an old place, was struck by its poverty, by the raw relationship of people to nature.  He stuck to a few counties that are to the south and east of Memphis, tucked below Tennessee and not far from the Alabama line. Interstates were things that ran someplace else. In these rolling hills and small villages, he struck up friendships and stayed for four years.


“They’re about the land,” he writes about his pictures of the era, “and about the people living their lives as best they can in the circumstances they are in. I was there in a rural America that was at its end.”


In his lecture, four decades later, he counted himself fortunate to have done so.


“I was lucky to get it,” he said, “while it was there.”


[image error]

Riller Smith ‘s quilts on the line. Lafayette County, Miss., 1972. Photo: Michael Ford

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 29, 2019 06:00

Library of Congress's Blog

Library of Congress
Library of Congress isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Library of Congress's blog with rss.