Jon Gauthier’s Reviews > An Introduction to Historical Linguistics > Status Update

Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 136 of 332
Was disappointed with the somewhat hand-wavy internal reconstruction chapter until I got to the exercises. The majority of the exercises at this point are open-ended questions about real-world data, and some of the problems here were a lot of fun.
Nov 20, 2012 08:46PM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics

1 like ·  flag

Jon’s Previous Updates

Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 323 of 332
Finished the last chapter—time to pick through a meaty bibliography.
Nov 29, 2012 06:26AM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 284 of 332
Nov 27, 2012 07:05PM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 253 of 332
And I thought some of the previous chapters were hand-wavy...
Nov 25, 2012 08:39PM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 222 of 332
Nov 24, 2012 10:12AM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 204 of 332
Nov 23, 2012 07:36PM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 148 of 332
Nov 23, 2012 08:24AM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 122 of 332
Nov 19, 2012 06:20AM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 104 of 332
Guided reconstruction of a proto-Polynesian language based on a small data set. Very cool!
Nov 17, 2012 02:11PM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 82 of 332
Nov 16, 2012 09:30PM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Jon Gauthier
Jon Gauthier is on page 54 of 332
Nov 16, 2012 06:32AM
An Introduction to Historical Linguistics


Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jon (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jon Gauthier @Thomas, re: an intro book—this one uses jargon very sparingly. You're not expected to know much more than the definitions of 'phoneme' and 'morpheme.' If you do pick this one, you'd most likely be fine just diving in without a review of descriptive linguistics.

I'm really enjoying this so far, though it's difficult to separate my impression of the work from my impression of the subject :)


message 2: by Thomas (new) - added it

Thomas Thanks for the feedback. I went ahead and ordered a copy on a whim about a week ago when I saw how cheap it was on Amazon. Not that I have time to dig in soon, but flipping through it has me determined to read it as soon as possible. I still plan to review some more fundamental linguistics, if possible (it's been ~20 years since I really studied it). Who knows, though, maybe I'll try to read this concurrently.


back to top