Mike > Recent Status Updates

This seems pretty interesting so far. This is definitely a good conceit for a book, even if it doesn't totally make sense (yet?), and Verity's voice is very well-executed. I'm optimistic for what's to come.

Dancy vs. the Pterosaur by Caitlin R. Kiernan: 3/5 I like the premise, but the prose and characterization have room for improvement.

Calved by Sam J. Miller: 5/5 A very well-written story with an excellent twist at the end. Easily the best short story I've read in a while.

Capitalism in the 22nd Century by Geoff Ryman: 2/5 There were some good ideas here, but the execution was too exaggerated and unfocused to work.

Emergence by Gwyneth Jones: 2/5 Again, there were good ideas, but the whole thing was just confusing.

The Deepwater Bride by Tasmyn Muir: 3/5 This was well-written, and with a good protagonist, but the story just went nowhere.

The Chosen One by Saundra Mitchell: 2/5 (DNF) Doesn't capture a medieval tone very well, and it's just boring.

Improbable Futures by Kami Garcia: 3/5 Very well-written, but story fails to deliver.

Death for the Deathless by Margaret Stohl: 4/5 Only moderately well-written, but the killer twist at the end makes up for it.

Fate by Simone Elkeles: 1/5 Very badly-written, very limp and generic romance.

Misery by Heather Brewer: 2/5 The premise went totally unexplored, leaving the story limp and forgettable.

The Mind is a Powerful Thing by Matt de la Pena: 5/5 Exceptionally well-written, and very realistic.

The Chosen One by Saundra Mitchell: 2/5 (DNF) This doesn't do a very good job of capturing the kind of fairy tale atmosphere it's going for, so it just feels boring and meandering.

One True Love by Malinda Lo: 4/5 It goes on a bit too long, but this is a very well-written pastiche of 19th-century fairy tales, and it's lots of fun to read.

This Is a Mortal Wound by Michael Grant: 1/5 This is one of the worst short stories I've ever read, and it makes me sad to see it come from a childhood favorite. This is badly-written, preachy, badly-structured, and just plain unfunny.

The Angriest Man by Lisa McMann: 3/5 This is well-written, and I suppose the premise is pretty good, but it's way too short to do anything with its ideas, and it ends up being really forgettable.

Out of the Blue by Meg Cabot: 1/5 This is incredibly cheesy and unrealistic, and not well-written at all. It mostly fails to be funny, and the story isn't even a little engaging in its own right.

I'm really thinking that fantasy just isn't my genre, apart from magical realism. This isn't bad or anything, it's just really, really boring to me.

Gentlemen Send Phantoms by Laini Taylor: 3/5 The writing is just as good as I remember it, but alas, the story is not.

Burned Bright by Diana Peterfreund: 4/5 Perhaps a bit cliched, but that twist at the end makes up for everything. Significantly better than I remember it.

A Murmuration by Alastair Reynolds: 1/5 This story was incredibly dull, and very hard to follow.

Kaiju Maximus: So Various, So Beautiful, So New by Kai Ashante Wilson: 3/5 There were some interesting ideas, it was just hard to see how everything fit together.

Water of Versailles by Kelly Robson: 4/5 Not outright funny, but quite creative, and a fun read.

There are definitely a lot of cool facts to share with friends in this book. Any obnoxious nerds like me should definitely read this book.

Jamaica Ginger by Nalo Hopinkson and Nisi Shawl: 4/5. Perhaps a bit predictable and cliched, but the story is very well-written, and I liked the main character a lot.

Night Dog by Neil Gaiman: 3/5 I normally love Gaiman, but this was disappointing - the first half is boring, and the second half is weird, and not in a good way. Decent writing and dialogue, but that's about it.

City of Ash by Paolo Bacigalupi: 3/5 Lots of potential, and some very good prose, but there's just not enough of a story here.

This is definitely not very well-written - the transitions are pretty choppy, and Yong's attempts at humor are pretty cringe-worthy. But the book is otherwise pretty interesting and well-researched.

This could be better-written, but the information is quite good. There are worse things I could be reading for this biology class I have to take.

My impatience for royal court drama probably means that I just shouldn't be reading high fantasy. This isn't bad, but I'm very bored by the plot.

Probably the best thing about Host's writing is how creative her worldbuilding always is. I find the mythos here a lot easier to follow than it normally is, and I'm really enjoying this book for that, if not much else.

This book is pretty good, I'm just not enthralled with it like I was with The Boyfriend List.

I guess I just wish this were a bit more specific, about the precise techniques of logotherapy. I feel like I have a pretty good grasp on it, but it could be more solid.

I feel like it's actually a pretty big spoiler for the book's summary to tell you that the field trip doesn't go well. I mean, I guess I could've guessed that it wouldn't go great, but knowing that it's "disastrous" is making me anxious for what follows.

I feel like it's actually a pretty big spoiler for the book's summary to tell you that the field trip doesn't go well. I mean, I guess I could've guessed that it wouldn't go great, but knowing that it's "disastrous" is making me anxious for what follows.

This book is very insightful and important, but there's only so much of it I can take at a time. This is very, very complex.

Yeah, this isn't as good as The Boyfriend List - the plot doesn't have as much direction, and it's not as funny. But man, it will never not be entertaining to read about Ruby Oliver.

This honestly feels like philosophy just as much as it does like psychology. And while this is exhausting to read, in the same way that I find most philosophy exhausting, it's also very fascinating and on-point.

This is quite the accomplishment - Lockhart has managed to write a protagonist so engaging that I'm actually invested in high school drama. This isn't as funny as The Boyfriend List, but it's still so much better than I would expect it to be based on the premise.

This is not a particularly well-selected sample of Gandhi's writing. It's too repetitive, and not chronological enough.

Gandhi doesn't completely avoid going into detail about how exactly his philosophies will shake off British colonial rule, but I'd need more detail in this to really get behind them as a maxim.

This book is, I think it's safe to say, pretty likely to be read by people with strong suicidal thoughts. To fill this book with instructions on how to kill yourself, complete with ratings on how painful and effective the methods are, is perhaps the most absurdly irresponsible thing I have ever seen in a novel. This book is literally dangerous to support or publicize.

I like this way better than the last volume. This handles its tone extremely well (considering the potential for mood whiplash that's there), and it's a powerful testament to the power of music.

A Cheertastic Christmas Miracle by John Green: 3/5 This story was definitely funny, but aspects of it were also pretty ridiculous, and watching Green try to do gender politics was kind of cringe-inducing. Still, I liked the prose and the characters overall - it could've been a lot worse.