Status Updates From Prolegomena to Any Future M...

This guy might be the LeBron of thinking

Critical idealism! Part one down!

A priori a priori a priori

On to the First Part proper. I think I need to read more philosophy because while it’s interesting, I’m wondering if I need to sharpen my skills to adequately understand

I don’t have much to say about the content so far but I will say Kant was correct for complaining that:

“… It is misunderstood because men choose to skim through the book and not to think it through — a disagreeable task, because the work is dry, obscure, opposed to all ordinary notions, and moreover long-winded.”

Aye, that it might be.

Concise editor’s introduction actually was helpful, that is not always the case!

Almost done. Finish line in sight.

!!!CATEGORIES MENTION!!!

a lot less difficult than i expected — the name “kant” carries with it a reputation of inscrutability which i have not yet found to be accurate. elaborate terminology, yes, but not impossible to follow once immersed into his lexicon.

i want to kill myself

Past the 'first part of the main transcendetal question'. Again, the language employed in this translation is a bit too obtuse for me at times, but the use of more concrete examples from then-contemporary mathematics has helped things start to click for me.