Status Updates From Kings and Queens (Collins Gem)
Kings and Queens (Collins Gem) by
Status Updates Showing 1-12 of 12
Gregory
is finished
This is very enlightening, but unfortunately it offers only some interesting facts of the British monarchs. Still a very interesting read.
— Jul 16, 2022 04:27AM
Add a comment
Gregory
is on page 196 of 256
This is so interesting, and every page is very informative. I just simply wish there were larger segments in regard to certain kings. I just simply love this kind of History.
— Jul 13, 2022 11:06AM
Add a comment
Gregory
is on page 156 of 256
After a visit to London I'm actually a sucker for the British monarchy. I can't help it, I just am like that
— Jul 12, 2022 12:17PM
Add a comment
Jackie
is on page 171 of 256
Catherine of Aragon, Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour, Anne of Cleves, Catherine Howard, Catherine Parr
— Mar 25, 2016 06:47AM
Add a comment
Jackie
is on page 153 of 256
Allegedly, the longbow is a Welsh invention. Is that so?
— Mar 25, 2016 02:56AM
Add a comment
Jackie
is on page 133 of 256
Thomas Becket becomes St Thomas, whose shrine is the pilgrims' destination in the Canterbury Tales. Cool!
— Mar 25, 2016 02:25AM
Add a comment
Jackie
is on page 110 of 256
Harthacanute, King from 1035 to 1042, "died of 'a horrible convulsion' while attending a wedding". Couldn't be more real life Game of Thrones ^^
— Mar 25, 2016 01:17AM
Add a comment
Jackie
is on page 61 of 256
The title "Prince of Wales" exists since 1282!
— Mar 24, 2016 04:27PM
Add a comment
Jackie
is on page 26 of 256
Macbeth (1040-1057), apparantly unfairly treated by Shakespeare.
— Mar 24, 2016 03:21PM
Add a comment
Jackie
is on page 23 of 256
Some more criticism (really sorry about that...), but why are not all the pictures labeled? I mean, who recognizes an aureus (gold coin) struck under the reign of Hadrian, apart from nerds like me (and this, obviously, is a book for everyone, not just nerds)? What does a picture help, without the reader knowing what it depicts?
— Mar 24, 2016 03:05PM
Add a comment
Jackie
is on page 19 of 256
Oh dear. Maybe, I should just skip the Roman part the next time I read sth similar... No, the Roman Empire wasn't separated by Constantine (but Diocletian). And why did they add, for Claudius and Vespasian (p. 16), the dates they lived (contrary to the dates they ruled, as usual)? For the other emperors mentioned (pp. 18-19), they did add the dates they ruled. And why did they choose a portait of Augustus (p. 17)? I
— Mar 24, 2016 02:41PM
Add a comment
