Turning my back on Rational Man, I also turned away from rigorous economic theorizing. Microeconomics has yet to provide us with theories of the firm that explain strategizing or the firm’s capability to generate profit or growth, or even
...more
“The New Testament is a brutal destroyer of human illusions. If you follow Jesus and don't end up dead, it appears you have some explaining to do. The stark signifier of the human condition is one who spoke up for love and justice and was done to death for his pains. The traumatic truth of human history is a mutilated body.”
― Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate
― Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate
“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”
―
―
“Charles II once invited the members of the Royal Society to explain to him why a dead fish weighs more than the same fish alive; a number of subtle explanations were offered to him. He then pointed out that it does not.”
―
―
“The idea that this end of philosophy— at least, of political philosophy and (I claim) moral philosophy— has close relations with history overlaps with a more ambitious view held by a consistently underestimated Oxford philosopher, R. G. Collingwood. The trouble with Collingwood’s kind of commitment is that it requires one to know some history. My two associates in the view I am sketching are Alasdair MacIntyre and Charles Taylor. They are both Roman Catholics, though of different sorts. I used to find this a disquieting fact but no longer do so. All three of us, I could say, accept the significant role of Christianity in understanding modern moral consciousness, and adopt respectively the three possible views about how to move in relation to that: backward in it, forward in it, and out of it. In any case, we all assume some historical commitments, they on a more ambitious scale than I, and perhaps there is a rather nervous competition for who writes the most irresponsible history.”
―
―
“Historical determinism is a recipe for political quietism.”
― Why Marx Was Right
― Why Marx Was Right
Caleb’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Caleb’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Polls voted on by Caleb
Lists liked by Caleb




















































