103 books
—
39 voters
Dakota Ashley Limón
https://www.goodreads.com/daasli
to-read
(1952)
currently-reading (1)
read (435)
religion-and-spirituality (207)
psychology (201)
fiction-general (191)
sociology-and-history (170)
favorites (125)
philosophy (114)
ecopsychology (107)
science (98)
short-stories-and-essays (83)
currently-reading (1)
read (435)
religion-and-spirituality (207)
psychology (201)
fiction-general (191)
sociology-and-history (170)
favorites (125)
philosophy (114)
ecopsychology (107)
science (98)
short-stories-and-essays (83)
art-and-architecture
(82)
poetry (74)
mythology (71)
autobiographical (69)
mysticism (60)
japanese-literature (51)
2018-2020-thesis (47)
transgressive-literature (47)
ttu-library-reads (40)
decolonial-literature (38)
psychedelia (36)
from-m-train (32)
poetry (74)
mythology (71)
autobiographical (69)
mysticism (60)
japanese-literature (51)
2018-2020-thesis (47)
transgressive-literature (47)
ttu-library-reads (40)
decolonial-literature (38)
psychedelia (36)
from-m-train (32)
christian-mysticism-and-orthodoxy
(30)
social-psychology (30)
critical-theory (27)
postmodernism (27)
inspiration-and-influence (25)
anti-racist-social-environmental-ju (24)
continental-philosophy (24)
ciis-esr-reading-list (23)
absurd-existential-dark (22)
neuroscience (22)
ciis-fall-2020 (21)
nonfiction-general (20)
social-psychology (30)
critical-theory (27)
postmodernism (27)
inspiration-and-influence (25)
anti-racist-social-environmental-ju (24)
continental-philosophy (24)
ciis-esr-reading-list (23)
absurd-existential-dark (22)
neuroscience (22)
ciis-fall-2020 (21)
nonfiction-general (20)
“We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn't, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares.
But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision, there was another - slightly older, slightly less well known, equally chilling: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Contrary to common belief even among the educated, Huxley and Orwell did not prophesy the same thing. Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.
What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us.
This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right.”
― Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business
But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision, there was another - slightly older, slightly less well known, equally chilling: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Contrary to common belief even among the educated, Huxley and Orwell did not prophesy the same thing. Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.
What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us.
This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right.”
― Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business
“I am circling around God, around the ancient tower, and I have been circling for a thousand years, and I still don't know if I am a falcon, or a storm, or a great song.”
― Rainer Maria Rilke's The Book of Hours: A New Translation with Commentary (Studies in German Literature Linguistics and Culture)
― Rainer Maria Rilke's The Book of Hours: A New Translation with Commentary (Studies in German Literature Linguistics and Culture)
“Live, you say, in the present;
Live only in the present.
But I don’t want the present, I want reality;
I want things that exist, not time that measures them.
What is the present?
It’s something relative to the past and the future.
It’s a thing that exists in virtue of other things existing.
I only want reality, things without the present.
I don’t want to include time in my scheme.
I don’t want to think about things as present; I want to think of them as things.
I don’t want to separate them from themselves, treating them as present.
I shouldn’t even treat them as real.
I should treat them as nothing.
I should see them, only see them;
See them till I can’t think about them.
See them without time, without space,
To see, dispensing with everything but what you see.
And this is the science of seeing, which isn’t a science.”
― The Collected Poems of Alberto Caeiro
Live only in the present.
But I don’t want the present, I want reality;
I want things that exist, not time that measures them.
What is the present?
It’s something relative to the past and the future.
It’s a thing that exists in virtue of other things existing.
I only want reality, things without the present.
I don’t want to include time in my scheme.
I don’t want to think about things as present; I want to think of them as things.
I don’t want to separate them from themselves, treating them as present.
I shouldn’t even treat them as real.
I should treat them as nothing.
I should see them, only see them;
See them till I can’t think about them.
See them without time, without space,
To see, dispensing with everything but what you see.
And this is the science of seeing, which isn’t a science.”
― The Collected Poems of Alberto Caeiro
Japanese Literature
— 5487 members
— last activity Jan 30, 2026 03:16AM
A group for people who enjoy literature written by Japanese authors, the arts, culture, and history of Japan. This month we have our group read and ...more
Literary Fiction by People of Color
— 13164 members
— last activity Jan 27, 2026 08:12PM
This can include genre fiction that is literary (e.g. speculative fiction, historical fiction, etc.), as long as it's written by a person of color (Af ...more
Anarchist & Radical Book Club
— 2697 members
— last activity Dec 18, 2025 01:03AM
This is a group to read and discuss anarchist practice and theory, by gathering a large body of anarchist literature, non-fiction, and theory, as well ...more
Young Adult Book Reading Challenges
— 8283 members
— last activity Jan 26, 2026 07:10AM
Welcome to the Young Adult Book Reading Challenges! Welcome everyone who is interested in YA books! We have amazing reading challenges going on all t ...more
Dakota Ashley’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Dakota Ashley’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Art, Fiction, History, Non-fiction, Philosophy, Poetry, Psychology, Religion, Science, Science fiction, and Spirituality
Polls voted on by Dakota Ashley
Lists liked by Dakota Ashley























































