Robert

“The Supreme Court has already defined “humanism” as a religion (I’ve got the stuff right here where they made the statement, when they made it, and the judges who agreed with it). Humanism and atheism is what is taught in every public school in America “year ‘round.” That is NOT “separation of Church and State,” if by “church” you mean a “religion.”
― Peter S. Ruckman, Will The Real "ALLAH" Please Stand Up?

“When President Bush tried to put a black man on the Supreme Court (1991), he discovered that the NAACP was not really interested in promoting “Colored People” at all. It was interested in promoting left-wing, radical, black Socialists. Suddenly “color” had very little to do with it. Political stance determined the “evaluation.” The press was not against queers, dopeheads, sex perverts, atheists, and Communists; they were against conservative Americans. Apartheid. Conservative Americans, of any race, have always outnumbered queers, dopeheads, atheists, and sex perverts.”
― Peter S. Ruckman, Roots and Methodology

“In 1991, the editors in The Scientific American were saying that environmental ecology was a MORAL issue. The same editors (with the editors of every major daily newspaper in America, plus CBS, NBC, and ABC) were treating premarital sex, use of drugs, pornography, sex perversion, and fornication as “LIFESTYLES” with no moral overtones. “Good and evil” could only be applied to people who opposed federal control of businesses and property. They were “good” if they submitted to control and “fines,” but they were “evil” if they had any freedom. “Good and evil” are not even talked about in any high school or college in America where they touch adultery, fornication, sex perversion, stealing, cursing, cheating, pornography, or lying. You can’t even post a standard for “good and evil” (the Ten Commandments) in the hallway of a public school. At the same time, you are being taught that it is “EVIL” to put your garbage in the wrong place. What has happened?”
― Peter S. Ruckman, Roots and Methodology

“DEMONSTRATION. And to this proposition every philosopher since Comte would agree (see pp. 110–115). If there is one thing that all of the philosophers would agree upon when discussing “science,” it would be that the discipline would have to PROVE what it professed to believe.”
― Peter S. Ruckman, The Christian's Handbook of Science and Philosophy