English Mysteries Club discussion
Archive pre-2020
>
Currently Reading?
message 251:
by
Helen
(new)
Oct 09, 2012 04:23PM

reply
|
flag

I'm currently reading Unnatural Causes by P.D. James and I'm enjoying it greatly, as always. Want to start Our Mutual Friend by Charles Dickens..."
Which Dickens?





I will keep your secret if you'll keep mine! There just is no tiring of Lord Peter.

I haven't finished rating the books I can remember reading and now I've found there is another shelf here
for books I own.
This could become another career

I haven't finished rating the books I can rememb..."
Ah yes... I try to enter some everyday but I keep getting distracted by books I should reread because either I don't remember it at all or I remember it fondly... "Murder Must Advertise" is certainly in the second category!!!



Shhhhhhhhhhh.

It's years since I read it, but it made a strong impression on me. I won't say what type of impression so as not to spoil it for you in any way! Look forward to your comments once you finish.

I've just got ruthless. If it's not GOOD by chapter 2, either in a gripping plot or decent writing, preferably both, it's returned to the charity shop from whence it came (Aith, Shetland, 5 for £1) Life is too short to read bad books.
Karylne, I think it was CS Lewis who said the mark of a true reader is that they re-read, because they're getting more from the book than just wanting a story.
Now here's one that puzzles all our readers' group - one member ALWAYS reads the last chapter first.

I never, ever disagree with CS Lewis, either.


Hello Idaho! From Tulum, Mexico.
FYI Crete (before the Tsunami on Santorini) http://www.minoanatlantis.com/Tsunami... which wiped out the Minoans, it seems odd that Cretin took on it's meaning.

Weird though.
Thinking of another discussion... how about C S Lewis as a detective ...? You could go for paranormal-style activities, like the Paul Gallico ones, which have people believing in spiritualism, or devil worship, and he could expose the fakes. I hereby copyright this idea.

Marsali - perhaps she should read romances only, because to qualify as a romance it has to have a happy ending... You can get a good number of mysteries which are also romances. Seriously, I cannot understand her reading the last chapter first. I don't even read the blurb, so I can let the book unfold for me exactly as the author intended.
That said, I do re-read, even though I have a huge TBR pile, because my favourites have characters I like to revisit and/or are written so well. Also, sometimes I need the comfort re-reading gives on top of the distraction first reading gives. And I sometimes re-read a book I've just read for the first time, this time to pay attention to how everything developed and where the clues were hidden rather than rushing through to get to the resolution.
I can't comment on your idea about C S Lewis, as the Narnia books were probably the last fantasy books I read, too long ago to remember at all well.


And yes I'm a jerk, as I'm a chronic peeker and someone who often flips ahead when I'm reading. Why? Well, why not? I can't really be bothered explaining why I do it. Why should I have to justify something that hurts no-one and adds to my reading enjoyment?!

Yes, you've just articulated what I was working my way around - I wouldn't dream of telling my friend only to read romances, and I'm sorry if I was coming across as judgemental. I find it a weird habit (weird to me is a description, not necessarily negative - I'm weird myself) but it's what she does ... far, FAR more annoying are the pupils who've actually read the class text, whizzed through it, then insist on telling the whole class the ending, loudly!

I liked Fanny Price, poor child ... but has anyone killed Esther Summerson from Bleak House yet? If not, long overdue ... I've never been quite sure whether Dickens really meant her to be likeable or if it was a savage, accurate portrait of someone with no self-confidence. Either way, I'll start working on my own alibi now, via my shelf of Freeman Wills Croft for ideas.

Haven't read Bleak House (not a Dickens fan) but I think the most irritating heroine in Victorian literature for me is Hardy's eternal victim Tess.


I hear you. I know I will never complete my reading list even if I live to be 100, and that is not too likely.


And I have to confess I hven't read any Val McDermid yet either (not that I can remember)
But following..."
I love Val McDermid's Kate Brannigan series - titles like Star Struck, Dead Beat, Blue Genes etc - Brannigan is a wise-cracking Manchester PI. The Lindsey Gordon ones are good too, but I find the Tony Hill series (Wire in the Blood) too gory. I'm not really into nasty serial killers.

Certainly do, that's why I was puzzled that the way people chose to read their favourite novels was being condemned in a couple of the comments. I wasn't at all disparaging romance just trying to point out the ridiculousness of the earlier suggestion that people who like to check endings should only read them.

I think that some of these books, because we know they have happy endings, are a break from some of the suspense some of us read more of.
Val McDermid - I have never read his Kate Brannigan series. Will give that a try. The Wire in the Blood series is just too much for me. I used to really like fiction and non-fiction about serial killers. But now it is really too depressing for me.
However, I do think that there are some good authors being recognized out of Scotland lately. I like quite a few of Denise Mina's books.

It's years since I read it, but it made a strong impression on me. I won't say what ty..."
Well, although I ended up rating this 4 stars, I waffled between 2 and 4 for quite a while... Well-written story of a sociopath (maybe the first since this was written in '38), I'm glad I read it but I'll never reread it!! Way too creepy for my tastes.



Leslie - I have read Bruce Alexander's books and really enjoyed them.

P. D. James is a great author and allowing this horrible work to taint her excellent portfolio of works is just wrong.
I have a friend who says that given her age she probably is not really all there anymore and that she will not be writing anymore works about Dalgliesh. That might be true. I just hope there are no more sad examples of her work like this one. It would be tragic if she was remembered for this rather than her other great works.
I have read all her Dalgliesh series and seen quite a few of the productions from PBS. They are complex with interesting story lines, filled with suspense and intrigue. The plot twists keep me interested. Although some may be able to tell the ending, I can't.
When I read books like this, I realize how very much talent it takes to put them together. I don't think my dislike of this book is based on my desire to only see books on Dalgliesh. It was really not worthwhile and not up to her standards. I hope that her publishers don't release any more bad writing like this. But I am sure many people bought it so doubt they will care about her overall reputation or legacy.

And there are/were plenty of people out there who liked it. It was even reviewed positively in the NY Times.

I think I lot of authors have copied her style over the years, but without Lord Peter they don't quite have the same punch.

I've just g..."
I rather enjoy the 50 page rule for books-if you don't like it by 50 pages, you may stop. Furthermore, for those older than 50 the rule is 100 minus your age is the number of pages you must read. Which means, once you turn 100, you may, in all good conscience, judge a book by its cover.

I think that others are lucky to have room in their houses for a library and to keep hundreds of books. I have downsized to a very small house and just could not keep them.
The good news is that a lot of the books I love are available at libraries. And I have been known to go out and buy one now and again!!! Especially from authors that I enjoy and will probably want to re-read.
And honestly some of the books I had were not a loss. They were authors that I liked at one time, but just don't really enjoy anymore. Those were just space wasters.

I agree. I started to read it but, sadly, put it down. Also, I'm a bit suspicious of people who say they figure things out a few pages in.

Love Roderick Alleyn and Troy too!

I know, I'm thinking about downsizing and buying a Kindle or Nook.But I work at a press clipping bureau and electronic media is a tool that seems nice but is seriously limiting the publishing industry

Well, although I ended up rating this 4 stars, I waffled between 2 and 4 for quite a while... Well-written story of a sociopath (maybe the first since this was written in '38), I'm glad I read it but I'll never reread it!! Way too creepy for my tastes. ."
I agree! It haunted me for ages, and is one of the reasons why I now avoid reading anything "horrid".
Books mentioned in this topic
The Taken (other topics)Sherlock Holmes: Murder at the Savoy & Other Stories (other topics)
Wicked Autumn (other topics)
Cover Her Face (other topics)
A Mind to Murder (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Alice Clark-Platts (other topics)Chris Ould (other topics)
Adrian McKinty (other topics)
Will Thomas (other topics)
Anna Katharine Green (other topics)
More...