SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion

312 views
Members' Chat > The trouble with (fantasy) series

Comments Showing 51-54 of 54 (54 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 2 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 51: by Sysilouhi (new)

Sysilouhi Christopher wrote: "I think the point that Daniel and some others have made about motivation within the context of good and evil is a big problem in fantasy, particularly newer books. It seems like most authors don't ..."

Tolkien's work is unique in many ways, but I would recommend Escape from Hell! and City of Saints and Madmen. Not maybe exactly philosophical but definitely books that make you think about the world. And from what I remember I found Lois McMaster Bujold's world(s) quite flat and unispiring but it has been years since I read the books.


message 52: by Bill (new)

Bill (kernos) | 426 comments Christopher wrote: "Thanks, Kernos. I'll give them a try. I haven't read either of them before. Any particular titles worth trying first?"

For Janny the Wars of Light and Shadow is long, complex and IMO brilliant. The last book in the series to be published soon. It is one of the few fantasy that encourages and requires multiple readings and a good bit of reader input.

CJ Cherryh is my all time favorite SFF author. She has never disappointed. She has several fantasy series. It's hard to pick one, but I'd suggest The Fortress Series.


message 53: by Christopher (new)

Christopher Bunn | 25 comments Okay, thanks, Kernos. I'll nab both of those for my Kindle and give 'em a go. SSirppi, you've mentioned another two that I've never heard about before as well. Have I been living under a rock? I'll try them as well. Thanks.

I guess, to clarify, I don't think a fantasy has to be outright philosophical in nature. However, if it possesses some kind of rational, internally consistent moral/ethical underpinning (regardless of what school of thought that is), it gives more depth to the story. Even if you have to scrutinize pretty carefully as a reader to recognize it.

I realize what I just wrote is an ambiguous mess, but, oh well...


message 54: by Daniel (new)

Daniel McHugh | 17 comments Christopher,

So what you're saying is "up" can be "down" and "down" can be "up" as long as it's consistent and recognizable as the construct. Maybe even more to the point is "up" can be "squirrel" and "down" can be "rollerskate key" but they damn well better be "squirrel" and "rollerskate key" every time!

How's that for a mess?


« previous 1 2 next »
back to top