The Sword and Laser discussion
Is the idea of "Lem"ing a book bad for the S&L Community?

And yes I think giving the act of not finishing a book a title makes it something to aspire to (for some at least). It makes a reader sound sharp and discerning, maybe even cut throat.
I grant, however, that this is only my opinion and I have a hard time not finishing books, even the ones I don't like. An unfinished book haunts me until I finally read the last page (which is sometimes a relief).


I absolutely agree. I think we've got a big enough community here that nobody should feel forced into reading a book they really dislike - there will always be enough people who did read the whole book to keep the discussions going - but the "lem threads" have this bizarre bragging-rights tone to them that really puts me off.

THat phrases it well. It's the bragging aspect of it that I dislike too and what I think makes it a dangerous trend. I think people will be quicker to drop a book they might eventually like or come back to.

I read strictly for pleasure. The pleasure of a book club is twofold: finding good books you may not have chosen for yourself; and discussing the book with others. If you want to get the most out of the discussions, you should at least try to finish the book. That said, it shouldn't feel like another dreaded homework assignment. While I would certainly encourage people to read enough of the book to give it a fair chance (50 - 60 pages should be enough to get past the introductions & setup & into the meat of the story), if it gets to the point where you would prefer to gouge your eves out rather than turn another page, by all means put it down & move on to something else.

I had to lem A Feast for Crows recently, I'm a huge ASOIAF fan and was disappointed that I couldn't get through it.
But life's too short to read the vast amounts of books available, shouldn't waste time struggling through one you're not enjoying. :)

I don't see it as something to aspire to, but when you are reading for fun it should be fun. If you find a book frustrating or annoying and decidedly not fun to read its time to lem it and move on to something more enjoyable.



Tolkien'd?

but the "lem threads" have this bizarre bragging-rights tone to them that really puts me off.
That's exactly my feeling. It feels as if its the cool thing to abandon a book and then brag about it. I've been half tempted to go back through the various book discussions and take a tally of how many and who have abandoned a book and look for patterns. Sadly that would require a lot more time and effort than I have available.
I do think it would be neat to setup polls for the books we read. That way we could maybe get a more realistic picture of how people are rating the book and how many are abandoning it. Are a majority of the people really disliking the books that much, or is it just a very vocal minority?
I know its a dampener on enthusiasm when the lem threads show up before the official start dates.
Note - I have no problems with someone not liking a book and wanting to discus why they don't like a book. I do have problems with people throwing hissy fits because the book chosen isn't the book they wanted.


I actually feel bad if i do lem a book I feel kind of guilty and its not often that I do lem a book as sometimes you can force yourself to the half way point in a book and then really get into the story, though that didnt happen with gabriels ghost I had to force myself through all the book and veronica knows where im coming from there! Realistically though there are bound to be some books that I will really dislike and will lem such is life so for me lem is here to stay.

In a book club as large as this one I think it's fair to assume that there are always people who don't like the book and won't read it at all or give up sooner or later. I think that's okay and wouldn't worry too much about it.
Yet I don't especially appreciate any early lemming threads for two reasons: First, lemming in this context is usually not what I would considered lemming, it's mostly "Didn't sound like it was for me, so I won't read it".
Secondly and more importantly I also think that it sends a negative vibe for the group. If you don't like the book, fine, don't read it. If you started and decide you don't like it later on, feel free to start a thread and discuss the issues you had with the book.
I don't believe that lemming is either cool or uncool, it's just a thing that happens and if you have something worthy to say about what made you stop reading. For all others I'd say, please ignore the threads that you feel are too negative. As long as I've been here it has been a marvelous group of avid readers and I'd like it to stay that way.

For me sometimes it just happens. We're busy people, lots of things draw on our intentions. My approach to book reading has lately aligned itself with my approach to video games. New and exciting titles are constantly coming out, however we always make time for the ones that have impacted us.
I've lemmed books, heck I've lemmed some good books. And there have been times I've un-lemmed them later. I see your point about early-lemming though, I think this is more close-mindedness than anything, and I try to have an open mind about new books, even though there are specific things that attract me more than others. Having an open mind is a crucial part of being in a book club, in my opinion, and will always foster positive experiences for the reader and community. There are times though when books don't cut it for a reader and that's ok too.
Tassie Dave wrote: "You are not truly lemming a book unless you toss it off a cliff into the sea. :-)"
Or setting fire to it in a ritual cleansing.
Or setting fire to it in a ritual cleansing.

Tolkien'd?"
While I wouldn't feel any badge of honour for lemming a book (I'd feel ashamed I couldn't finish it) I do like this idea. Let me try this out:
I really want to Tolkien Tigana so that I can get onto Leviathan Wakes.
Yes, that works I think. :D

Tolkien'd?"
How 'bout Tolstoy'd?

In saying that though I don't have a problem with those who do give up on a book. People should never feel obligated to complete a book. This group is here for the enjoyment of books and if you're not enjoying it then you shouldn't force yourself to continue. I've ever given up on one book in disgust but there's others that I just grew bored with and put down that I'll probably never pick up again. It doesn't bother me as there are countless other books out there to read.
So I don't believe people should be boasting, but they also should not be ashamed or worried to give up a book. And if you're going to start a thread about it at least give a thought-out reason why, not just "it's stupid".



Or you could just be wasting your time. Or people can just decide for themselves whether they want to stop reading and should not feel pressured to finish it. It's this sort of guilt-tripping that I don't like to see. People shouldn't be feeling guilty for not finishing a book.

If people want to read a book, they will. And if they want to stop reading a book, they will. I can't imagine that lemming a book is cool or uncool but rather an individual decision.
Personally I find it an act of sheer lunacy to read a book for pleasure if the only pleasure derived is from completion, unless you are at University. Equally so, if people are trying to wear their lemmings as badges of honor or the like, then they are just so many naked fools dancing around tall flames chanting "burn baby burn!" Pay them little mind and they will soon get tired.
But this is all part of what makes life and literature interesting. One person's lem is another person's love.

I personally think if you are going to speak about a book in a book club you need to A - specify how far you have read or B - have read the whole book. I also feel it is a disservice to authors to bash a full book when you've only read 50 pages. That at least to me is laziness and frankly rude. If you have only read 50 pages it only qualifies you to speak about those 50 pages and not the full book.

And just because this is a book club does not mean one has to read for other than pleasure. I joined this club because I like reading sci-fi and fantasy books. I will only ever read them for pleasure. If I'm not getting pleasure or enjoyment from reading it then I will stop reading.





I think their opinion can be as valid as anyone else's if they provide reasoning behind their decision.

Would a rational person remain in a crappy relationship just to prove they can endure? I would hope not.

http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/8...


No, I'm not saying people should force themselves to read things they're not liking... but I DO feel people who are going to join a book club and thus try out things that are picked by the club need do do a few things:
1) Be open to new things. That might mean a writing style you're not generally a fan of, a subgenre you'd not read normally, etc. Especially in SFF it feels really odd to read some pretty unadventurous posts.
2) Give the book at least 100 pages or so. I'm sorry, but I have to roll my eyes when I read a post that says something like "I'm through chapter 2 and kind of bored..." Oh really? TWO chapters...? I'm not a particularly fast reader, but 100 pages is a couple of hours for me. I think it's fair to expect people to put in a couple of hours.
3) Say WHY you're stopping. Not so people can judge you - your time, your decision - but so we can have some discussion. It's not really interesting to just hear "I'm stopping" but hearing a perspective on why someone doesn't like something can spark good discussions sometimes.





Being honest doesn't mean people need to be all

about it. Most of the lemming discussions I've seen are people kvetching about the choice of book, proclaiming that they're lemming it because it's not the type of sci-fi they like, and adding nothing constructive to the actual discussion.

@ian - see Sean's take. While I don't think people need to hide the fact that they didn't like the book and stopped reading it, simply stating that is no more interesting to read that the inverse... that they finished the book. The difference is that the person who finished can talk about the book. The person who lems after 20 pages can't, really. The person who lems after some substantial investment CAN though and that can provoke interesting discussion.

I don't begrudge people their choice of quitting a book early, but this is a book club after all; we are supposed to be reading things we don't normally read so we can generate a broader discussion. I haven't been too involved in the SF/F book genre, so every month's pick has been a great chance of broadening my palette.
Although there are a few exceptions, most Lem threads are just full of people saying the equivalent of "+1" or trying to think of the coolest way to say they didn't read the book without giving any substantial insight. It almost makes me wish that the threads had an upvote/downvote system ala Reddit, so people who can voice their agreement or disagreement by voting, freeing up the actual comments for more fleshed out opinions and comments.

I'm throwing down a gauntlet... What have you done to make it better? Just complain? Not good enough; try again. Constructive contribution always makes a community better.
P.S. Don't feed the trolls.

I'd hope it's valuable to hear that some of us don't participate much because of the lems and the general negativity around a lot of the books. Unless you happen to feel that the S&L community is perfect, talking about issues isn't trolling and it shouldn't be out of bounds.
Oddly, the last couple of books have less of this than the prior bunch.

Also, just because you may not be trolling doesn't mean that someone in the a 10k member base might not be.
Books mentioned in this topic
War and Peace (other topics)Moby-Dick or, The Whale (other topics)
A Tale of Two Cities (other topics)
Reamde (other topics)
Thoughts? Am I reading too much into this?