Chaos Reading discussion
Books & Reading In General
>
Pet hates (for grumpy old gits)
date
newest »

message 201:
by
Mike (the Paladin)
(new)
Jul 20, 2013 10:18AM

reply
|
flag

Derek wrote: "I don't know, but it seems even more prevalent in German. Whenever I am doing librarian work on Goodreads, and come across German-language editions of books that I know in English, they seem to hav..."
Same for French books. I noticed when traveling all the novels say 'Roman'.
Same for French books. I noticed when traveling all the novels say 'Roman'.
Pet peeve: Independent booksellers who behave like martyrs & don't take any responsibility for adapting their business model to keep pace with the times.
Our local indie bookseller is always either moaning about being the last of dying breed or boasting about how she's been in the industry for 40 years and knows it all:
* She has banned smartphones in the store because, "people take pictures of the ISBN then go and order the books online because they're cheaper". (?) I once tried to show her the "scan" function on the GR app, but she wouldn't hear of it.
* Once, I took my laptop in to use my TBR as a shopping guide & she demanded to know what I was looking at. When I showed her GR, I got a sneer in response. So then I asked if she had any of the 200 books on my priority list in stock. She said something about how they're all pretty mainstream, and she of course knows them all, but...... and wandered off. Apparently the answer was "no".
* One of her staff maintains a FB page for the shop, but they mostly post about the demise of indie booksellers. There's nothing to actually engage people.
Apparently they've decided it's 'technology vs bookshops' and that's an end to it. In doing that they've missed the opportunity to use the internet to their advantage.
If they have all this expertise, why aren't they marketing themselves as being able to provide something the internet can't? Otherwise, the book buying decision comes down purely to price, in which case the bookseller loses. I'm not saying all indie booksellers are like this (or even most) - but there are a few who seem to be relying purely on people being willing to pay extra just to keep them in business - without giving anything back in return.
I should be an independent bookseller's dream, but that behaviour is SO off-putting!
Thank you. I've had that rant brewing for a few months now. :)
Our local indie bookseller is always either moaning about being the last of dying breed or boasting about how she's been in the industry for 40 years and knows it all:
* She has banned smartphones in the store because, "people take pictures of the ISBN then go and order the books online because they're cheaper". (?) I once tried to show her the "scan" function on the GR app, but she wouldn't hear of it.
* Once, I took my laptop in to use my TBR as a shopping guide & she demanded to know what I was looking at. When I showed her GR, I got a sneer in response. So then I asked if she had any of the 200 books on my priority list in stock. She said something about how they're all pretty mainstream, and she of course knows them all, but...... and wandered off. Apparently the answer was "no".
* One of her staff maintains a FB page for the shop, but they mostly post about the demise of indie booksellers. There's nothing to actually engage people.
Apparently they've decided it's 'technology vs bookshops' and that's an end to it. In doing that they've missed the opportunity to use the internet to their advantage.
If they have all this expertise, why aren't they marketing themselves as being able to provide something the internet can't? Otherwise, the book buying decision comes down purely to price, in which case the bookseller loses. I'm not saying all indie booksellers are like this (or even most) - but there are a few who seem to be relying purely on people being willing to pay extra just to keep them in business - without giving anything back in return.
I should be an independent bookseller's dream, but that behaviour is SO off-putting!
Thank you. I've had that rant brewing for a few months now. :)
Ruby wrote: "Pet peeve: Independent booksellers who behave like martyrs & don't take any responsibility for adapting their business model to keep pace with the times.
Our local indie bookseller is always eit..."
Sounds like the attitude that I used to encounter at the Seattle Co-op markets. Lots of whining about Whole Foods hurting their business. Little admission that maybe the problem was that if people can get their organic, free-trade pluots without the snotty holier-than-thou attitude and grudging service they will choose that route.
Our local indie bookseller is always eit..."
Sounds like the attitude that I used to encounter at the Seattle Co-op markets. Lots of whining about Whole Foods hurting their business. Little admission that maybe the problem was that if people can get their organic, free-trade pluots without the snotty holier-than-thou attitude and grudging service they will choose that route.
Whitney wrote: "Sounds like the attitude that I used to encounter at the Seattle Co-op markets. Lots of whining about Whole Foods hurting their business. Little admission that maybe the problem was that if people can get their organic, free-trade pluots without the snotty holier-than-thou attitude and grudging service they will choose that route. ..."
Well said.
Well said.

I only mention it because it would have taken an hour to improve, and the rest of the store was like that. No wonder they're going out of business, it looks like they really don't care to enhance the shopping experience.

I would also like to vent about those e-books that libraries lend. We need more time!!! I mean life interrupts the reading process and we are required to set the instrument down.
And its really sad that threads like this....slowly....wind...down....
P.S. The platypuses in the fedoras are adorable.



Mike, I live smack dab in the middle of Alaska. I have only 2 choices for physical book stores. The locally owned one has a pitiful selection of "new" books. They have a grand selection of used. And Barnes and Noble....some guy sitting in New York City is deciding what people who choose to live in the middle of nowhere want to read. I mean, do you think we are..normal??
Oh and customer service?? What is customer service??


I wish we had better customer service. I really would rather purchased books locally, than online. There is something joyous about physically perusing a book store.

All that but we've lost the joy of spending hours surrounded by books and getting the joy of discovery. Book stores today carry a very limited selection of titles and usually have an online option where you can buy the same book from the same store but for less money.
Of course you can usually have a cup of coffee and buy toys in book stores now.



Ridiculous use of apostrophes (I mean you, who wrote the book about Wit'ch), poor editing, deliberate new words for old things, and poor binding (I took out a library book, a new hardcover. A block of about seventy pages were put in backwards)
I have to say, as much as I've enjoyed City of Saints and Madmen, the paperback cover and binding are really crap. The cover art doesn't reflect the style of illustrations or the story. It's also the kind of book you have to continually flick around in - back and forth between the appendices, bibliography, glossary, footnotes, references etc etc. Which is fine IF the binding is of high enough quality to sustain it. I've got pages falling out all over the place. Oh, and there is no consistent page numbering. Each section is numbered separately, or in many cases not at all. I'd really like to see a nice special edition of this book.
So today (as I was browsing their very small book selection) a newsagent told me, "There's some more books over there on sale. The ones written by females are cheaper, because they don't sell as well." Yeah, I'm out. I just can't..even..

Arrgh! He's probably right, but telling your customers that doesn't do anything to solve the problem. I simply can't imagine why the author's gender could matter.

Derek wrote: "Arrgh! He's probably right, but telling your customers that doesn't do anything to solve the problem. I simply can't imagine why the author's gender could matter. ..."
I actually think he was talking about romance novels. When he showed me the stand he was talking about, it had Sidney Sheldon at the front anyway, and a tonne of crappy romance novels behind.
In retrospect, I wish I'd said, "If you insist on stocking the kind of novels "by females" that have been out of fashion for 50 years, then yeah - they probably won't sell as well."
I had been browsing the classics, and a fair few of those were by female writers.
I doubt it's actually an issue of who the author is, but then again, this IS Townsville..
I actually think he was talking about romance novels. When he showed me the stand he was talking about, it had Sidney Sheldon at the front anyway, and a tonne of crappy romance novels behind.
In retrospect, I wish I'd said, "If you insist on stocking the kind of novels "by females" that have been out of fashion for 50 years, then yeah - they probably won't sell as well."
I had been browsing the classics, and a fair few of those were by female writers.
I doubt it's actually an issue of who the author is, but then again, this IS Townsville..
New pet hate: Authors of ebooks who keep editing them and releasing updated Kindle versions. FFS. The book is finished. Back away from the keyboard..

That's exactly the problem though: the book isn't finished. It got "published" without proper, or often even any, editing, and it has probably had a bunch of reviews saying that the story was good, but the editing sucked.
Though I do recall one author who actually changed the story (more than once) because her readers wanted different endings...
Derek wrote: "Ruby wrote: "New pet hate: Authors of ebooks who keep editing them and releasing updated Kindle versions. FFS. The book is finished. Back away from the keyboard.."
That's exactly the problem thoug..."
This is something that's going to be interesting in how it plays out. There have been the occasional hard copy books that have different editions, but it's obviously something we'll be seeing more off. As Derek said, with self-publishing fixing spelling and grammatical areas is inevitable. Changing in response to audience demands is a lot more dicey. I doubt many serious writers will engage in that.
I do know of one writer who changed his book in response to comments (from me and others) about a couple rape scenes. From what he said and later wrote about it, he did not intend them to come off they way they did (i.e. misogynistic). In response to criticism / discussion, he went back and tweaked them to make his intent more obvious. In this case, he was originally sending a message he hadn't intended, was it wrong to change the book?
I'm not supporting one view or another, just been thinking about it and the implications. When it becomes more common, will it be like books with multiple translators and people debating which version is the best?
That's exactly the problem thoug..."
This is something that's going to be interesting in how it plays out. There have been the occasional hard copy books that have different editions, but it's obviously something we'll be seeing more off. As Derek said, with self-publishing fixing spelling and grammatical areas is inevitable. Changing in response to audience demands is a lot more dicey. I doubt many serious writers will engage in that.
I do know of one writer who changed his book in response to comments (from me and others) about a couple rape scenes. From what he said and later wrote about it, he did not intend them to come off they way they did (i.e. misogynistic). In response to criticism / discussion, he went back and tweaked them to make his intent more obvious. In this case, he was originally sending a message he hadn't intended, was it wrong to change the book?
I'm not supporting one view or another, just been thinking about it and the implications. When it becomes more common, will it be like books with multiple translators and people debating which version is the best?

I'd say it's absolutely not wrong—but it's still a failure of editing. If you hire a real editor, you'll at least get that discussion. Even if you just get a bunch of Goodreaders to beta-read it, you'll get that discussion. It should never reach the point of being "published" without the author at least knowing that there's going to be fallout.
As with all artists, I think there must be a point at which they're prepared to say "It's finished" and stop tweaking it.
From the reader's perspective, I don't have time to update my Kindle every time someone tweaks it, for whatever reason (particularly when I've seen certain ebooks with more than 40 iterations).
My view: Release it, and live with the finished product.
From the reader's perspective, I don't have time to update my Kindle every time someone tweaks it, for whatever reason (particularly when I've seen certain ebooks with more than 40 iterations).
My view: Release it, and live with the finished product.


I'm not sure whether I hate that more, or less, than books that are well written (at least, they produce a good and engaging story)—but full of "textual" errors. The badly written ones I can just toss back in the slush pile. The ones that seem like they should be good, but haven't been even slightly edited make me angry.
Books mentioned in this topic
City of Saints and Madmen (other topics)A Song of Ice and Fire (other topics)
The Eye of the World (other topics)
A Game of Thrones (other topics)
The Great Hunt (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Sidney Sheldon (other topics)Robert B. Parker (other topics)
Guy Gavriel Kay (other topics)
Terry Goodkind (other topics)
Brandon Sanderson (other topics)
More...