The Sword and Laser discussion

This topic is about
Tigana
2012 Reads
>
TIG: Not impressed by audio version
date
newest »



And, yes, his reading style is a bit laid back.
But I did find that after a few chapters, I got in the groove of both the writing style and Simon Vance's interpretation. But you definitely can't go wrong with the paper version.







I agree Vance. There are so many names and locations tossed around early on, it's hard to keep track of when you can't just flip back a couple pages to double check something or look at a map.
But I really like the audio so far. I'm a couple hours in. Simon Vance's voice just feels like a good fit for this type of story.



I adore the accent, may my husband and I never know which came first- my love of his accent or my love of him. Simons voice is like listening to my sweetheart read aloud - yumm.

Let us know how it goes!


I wanted to see if it would be quicker for me to listen to the audio book or read the book myself... Found I enjoyed the pace the audiobook had for world building, but when something interesting would happen, I would read laps around the narration as I usually am a fast reader...



totally agree. Chapter 4-ish is where it started to flow pretty well for me. Those first few chapters though...Yeesh. Rough is an understatement. all I was thinking was, "And how many hours am I going to have to listen to this?"


Simon Vance's voice is that perfect soothing tone so it becomes white noise to me. I choose to do audio books frequently because I like to work on projects while I'm "reading". But even doing absolutely nothing except listening, I find myself having difficulty keeping my attention from wandering. :/





It did take me a bit to get into it, but it helps that I listen to it on my commute to and from work every day.


Yeah, you should try reading some of the Malazan books - you don't even get the * * * and I find myself having to go back a page to figure out where the transition was.



thats why I dont do audiobooks, I think have selective hearing. Only I'm not selecting what I want to hear

That said, I am enjoying Simon Vance's reading, and the book itself, quite a bit. What I do notice, though, is one of the reasons I drifted off from the book while trying to read it fast - Kay writes beautifully, but he is quite long-winded and poetically redundant. The same refrains are used over and over again and I'm sure in skimming through them while reading, I was missing the "voice" of the author and part of the appeal. On the other hand, it does get a bit tiring, but I've only been listening to the audiobook driving to and from work (20-30 minutes at a time) and on a long walk (about 1.5 hrs).
Here is my impression of what I'm talking about (I'm spoilering it in case you haven't got very far yet). This is not a quote, but not quite a parody. Also, if I screw up a name, remember that I'm going by the audiobook and a few looks at Wikipedia.
(view spoiler)
And so on... I actually don't mind it much in the audiobook, but it can get grating when reading through at a rapid pace. I have a hard time reading poetry without reading it out loud or at least sub-vocalizing it for the same reasons.
I read a bit of a paper copy today at a B&N and discovered that I place nearly all of the blame for that reaction on the audiobook performer. I found the written prose to be quite solid and it didn't bear (for me) the sense of 'undifferentiated Tolkein knock-off' that I got from the audiobook reading. Your mileage may vary wildly, but I had a negative enough reaction to the one version that I thought I'd share it, in case folks were still deciding how to consume the novel.