Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Book & Author Page Issues
>
Goodread listopia
Dune Dune (a science fiction novel) is in that list which has no more magic system than twilight.
anyway last time i saw there were 26 people voted for the twilight series. You can't just disregard that many people's vote.
anyway last time i saw there were 26 people voted for the twilight series. You can't just disregard that many people's vote.

This one too:
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/27...

I agree especially since there is one book and all of the votes come from the authors friends.


I don't see why they wouldn't be allowed. They're no different as far as I'm concerned than a list of all books by an author. Sometimes people like to check off what they've read by an author or a press. A popular list is the NYRB (New York Review Books). A lot of people collect these and are really into them, because it's a nicely curated collection, good quality works, and the cover design and cover art is interesting and noteworthy.
I can't see any arguments against them.

But the title and description are legitimate. Anyone can add books/vote books onto it. Just because no one has yet isn't a reason to delete it.
Vicky wrote: "What's the stance on a listopia that's purpose is to list all books by a specific publisher?"
I can't see any reason these shouldn't exist, as long as their name and description is clear.
Got 9 & 10.
I can't see any reason these shouldn't exist, as long as their name and description is clear.
Got 9 & 10.

But the title and description are legitimate. Anyone can add books/vote books onto it. Just be..."
I know you did not address this to me but as a list it feels disingenuous
I am a huge fan of listopia lists, while I get that they are subject to sock puppeting if you will. It seems like we should try and limit that as much as possible. I think it would be different if the list creator had listed other books but the way it was done the list just does not seem legitimate actually it seems self serving, like you could not think of any other sci-fi book to add to your list. Only you but then it is ok because others can add to the list?
But that is just my two cents.

If I start a list "Best Books of 1888" and my rule is that I only vote on books I've actually read, and I've only read one book from 1888, I will have created a list with only one book. Most times other people will come along and add books so the list will grow, but it's conceivable that either might not happen, or would just take a long time to happen. But the list isn't illegitimate because there's only one book on it.

It is the fact that the author created the list, listed only one book and only the author's friends make it seem that way.
Again this is my two cents

Works for me.
Here's a few more: http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/32...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/28...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/13...

http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/23...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/25...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/26...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/30...

Bundles are a new indie thing. I've seen them for both independent books and video games.
They bundle a group of books/games together and sell them as themed sets, with a new set being provided every so often. The consumer pays as much or as little as they want and decide how much of their money goes to the authors or the bundle company. There are also options to donate to charity. Here's the website for Story Bundle: http://storybundle.com/
I could see the same case being made for them as for publishing imprints, I don't think they offend any listopia guidelines.


The remove duplicates button will get rid of duplicates, so that's not an issue (or abuse). Abuse would be an author creating sockpuppet accounts to vote up a book, which Goodreads can determine.




http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/85...

Here are the links to the books Listopia vote pages: http://www.goodreads.com/list/book/17... (We wove web..)
http://www.goodreads.com/list/book/17... (Albion..)
Here are some examples of the votes on actual lists: http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/17... (places 17&18)
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/11... (146&147, don't even belong in the list first place)
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/17... (42&43)
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/30... (1&2, books not even nominated for the award).

I just sent an email to support about another two books about the Kennedy assassination which are making the Listopia rounds. But in the meantime, these five listopias, which I plucked from two pages worth of listopias, seem too niche. Can these five listopias be scrapped?
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/35...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/35...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/35...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/34...
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/34...
The 5 lists in 48 do seem unnecessarily duplicative. The fifth had the most books and the most votes; I edited it and deleted the others.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Dune (other topics)New Moon (other topics)
New Moon From the list "Most Interesting Magic System". Although that book does not conflict with the list's description.
list's link: http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/871
Change log: http://www.goodreads.com/list/edits/8...
Some steps should be taken against this abuser.
Also that book should be return to the list.