Young Adult Book Reading Challenges discussion
Member's Chat
>
What's your view on the dystopian bandwagon?

I've read alot of good dystopian / post-apocalyptic novels over the past year. Divergent, Birthmarked, Enclave, Aftertime series, The Forest of Hands and Teeth series, Dead Living just to name a few. And I'm not sure if these were started before or after The Hunger Games. Even if only a handful of the new novels coming out are good I'll take it. I would rather read a so-so dystopian than a so-so paranormal romance any day!!!

The Hunger Games absolutely did crack open the genre, and there are plenty of us trying to do what it did best: create a gripping story full of fascinating characters in an awe-inspiring landscape.
Like with everything, some will be successful and some won't, but there are more ways the future could turn out than any number of authors could predict.
--Jason
Author of YA Dystopian
Suspense, The Spencer Nye Trilogy #1


There could be dystopians based around caste systems, reproduction, war, distribution of information, love, etc. I'm not to worried about reading the same book over-and-over again or a ton of Hunger Games rip-offs.

Just like teen paranormal romances that in majority are carbon copies of each other, the YA dystopias are becoming indistinguishable. The only thing they differ in is the horrible way people are treated in them, the rest - love stories, love triangles, "awakening" to the problems within societies, the fights to overturn the bad - all exactly the same.
There are still some gems of dystopian fiction buried in a pile of subpar books written by trend-jumping debut authors, but they are hard to find.

Speaking of steampunk, Deserunt, I just finished Steampunk!: An Anthology of Fantastically Rich and Strange Stories and it's a good one. If you like short stories, this is a steampunk collection worth reading.

Exactly. Many posters here say that dystopian novels are hard to replicate. However, I think otherwise. They all start out in a dystopian society where people are treated horribly, later comes the "awakening," after is the love triangle, then the protagonist becoming the "symbol for hope." T___T

http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/97...
A lot of these books have summaries of dystopian societies. Enjoy. :)


Sigh, this makes me wary in buying those mentioned titles now. =\
I have Delirium shelved. Hopefully, it will not disappoint me.

I have discovered because of all these books that I like these types of stories. I hadn't read too many before.

http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/97...
A lot of these books have summaries of dystopian societies. Enjoy..."
Thanks. My. Son. Has enjoyed. Hunger games,divergent. But. Not maze runner. So. Looking for suggestions

A few in this genre now are ho hum. I thought they would be wonderful but they fell short. It happens in every genre,a great read comes out and everyone follows suit.
I wont take away from the gr8 reads in this genre now. There are a few true gems.
Can sum1 please tell me what "Steampunk" is?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steampunk
Mostly it has to do with steam-operated gadgets in Victorian Britain setting. But there is a variety of interpretations.

What made The Hunger Games stand out was that it did everything a dystopian novel was supposed to: figure out how the political landscape of a futuristic society like Panem would work, then put the reader in the shoes of a heroine as she rips it all down. The Girl Who Was on Fire: Your Favorite Authors on Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games Trilogy is a great collection of essays on why The Hunger Games struck a chord. But all people ended up talking about was Gale vs Peeta, and that's what all the authors are jumping on. The romance is the focus, to the detriment of what truly makes dystopian fiction interesting.
...I have apparently been bottling this up for a while. XD




And for the record, I agree with all the above anti-Hunger-Games-love-triangle statements. The Gale vs. Peeta madness sucked the life out of that series.

Books such as The Hunger Games, Divergent and Delirium are all my favorites, and they all lean heavily on dystopian futures.

Hunger Games and Divergent for example, deal with wider issues that face us here and now, under the regime or democracy we live in - all is controlled by fear, all is manipulated by media and the hidden scars that come whilst standing against it.
It would be nice if authors invested more time in the background of such dystopia's so we can understand and delve into their world more willingly, the way we do whilst reading such books as Game of Thrones, Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings etc.

I agree with the person who said it's not necessarily that authors are jumping on the dystopian bandwagon, because most of the dystopians I've read that have been published recently managed to make the story their own on some level. It's the romance. Cliches, insta-love, love triangles, reluctant attraction, it's all been done before and it's all very tiresome. Dystopians are powerful, and by adding in the fore mentioned it cheapens the point that the author (should be) trying to make.
I am a dystopian junkie at heart though, so I can't say I'm not looking forward to the new additions.


-Fahrenheit 451 or Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 The Authorized Adaptation a graphic novel based on the same, with Bradbury's blessing.
-The Handmaid's Tale is one of the scariest books out there that isn't horror.
-Little Brother is a teen version of 1984.
-The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas is a grown up version of The Giver. (But suitable for teens.)
- A Canticle for Leibowitz
- Parable of the Sower this book needs to be better known...
All are way older than the current crop of dystopian novels and well worth reading.



I am the same way about books disturbing me and it ends up that is the reason I really like reading them! It's so foreign to me that it is almost confusing but I can't stop telling people about them. Make sense?


Yes it does.

I think some of the current dystopian fiction loses its umph b/c many of the basic storylines have been told already. Then again, I'm pretty good at blocking out other books while reading a new one, so that I don't let comparison b/w the two get in the way. When it comes down to it, the dystopians that have deeper layers of meaning & not just a love story set in a messed up world are the ones that speak to me. I personally devour a good love story, but that can't be the only thing going on in a dystopian novel. It's the effects of the government (or lack thereof) on the society; all illusions of a balanced, perfect life are brought into question, by the characters &/or reader. I personally think a good dystopian makes us reflect on our own society & shows us that we may have more in common with this fictitious world than we realize. I say bring on more dystopians, but I realize that as more & more come out, many of the ideas may get stale. I think there will still be many standouts in the line of already told, poorly developed stories that "bandwagon" writing creates.



I'm sure, like after the Twilight craze, many authors will be jumping at the bit to write dystopian after The Hunger Games. Probably many of them will suck, but amid the quickly put together bangwagoners there will be the gems I am sure.
P.S. Completely agree with you Liz, I love that dystopians have so much more to them than just a love story, as is the case with most YA books anymore even though they claim to focus on the paranormal, fantasy, etc.

Then once the book is complete and you've spent a year or two searching for an agent / publisher, the publisher will plan the book release for at least a year from when they pick up the book. Most of these debut authors had to have started their stories long before Hunger Games. My guess is that publishers are pulling more dystopians out of the slush pile than they used to.
So I don't think the authors could be blamed for jumping on the bandwagon.


I think Suzanne Collins felt the same way. When Katniss ranted at a council meeting about everybody being more concerned about who she would pick while there is a war to worry about, I think Katniss was echoing Collins' own opinion.
And I think the plot in Mockingjay was amazing because it's about something I believe in. However, if you sliced out the romance from the book, you'd lose a very powerful element of the story. You'd be taking away the human aspect. There wasn't just romance in HG; there was conversation, friendship, love, caring, sacrifice, comfort, and understanding.
Though people got all hung up on the love triangle and the romance, that isn't really what drew them in. It was the depth of the connection between Peeta and Katniss: their friendship.

I hadn't heard that before. Thx for sharing.
I still don't blame the authors on that but rather the publishers. It's considered professional to listen to the advice of your publisher.


Paranormal: another girl with strange powers.
Dystopian: another world with odd names for their technologies, factions, and whatever.
I'm ashamed to say I often find myself rolling my eyes at some of the new books coming out, and I hate feeling that way.


But I push that aside. I won't know how unique a book is until I open it up and read it.

Books mentioned in this topic
Parable of the Sower (other topics)Kindred (other topics)
Parable of the Talents (other topics)
Brave New World (other topics)
1984 (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Charles de Lint (other topics)Emma Bull (other topics)
Terri Windling (other topics)
Jane Yolen (other topics)
Neil Gaiman (other topics)
More...
I hope no one brought this up yet on another thread and that I did not offend anyone with this post. >.<