Eragon
discussion
The movie version sucks!
message 1:
by
Brian
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Aug 26, 2011 02:33PM

reply
|
flag







Some examples: Angela the Herbalist, who was treated like an extra. Solembum the Wercat, left out altogether.
The way Eragon found out Brom was another Rider was stupid. Arya and Eragon's relationship felt stale and predictable.
So yeah, the movie version sucked.

The next day I wrote FOX an, i'm sure pointless, e-mail because I needed to vent.
It's been so long, its hard to say what exactly but there was like 101 things wrong with it; and I mean really wrong with it. Not just plot changes.
It would be nice if they re-made this movie before I died.
It shouldn't have been called Eragon. Basically it was just a scheme to make money because they obviously knew their could be no future after this. They messed up the plot so much that to even consider tring to produce Brisingr or Eldest out of that chaos would be ludacris.

I was sad because I didn't like how they made Aayra


I watched Eragon first then read.
I really enjoyed the movie but I have stopped comparing movie to book.....I wish they would continue making more movies with the series!


Oh, and Amy, be careful what you wish for. A whole lot of other people might be driven insane if that were to come true.


I re-read the series immediately after seeing the movie to obiliterate the movie images from my mind...

The book felt more serious and dangerous while the movie felt more like the later film, 'The Waterhorse'.


The movie SUCKED. I might have liked it if it wasn't compared to the book, but they took like two of the events that happened in the book, twisted ALL the characters around into hideous grotesques, added a million other things that NEVER happened and called it "Eragon, the Movie".
The people who made that movie are idiots. Don't authors have to approve the movie or something? I don't think Chistopher Paolini would have approved that trash. >:(
Don't mind me. I have wanted to say that for a long time. Oh, and don't even get me started on that pathetic moving picture that they made out of Percy Jackson. Is there a discussion on that? I have a LOT to contribute. :P

According to Wikipedia, Paolini liked the movie...

Then I read the book, and now the only reason I would watch Eragon again, is to look at the cute dragon, because that you cant argue.... that is probably the best dragon depiction in a movie!!!!!! (And I love her voice)
And that is about the best I can say about the movie!!! (Ok, and I like the black horse :D )
Other than that, There is not much that is saving the movie!!!!




Call myself a troll? Hardly think so. No way, how about you call yourself a ugly fleabag since you wanted to me to call myself a troll?





Totally agree Jeremy Irons was great as Brom.

I mean seriously! Arya wasn't even an elf and did you see how fast Saphira grew. *facepalm*


..."
However Brom wasn't supposed to be some weird beggar dude!!! The guy that played him was a good actor though I always pictured him older!!
I think the film was a complete disapointment!!! You just can't compare it to the book..... I vote that the film gets remade, but yeah, they can keep Jeremy Irons
^^
^^

yes. the movie sucked. badly. they could have done it WAY better then that. It ended it a cliffhanger, and it were not like the book at all.


Brian wrote: "Anna C., please tell me that you are a troll. You can tell me--my faith in humanity depends on your answer."
And Your a troll for saying that
And Your a troll for saying that