This is not The Haters Club You're Looking For discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
35 views
I hate that science has proven that females are EVIL...but it has!

Comments Showing 1-50 of 60 (60 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1

message 1: by Tom (new)

Tom Foolery (tomfoolery) ...
Genius.


message 2: by Rusty (new)

Rusty (rustyshackleford) | 2198 comments What is science going to prove next - that poop stinks?


message 3: by Malbadeen (new)

Malbadeen "girls require money"? that is so sad you guys.


Jackie "the Librarian" Where can I find these men with money?


message 5: by [deleted user] (new)

I've supported every boyfriend! Every boyfriend!


Reads with Scotch Bad Montambo! BAD!


Jackie "the Librarian" There's your mistake, Sarah. Apparently, you are going against the natural order of things.


message 8: by Dave (last edited Sep 21, 2008 01:06AM) (new)

Dave Russell I have a problem with the math. First he says that "girls require time and money" and he turns that into Money x Time when really it should be Money + Time. For it to be Money x Time it would have to read "girls require money per time," in which case we would be talking about prostitutes.




message 9: by Lori (new)

Lori Thank you Dave, I too noticed the smudging of the mathematical formula. He tried to slip it past us, but he's still in the theoretical stage without proof.


message 10: by [deleted user] (new)

Math Schmath. I'm not a number!!!!!!


message 11: by Dave (new)

Dave Russell No, you're a variable.


message 12: by Dave (new)

Dave Russell This is my 500th comment in THC!!!





The rest is silence.


message 13: by [deleted user] (new)

Don't go! I'll delete your old posts if I have to.

;)


message 14: by [deleted user] (new)

KD is into death metal, so he probably likes them evil.


message 15: by Amanda (new)

Amanda (randymandy) Money per time would be Divided By not Multiplied.

$/t



Also, Sarah's experience is my own. My next boyfriend better have a goddamn job. A well-paying one.



Even though I'm whining, I think Message 1 is funny.


message 16: by [deleted user] (new)

Me too. I just got miffed because where are the men who spend money on girls?!


message 17: by [deleted user] (last edited Sep 21, 2008 10:11AM) (new)

Maybe I need to be more shallow!

My first "date" told me he couldn't find his wallet when we were at dinner! He was lying!

My senior year boyfriend was on free lunch and had these lunch tickets. He worked really part time at Cinnabon because he was usually either in football or wrestling. He'd take every check and go put money towards his letterman jacket. Sometimes he'd pay for a movie, but I paid for his lunch almost every day that year because who wanted cafeteria free lunch when we could go be alone in the taco bell parking lot? I also paid most of the expenses of our formal dances and I was the driver.

My next major boyfriend (Marie's brother) still owes me about $7529385749375 and his electricity (for the apartment he shares with his fiance) is STILL IN MY NAME. It was only supposed to be for one month, but it's been years.

My last boyfriend didn't have a car and worked about half an hour from my house and I picked him up almost every night! An hour of driving and I never batted an eye. I paid for most dinners and he gave me free books from Powells.


message 18: by [deleted user] (new)

Yay penniless losers!

Except, could they just pay a little more? There's a balance, I think.


message 19: by Dave (new)

Dave Russell Marie, you're probably better off not dating a guy who has a hair dryer, let alone gets mad when you accidentally drop in the toilet (I assume it was accidentally.)


message 20: by Dave (new)

Dave Russell Oh yeah and yay penniless losers like me!


message 21: by Amanda (new)

Amanda (randymandy) Fuck penniless losers! I want to eat sushi every night and it's expensive.
Penniless losers are only good for passionate love affairs. Fine by me.


message 22: by Dave (new)

Dave Russell Yay passionate love affairs!


message 23: by [deleted user] (new)

Yay PLA with PL's!


message 24: by Erin (new)

Erin yay!


Reads with Scotch Penniless losers are called penniless losers for a reason. If they can’t figure out how to get a job; are you sure the can figure out where to stick/lick it for your little PLA’s?

Marie… a hair dryer… are you kidding! I don’t care how much money he had, he was a looser. In the future when you find a hair dryer in your man’s possessions then it is time to give him walking papers.



message 26: by Rusty (new)

Rusty (rustyshackleford) | 2198 comments Sounds to me like the Portland ladies are still looking for men in the Taco Bell parking lot (that, or the hair salon). You might want to branch out.

Maybe you could try the Carl’s Jr. parking lot next.



message 27: by [deleted user] (new)

Good Lord, Nick! You know how to take ANY appeal out of sex!!! OH MY GOD, YOU ARE DISGUSTING!!!

Also, PL's DO know what's happening in the physical realm--it's all they got!

Rusty, you're right. I'm getting an art museum membership and I'm going to hang out there every weekend looking sexy.


message 28: by Rusty (new)

Rusty (rustyshackleford) | 2198 comments No Marie, you find the guy in the parking lot, first. Chat him up, he pays, and your budget is completely unaffected.

If he turns out to be an idiot – hey, at least you got a free meal.


Damnit, now I’m hungry for Carl’s Jr.



message 29: by Rusty (new)

Rusty (rustyshackleford) | 2198 comments Oh, so you're TARGETING penniless losers?!

Well....if I see you in the parking lot, I'll be happy to buy you lunch, but your penniless loser is on his own.


message 30: by Rusty (new)

Rusty (rustyshackleford) | 2198 comments Not sure if you're serious, but Rusty does not make those kind of insinuations. If you’ll notice, he does not even flirt on the nets. That's just not his SOP.


message 31: by Rusty (new)

Rusty (rustyshackleford) | 2198 comments SOP - Standard Operating Procedure

I'm not claiming to be an upstanding guy - I just have an online code of behavior (which includes what I mentioned), as I imagine every one else does.


message 32: by Amanda (last edited Sep 23, 2008 10:36AM) (new)

Amanda (randymandy) as I imagine every one else does
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!! I have never laughed so heartily in all my life! Code of Behavior. Ohhhhh, that's a good one. Ok. Wow. Man, that was funny. I feel like I just did sit-ups for a hour. HA! Shit, Rusty, that's funny.


message 33: by Rusty (new)

Rusty (rustyshackleford) | 2198 comments Amanda, don’t make me drive to North Carolina. I have no compunctions about slashing your tires and starting a bonfire with your Twilight books.


message 34: by Amanda (last edited Sep 23, 2008 12:01PM) (new)

Amanda (randymandy) If I toss on the Anita Blakes, we'll have time for marshmallows, too!

Edit: Vegetarian ones...


message 35: by Rusty (last edited Sep 24, 2008 05:52AM) (new)

Rusty (rustyshackleford) | 2198 comments If I toss on my copy of Pilgrims' Progress, we can cook a turkey.

Edit: turkey, not tofurkey


message 36: by Not Bill (new)

Not Bill This thread is an instant classic. I nominate KD to Chair of THC School of Science. Bravo KD!


Reads with Scotch Re message #36, Marie: I am actually not into 3-ways thank you very much. I know it sounds crazy, but here it is. There is way too much going on during a 3-way. Too many boobies, too many holes, it is very distracting. When there is three someone is getting left out. It is a wash, I’ll pass. I prefer to lighten the world one women at a time.


And Leave my inverted skeletal thruster alone~! Don’t knock it, you have never had the pleasure of trying it. You missed your chance at PNBA }:-p



message 38: by Amanda (new)

Amanda (randymandy) Nick, you forgot to describe exactly what an inverted skeletal thruster is.


Reads with Scotch I can not just reveal trade secrets in public. Right now my wife has exclusive rights to that particular orgasmic rollercoaster. So you will have to wait until she gives me the boot. Then I will be willing to give demonstrations, because words just can not describe, honest. }:-D


message 40: by Amanda (last edited Sep 23, 2008 03:35PM) (new)

Amanda (randymandy) I hate that that is kinda exciting. I really, really hate it.
*sigh*


message 41: by Malbadeen (new)

Malbadeen This is my most favorite thread EVER because TWO men have admitted to having thresholds when it comes to things sexual and/or private. Yay! there is hope!!!


Reads with Scotch Me sexual deviancy knows no bounds... It is just restricted to my wife that is all. I'm freaky.


message 43: by Malbadeen (new)

Malbadeen ewwwwww


Reads with Scotch you can say that again ;)


message 45: by Tom (new)

Tom Foolery (tomfoolery) That again;)

It's a disease, i can't help it.


message 46: by David (new)

David I have a seven inch threshold myself. Others?


message 47: by Amanda (new)

Amanda (randymandy) Prove it.


message 48: by Tom (new)

Tom Foolery (tomfoolery) Is it me, or does seven inches seem kind of small for a doorstep?



message 49: by Amanda (new)

Amanda (randymandy) Wonka-step


message 50: by Amanda (new)

Amanda (randymandy) Doorsteps have a smaller standard rise than regular steps?
I guess they do... Why, though? That's dumb.


« previous 1
back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.