To Kill a Mockingbird
discussion
The Atticus Factor
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Kenny
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 05, 2011 04:37AM

reply
|
flag


Sure, Scout idolized him, but I truly feel his overall characterization is almost above reproach. I'd never use the word "hot" in a sentence with Atticus at all (eww). Leave me with my vision of a near-perfect father figure. He's like Andy Griffith, and nobody can convince me otherwise! :)



Interesting. I think you are one of the few then. :)

Would you believe it if a ten year old girl saw her single-parent father as flawed? That seems unrealistic to me.

Yes I think people want to believe in him and I'm desperate for him to be real, but I admit I would rather try and imagine him as more rounded. Cursing the world for taking his wife, punching the villain, like we all would.

I don't want him to be anything different than he is. It's like the scene leaving the courtroom and all the people in the balcony standing in respect as Atticus leaves the courtroom.
I can appreciate that you feel differently but cannot accept it. :)

It is the fact that he does not "curse" and "punch" that makes him worth writing a book about and a heroic figure for the ages. A lot of us have had to rise above unpleasant circumstances and tried to maintain a level of dignity while doing it BECAUSE of heroes like Atticus.
"Stand up, Miss Jean Louise, you're father's passing." They don't say things like this about the cursers and the punchers.

It is the fact that he does not "curse" and "punch" that makes him worth writing a book about and ..."
I have actually thought a lot about what you and Kenny have said. I also re-read large parts of the book today. I repeat I do love him and the portrait of him through the eyes of a child is that of a perfect father.... and its very affecting. Even the the incident with the dog surprises both Jem and Scout.
I also think that coming at this as an Englishman affects this enormously, I think the class based lawyer system here precludes an "Everyman" character like Finch. The English legal system being stuffy and exclusive. So all in all I accept my punishmants like a man and say proudly "Jean Louise Stand up your father is passing"


Could not agree more!

Wonderful, wonderful example -- one of my favorite characters in literature. Of course he certainly goes through a LOT. Have you read the sequel?

I chose to name our four-year old son Atticus because o..."
That is beautiful, absolutely beautiful! Usually I loathe old names on children, but I amm 100% on board with this one.
Jay wrote: "Jay Old Atticus is a stiff-neck, a colossal bore, a self-righteous, huffing-puffing, over-subtle, stylized bastard. He's one of those simple-minded folks who believe in good old honesty and hard-wo..."
I'd very much like to discuss this. I find the homosexual comment about Atticus amusing; it could very well be. But what I really want to discuss is this idea of ignorance. I see Atticus as simple, I agree, and noble, everything you said - except the ignorance. I admit that the ignorance you claim would go well with Atticus' character, but I actually get the impression of quiet intelligence in Atticus. He is observant and well-raed. He knows far more than he lets on. It's not even a matter of moral ignorance either; Atticus knows how the world works (for example, the Cunninghams wanting to lynch Tom), but he doesn't ACCEPT it. Taking a stand shouldn't be confused for ignorance.
At what point do we see his ignorance in the novel? Anyone?


He is the 'father' figure for the entire human race and viewed often through the eyes of his surrogate children - the human companions who travel with him and who love and admire his wisdom and bravery.

Thanks for a great discussion - I will look into reading some of the suggested books and try to remember to come back here when I recognize a character relevant to "The Atticus (Finch) Factor."


1. Protagonist
2. Antagonist (not necessarily a person, but whatever)
3. Sidekick
4. Comic Relief (sometimes)
5. Wiseguy (counsel of the protagonist, helps him with his task/mission/learning)
Most or all wiseguys are meant to have (to some extent) that Atticus Factor.
And to add to the list, Hans Hubermann in The Book Thief

Adam - thank you for your insightful post. I agree that "tranquil understanding" is the ticket, and in line with tranquil would be "non-judgmental" understanding since, as you noted, these are great teachers yet still open and willing learners (the best teachers are). Thank you for including Lee in this group of characters, as well, as I love Lee and think he represents the Atticus Factor. One of my favorite scenes in "East of Eden" is when Sam recognizes that Lee is a profound thinker, and he sees Lee as he is, not how people are expected to see him. It is a very warm moment.
I am loving all the responses about how people perceive the Atticus Factor, what characters they think fit this character, and other types of characters in novels. It just shows us that a good story can not be outdone by rich characters, and the best novels are those that contain both.
I haven't read "The Book Thief" but will add it to my queue! Thank you.

Also the crusading journalist from Gentleman's Agreement should qualify as well. Small wonder Gregory Peck played him in the film version.



Interesting....I can't really answer as I've not finished the book yet....I got distracted in the middle somewhere...

It would be in the last third of the book that the Atticus factor within Albert Moore becomes most apparent. If you decide to finish the book, see if you agree or not.

Katniss is WAY more flawed than Atticus. But I personally think that the mockingjay symbol was Suzanne Collins' nod to Harper Lee's mockingbird.



Considering the man killed was the man who sent an innocent man to death I don't think Atticus is failing anything. He tried to persuade Tate but wasn't too insisting and I think he would have acted this way even if it hadn't been his son he was protecting. Besides Jem or Boo were never intent on killing anyone.

We're definitely on the same page to the point you just mentioned, only my actual point was: eventhough the dead guy was not innocent and has killed Tom Robinson, still the two cases were totally different and standing separately. My main point is; it is hard to enforce the law to the fullest and purest, which is I think it's very humane and 'acceptable' in the case of Atticus giving in to Heck's persistence toward Jem-Boo case. The latter two names were definitely innocent and trying to defend themselves.

Perhaps it's not Atticus that was flawed in this situation but the law. My take-away from
To Kill a Mockingbird was more about how admirable men are those that act morally.
The law, on the other hand, is just what's agreed to by a group of politicians pandering to what they think the (often uninformed, often foolish) majority wants or will accept.
Remember, the Supreme Court of the U.S. in their Dredd Scott decision ruled that a black man who'd lived for decades in the North had to be returned to his white owners in the south because black men were only property. (and worth 3/5ths of a white man when it came to assigning U.S. Representatives)
To be truly moral a wise man sometimes has to act outside the law.
Who cares if Atticus failed as a lawyer (agent of the courts)? He succeeded at being a human being.

In the context of law has so many flaws and biases of interests (by politicians or the top leader), I would definitely agree with people who believe that a wise man has to act and stand out to bend the flawed-law.. kinda like what Gandhi has done, or, Atticus at TKAM.
Law is merely a product, where human are the producer. Wise or corrupt the law depends on how wise or corrupt the people who created it.


Perhaps it's not Atticus that was flawed in this situation but the law. My take-away from
To Kill a Mockingbird was ..."
Have you read Les Miserables? Hugo goes on this enormous rant about law vs. justice. The conflict is also represented by two characters in the book (Valjean and Javert)

Think you have hit the nail on the head - there aren't many characters that I have come across that don't have flaws, but I have always considered Atticus in the same way that you have summarised here.

Check out my webcomic: http://reddkaiman.blogspot.com/2013/0...


I have to say, I love Atticus - he just might be my favorite character EVER. I love the post that says "He does not posess a strong moral core, like so many other characters in books - he IS morality. He's not decent, he IS decency. When Atticus acts, he is RIGHT." This sums up Atticus. I can see the complaint that he has no "grey areas" but I think that Lee makes this work, and I think that Scout's age has something to do with it.
My thought for a similar character is Lord Eddard (Ned) Stark from Game of Thrones. Yes, I will admit that Ned certainly has his grey areas (I can't, for instance picture Atticus taking part in a rebellion or fathering a bastard son) but I think that Ned absolutely has the Atticus factor.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
To Kill a Mockingbird (other topics)
Gentleman's Agreement (other topics)
The Hunger Games (other topics)
Bleak House (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
The Samurai's Garden (other topics)To Kill a Mockingbird (other topics)
Gentleman's Agreement (other topics)
The Hunger Games (other topics)
Bleak House (other topics)
More...