flight paths discussion
Flight Paths
>
From one thing to another
message 1:
by
Her Royal Orangeness
(new)
Jun 07, 2011 08:55PM

reply
|
flag

There is a clue in each book that is picked up in the next. At the same time, I try to make sure that the narrative voice is distinct, that there be enough difference that I do not get them conflated or mixed up.
This is quite different than when I fall under the influence of an author and must read the whole oeuvre,immediately in order of the writing

I am trying to broaden my literature palette, being on Goodreads has led to explosion of directions to my normally controlled environment.


Sometimes I need a wedgie in between.


This too, this too. I referred to this kind of roll "under the influence of an author" but I should have added 'totally engrossed in another world' or 'obssessed by a series'.
I once spent two years searching out and finally acquiring the entire Darkover series, this was just before Daw reprinted everything. I'm not sure how many of us in this group have read MZB...but likely you can imagine the thrill of finally being in position one gloomy February to totally immerse myself.
Ice, you also said
I am trying to broaden my literature palette, >>
Well yes, thats the whole point of a personal reading plan.




I know what you mean, and I hope the wedge shelf in this group will come to contain a whack of suitable titles, for its a fine art of selection. Its disconcerting when a book picked for a bit of respite reveals itself to be emotionally demanding.
Especially when a book has had a big impact on me and left me wrung out, I want next something lightly uplifting, slight but not trite.


Yes jumping between genres and authors but following a thread spiraling around certain time frames, issues and incidents, gathering alternate points of view.

I'm realizing that I often dismiss an author based on one book I disliked, and that this is often unfair. Any author can have one bad book. And sometimes an author writes in several genres, and is stronger in one than in another. And most authors improve with time (and gain the attention of better editors) so their first publication is not necessarily a reflection of their later work.
Thoughts?

The two authors that come to mind for me are James Patterson and Anne Rice. I read 2 of Patterson's early works (The Thomas Berryman Number and Season of the Machete - had to look up the names on my 'Master List') and since I disliked them both, I decided I was done with him. I have read comments that he improved a lot, and I know he's extremely popular now. However, there are a lot of authors I KNOW I like and many new ones I want to try, so I don't plan to give James another shot.
As far as Anne Rice goes, I just don't like the way she writes and am confident I wouldn't like her 2nd vampire book any better than the first.
It's sad, but true - we just can't read them ALL!!

I'm realizing that I often dismiss an author based on one book I disliked,..."
Heres another reason to read the reviews on GR, from people whos taste we share or at least trust.
I in fact have experienced loving one book by an author but thats it. Examples...Stephen King's Different Seasons, which I only read at the insistence of my son, I thought it was terrific. But I am not going to read his other stuff. And surprisingly, I liked Anne Rices Jesus book.
as a few of you have said
t's sad, but true - we just can't read them ALL!!

I have noticed that many of you like thrillers, horror, and vampire stuff. And kindles. I don't care for violence or suspense per se, so I don't read it and cant in fact understand the current vogue for vampires, or kindle.
I hope this doesnt alienate you.

I think we're most big enough to take it but I feel the same way about being less than laudatory about certain pop giants. Including Twilight.
How sad am I?

I wasn't offended by your earlier comment about Stephen King, but I do feel a need to say something about this message. It drives me completely bonkers that people think of King as someone who writes hack horror crap. These are usually people who either (1) never read anything King wrote or only read some of his worst work and/or (2) also think M. Night Shyamalan's "Signs" is about aliens.
The "ghoulies and ghosties and long legged beasties" in King's best books aren't there just to provide shock and gore. They are always symbolic of something deeper - something unexplored and unsaid, something painful and ugly. They are representative of the dark side of the human soul, our hiddenness and fear of being known, and how all of us kinna see the world as the monster lurking 'neath the bed.
King is also the most amazing storyteller I have ever read. I love his worlds and his characters, and the amazing way he uses words to describe them. Whenever I finish a King book, I always feel homesick for awhile...like I've been taken away from the place and the people that I most love.

In defense of Kindle, I'll say that I do prefer a living, "breathing" book, but I LOVE Kindle for traveling. I'm always worried about packing enough books, but now I just load the Kindle up with lots of free classics (just about anything pre-1926), and know I can read to my heart's content. I refuse to pay $12.99 for a digital book, but luckily I love reading the old, free stuff.

Well, hopefully one of his big fans here will fill you in.
I do note a couple of titles posted by HRO. Perhaps they might do, or, the only King I've read, Different Seasons, which is 4 long stories, and brilliant.

For a first read, I would recommend It. In my opinion, it's the best book for showcasing King's talent with world building, characterization, and psychology. The Stand is an excellent book, also, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Both the plot and the length are huge.

Stopped in my tracks by a sequel!
Have picked up Graham Greene as a solace, but I was dismayed to discover, alto there is no reference to it at all in the book I just finished, there is not only a sequel but that the 3rd book in series has not yet been published (or even written)
I found out by checking here on GR. A few days of searching around and I am afraid I will have to carry on without it for now.



I had the same problem with John Twelve Hawks. There had to be a sequel! And I had to wait a year for it.When the 3rd volume finally came into my hands, I put it away until such time as I will read the whole thing again.
A series within a series? Are you talking the Wayfarer double trilogy? I thought it was awesome.
Usually I do buy my books second hand, and of course I get a bit of a discount if I can get them where I work. But space and budget are dictating that I no longer feel compelled to own every book I read. I have a huge library and no more space in my cramped flat.

From what you have indicated, I dont think that you would have read just one of the Wayfarer series. But I know what you mean about forgetting titles. Thats why GR was such an appealling group to me, the chance to get it all down for reference. Of course, I've only listed a bit of my actual library, my physical tbr shelves, and piles :). Before this, since I was in my late 20's I developed the habit of writing titles down as I read them, in the back of my journal.
It' a daunting task, weeding out books.One must be fairly ruthless. I feel it's almost like betraying a friend. And who knows, maybe someday I will want to know how to build an adobe hut, or rekindle my interest in psychoanalysis. So good luck!

Are you at work?
I havent gotten into Martin either.

I have worked that shift, at a homeless shelter not in the neighbourhood. The commute was the bitch, not the work.


And I do walk sometimes, which is less risky but also an adventure what with the scene.
I should not be online now, needed to check a title for work. May you be rested, smiling

Except when I get so absorbed that I miss my stop!
I like biking because it does increase my stamina.
In the past, I have lived far from work, and in fact, I do have occassional work that takes miles out of town to remote locations. I can also tell hilarious stories of the days when I did booktables in the interior, and the years I lived on the Sunshine Coast miles from any bus route. They said it couldn't be done, and that was one of the times that I went so far as to get a learners permit.But I don't want to be a driver and have chosen the difficulties this entails.

I really object to the way the earth is parcelled up and divided by concrete, which is anti life. I cant promise not to rant about this from time to time, but I will try to keep it to a minimum.
When it gets down to the crunch, all I have are my convictions, and I`m down to the minimum about those.
You could say that I am a pantheist and that may be it. And it helps that I love walking.
My big news, actually went by bus across town to actually buy the Roessner sequel, and while I was there,and after intensive searching through the rows of S. King, which felt very odd indeed, I finally found an expanded copy of the stand. OMG its over 1000 pages.

I took that copy of the stand because it was the only one to be found in 4 shelves of SKing. I had no idea until I read the inside announcement that the original publication was an abridged version. The one I have claims to restore Sk's apocolyptic vision
"in it's entirety". Is this not a good thing?

I do have some experience with 1000+ page books, but generally I'm really keen on them. Usually I'll make a long deep book my morning read. I dont see that happening with the stand, but we'll see. Its going on the bottom of my current pile.
As for walden, I was probably too young when I read it, found it a bit tepid. One of those books that I like the idea of perhaps better than the writing.
Drive carefully, sleep well.
(not at the same time:)

As I said earlier in this thread: "The "ghoulies and ghosties and long legged beasties" in King's best books aren't there just to provide shock and gore. They are always symbolic of something deeper - something unexplored and unsaid, something painful and ugly. They are representative of the dark side of the human soul, our hiddenness and fear of being known, and how all of us kinna see the world as the monster lurking 'neath the bed."

Speaking of big fat juicy books,have you yet read Pillars of Earth, and sequel, and Shantaram? Cant remember and its morning, not time to search your shelves.
the mental quiet is where its at, she echoed longingly as she thrust herself out of bed and into the shower in preparation for another busy day.
cheers!

Speaking of big fat books, have you read the pillrs of earth or Shantaram? And are you still reading Ullyeses?
My answer to this message composed half hour ago did not appear for some reason, so I am recapping in a morning rush ( a slow rush)

OMG A Suitable Boy is waiting for me too, like a reproach that intimidates me into ignoring this book when I know it will be worthwhile....
Are you following any of the GR discussions on Ulysses? Because Ian was just reading and very into...I think he even started his own discussion thread somewhere.
Book like that needs friends

Oh, wait. You mean I'm supposed to actually read it as well?!! OMG
And Magdelanye-I love the idea of "Book like that needs friends"-I'm going to hold onto that quote!
But a book the size of A Suitable Boy needs more than friends; it needs family. It needs a mother!
What I want to know before I invest that much time is, Will it like change my life? Or at least my heart?
And Kinkajou: I love what you said about it feeling too odd to update your status on Ulysses. But I think you should, anyway; I think it would be a comfort to others who are also reading it & imagine the rest of the world somehow zipping along, nodding their heads wisely & laughing at obscure jokes.

But I am geared to long waits (by the seal hole) and fairly stubborn.
Ulysses is within my sights but next The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo after 'idiot'.

This too belongs in the gallery of emminently quotable quotes...
The intimidation factor for ASB is certainly huge.
Take heart from our very own Ice Bear who has commented very favorably on it as a rich and worthwhile read.
Kink...do you remember Ian Greye who is on p456 of Ullysses and has lots of interesting things to say about it. Maybe you can induce him to link with our thread?


See not so scarey after all.

BTW, his group will be nothing like the stuffy or pretentious ones you may have encountered.

I remember that conversation because I thought the expression that Ian threw out was so apropos for a certain type of read.

"The system is invisible, which makes it all the more impressive, all the more disquieting to deal with."
if this is the kind of horror king writes about, then maybe I've misjudged him.
but whats creeping me out right now, I remember answering this post, and HRO had a couple of comments... where did they go?

I did not know where to put this info, lifted from the instructions given by the moderator to the phantom of the opera group.
Yes Ice if you notice this, there is such a group. I will check it out further....and HRO, did you know this already?

**How to make a thread a "sticky": Once you've posted a new thread, click on the tiny "edit" next to the thread name. You'll see a window that will allow you to (1) change the folder the thread appears in, (2) mark this topic as important (it will be listed first)
and (3) close this topic for new posts. If you choose #2: mark this topic important - it will always appear at the top of your folder, no matter how many threads are added. (If you choose #3: close this topic - no one will be able to post comments to the thread. That's used more for announcements, at least in my group's case.)
Ice:
I have messaged them for link to Phantom group

and that's just one thread!
Books mentioned in this topic
Red Pill (other topics)The Anthologist (other topics)
On Earth We're Briefly Gorgeous (other topics)
Valerie; or, The Faculty of Dreams (other topics)
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Nicholson Baker (other topics)Hari Kunzru (other topics)
Ocean Vuong (other topics)
Sara Stridsberg (other topics)
Mark Charan Newton (other topics)