The Readers Review: Literature from 1714 to 1910 discussion

This topic is about
Jude the Obscure
Thomas Hardy Collection
>
Jude the Obscure: Week 2 - Part Second

I would write more, but it's hard typing large amounts on a phone. Hopefully I can chime in with small comments throughout the day though. :)
First, a big 'Thanks!' to Madge for getting the "Part Second" thread up for me! Yes, it has been quite a zoo here in Tucson. I am still here visiting with parents, my brother, and some old family friends from Gosport (near Portsmouth) in the UK. We have had a nice time taking them all about southern Arizona seeing the sights. Our English friends even purchased pairs of cowboy boots to take home with them.
I am planning to spend some time later this morning reading your last postings in the "Part First" folder and then coming back here and leave my observations on the initial portion of "Part Second".
Again, thank you, Madge, for creating the folder! ;-) Cheers! Chris
I am planning to spend some time later this morning reading your last postings in the "Part First" folder and then coming back here and leave my observations on the initial portion of "Part Second".
Again, thank you, Madge, for creating the folder! ;-) Cheers! Chris

BTW 'Gothic architecture' does not imply the architecture of the historical Goths. It has a much wider application. The term originated as a pejorative description and came to be used to describe culture that was considered rude and barbaric. Is Jude being described as rude and barbaric?
I have mentioned 'gothic revival' architecture with regard to churches in my Background material and this fashion swept away many old Anglo-Saxon and Norman churches. It was another instance of the old giving way to the new, the modern which Jude aspired to but which he did not observe amongst the university buildings where he thought it 'impossible that modern thought could house itself in such decrepit and superseded chambers'.
I wonder what Hardy is saying to us in these descriptions and what bearing they have upon the rest of the novel, and upon his burgeoning relationship with Sue?

Sorry for the semi-coherence and brevity.

PS: Hardy also had a relationship with his own cousin, Tryphena Sparks, about which there is a lot of speculation:-
http://mysite.verizon.net/hardycountr...


Very coherent Denae and well observed. I suppose we might describe Jude as 'old fashioned', despite his longing for a modern education.
'He did not at that time see that mediævalism was as dead as a fern-leaf in a lump of coal; that other developments were shaping in the world around him, in which Gothic architecture and its associations had no place. The deadly animosity of contemporary logic and vision towards so much of what he held in reverence was not yet revealed to him.'
Medievalism was mentioned earlier in II:1 along with 'pinnacles and indented battlements' and this is another possible reference to gothic literature, which was steeped in the romanticism of gothic castles. It occurs to me that Hardy might be obliquely criticising fashionable gothic literature and suggesting that his writing, for which he had been much criticised, especially with regard to sex and sexuality, was now the 'modern'?

..."
There are six parts to the novel Bill! :) Remember the Dick Whittington analogy in II:1.
I am not so interested at this stage in his relationship with Sue but with the scene Hardy is setting at the beginning of this section and with the insights he is giving into Jude's character and why he might behave as he does. As Denae has said, he projects his ideals onto people and surroundings and seems to want to craft them into a 'mould' in his own mind. Is this part of him being a stonemason who crafts pieces of stone into beautiful objects?


I thought the same. Just as he was attracted by his idea of Arabella, not the real one, so he is struck at how different Christminster looks by night and by daylight. He hasn't finished to really know the city and off he goes after his idea of Sue.
In contrast to the beginning of the first part, in this second there aren't dialogues till we get to Sue's perspective. In the first part we heard many voices, Philloston's, the aunt's, farmer Troutham's etc. Here there are no voices, we're only told that Jude imagines to talk to the famous authors of his books. If the section of Marygreen starts in real life, this one seems to me to start in a dreamy haze.

Great observation testina!
To further the analogy - Arabella was 'earthy' and belonged to the old Anglo Saxon towers of Marygreen but Sue is more ethereal and belongs to the 'dreaming spires' of Christminster. There is perhaps a line being drawn here between not only two women but two ways of life and two areas of England, possibly two ways of looking at religion in '...a city in whose history such men as
Newman, Pusey, Ward, Keble, loom so large!' (Chap.II:4.) (See Background information on the Oxford Movement/Tractarians.)
.

In short, Jude does not seem to realize that reality does not always match what is in his head.

Thank you for this information. In another book discussion I was bringing up this issue becasue I am currently reading The Portrait of a Lady, and they make the same sort of statement about how cousins should not marry, so I was wondering if in fact the view upon cousin marriage was changing.

In the previous discussion there was a passing remark made about Arabella being "Pagan-like" but it was agreed that she is in fact more more "earthy" and "practical" but I think the term Pagan can in fact be adeptly used for describing Sue. She does have that more ethereal, "spiritual" quality about her she does not seem as grounded in the real world in the way in which Arabella is. Like Jude, she is someone more of ideas. But at the same time, as evidenced in her buying of the Pagan idols, there does seem to be something within her that is in rebellion against the Christian religion.

In Part I Jude dreams of the city and what it might look like. In his mind he views it as this perfect place of learning. Yet as he looks at all the architecture he seems crumbling stone. I think the crumbling stone not only represents the changes in the society, but also to indicate that what he perceived as he dreamt about the city is not what the reality of the city.
I didn't even notice the lack of voices in Part II until it was pointed out. Maybe because I've moved great distances all alone several times. You don't know how to get to the grocery, post office, bank, or even work. You are truly even more isolated because you've lost your connections of family (his aunt) and friends (although he doesn't seem to have any everybody in his town knows him). Think of going somewhere and seeing complete strangers in a completely different setting, and in some cases a different culture.
He has learned his craft and is doing repairs to a mode of architecture that is going out of style. Here he has come to better himself and he's already behind the times and becoming obsolete. His reality cannot possibly match his dreams.
I see him as still clinging hopefully to those dreams as he indicates he cannot possible meet the teacher yet because he hasn't accomplished enough. Yet the teacher himself has not accomplished what he set out to do either. For me, this represents the difficulty of the time in working towards a goal that might be different from that which you were born. The teacher has simply done the same thing as before in a different location.
With regard to Sue, he is smitten by the photograph and watches from afar. In some ways, he's watching from afar in the rest of his life too. He tries to do what he thinks is morally correct, by staying away while Sue intervenes with that plan.
The hardest thing for me in this section was the denial letter. Here jude has done what he can for himself by learning from books. His self-education appears to be of high quality, yet working hard against all obstacles is not enough because he must stay in his place (social strata). It must be the Puritan ethic of New England (where I grew up) in me that feels so strongly his hard work should be rewarded. Yet he is summarily denied without so much as an interview and in many cases not even a letter back. Yes we're back to letters here....
I know he's a dreamer but I don't feel he needs to wake up. I feel a lot of this comes from his experience of a small town to a big town and setting ones expectations high. High expectations don't mean to me necessarily unattainable. To me if you don't set them high, you never get to grow and improve.
I didn't even notice the lack of voices in Part II until it was pointed out. Maybe because I've moved great distances all alone several times. You don't know how to get to the grocery, post office, bank, or even work. You are truly even more isolated because you've lost your connections of family (his aunt) and friends (although he doesn't seem to have any everybody in his town knows him). Think of going somewhere and seeing complete strangers in a completely different setting, and in some cases a different culture.
He has learned his craft and is doing repairs to a mode of architecture that is going out of style. Here he has come to better himself and he's already behind the times and becoming obsolete. His reality cannot possibly match his dreams.
I see him as still clinging hopefully to those dreams as he indicates he cannot possible meet the teacher yet because he hasn't accomplished enough. Yet the teacher himself has not accomplished what he set out to do either. For me, this represents the difficulty of the time in working towards a goal that might be different from that which you were born. The teacher has simply done the same thing as before in a different location.
With regard to Sue, he is smitten by the photograph and watches from afar. In some ways, he's watching from afar in the rest of his life too. He tries to do what he thinks is morally correct, by staying away while Sue intervenes with that plan.
The hardest thing for me in this section was the denial letter. Here jude has done what he can for himself by learning from books. His self-education appears to be of high quality, yet working hard against all obstacles is not enough because he must stay in his place (social strata). It must be the Puritan ethic of New England (where I grew up) in me that feels so strongly his hard work should be rewarded. Yet he is summarily denied without so much as an interview and in many cases not even a letter back. Yes we're back to letters here....
I know he's a dreamer but I don't feel he needs to wake up. I feel a lot of this comes from his experience of a small town to a big town and setting ones expectations high. High expectations don't mean to me necessarily unattainable. To me if you don't set them high, you never get to grow and improve.
With Sue, I think him working to help her is done of out of true caring, and because of his limited experience, it never occurred to him that it might work out differently than he thought.

I don't know that Jude being a dreamer is at all a problem. The problem, for me, comes into play with the great divide between what is possible and the things on which he bases his decisions. Ignoring reality is dangerous; merely being a dreamer is not.

There was also some self-motivation there. It kept her close to him.

This does recall to my mind what someone said in the previous discussion about how Jude did not seem to really learn any lesson from his experince with Arabella, and what a one track mind he has.
Sue in a way seems to have been swept up in his dreams/ambitions for Christminsiter. In the same way in which he saw the city from a distance and dreamed of, so he just happens to see a portrait of Sue, and she is connected to Christminster and thus be builds up this whole little fantasy of his own around her.


In this is Hardy conveying the way in which the system was set up to make any attempts for one to try and advance themselves destined to failure, and that the higher education was coveted by the elite allowing no room for others to rise themselves up.
Denae wrote: "Deborah wrote: "In Part I Jude dreams of the city and what it might look like. In his mind he views it as this perfect place of learning. Yet as he looks at all the architecture he seems crumblin..."
Him being a dreamer is not a problem for me either. I don't think he's ignoring reality. I just think he's motivate to change his world.
Him being a dreamer is not a problem for me either. I don't think he's ignoring reality. I just think he's motivate to change his world.
MadgeUK wrote: "Great post 21 Deborah - so many interesting ideas to take up besides the inevitable 'boy meets girl' (again):) I suspect that a lot of us here have experienced the isolation felt in moving from a ..."
I think for Jude this was more than from small town to big city. I went for Connecticut to Georgia. Completely different norms. Got a lecture from a friend about a thank you note, because I hadn't placed it in the envelope in the way it was expected. Then moved from Georgia to California. I won't talk about that one. Anyway, to us now it seems like no big deal. I think to Jude it felt like Connecticut to Georgia or California.
I think for Jude this was more than from small town to big city. I went for Connecticut to Georgia. Completely different norms. Got a lecture from a friend about a thank you note, because I hadn't placed it in the envelope in the way it was expected. Then moved from Georgia to California. I won't talk about that one. Anyway, to us now it seems like no big deal. I think to Jude it felt like Connecticut to Georgia or California.
Bill wrote: "I have a question for the group. Assuming this novel is both a character study and social commentary, which of these do you think Hardy is most interested in?"
I don't know that I could say one was more important. I think there is equal stressing on both. I think he's showing the challenges in his time that needed to be fixed, and also showing us that through strength of character, that change is possible.
I don't know that I could say one was more important. I think there is equal stressing on both. I think he's showing the challenges in his time that needed to be fixed, and also showing us that through strength of character, that change is possible.

I'm blowing hot and cold on the "coveted" term. In one sense I see what you mean. But in another sense, I think it's more the basic class concept, that the lower classes can't possibly handle the sophistication and demands of higher education. Just as a ten year old (normal, not genius) asking to go to Harvard would be told that he was just being absurd and to go home, or as I was growing up a woman who thought she should be President of a major US corporation would be looked at as though she just didn't understand life, so the college was so astonished by this mere stonemason thinking he should get inside the walls as a student rather than a repairman was as astonishing as, well, as a dog wanting to run for Congress. (Leaving aside that the dog could hardly do a worse job than many Congresspersons.)
"Coveted" implies some positive protectiveness; I'm not sure it was that so much as just astonishment that the idea would ever have even entered Jude's head.

I understand what you mean, and perhaps that was not the best choice of word to use here. But in some sense the upper classes do not want the lower classes to in face have any even ground with them they don't really want people to have an opportunity to rise up the ranks, becasue so much of class was determined through bloodlines. So on one hand they do view it as being ludacris that a lower class person would seek to enter into the school on the other hand they don't want to even give that person to opportunity to make the attempt to do it, and let them stand or fall upon thier own merit, but by keeping them suppressed in ignorance they can better keep thier own status.
In addition Silver, the upper classes truly believed the lower ranks were intellectually unable (as were women). As you say, it's all about bloodlines and genetics.

Yes I do think this is the case Silver and Hardy himself was unable to get to university because of the system.
Bill wrote: I have a question for the group. Assuming this novel is both a character study and social commentary, which of these do you think Hardy is most interested in?
I think he was interested in both as Deborah says in post 31 but Jude came immediately after his tussle with his publisher and reading public over Tess and he seemed intent in 'getting his oar in' again via Jude. He gave up novel writing after its bad reception and stuck to poetry.

I would say there could have been an amount of jealous guarding on the part of the schools.


http://www.victorianweb.org/history/C...
John Newman (later Cardinal), a founder member of the Oxford Movement, with which Hardy sympathised, promoted the idea of a liberal university education at this time and he championed the idea of opening up the universities to all who wished to learn. In particular he was against the idea that a university education should be practical or useful, he valued learning for learning's sake. Hardy is, I think exploring his ideas in Jude. Here is Newman's famous treatise on university education if anyone would care to read it:-
http://www.bartleby.com/28/2.html
I actually think Jude would do well in an academic society since he values learning, and they value learning.

I think, and at this point I'll say I'm tired and may not be thinking straight, that he is ambitious in his desire to join the intellectual which was reserve for theologians and the upper classes. I see the two as connected. I can't remember the time period, but there was a point in time when only theologians could read and the masses couldn't. The printing press changed that. Also the theologians were the only ones who could afford to have art. I don't think you can disconnect them.

I think that's a good assumption. He's either doing that or just trying to connect with somebody on a their home turf.

To me, Sue represented the new woman with her attraction to art that was "scandalous", her ability to support herself, and her determination to live by her goals (i.e. her leaving her position due to the destruction of her property). Just my opinion.
Okay, now I really need to log off and put my class together for tomorrow (no, not teacher, just fitness instructor).
Okay, now I really need to log off and put my class together for tomorrow (no, not teacher, just fitness instructor).



The Greek gods (and goddesses) had multiple roles, which sometimes changed over time.
The Oxford Classical Dictionary, which is my go-to reference for all things Greek and Roman, says that Apollo's most prominent functions included healing and purification, prophecy, care for the young, for poetry, and for music. Love was not among his primary responsibilities. (Those who know the Iliad know that he was the god whose priest Agamemnon offended, and that when the priest's daughter was not returned Apollo sent a plague on the Greeks, using his power as the god of healing and medicine.)
But I think more to the point here is that he was always represented as the most physically splendid of the gods, always presented as young, athletic, beautiful. His nude statutes were of young manliness personified. I'm sure Madge can come up with a number of images of the classical statutes of him.
So for Hardy's purposes, I don't think Apollo is included because of any connection with love per se, but because he was the personification of young manly beauty.

It is interesting that among other things Apollo is the god of intellectual inquiry, while Venus is the goddess associated with love. I think both these things can be associated with Sue's character and her basic nature. Much like Jude, she too is a person who is interesting in learning, she develops her own intellectual ideas, but she is also of a very sensitive nature as well.
The duality of the two figures, the appearance of both the feminine and the masculine I think is also something interesting in her attraction to these two deities. It is also interesting that while Apollo in many ways represents "civilization" Venus prior to being more commonly known as the goddess of love, was formerly the goddess of vegetation, and gardens, which alludes to a more "wild" nature of the goddess.
Perhaps Sue herself is suspended between these two duel aspects.
Silver wrote: "Denae wrote: "I'm interested in what ya'll think the significance of Sue's attraction to the statues of Apollo and Venus might be and what is the significance of her lie to Jude when describing the..."
Silver - Nicely expressed!
Silver - Nicely expressed!


The curate, who was ..."
I do not remember being given the impression that Jude drinks regularly. He got drunk once during the trouble with Arabella, and a few times towards the end of Part 2, but I feel like in thise cases he went more to be around what he considered to be the society in which he is not trapped. Basically, I have not as yet seen anything which indicates impending alcoholism, just someone going on drunken jags at times of stress or weakness. Still not health, but not alcoholism either.
Of course, the unfolding of the later parts of the book could prove me wrong.
Denae wrote: "Bill wrote: "Anyone else get a feeling Jude could end up battling alcoholism? He's turned to alcohol both times he's been disillusioned with women. And at the end of part 2, we get this:
The cur..."
I got the same impression you did. I don't see it as a problem for Jude yet as it seems to be truly a rarity. It's not like he's in the pub every evening.
The cur..."
I got the same impression you did. I don't see it as a problem for Jude yet as it seems to be truly a rarity. It's not like he's in the pub every evening.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Woodlanders (other topics)Jane Eyre (other topics)
The Return of the Native (other topics)
Two on a Tower (other topics)
The Woodlanders (other topics)
More...
Two quotes head Chapter 1, both of which may be pertinent to our discussion:
'Save his own soul he hath no star.' Swinburne.
'Nearness produced gradual acquaintance; Time produced love.' Ovid.
The second paragraph of Chapter 1 sums up the point we are at in Jude's life:
'He had at last found himself clear of Marygreen and Alfredston: he was out of his apprenticeship, and with his tools at his back seemed to be in the way of making a new start--the start to which, barring the interruption involved in his intimacy and married experience with Arabella, he had been looking forward for about ten years.'
Jude is now a stonemason 'of an all round sort' working on 'gothic-free stone work for the restoration of churches', work with which Hardy was familiar (See Background information.) When he reached Christminster (Oxford) he is described as 'a species of Dick Whittington whose spirit was touched to finer issues than a mere material gain. He went along the outlying streets with the cautious tread of an explorer. He saw nothing of the real city in the suburbs on this side.' Dick Whittington was a Gloucestershire man who, when leaving the City of London, disappointed, to return home, is supposed to have heard bells ringing 'Turn again Whittington, three times Lord Mayor of London'. Does this indicate that Jude will be successful in Christminster?
He took lodgings in the suburb of Beersheba, the biblical name of which means 'well of the oath', called so 'from the oath of peace between Abraham and Abimelech, king of the Philistines (Genesis 21:31), else from the seven (sheba' ) ewe lambs slain there: indeed sheba', an oath, is from the custom of binding one's self by seven things, as Abraham made the seven ewe lambs a pledge of his covenant with Abimelech.' No doubt there is some foreshadowing here.
Jude then explored the Christminster colleges. He went down 'obscure alleys and saw 'porticoes, oriels, doorways of enriched and florid middle-age design, their extinct air being accentuated by the rottenness of the stones'. He thought it 'impossible that modern thought could house itself in such decrepit and superseded chambers' and finally 'began to be impressed with the isolation of his own personality, as with a self-spectre, the sensation being that of one who walked but could not make himself seen or heard.'
At home, in a dream, he seems to have visions reminiscent of Dante's Divine Comedy and sees spectres of past poets and politicians, pagans and Christians, all of whom give him conflicting - obscure? - advice.
I wonder, is all this a good beginning to his new life or a bad one?