Fans of Interracial Romance discussion

111 views
Archived Threads > Message to all members! Please read!

Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Danielle The Book Huntress , Sees Love in All Colors (last edited Jan 26, 2011 12:05PM) (new)

 Danielle The Book Huntress  (gatadelafuente) | 7331 comments Mod
Okay, there is an ugly pattern on this group that I am getting sick of. People seem to want to come on this group to fight and to show how much they know about race relations and to spend time proving how they are right. What is the point???

I didn't start this group for there to be arguments about race. This is a group about celebrating and being open to interracial relations. If that's not why you're here, then maybe you need to rethink joining this group. I'm not asking anyone to leave, but I have had people who are afraid to participate and who want to leave because of all the focus on race issues from a negative viewpoint. It comes up, I respect that, but let it go!!!! If it gets to a point when people disagree, why keep it going?

I'm going to ask nicely here. Keep it positive, and keep the focus on celebrating the good in interracial relationships.

Whatever you think about people who like to be positive and to have fun (that we're living in the clouds/are ostriches), I can't change that, but this is supposed to be a positive group. We all know that racism is alive and well! But, we don't need to spend every post talking about that and proving to each other how flawed each others' perceptions are on race relations! If you want to focus on the negative, I'm sorry for you, and I'll tell you right now, it's not encouraged here.

I don't want to have keep closing down threads because it gets ugly. Pretty soon, I'm going to wonder if we shouldn't all just give up and go home!

Agree to disagree, let it go, and move on! Or we will have to do it for you by closing each and every thread.

Thank you.


message 2: by CaliGirlRae, Mod Squad (new)

CaliGirlRae (rae_l) | 2017 comments Mod
QFT (Quoted for truth, for anyone wondering :-))

Keep the negative elsewhere. I always liked that this group was pretty positive and upbeat overall. I do hope the folks who are nervous about participating will feel comfortable to post soon.

Thanks for posting this message, Danielle.


message 3: by Arch , Mod (new)

Arch  | 6706 comments Mod
I agree. :)


message 4: by Fiona (new)

Fiona McGier | 128 comments No! I just got here! Please don't let it go and move on! Disagreements are proof how much we need to talk to each other, right? Just be respectful and polite...like your grandmother is in the room!


message 5: by Arch , Mod (new)

Arch  | 6706 comments Mod
:) @ Kerrina.


message 6: by Danielle The Book Huntress , Sees Love in All Colors (new)

 Danielle The Book Huntress  (gatadelafuente) | 7331 comments Mod
Fiona, it's one thing to disagree and have a friendly discussion. That doesn't always happen around here, and that's what the issue is. If we can talk about things nicely and respect that we don't have to see things the same way, that is a great thing.

Kerrina, I love when I spot an IR couple.


message 7: by Arch , Mod (new)

Arch  | 6706 comments Mod
Yeah me too. Interracial couples are nice to see.


message 8: by Davina (last edited Jan 27, 2011 07:26AM) (new)

Davina D. | 796 comments Fiona, I agree.

I don't understand the fear of dissident voices on this group. You have an interracial group, race discussions (and other discussions that ignite people's passions) are going to come up. That's what makes the group an interesting community to be a part of.

If people are really shying away from posting, this is of course not ideal, but if somebody doesn't want to have that discussion, they don't have to participate. There are more than enough conversations on here to suit everyone's taste and interest. No need to try and stifle those you may not agree with.

I'm not saying this to take a swipe at anyone or to be disruptive, but I really don't understand the purpose of this overuse of power and the constant bombardment of public announcements.

What exactly do people find so offensive? The fact that people communicate differently? The fact that some people will not always see eye to eye on what is acceptable? Some people are sarcastic and snarky, some are staunch and opinionated, others are succint and deliberate. As long as everyone stay within the main framework of the rules (which as far as I could see, everyone has), then there's room for all personality types.

However, if the aim is to create a clique where everyone have the same approach to life, then perhaps this shouldn't be a public group. It should be private group where members are by invitation only.

Moreover, many people here are not from this country and will not express themselves in the approved American way. They're not obliged to. Thus, the first sign of disagreement is not an indication that people are trying to stir up trouble. It's an opportunity to hear other perspectives and the exchange of ideas (even if you don't join the conversation). I wish people will not be so quick to take other's people's views so personally. Take it exactly for what it is -- their opinion -- and move on.


message 9: by CaliGirlRae, Mod Squad (new)

CaliGirlRae (rae_l) | 2017 comments Mod
Let's not pretend this is miscommunication across cultures and language or an aim to homogenize everyone.

It would be nice if that happened but some feel they must belabor their point ad nauseum until all actual communication is shut down and it turns into another echo chamber to hear one speak. Debate and discussion is awesome. We can pretend it's sharing a point and being all communicative, but time and again (especially this last time), it's proven to be otherwise. If we can agree to disagree and move on, like Danielle mentioned, it would be groovy but some would rather turn it into a rant session/fight for who's right. That's too much of a time and energy suck when folks just want to visit the group to relax. Drama offline is hard enough without bringing it to someplace you want to kick your heels up and relax in.


message 10: by Danielle The Book Huntress , Sees Love in All Colors (last edited Jan 28, 2011 05:51AM) (new)

 Danielle The Book Huntress  (gatadelafuente) | 7331 comments Mod
I would say this one thing to anyone who feels this is a restrictive environment. If you are unhappy here, you should feel free to leave this group. The purpose is not to make this group a clique, but to make sure that it is a comfortable environment for all the members. If certain members want an environment in which loud voices continually express their opinions and don't consider that others will not agree and have different opinions, although not as aggressively spoken, how is that an open, friendly environment for exchange of ideas? If the goal is to have an environment in which debate is frequent and heated, unnecessarily, and in which there is a continual circle of stating the same opinion endlessly when one's position has been clearly made, this is not the place for a person who seeks that environment. It's counterintuitive for the group dynamic. Freedom of expression is great, and one is encouraged to express their opinions, so long as it is done respectfully. However, it can rapidly get to the point when it's not so much an expression of ideals, but a statement about oneself being right and one's voice being the sure voice of reason--that's not okay here. I'm going to ask such a person to consider moving on. This group is not the place for you. As Rae said, the goal here is a laidback, relaxed environment, and that is not going to work with continual arguments and feuding.

The moderators here don't need to justify their use of power. It has been used fairly. And it is warranted for the good of this group. If you don't like that, then I won't apologize, because there is no way to find common ground here.


message 11: by TinaNoir (new)

TinaNoir | 1456 comments Whenever I see these pop up I always feel as if I walked into the room 10 minutes too late and wondered what was going on?

Maybe I don't frequent the more sensitive topics or maybe I am just oblivious because I simply don't see the ugliness.

My question for those who notice, is it widespread and everybody gets into the mix hence these posts? If it isn't a widespread thing, then are there posters who tend to be in the mix more than others? If so, are they notified by PM? If not, maybe they should be. For all I know, I am one of them and again I am just oblivious because in my mind I'm just chatting and making my point but to others I may be part of the problem. But If I am not aware of it, how am I supposed to fix what I don't perceive as being a problem?

It seems to me that these posts are nice reminders of something that should be self evident anyway. But the issue will never be truly fixed if the person(s)these posts are supposed to be directed toward the most aren't aware they are the problem and they think these are addressed to those other people who are the real troublemakers.

Does this make sense?


message 12: by Arch , Mod (new)

Arch  | 6706 comments Mod
Tina, the posts are general posts. We do contact people when they are out of line.


message 13: by TinaNoir (new)

TinaNoir | 1456 comments Thanks for the clarification, Arch.


message 14: by Arch , Mod (new)

Arch  | 6706 comments Mod
You are welcome Tina.


message 15: by Davina (last edited Jan 28, 2011 01:00PM) (new)

Davina D. | 796 comments With all due respect to you, Rae, I must disagree with your post @ 10. I think it is quite blatantly a miscommunication across culture because while your intention is not to homogenize, you inadvertently squelch heterogeneity by stifling or restricting freedom of expression. Conversations will and do die a natural death. If people just want to hear their own voices, they will eventually stop talking if they realise no one is listening.

More importantly (and speaking in general terms here, not just directly to or about you) its not the most judicious use of power to close threads and target individuals just because 1) you don't like them, 2) you fundamentally disagree with their opinions, or 3) it is not a conversation you want to have (after all, you're free to leave the thread or not participate at all -- although I realise this maybe difficult for moderators who are required to monitor all threads).

I don't deny that some posters can be (sometimes unintentionally) provocative, or that there isn't a need for proactive leadership considering the hot button topics we normally discuss here, but it's not even about that. At least not in the most recent past.

People can be pretty adamant in expressing their opinions, but does it mean the person is trying to push their opinion down your throat? Not necessarily. This may be a kneejerk reaction to such behaviour in America, but outside of an American context, this is a normal way to converse for many people. If someone is blatantly obnoxious and disrespectful (name calling and throwing around nasty virtual blows) then yes, remind us all of the rule to agree to disagree, and perhaps even take stronger action in extreme cases. But again like Tina said, the ugliness you all are referring to, I don't see it. What I see is a definite clash in (cultural) communication styles and personality types. What you find offensive, disrespectful or inappropriate the person in question may genuinely not see that way. So maybe a necessary course of action is to send a private message to the person (not just to hand out warnings) explaining why their messages may offend (especially when you're dealing with someone who may not be aware of American discussion etiquette). For indeed just telling someone they're breaking the rules, and not saying in what way, will just cause the behaviour to continue out of ignorance.

I wish more lurkers felt comfortable enough to speak out so that you can see its not just Davina running her mouth. Since the most recent incident many people who I don't know and have never spoken to before have contacted me privately to say they don't see what all the strong arming is about.

Now with regards to the comment about leaving the group, I'm sure some people want nothing more, but once again I'll say this: if you guys only want people who agree with you and communicate in the same way as you do create a private members group, and pick and choose who you let in. You simply will not avoid personality clashes and flare ups in a public forum, not now or in the future.

And with this I rest my case. I think the picture is very clear for all who care to see.


message 16: by Arch , Mod (last edited Jan 28, 2011 02:06PM) (new)

Arch  | 6706 comments Mod
If lurkers have any questions or concerns about the posts that the moderators make, they should contact us and not you Davina or any other non moderator on this group. Our private message is always open.

If a person wants to leave the group, then they need to leave the group. We aren't asking anyone to stay on the group. We are only asking that people get along and stop trying to be the one at the top of the ladder.

You have been on this group a long time Davina and you know good and well what we are talking about.

Now, I am only going to say this once. Every building have an exit. If a person can't follow the rules, then use it or we will have to escort you to the exit. It's your choice.

This place is going to be a peaceful place.

If anyone doesn't like what I have said, remember my private message is always open.


message 17: by Bekah, Mod (new)

Bekah (bekah317) | 113 comments Mod
You make some good points about communication Davina, I really appreciate that. However, when the moderators are posting comments about the rules and how discussions need to be handled, there are just going to be some things and issues that are occurring that you will not be privy to. We have an obligation to the group as a whole. Not just those with stronger voices, or weaker voices, or those who lurk or post everyday, but the entire group.

So there will be instances when issues arise and you won't know why a message has been posted, but its nice to know that, though it may at times be tedious, it will be respected and followed by the members of the group as it will be for the good of all in the group.

Thank you!


message 18: by Davina (new)

Davina D. | 796 comments @Arch, my posts here are in reference to all disputes that have arisen on this group, both the one in question and those of the past.


message 19: by Arch , Mod (new)

Arch  | 6706 comments Mod
Davina,

And my posts here are standing tall.


message 20: by Danielle The Book Huntress , Sees Love in All Colors (new)

 Danielle The Book Huntress  (gatadelafuente) | 7331 comments Mod
Hi Mellisa. If you are wanting to find a person who is willing to legally lend you a book via Kindle or Nook, the best thing is to start a thread for it. This is probably not the best thread to post this in.


message 21: by Mellisa (new)

Mellisa Demille | 7 comments Lady Danielle "The Book Huntress" wrote: "Hi Mellisa. If you are wanting to find a person who is willing to legally lend you a book via Kindle or Nook, the best thing is to start a thread for it. This is probably not the best thread to..."

Sorry, and thanks for the heads up. Did n't know where to post it ..


message 22: by Danielle The Book Huntress , Sees Love in All Colors (new)

 Danielle The Book Huntress  (gatadelafuente) | 7331 comments Mod
No problem, Mellisa. I started a thread for Kindle/Nook lending:

http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/5...


message 23: by Emotonal (new)

Emotonal Reads | 164 comments Nicely put Lady D :)
Thanks for making this community for people who celebrate and truly believe that love knows no color and is thankful for it. :)


message 24: by Danielle The Book Huntress , Sees Love in All Colors (new)

 Danielle The Book Huntress  (gatadelafuente) | 7331 comments Mod
Thanks for taking the time to read this, Emotonal!


message 25: by Nooniemom (new)

Nooniemom | 466 comments Davina, I agree wholeheartedly on your poIf we all believe, speak and act the same, where is the diversity? If some are afraid to voice their opinions because of fear of backlash, then they need to remove themselves from that debate and find another more to their liking.

I enjoy a vigorous debate, gets my juices flowing! That's why I join groups. I would hate for this group to become a "please everyone all the time "because that ideaology doesn't fly.


When a group is OPEN then that is the chance ANYONE takes when joining. If the des

ase everybody all


message 26: by Nooniemom (new)

Nooniemom | 466 comments desire is for a more homogeneous group, then make it private.


Please excuse my errors!


message 27: by Danielle The Book Huntress , Sees Love in All Colors (last edited Jun 11, 2012 07:44AM) (new)

 Danielle The Book Huntress  (gatadelafuente) | 7331 comments Mod
Nonniemom, we don't desire a homogenous or private group, we just desire a group where everyone feels comfortable and there isn't always battles going on. Very different thing. Argument is not the same thing as discussion. Thanks for your input.


message 28: by Arch , Mod (new)

Arch  | 6706 comments Mod
We are going to have respect on this group. If someone can't walk in respectful shoes, then this isn't the group for them. Some people like to argue and some people don't. This isn't a group for arguments. Walk in happy disagreement shoes or walk away.


back to top