The Seasonal Reading Challenge discussion
OLD TASK HELP THREADS
>
15.1 - Time After Time
Snow Falling on Cedars
Water for Elephants
Catching Fire(and others in the series)
The Children of Men
The Mists of Avalon(and others in the series)
Water for Elephants
Catching Fire(and others in the series)
The Children of Men
The Mists of Avalon(and others in the series)
Kathy G. wrote: "Is Snow Falling on Cedars Historical Fiction. Thanks."
Yep - written in 1994, set in 1954 - so it meets the 30 years test
Yep - written in 1994, set in 1954 - so it meets the 30 years test

I may re-read it or if I get through my tbr-own list, grab something from my TBR list. Goes for the future tasks, too.

The Christmas Quilt
Riona wrote: "Does Water for Elephants count as historical? I believe it's set during the Depression."
Yep, that works (and it's a terrific book, too!)
Yep, that works (and it's a terrific book, too!)
Sheila wrote: "Hi Sandy I've been working on my "plan" and was wondering about The Christmas Quilt by Jennifer Chiaverini for the historical book for this task. It starts in current times but when blocks for a ..."
It's been awhile since I read this one, and I seem to recall a significant part of it being set in the past - if so, it works.
It's been awhile since I read this one, and I seem to recall a significant part of it being set in the past - if so, it works.

Jayme(the ghost reader) wrote: "Would "Catching Fire" work for future?"
yes - I don't think any of these books specify dates, but they are clearly in the future.
yes - I don't think any of these books specify dates, but they are clearly in the future.

Thanks!
Erin wrote: "Would The Children of Men work for the future? It's definitely a dystopian novel, but it was published in 1992, and the description says it takes place in 2021...only 29 years.
Thanks!"
I'll take it. It's clearly a "future" novel.
Thanks!"
I'll take it. It's clearly a "future" novel.
Beth NC wrote: "Will the Avalon Series by Marion Zimmer Bradley work of historical novel?"
Yes - it takes place in an Earth context (as opposed to a complete fantasy world) and deals with the Arthurian period, so that will work.
Yes - it takes place in an Earth context (as opposed to a complete fantasy world) and deals with the Arthurian period, so that will work.

Also Uglies, The Forest of Hands and Teeth and The Road
chucklesthescot wrote: "I recently bought Gone but don't know exactly when the book is set. It sounds futuristic so does anyone know if it would be suitable for part 2?
Also Uglies, Th..."</i>
Don't know about the other two, but [book:Uglies and The Road are certainly future
Also Uglies, Th..."</i>
Don't know about the other two, but [book:Uglies and The Road are certainly future
The Giver is set in a dystopian future, so those work. A Wrinkle in Time, though, while science fiction, is set in a contemporary world, not the future, so that group of books won't work.
FYI - I'm going to be away until Sunday, and will have limited computer access. I'll try to get on here and answer questions if possible, but can't promise anything.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Happy Thanksgiving!


I was thinking of either The Chrysalids or Chocky.
Christina wrote: "Would The Invention of Hugo Cabretwork for historical fiction? It is set in 1931 and was published in 2007."
yes
yes
Petra wrote: "Would John Wyndham books be considered "future" (Part B)? His books are mainly post-apocaliptic type of settings where something catastrophic happened (caused by humans) and the surv..."
The Chrysalids sounds like it would work, but Chocky doesn't sounds as if it's set in the future. A lot of his books, like Midwich Cuckoos, aren't necessarily set in the future, they're set in a contemporary time, but then science fictiony things happen.
The Chrysalids sounds like it would work, but Chocky doesn't sounds as if it's set in the future. A lot of his books, like Midwich Cuckoos, aren't necessarily set in the future, they're set in a contemporary time, but then science fictiony things happen.
KatieDE wrote: "Just for clarification...
Does The Poisonwood Bible work? Set in 1959, published 1998."
sure.
Does The Poisonwood Bible work? Set in 1959, published 1998."
sure.
Meagan wrote: "Would The City of Ember count as future?"
If it takes place on earth, it would, since it sure sounds like it would be in our future. If it's a fantasy planet not related to earth, no.
If it takes place on earth, it would, since it sure sounds like it would be in our future. If it's a fantasy planet not related to earth, no.

"Unidentified architects and engineers, referred to as "the Builders", designed a self-contained city that would include everything necessary for its inhabitants to survive for a period of 200 years. During that time, the Earth would be uninhabitable for an unspecified reason."
Meagan wrote: "City of Ember takes place on Earth...
"Unidentified architects and engineers, referred to as "the Builders", designed a self-contained city that would include everything necessary for its inhabita..."
so that works!
"Unidentified architects and engineers, referred to as "the Builders", designed a self-contained city that would include everything necessary for its inhabita..."
so that works!

Cindy AL wrote: "Just started Bitter Seeds by Ian Tregillan (wow, it's not in Goodreads yet). It is an alternative history book about World War II. I was going to use it in a different slot, but would alternative h..."
No, alternative history is okay. I'm just looking for past and future, not contemporary - but fantasy past works, just as fantasy future does!
No, alternative history is okay. I'm just looking for past and future, not contemporary - but fantasy past works, just as fantasy future does!
Kathryn wrote: "Just checking, does Little Town on the Prairie qualify for part a?"
Sure - it was written in 1941, and set in the late 19th century, so that works.
Sure - it was written in 1941, and set in the late 19th century, so that works.
Valorie wrote: "Will A Kiss Before the Apocalypse work for part B?"
I can't tell from the description when it's set - a lot of urban fantasy is set in a contemporary setting. Paranormal doesn't necessarily equal future. If it's set in the future, sure - if it's paranormal action set in a contemporary time, then no.
I can't tell from the description when it's set - a lot of urban fantasy is set in a contemporary setting. Paranormal doesn't necessarily equal future. If it's set in the future, sure - if it's paranormal action set in a contemporary time, then no.

I can't tell from the description when it's set - a lot of urban fantasy is set in a contemporary setting. Pa..."
Ok thanks!

Stacie wrote: "Will Castle Waiting work for part A?"
It seems clearly set in "olden times" - since it's listed as a fantasy novel, it works if it's set on earth, not on some fantasy planet. Since it seems to be a retelling of fairy tales, I'll accept it as earth set unless there's an indication that it's on some other world.
It seems clearly set in "olden times" - since it's listed as a fantasy novel, it works if it's set on earth, not on some fantasy planet. Since it seems to be a retelling of fairy tales, I'll accept it as earth set unless there's an indication that it's on some other world.
KSMary wrote: "I think you might have skipped my question about The Host. Will it work for this task?"
I'm sorry. I think it works - it's future and it's earth.
I'm sorry. I think it works - it's future and it's earth.
Books mentioned in this topic
We (other topics)The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (other topics)
Ender’s Game (other topics)
Ender’s Game (other topics)
We (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
John Wyndham (other topics)John Wyndham (other topics)
Marion Zimmer Bradley (other topics)
Marion Zimmer Bradley (other topics)
Stephanie Dray (other topics)
January was named for Janus, the god looking both forward and backwards.
A. Read a novel of historical fiction
AND
B. Read a novel set in the future.
To qualify as "historical" or "future," the book must be set at least 30 years before or roughly 30 years after the time it was written.
For example, 1984 works as a "future" novel, because it was written in 1949. Pride and Prejudice, on the other hand, would not work for historical, because the setting is contemporaneous with the time it was written.
Many (most?) dystopian/post-apocalytic/science fiction books don't specify exactly when they take place - but this type of book is clearly not present or past, so will qualify as "future."