Hard SF discussion
Inherit the Stars (Sept 2010)
>
BotM: "Inherit the Stars" by James Hogan
date
newest »


I'm about 3/4 thru the book.

Is there anything you'd like to say about Inherit the Stars?
Not everybody will have read / finished the book already, but you can comment if you want. People who don't want "spoilers" don't have to read the comments until they've read the book. If you prefer, you can have a "non-spoilers" and a "spoilers" sections of your comments.
There is also a group poll in which you can rate the book.

For a while I was afraid Hogan was going to repeat his laughable misunderstanding of magnetic resonance imaging, which he demonstrated over and over in his The Genesis Machine. But here he just used an imaging machine named a "Trimagniscope", which is somewhat magical. Really, though, no science is better than bad science.
Additionally, the socio-political events predicted in this book seem more like an alternate history than a future. The book was written 33 years ago, and set 50 years in the future at that time. Hogan's optimistic view that improvements in education and technology would lead to a world with diminished nationalism and rooted in international humanism in the early 21st century, turned out pretty wrong. In fact, that perspective itself has become discredited, as much as I really would like it to be true.
All in all, I did enjoy the unraveling of the science mysteries of the book, and didn't realize there was a series of four sequels. I'll definitely be looking for The Gentle Giants of Ganymede now.



http://www.webscription.net/s-60-jame...
as well as two others of his novels!
So I finished reading it outside the reading window but I want to say that I've probably enjoyed this book more than the others that the we've read in recent months. In most respects the story holds up well even if the characters are somewhat wooden. The main thing that hurts this story is the lack of DNA testing in it....well, that and somewhat wooden characters.
The only other story item that was somewhat glaring given the current cultural taboo on it was the prevalent smoking in the story. Everyone was lighting up at the slightest provocation, including on spaceships. I think that if I lived in this universe, I would have been a tobacconist. I would have been rich!
The only other story item that was somewhat glaring given the current cultural taboo on it was the prevalent smoking in the story. Everyone was lighting up at the slightest provocation, including on spaceships. I think that if I lived in this universe, I would have been a tobacconist. I would have been rich!


As a scientific layperson all the science sounds plausible to me - any holes in it from the 1977 perspective? While DNA per se is not mentioned, there is a commment at location 820-33 kindle (24% of book)that refers to analyzing and using genetic codes in reproductive cells. And I don't think DNA was on the radar in 1977 - found a list of dates that suggests the key breakthrough that allowed DNA profiling came in 1980, here: http://www.crimtrac.gov.au/systems_pr...
Must get my cyber hands on the sequels!

The BotM is Inherit the Stars, here’s the blurb: From way back in 1978, when the earth was still young.