SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Group Reads Discussions 2008
>
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? - Why Can’t the Androids be Free? (MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Sandi
(new)
Jun 30, 2008 08:21PM

reply
|
flag


The escaped androids are "retired" because in order to escape they murdered their owners and quite possibly other humans as well. It's seems odd that man would create an assistant without some basic prime directives and/or a "kill" switch for emergency shutdown. Since the androids are made, they do not benefit from a childhood to learn ethics and familial relationships. And their lifespan is so short compared to a human's lifespan, it may also drive them to fight or flight - especially if they are organically patterned after humans with all the primal instincts replicated.
Not sure I would see any benefits to giving the androids Earth. Unless we gave them a directive to clean it up? And also gave them run of the factory? The humans would probably have to abandon Earth to the androids, though, unless the next generations of androids live longer and learn to overcome their inherent psychoses.

Even after reading it twice, I didn't see any indication that the androids had killed anyone to get to earth. In one scene, Pris tells Isidore that they came because the colonies are lonely, even for androids.
If the androids could pass the empathy test, would they then be okay? I get the impression that the answer is still "no". Deckard quits hunting androids, but you know that there will be others to take his place.

Does Deckard quit hunting them? He says that he is cured from the Rachel curse. Especially, I would think, after she killed his sheep.
She killed his sheep! Doesn't that signify that the androids shouldn't live free? It proves a total lack of involvement and sympathy for other living things. I found the androids pretty dangerous.
And what about Buster Friendly? Even before the expose, he struck me as extremely sinister. So when we find out he is an android, it seems to be a power play between the humans and androids. There seems to be a conspiracy to wipe out what does make us human.
One could argue that the reason behind that is so the androids could live free, ie no Mercerism = empathy in humans, and so no empathy test. Yet there is no self-awareness, no thought to wonder what is this empathy and why is it so important? Instead there's a certain nihilism, tear down the system so we can thrive.
Whereas at the end, Iran orders the full selection for the new turtle out of love for her husband.

It is so sad to see humanity reduced to such a meaningless existence. And in our death throes, heaven forbid we should let anything, animals or androids, get the upper hand on survival. Who knows, the androids, if given a chance, might actually be able to heal the earth, and restore the animals. Not sure if they should bother with the humans, though. :)

I guess I'm showing my bias towards animals!
Well I can only say that Rachel acted for vengeance and spite. Yes, humans in our world do that too, but we haven't seen them do that in the book. ANd only 2 android hunters have been able to continue in their jobs after their encounter with Rachel - the others all developed too much empathy for killing.


:)
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.