[asmb] Book Club discussion
Book Chat - General
>
Books you refuse to read
Well, I don't tend to read too much in the way of Romance style novels myself. But I won't object to hardcore sex scenes in the books I read. My wife got me to check out Kushiel's Dart, which is fantasy, but quite erotic. And really kinky at times too, but still very good.
In general, I'll read anything. My books on here reflect all the books I've actually finished. Often, if I get a novel, like I did recently, that just sucks... it doesn't get finished.
There's several books my wife has that I'm still meaning to read, I just haven't sat down and read them. Hell, I need to go and read Dead Witch Walking again so that I can get back into the series. It is urban fantasy, and a lot of fun.
In general, I try to give just about anything a chance. But I won't waste my time on something I cannot glean any enjoyment from. And I'm general easy to entertain.
In general, I'll read anything. My books on here reflect all the books I've actually finished. Often, if I get a novel, like I did recently, that just sucks... it doesn't get finished.
There's several books my wife has that I'm still meaning to read, I just haven't sat down and read them. Hell, I need to go and read Dead Witch Walking again so that I can get back into the series. It is urban fantasy, and a lot of fun.
In general, I try to give just about anything a chance. But I won't waste my time on something I cannot glean any enjoyment from. And I'm general easy to entertain.
I actually find it funny that you mentioned Kushiel's Dart, cause I have read that, and have started the second book Kushiel's Choosen. I was thinking of editing the OP to mention that books like Kushiel's Dart dont really bother me because the books isn't based completely on who is sleeping with whom. Yes there is some hardcore sex scenes in it, but it is actually a part of the story not just there to entice. There is a reason for it, and it explains as well as develops the characters.
I am also very bad at picking up books and not finishing them if they dont grab my attention in the first few chapters. Sometimes its just that I am not in the mood for that style of writing or storyline. I also have a bad problem with buying books and then never reading them. Like i will get a gift card to a bookstore, go a buy 50 dollars worth of books, and a few always fall through the cracks. They get pushed to the side cause something else has caught my attention. >.< Its horrible I know. I actually have Dead Witch Walking, and have never gotten around to read it, I have also had the next in the Kushiel series and haven't gotten to them yet either.
What are some of the books that you have started to read and then just stopped cause you didn't like them? Have you ever thought of going back and rereading them? I did that awhile ago to a few books, and found that at least some of them were worth reading. While others I still couldn't finish.
I am also very bad at picking up books and not finishing them if they dont grab my attention in the first few chapters. Sometimes its just that I am not in the mood for that style of writing or storyline. I also have a bad problem with buying books and then never reading them. Like i will get a gift card to a bookstore, go a buy 50 dollars worth of books, and a few always fall through the cracks. They get pushed to the side cause something else has caught my attention. >.< Its horrible I know. I actually have Dead Witch Walking, and have never gotten around to read it, I have also had the next in the Kushiel series and haven't gotten to them yet either.
What are some of the books that you have started to read and then just stopped cause you didn't like them? Have you ever thought of going back and rereading them? I did that awhile ago to a few books, and found that at least some of them were worth reading. While others I still couldn't finish.


haha, that is very odd. Maybe there is a group psyche of nerddom that we are all tapped into. Kushiel's Dart is a very good book, but i was grateful that the person who recommended it to me warned me about the sex scenes. They can get rather graphic and detailed. If I hadn't been warned i'd have probably stopped reading the book, and I'd have missed out on a really great book.
And yeah people dont usually remember the books they refuse to read haha. I just was curious to see if there was anyone who just loathed a book/genre and why.
And yeah people dont usually remember the books they refuse to read haha. I just was curious to see if there was anyone who just loathed a book/genre and why.
I avoid romance myself, I used to read it back before I became rather cynical. lol. Now it just irritates me. Although I don't mind sex scenes, even graphic ones in books I read as long as it's not the main theme of the book. That whole Their eyes locked and they just knew it was right, how deep their passionate feelings went for each other, blah fucking blah.
I also refuse to read Harry Potter or The Twilight series.
I also refuse to read Harry Potter or The Twilight series.
Yeah that's my main pet peeve with romance is that more often then not the books seem to either revolve around the sex or the sex scene derails the book. It's like one minute the plot line is developing the next the author is describing engorged male anatomy. It's slightly ludicrous. And can I say I've never met anyone who has refused to read harry potter. I'm a huge potter and twilight fan, I get why you wouldn't read twilight but harry potter? Really?
yeah, When the first book came out, Baby's teacher recommended it for him & I to read together. We tried, oh Gods did we try but he hated it and delighted in pointing out parts of the book reminded him of other books I had read to him. It became a bit of a struggle before we gave up and found something else. So I guess it just reminds me of the whole aggravation of trying to convince him that even if it had simularites to other books it didn't matter and to keep reading. Esp now that he's gone, I don't want to be reminded of the frustrating times. kwim?
Is there any real reason? Do you just hate his style of writing?
If people haven't figured it out yet, im very curious and like to pick peoples brains on the how's and why's. Hopefully no one gets offended.
If people haven't figured it out yet, im very curious and like to pick peoples brains on the how's and why's. Hopefully no one gets offended.

I have only tried to read one of Kings books, and that was the Stand. It eas good but so god awful long I never could finish it
I'll give most things a try really. Though a lot of synopsis have put me off books forever. Anything that mentions a heroine and an irresistible, sexy guy I avoid. That's a warning label that the book is just smut. I've read one book that was like that and it was enough. I mean, I thought movies were bad about throwing out the sex scenes for the hell of it, but it seems books are a gazillion times worst. Blech. It's not that I even have a problem with sex, I just have a problem with it being used in place of a story and proper character development.
I usually don't read history either, I'm just not interested in the stuff at all. Anything on politics is the same.
Oh and I'm almost to the point where I refuse to read anything with vampires in it. They've become synonymous with sexbots and that's just not fun.
I usually don't read history either, I'm just not interested in the stuff at all. Anything on politics is the same.
Oh and I'm almost to the point where I refuse to read anything with vampires in it. They've become synonymous with sexbots and that's just not fun.

I've even read a few of his short stories before thinking, "At least he doesn't have the length to mess it all up" I was wrong. It's like reading Falnnery O'Connor and feeling sinful and wanting to believe it God, which I don't I laugh at the fact that this woman was so tortured by her own beliefs.
I have to say my favorite author is William Faulkner. Now he could write some shit that will scare you, because he took something realistic and wrote about it. When I read Stephen King he took something realistic and butchered it.
I don't know exactly when my hatred from him sprung. But I remember reading one of his short stories about roller coasters. I put it out of my head until late one night I was watching the sci-fi channel and the short story turned out to be a movie. I realized it then that instead of reading and taking a part or being captivated by the story, that I was just reading a screenplay waiting to turn into another crappy movie. Since then I refuse to even look at another Stephen King novel. I just can't understand why people find him so popular, maybe they're simpletons, but I bet if one of them stopped to read "A Light in August" then they'd understand real fear and horror.

You did it wrong. It should be thus,
"She didn't like the Great Gatsby.
I guess that means the Great Gatsby....
*puts on sunglass*
Wasn't so great."
See what the internet has done to me?
As for more on this topic, I flat out refuse to read Twilight.
"She didn't like the Great Gatsby.
I guess that means the Great Gatsby....
*puts on sunglass*
Wasn't so great."
See what the internet has done to me?
As for more on this topic, I flat out refuse to read Twilight.

From all of the hype and the brief synopsis of the series my friends have given me... there's just no way I can do it. That and I'm no pre-teen girl. >.<
Jamie wrote: "I'll give most things a try really. Though a lot of synopsis have put me off books forever. Anything that mentions a heroine and an irresistible, sexy guy I avoid. That's a warning label that the b..."
Yeah that is kinda how i feel about books, there are some that the back synopsis is enough for me to never want to read it. Although there have been a few times where i was suprised by the depth of a novel that the synopsis didn't allude too, but that is few and far between.
And I agree with history and politic books, if i wanted to know what a politician was thinking i just watch the nightly news. that and it always seem to be pushing their political agenda and trying to make it seem like the bad things they've done weren't that horrible. Which I could careless about their personal lives, it seems like the political ring is just high school drama on a much larger scale.(simplification of it i know but thats how it feels at times) So i avoid books like that.
As for vamp books, yeah they can get like that but if you want a real vampire book that isn't just about tall dark sexy vamps, but actually has a plot line check out Jocelynn Drake dark day's novels. the first is Nightwalker. the vamps are still sexy, but they also kick ass, and are real characters and not just the shade of a character.
Yeah that is kinda how i feel about books, there are some that the back synopsis is enough for me to never want to read it. Although there have been a few times where i was suprised by the depth of a novel that the synopsis didn't allude too, but that is few and far between.
And I agree with history and politic books, if i wanted to know what a politician was thinking i just watch the nightly news. that and it always seem to be pushing their political agenda and trying to make it seem like the bad things they've done weren't that horrible. Which I could careless about their personal lives, it seems like the political ring is just high school drama on a much larger scale.(simplification of it i know but thats how it feels at times) So i avoid books like that.
As for vamp books, yeah they can get like that but if you want a real vampire book that isn't just about tall dark sexy vamps, but actually has a plot line check out Jocelynn Drake dark day's novels. the first is Nightwalker. the vamps are still sexy, but they also kick ass, and are real characters and not just the shade of a character.
Alexander wrote: "Nothing, actually. I'll always give something a fair chance before I put it down. Yes, I even read a few pages of Twilight."
brave man to try and read twilight haha.
I actually love the books, but im also female and i have yet to find a straight guy that liked the series. Its not what I'd consider literature, but its a fun read. In my opinion twilight is like the summer blockbuster of books. not a whole lot of depth of character, but thats not what it was written for. It is pure entertainment, not there to try to enlighten the masses.
brave man to try and read twilight haha.
I actually love the books, but im also female and i have yet to find a straight guy that liked the series. Its not what I'd consider literature, but its a fun read. In my opinion twilight is like the summer blockbuster of books. not a whole lot of depth of character, but thats not what it was written for. It is pure entertainment, not there to try to enlighten the masses.
Andra wrote: "I have to say my favorite author is William Faulkner"
hmm...haven't really heard of him, I will have to check him out. And I agree that King has a tendency to take simple scary concepts and try to make them more adult, however if its done right then it makes an excellent book; but as i've said before i haven't ever really read Steven King so i really can't state my personal opinion of whether he fails at it or not.
hmm...haven't really heard of him, I will have to check him out. And I agree that King has a tendency to take simple scary concepts and try to make them more adult, however if its done right then it makes an excellent book; but as i've said before i haven't ever really read Steven King so i really can't state my personal opinion of whether he fails at it or not.

I also think that all copies of "Tristram Shandy" should be launched into the sun. It tainted an entire semester of reading, a semester I will never get back. Just when you think that the writings of the 1700's are a mental delight, this turd shows up and won't fricking flush away. Go away, Tristram Shandy, you suck.
:D
hahaha, I have never read or heard of Tristram Shandy, but now i will know to avoid it.
but i agree with the Anita Blake series. The first few books were good but they just got more and more pornorific. Which is sad cause there is a relatively good underlining story. I actually find the character of Anita very interesting(i've only read the first 3 books) but its like every time the character makes a stride in development they have to then throw a sex scene into it to make up for it.
but i agree with the Anita Blake series. The first few books were good but they just got more and more pornorific. Which is sad cause there is a relatively good underlining story. I actually find the character of Anita very interesting(i've only read the first 3 books) but its like every time the character makes a stride in development they have to then throw a sex scene into it to make up for it.
Oh goodness, the Anita Blake series is terrible! I had to work to get through the first book. I put it down a few times and would only read a few chapters between books. The sex was just ridiculous and from what I read of discussions on it, it just gets worse - horrendously worse. Like later on she gets some kind of power, but has to have oodles of sex to keep it in check or something. Those times when she HAS to have sex, it's not just mentioned, it gets full descriptions and lengthy scenes. >.<
Actually, looking at my list of books - this is one of the few books I dropped before finishing. :D I couldn't even get through the first one. Oh brother.
Actually, looking at my list of books - this is one of the few books I dropped before finishing. :D I couldn't even get through the first one. Oh brother.

Yeah I only read the first one and kinda dropped the series, then my friends let me borrow the next two in the series. The third one was really where the character developed, but it was also when it kinda dissolved into a porn fest, ( I mean worse than before). Which is sad, cause I think as Andra said it would be a good series without it.
There is really only one series that seems to have sex in every book that i can tolerate. And that is Karen Chance's Claimed by Shadow series. The only reason why i put up with it, is that the rest of the story is very good. It actually has several interesting characters and indepth plot lines. So i can forgive and skip over the one page or so of sex, and the plot that goes with it.(and yes, she actually made a plot point out of the sex, which was rather inventive without being porn.) That and her first book i nearly fell over laughing at the sexual scene because it was clear she wasn't comfortable writing it. She kept calling the characters genitalia their "sex". Which was just so strange, yet funny to me, I had forgave her for putting it in there.
There is really only one series that seems to have sex in every book that i can tolerate. And that is Karen Chance's Claimed by Shadow series. The only reason why i put up with it, is that the rest of the story is very good. It actually has several interesting characters and indepth plot lines. So i can forgive and skip over the one page or so of sex, and the plot that goes with it.(and yes, she actually made a plot point out of the sex, which was rather inventive without being porn.) That and her first book i nearly fell over laughing at the sexual scene because it was clear she wasn't comfortable writing it. She kept calling the characters genitalia their "sex". Which was just so strange, yet funny to me, I had forgave her for putting it in there.

In general I don't like those Harlequin series romances, those things are just smut with a fancy cover. If I wanted that I'd write it myself honestly. Otherwise I'm willing to give a book the benefit of the doubt. I tend to shy away from purely political books, but I do enjoy reading biographies of famous politicians.
Yeah it seems like almost everyone is in agreement that the less smut the better. Which begs the question why is there so much invading other genre's.
I can honestly say I will also never read a political book, bio or regular. It just doesn't hold any interest for me what so ever. If i read a bio, i'd rather read about someone not famous.
I can honestly say I will also never read a political book, bio or regular. It just doesn't hold any interest for me what so ever. If i read a bio, i'd rather read about someone not famous.
True, but there is a difference between a sex scene and what I'd call smut. A sex scene between a couple that had been building through a book doesn't bother me. A lil sexuality and sexual tension can be good, but more and more its just a sex scene for the sake of sex. Which takes away from the story, and honesty turns me off of a book. Sure sex sells but let's keep that in the realm of romance novels, it doesn't need to be in nearly every fantasy book I pick up.

also, sex seems to really annoy people. oh i so get that. every five minutes someone is going at it! gah! but some series are really centered around sex, sexual proclivities, and sexual deviance. i mean sci-fi and erotic fiction go hand in hand. or... something along those lines... >.< my point is, fiction is about escapism and there are a lot of lonely men and women out there. been there, done that, wrote the emo guidebook to i hate my life. its so popular because everyone wishes they had a romance like that in their lives. people want to put themselves in the shoes of a hero or heroine WHO GETS THE GIRL/GUY TOO! the ultimate form of get your cake and eat it too.

Haha I so just had a mental image of you skulking around at night raiding your neighbours goodwill pile. And I've just never got into politics, and its not because I can't follow the complex issues, however watching grown men squabbling like kids annoys me. So much so that even funny political satire wears thin after a short while, even if I agree and like the satire of the person, or group I can't stomach too much of it
I remembered another one, oddly because I have seen peeps posting about it. I won't read Ender's game or any of the series about it. I tried Reading the first book and ended up giving it away to my best friends then 11 year old.
Lildreamelf wrote: "also, sex seems to really annoy people. oh i so get that. every five minutes someone is going at it! gah! but some series are really centered around sex, sexual proclivities, and sexual deviance. i mean sci-fi and erotic fiction go hand in hand. or... something along those lines... >.< my point is, fiction is about escapism and there are a lot of lonely men and women out there. been there, done that, wrote the emo guidebook to i hate my life. its so popular because everyone wishes they had a romance like that in their lives. people want to put themselves in the shoes of a hero or heroine WHO GETS THE GIRL/GUY TOO! the ultimate form of get your cake and eat it too."
I get that there is a big market for it out there, and thats why it seems like more and more authors are putting sex scenes in their books. Im really not against sex scenes in general, most of my books have one or two in them(cause i read mainly fantasy). Its just hard to describe the difference I feel between a natural growth and progress towards the sex scene, and just having it for the sake of having a sex scene. Kushiel's Dart is probably the best example of a series that deals with a lot of sex, deviant and otherwise, but it has a point to all of it. Now Im not saying every books needs to make a plot point out of sex, but having it explain characters actions helps take it from titillation of the masses to relevance to the story line.
There are also other ways for authors to let people feel the escapism of "getting the guy/girl" without undo sex. I think the Patricia Briggs is a great example, in almost all of her books the girl gets the guy yet there isn't ever any graphic sex scenes. Another example is Ilona Andrews, her two main characters go at each other for 4 books before they ever have sex. Now there is plenty of build up and near misses, so to speak, that entice the reader; however she lets their relationship take a normal course.
I guess really that is my problem, that in too many books there is no lead up, no anticipation, no joy of wondering when a couple is actually going to get together. More and more its just wham bam thank you ma'am. I would just like to see a bit more reality when it comes to book romances, well as much reality is possible. There is so much fantasy that goes into even the relationship of these books, that I'd like to see at least some thing resemble normality.
I get that there is a big market for it out there, and thats why it seems like more and more authors are putting sex scenes in their books. Im really not against sex scenes in general, most of my books have one or two in them(cause i read mainly fantasy). Its just hard to describe the difference I feel between a natural growth and progress towards the sex scene, and just having it for the sake of having a sex scene. Kushiel's Dart is probably the best example of a series that deals with a lot of sex, deviant and otherwise, but it has a point to all of it. Now Im not saying every books needs to make a plot point out of sex, but having it explain characters actions helps take it from titillation of the masses to relevance to the story line.
There are also other ways for authors to let people feel the escapism of "getting the guy/girl" without undo sex. I think the Patricia Briggs is a great example, in almost all of her books the girl gets the guy yet there isn't ever any graphic sex scenes. Another example is Ilona Andrews, her two main characters go at each other for 4 books before they ever have sex. Now there is plenty of build up and near misses, so to speak, that entice the reader; however she lets their relationship take a normal course.
I guess really that is my problem, that in too many books there is no lead up, no anticipation, no joy of wondering when a couple is actually going to get together. More and more its just wham bam thank you ma'am. I would just like to see a bit more reality when it comes to book romances, well as much reality is possible. There is so much fantasy that goes into even the relationship of these books, that I'd like to see at least some thing resemble normality.

DuctTapeDiva wrote: "I remembered another one, oddly because I have seen peeps posting about it. I won't read Ender's game or any of the series about it. I tried Reading the first book and ended up giving it away to my..."
You didn't enjoy enders game? I loved that book. What was it that turned you off of it?
You didn't enjoy enders game? I loved that book. What was it that turned you off of it?
Dian wrote: "DuctTapeDiva wrote: "I remembered another one, oddly because I have seen peeps posting about it. I won't read Ender's game or any of the series about it. I tried Reading the first book and ended up..."
Honestly, I suppose I am a bit of a book snob. lol, It read like a children's book. I read children's books as a child and again to my children. As an adult I prefer more depth, I suppose you could say.(& we see a glimmer of why I got tossed out of my last book club.lol) I realize that sounds awful but it's at least honest.
Honestly, I suppose I am a bit of a book snob. lol, It read like a children's book. I read children's books as a child and again to my children. As an adult I prefer more depth, I suppose you could say.(& we see a glimmer of why I got tossed out of my last book club.lol) I realize that sounds awful but it's at least honest.
I think you explained it very well. It's not the sex scene itself but how graphic it is or isn't, and how it effects the story.

"Watchmen" . o.O
People had made such a big deal about nekid blue-dude that I had thought that -one- particular scene had been shortened, darkened into obscurity, or skipped for the theater release anyway [since I knew they wanted to stick to the book as much as possible under the circumstances:]. It wasn't. >.<

..."Extreme Screen" viewing...
*curls into fetal position

People had made such a big deal about nekid blue-dude that I had thought that -one- particular scene had been shortened, darkened into obscurity, or skipped for the theater release anyway [since I knew they wanted to stick to the book as much as possible under the circumstances:]. It wasn't. >.<
haha! i laughed so hard during that scene i almost peed myself... :D good times... good times.

i agree that the understated sex scene can be some of the sexiest. hell, i think kissing scenes can be hotter than sex scenes. or maybe that's just the romantic in me. i do hope that Kushiel's Dart, the very first book in Jacqueline Carey's Kushiel series gets picked as a Book of the Month. I would like your take on the sex in that book, since there is a lot of sex that is very graphic and deviant, but I think it is well-handled. and i think the language is some of the over-opulent ocher style i was mentioning before, but i think it really works well without being overly pretentious. and the sex is really key to the storyline. sometimes it could have been paired down here or there, but then it wouldn't have the affect she's going for.

...that I semi-refuse to read anything by R.A. Salvatore. Because I'm pretty sure he's a hack.
I would, at very least, take a lot of convincing.
[Then again, I sometimes love to rant about things that I hate, so maybe I wouldn't take so much convincing after all. <_< :]

read one. i don't want to be the only person ranting like a maniac here.
Books mentioned in this topic
Claimed by Shadow (other topics)Nightwalker (other topics)
Dead Witch Walking (other topics)
Kushiel's Dart (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Ilona Andrews (other topics)Karen Chance (other topics)
Jocelynn Drake (other topics)
There is very little that I wouldn't read but a genre that i tend to avoid like the plague is Romance. Not that I dont enjoy romantic books, I actually do, however most romance novels are porn dressed up as literature. If I want titilation I will go look for porn, I dont want graphic sex scenes in a book that I am trying to enjoy. Sadly thats not just romance books that has graphic sex scenes, it just has more of it.
Its bad enough that a lot of fantasy authors feel the need to put in sex scenes to make their books enjoyable, I really dont want to read a book that is purely based on sex.