Challenge: 50 Books discussion
Pet reading hates
date
newest »


I concur. It's not just anti-feminist, it's really disrespectful. I hate it even worse when women embrace and use the term (same with "chick flick").

It still boggles my mind to see women being the main contributors to the hyper-sexual society we've become. A lot of women behave as if they don't have any other identity than a sexual one. It's really disgusting to see how so many women (all ages) behave.

Also, don't tell me you don't have to read the book because "I've seen the movie".

ARRGHHHHHHH! Raise your hand if you've ever walked out of a theatre shaking your head & wondering why they made your favorite book into a movie, if they didn't want to use anything from the book.

ARRGHHHHHHH! Raise your hand if you've ever walked out of a theatre shaking your head & wondering why they ma..."
It's not just after the movie but during it as well, I'm sure I'm not the only one who sits there thinking no that's not how it happened or that bit is wrong and that never happened.
I know they can't put every page of a book into a movie but surely they should be able to adapt the book in some way that remains loyal to the story, is that really to much to ask.
To Kill a Mockingbird and Mystic River prove that they CAN do it; they must just think their way is better. The exception that proves the rule is Bridges of Madison County, which was better than the book.

Hi Peg. I most feared LOTR when it was being made into a movie. But Jackson did an excellent job of it. Brought middleearth to life. It can certainly be done.
Zee wrote: "I agree to the bit about book to film. I _HAVE_ to read the book, preferably before the film, so I can get a good idea of what's been used and what's been discarded.
Hi Peg. I most feared LOTR ..."
I have held out on seeing LOTR or the Narnia books. I'd rather stay with my own images, old as they are.
Hi Peg. I most feared LOTR ..."
I have held out on seeing LOTR or the Narnia books. I'd rather stay with my own images, old as they are.

L.J.
The Sex Club
Secrets to Die for

But I feel what you're saying. I would personally feel I'd be wasting valuable NEW reading time by re-reading old books.

My biggest pet peeve is when I share with someone I enjoy reading and they say (normally in a condescending tone) oh I wish I had that kind of time to read. I totally understand that many people are super busy and really do wish they had more time to read. I think it is how it is said. I have known many new parents or people in grad school, etc who have also said this but they say it in a wishful tone of voice. However, the couple times this has been said to me in such a negative way was by non readers. People who have never been into reading ever. So instead of saying they just aren't into it, they have tried to put me down because I make the time to read. Anyway this might not make sense to any of y'all.
I have only reread a couple books, and really enjoyed them the second time. I reread Pearl Buck's Dragon Seed that I read for the first time back in high school. Not only did I revisit the characters but it brought back emotions and memories of things that where happening to me back then.
I reread quite often, because I suggest books that I have read and liked to my local book group; if they make the cut, then obviously I have to read them again. Also, when I can squeeze in the time, I reread To Kill a Mockingbird, my all-time favorite (although recently I may watch the movie instead).

I have a 50th anniversary copy, plus 2 copies of the DVD, because they have different extras. I still get chills whenever the pastor who let Scout into the balcony, says to her (sitting on the floor) as Atticus is leaving the courthouse, "Stand up, Miss Jean Louise, your father is passing." A Time magazine tribute to Gregory Peck after his death ended with, "Stand up, America. Gregory Peck has passed."


Something I absolutely can't stand though, like someone said above, is when a perfectly good detective/mystery story for example has a female and male lead and they have to get together! I'm not a romance fan and I just don't care whether two characters will end up together or not! Leave the romance alone if you're writing mystery I say, and if I want to pick up a romance book, I will. Karen Rose is a particularly bad repeat offender for this.
Beth wrote: "I hate it when people bend and dog ear books, I think you should treat them with more respect. On the whole notes front, I don't (I'm a bit too anal for that, I have mini post-its in the front of m..."
I agree with this, the exception being the series by Julia Spencer-Fleming. Her main characters simply belonged together from the beginning.
I agree with this, the exception being the series by Julia Spencer-Fleming. Her main characters simply belonged together from the beginning.


Both my parents are vision impaired, and its a nightmare trying to find them audiobooks that havent been abridged, and when you do, the publishers seem almost proud that they're the full text!
Who gets to decide what part of a book is worth keeping and what parts to chop out? If you're going to publish something, publish the full text, since that was what the author intended!
Books mentioned in this topic
The Sex Club (other topics)Secrets to Die for (other topics)
American Psycho (other topics)
House of Leaves (other topics)
Also I get really annoyed when someone tells me what kind of books they like, I recommend a book to them that I think they well enjoy, let them barrow mine even, then they don’t even try to read it! Just because they don’t think it sounds good. You have no idea how many books I have read when I thought the book sounded boring but I ended up loving the book. At least give it a try and read the first chapter or two!