Weekly Short Stories Contest and Company! discussion
Totally Random
>
Chat (Cookies and tea allowed in this room)
message 301:
by
Stephanie
(new)
Jan 23, 2012 07:06PM

reply
|
flag


Thanks, M :D It means a lot :D


Half my notes today:
"People go astray who blame ways or things for thwarting them. When you are thwarted, it is you own attitude that is out of order." - Meister Johannes Eckhart (14th century theologian)
Attitudes to having a productive mindset:
- Benevolence
- Empathy
- Curiosity
- Equanimity
It isn't that I disagree (although I think that quote is a little ridiculous if applied wholesale, as the wording implies; peoples lives and plans are, in fact, thwarted by outside forces with regularity) but composition class doesn't sounds like the place for that.
Especially when the teacher starts on about how limiting God to narrow, defining ideas is "crap." Really, I thought believing in somethings indicated you didn't believe in others - which means believing something about God is limiting Him to some degree (as in, defining Him as one being and not many), which in turn means that if you don't limit Him you don't really believe anything about Him. My composition teacher certainly doesn't seem to really believe anything discernable about God.
Oh, and our writing assignments have all been two or three paragraphs long. So, to top it off, he kind of makes writing dull.


My first love ...
My hometown ...
Games ...
Not really funny, but writing with these openings (in first or third person) can be helpful.

Then again, I never took high school English. My understanding of writing comes from sheer experience, so I could be mistaken.






Also, reading something you actually knows may help even more. Don't try to translate it, just read it as M suggested. For instance, if you were to learn Latin, the Latin Vulgate or the Harrius Potter series could be immensely helpful.

I seem to recall learning English much the same way, actually.




Japanese has a lot of dental and frontal sounds, they don't use any guttural sounds and their only glottal sound is an h. There is also a k and a g.
I can go on and on, but I'm not in the mood to look through my book at the moment.

Oh, and then the big companies tried to price fix their games. The consumers are rewarded with Minecraft, a low resolution but highly entertaining game for about fifteen dollars. Bethesda knew they needed something really good that the creators of Minecraft couldn't pull off - and put out Skyrim. Consumers win again, since this is a game that can be played on any recent desktop and even some laptops that has the immensity and complexity of Middle Earth and the graphics to go along with it.
We complain that games have nothing new to offer and some genius invents Portal.
The only real legitimate complaints about the gaming industry are the rackeetering levels of profit Game Stop makes at the expense of the game makers and piracy - and the makers are starting to work around that without ill-conceived bills like SOPA.
So ... yeah, just some midnight snack musings.


Huh. I guess I should learn the pronunciation rules then...


I hate the lovey-dovey crap, too, which is probably why I couldn't add more to Mary.



The rest was pretty good understated writing.

Anyway, writing for the market sounds incredibly dull. Sounds like real work ... something I only apply to chores. My livihood should be something I'm willing to do for free but don't have to.
Hence combat engineer writing books on the side. That's the career I'm aiming for.
(Note: I'm not ignoring the importance of smaller jobs like flipping burgers. That's good and respectable work, just not a career ...)

I got lucky--or unlucky, depending on how you look at it--and didn’t have to make a living off writing, so I haven’t had to put up with the lost fees and all the rejection slips that inevitably go with doing it for a living. On the other hand, I never became a writer.
When you approach something like this competition you’ve supplied a link for, you have to find a way to steel yourself, remove yourself. These are people who are selling a product. All they care about is how well it sells. That isn’t entirely bad. Think of the writers who have made fortunes off what sells. Think of Dean Koontz.
No one likes the idea of prostituting himself, but there’s a great deal of that in writing, or in business of any kind. I don’t mean to discourage you from submitting to the competition, but I think you should see the competition for what it is. They aren’t interested in you as a writer or in anything you may have to say or have to offer as a person. What they’re interested in is how many subscribers they have.
Your purpose is to make sure they have more subscribers next issue than last.

I doubt I'll ever rely on writing for income.

I went to see a clinical psychologist about a year ago. I would never have dared, but that I had suffered through four years of college and six years of graduate school virtually unable to read tormented me.
The hour and a half I spent with the psychologist was worth far more than I paid him. He told me things about me so simple I couldn’t have seen them for myself. Of the things I might caution a student against becoming, a clinical pyschologist or an architect aren’t among them. Those are beautiful things to become.


Well, I set my coffee down somewhere . . .
Alex, Edward’s right. You should submit your story to the contest. You might want to work it over good first, though.



Oh, and clean. My mum just decided on that one.
Oddly enough, I tend to get more work done when I'm also doing something irrelevant, like chatting on this group.
Something I'd like to point out: I never told you to submit the story. It said that I liked it, which is a very different expression than, "It is good." I use first person pronouns when expressing opinions that have a good chance of not meshing with everyone, especially an editor.
Also, I glanced over the story again. I think an editor would find the ellipses overused.
When dealing with a word limit, something I find useful is to seperated it into distinct Acts based on word count. Your limit is 1,500, and the first act can take up to a quarter of that, the third act another quarter, and the middle act is a full half. So split up the acts 375/750/375 with about a thirty word variance. That way, you know where you can remove words without upsetting the pacing quite as much. Again, this often works for me.
Okay, time to create a virtually sentient trap to scare my players with.

I gotta do dishes, study for French, do my Russian homework, read my library books that are due this week and write. Definitely write. Oh, and figure out where my medical records are...
Books mentioned in this topic
Falling Worlds (other topics)Worlds with Ruby (other topics)
Worlds with Ruby (other topics)
Falling Worlds (other topics)
Your God Is Too Small (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Elias Canetti (other topics)Morris Berman (other topics)
Noam Chomsky (other topics)
Jane Jacobs (other topics)
Marshall Sahlins (other topics)
More...