You'll love this one...!! A book club & more discussion

119 views
Challenges: Year Long Help 2021 > 2021 Annual Challenge - General Questions and Discussion

Comments Showing 151-200 of 204 (204 new)    post a comment »

message 151: by [deleted user] (new)

General question - do short story collections count provided the collection meets the page requirements?


message 152: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments Kathryn wrote: "General question - do short story collections count provided the collection meets the page requirements?"

Yes, they count. We consider the collection as a whole.


message 153: by [deleted user] (new)

Janice wrote: "Kathryn wrote: "General question - do short story collections count provided the collection meets the page requirements?"

Yes, they count. We consider the collection as a whole."


Thanks for confirming Janice.


message 154: by Odette (new)

Odette (odman) | 997 comments I am just about to finish my first 4 museums for Badge 1.

Can I use books that I have already read this year for Badge 2? That is if they fit any of the criteria for the 6 museums I am going to select. I can put read date in report.


message 155: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments Odette wrote: "I am just about to finish my first 4 museums for Badge 1.

Can I use books that I have already read this year for Badge 2? That is if they fit any of the criteria for the 6 museums I am going to s..."


Yes, you may. The rules state that you can read the badges out of order.


message 156: by Odette (new)

Odette (odman) | 997 comments OK, thanks.


message 157: by Anne ✨ (new)

Anne ✨ Finds Joy (annefindsjoy) | 799 comments I'm listening to a book Black Swan Green for a task... but I'm really struggling to finish it.

I'm 67% in (which would translate to pg. 198 of 296pg)... I'm tempted to DNF it and move on, but wasn't sure if I have to finish it to count it? Is there a rule around % finished of a book to count it?


message 158: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments Anne ✨ wrote: "I'm listening to a book Black Swan Green for a task... but I'm really struggling to finish it.

I'm 67% in (which would translate to pg. 198 of 296pg)... I'm tempted to DNF it and mov..."


Sorry, but you have to finish a book in order for it to be counted. It's too bad that the book sucks, Anne.


message 159: by Anne ✨ (new)

Anne ✨ Finds Joy (annefindsjoy) | 799 comments Janice wrote: "Anne ✨ wrote: "I'm listening to a book Black Swan Green for a task... but I'm really struggling to finish it.

I'm 67% in (which would translate to pg. 198 of 296pg)... I'm tempted to..."


thanks for the clarification Janice! I will persevere! :) It's well written, story just doesn't engage.. luckily the audio narration is good, so there's that!


message 160: by Cherie (new)

Cherie (crobins0) | 21536 comments Good question though, Anne. I have always “just muddled on” to the end to report a book for a task. I have had one DNF on my challenge this year. I hated to not be able to use it, but the story was so bad that I could not go on.
Unfortunately for me, the audio was just as bad as the story. With the exception of Neil Gaiman, Stephen Fry and maybe Bill Bryson, most authors should not narrate their own books


message 161: by Camilla (new)

Camilla | 2101 comments Asking for a ruling for the length of a book I just finished (noticed only when I started to report it that it's got only ebook and kindle editions). The book is Abominable. GR has the number of pages as 312, Amazon has 337.


message 162: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments Camilla wrote: "Asking for a ruling for the length of a book I just finished (noticed only when I started to report it that it's got only ebook and kindle editions). The book is Abominable. GR has ..."

I think that's safe to say an actual book would be over 175. :)


message 163: by Camilla (new)

Camilla | 2101 comments Thank you Janice. I thought so as well, but wanted to be a good girl and ask for a ruling according to your instructions.


message 164: by Mary Ann (new)

Mary Ann (bellabellacat) | 160 comments I have question on publication dates. Seems like most books are published initially in hardcover and electronic versions and the paperbacks come later on, sometimes much later on. Should I consider the publication date as the date of the version I'm reading, or the initial publication date? For instance, Musicophilia Tales of Music and the Brain by Oliver Sacks was initially published (hardcover) in 2007, but the paperback in 2008. Could be I'm overthinking.....


message 165: by Marnie (new)

Marnie (marnie19) | 3259 comments I know cover tasks are based on the actual book you read so I would assume publishing dates would be as well. Now I’m curious if Janice agrees lol.


message 166: by Rusalka, Moderator (last edited Jul 24, 2021 09:09AM) (new)

Rusalka (rusalkii) | 19206 comments Ooo Up to Janice, but.

I would always say it's the original publication date. Otherwise you could read Jane Austen say for a published in 2021 task if it was a brand new edition. And that's just not cricket. And that's how I always play it in my challenges, and when looking for books for Janice's ones.


message 167: by Marnie (new)

Marnie (marnie19) | 3259 comments That makes sense Rusalka. Modern Jane Austen doesn’t seem to be in the spirit of the task.


message 168: by Rusalka, Moderator (new)

Rusalka (rusalkii) | 19206 comments Same works with translations. The English version of the book can come out 50 years after the book was published. Just my feeling for guidance in the meantime.

But Janice is the arbiter of such things. I'm sure she'll set us straight soon :D


message 169: by Marnie (new)

Marnie (marnie19) | 3259 comments Message 20 in this thread is Janice’s answer. Originally published in 2000 not the addition you read.


message 170: by Mary Ann (new)

Mary Ann (bellabellacat) | 160 comments Marnie wrote: "Message 20 in this thread is Janice’s answer. Originally published in 2000 not the addition you read."
Shoot...I did a search and didn't see message 20. Many thanks ladies! Thinking of Jane Austen's books does put things in perspective! :-)


message 171: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments It's the original publication date we're looking for.


message 172: by Rusalka, Moderator (new)

Rusalka (rusalkii) | 19206 comments Mary Ann wrote: "Shoot...I did a search and didn't see message 20. Many thanks ladies! Thinking of Jane Austen's books does put things in perspective! :-)."

Glad that helped :D


message 173: by Esther (new)

Esther (nyctale) | 5191 comments Janice, there is something I have been struggling with. About the MPG. What if a book had no genre listed. This happens to me a lot as people who read in French do not seem to use shelves. I am just wondering if there is a loophole...


message 174: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments Esther wrote: "Janice, there is something I have been struggling with. About the MPG. What if a book had no genre listed. This happens to me a lot as people who read in French do not seem to use shelves. I am jus..."

I wonder if World Catalogue will give you the information. There should be a link where it says "Get a copy" on the main book page, possibly under "Book Links".

Goodreads is running a beta book page and it looks quite different. We may have to rethink how we do things in our challenges once the new format goes live.


message 175: by Esther (new)

Esther (nyctale) | 5191 comments Janice wrote: "Esther wrote: "Janice, there is something I have been struggling with. About the MPG. What if a book had no genre listed. This happens to me a lot as people who read in French do not seem to use sh..."

Are you telling me you will accept world catalog info if there is not MBP genre list? I should have asked this years ago. :)


message 176: by Kristie, Moderator (new)

Kristie | 19147 comments Janice - The new book page still has MPG. It is actually bigger and in the center of the page now. It only lists the top 4-5, but when you click 'more' at the end of the list it adds the next few so you end up with the top ten or so. The next option is 'see all', which brings you to the tag page that we don't currently use. You should be able to still use it as an option.

Esther, are the books you are reading only published in French?


message 177: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments Esther wrote: "Are you telling me you will accept world catalog info if there is not MBP genre list? I should have asked this years ago. :)..."

What do you use now? Or do you not include the book for the challenge if there is no specified genre?

Yes, if there is no specified genre, you may use WorldCat as a resource.


message 178: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments Kristie wrote: "Janice - The new book page still has MPG. It is actually bigger and in the center of the page now. It only lists the top 4-5, but when you click 'more' at the end of the list it adds the next few s..."

I really dislike the new page. Everything is so big and in your face and it's harder to find the information you want. I played with it last night for a bit.


message 179: by Rusalka, Moderator (new)

Rusalka (rusalkii) | 19206 comments New page? What platform you guys using?


message 180: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments At the top of the book page, there is a notation that Goodreads is developing a new page and you can switch by clicking a link. If you really detest it, like I do, you can switch back by clicking "Beta" in the bottom right hand corner.


message 181: by Peggy (new)

Peggy (pebbles84) | 15868 comments Hm, I don't even have that notation. I think.


message 182: by Rusalka, Moderator (new)

Rusalka (rusalkii) | 19206 comments Hmm me neither. I will keep an eye out for it, but not on my screen yet


message 183: by Kristie, Moderator (new)

Kristie | 19147 comments Not everyone has access to it yet. It's still beta testing.


message 184: by Dawn (new)

Dawn (caveatlector) | 1786 comments I had access for one day and then it disappeared. I would like to have it so I can get used to it before it is official. I think it's going to take a bit of adjusting but I am always hopeful that it will make things better.


message 185: by Camilla (new)

Camilla | 2101 comments Dawn wrote: "I had access for one day and then it disappeared. I would like to have it so I can get used to it before it is official. I think it's going to take a bit of adjusting but I am always hopeful that i..."

I tried it for about five minutes, but since the beta version doesn't allow any editing of book data (since I'm a GR librarian), I couldn't get out fast enough. There were some features I definitely didn't like, but can't remember what they were, LOL!


message 186: by Dawn (new)

Dawn (caveatlector) | 1786 comments I assume they will fix that part or what is the point of having all the unpaid labour!!


message 187: by Camilla (new)

Camilla | 2101 comments Dawn wrote: "I assume they will fix that part or what is the point of having all the unpaid labour!!"

Hear, hear!


message 188: by Esther (new)

Esther (nyctale) | 5191 comments Janice wrote: "Esther wrote: "Are you telling me you will accept world catalog info if there is not MBP genre list? I should have asked this years ago. :)..."

What do you use now? Or do you not include the book ..."


yes, I have been not including them. I just realised now, after years of grumling, that I never asked.


message 189: by Esther (last edited Aug 25, 2021 02:37PM) (new)

Esther (nyctale) | 5191 comments Kristie wrote: "Esther, are the books you are reading only published in French?..."

Most are. Not many non-english book are translated into English.


message 190: by Janice, Moderator (last edited Aug 25, 2021 05:57PM) (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments

Top of page


message 191: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments

Showing your review...


message 192: by Janice, Moderator (last edited Aug 25, 2021 06:00PM) (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments

Bottom of page.


message 193: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments These may not look very large, but when they are full screen, they are huge! That "Join the Discussion" line of 269, 100, 43 is spaced all the way across your screen. My laptop has a 17" screen and those numbers are full screen across and half screen down.


message 194: by Kristie, Moderator (new)

Kristie | 19147 comments Everything IS really big. lol


message 195: by Peggy (new)

Peggy (pebbles84) | 15868 comments Thanks for giving us a preview Janice!


message 196: by Rusalka, Moderator (last edited Aug 26, 2021 06:55AM) (new)

Rusalka (rusalkii) | 19206 comments Thanks Janice. That is very... large.
I can't imagine how big that will be on my 27" screens

Did they get feedback that people couldn't see things?


message 197: by Janice, Moderator (new)

Janice (jamasc) | 59894 comments My reaction to the size was "what, am I a child or in my dotage?" It could go either way these days I guess.

I've been meaning to give them feedback but I don't have email set up on this laptop, and when I go down to my work computer, I'm not thinking about Goodreads.


message 198: by Kristie, Moderator (new)

Kristie | 19147 comments I wonder if they're trying to be more inclusive for visually impaired members.


message 199: by Katrisa (new)

Katrisa | 4460 comments My main issue with the new page set up is that you have to look at like 30 random reviews before you get to the part with other books by the author lists with the book and stuff. I like to see what my friends thought about books and maybe like will look through the first couple reviews but I definitely don't need that many reviews.


message 200: by Jayme, Moderator (last edited Sep 03, 2021 02:52AM) (new)

Jayme | 4519 comments I totally agree, Katrisa. I like seeing my friends' reviews first. I know who's into mysteries, historical fiction etc and trust their reviews more as opposed to random strangers.


back to top