Do Better: SFF without Sexual Violence discussion
THE BOOKSHELF-DATABASE
>
Recommend Books Here
message 451:
by
Mary
(new)
Jan 04, 2021 04:59AM

reply
|
flag
Eva wrote: "Some shorter fiction I've read recently meets our criteria, I believe:
Thanks, Eva! I was wondering how the last decade or so of SFF/H stories compared to the content of SFF/H novels. I imagine that stories are safer territory, but I wouldn't want to assume...a good question for those partaking in our Wbtm 2021 short story challenge
I do wish Goodreads librarians would allow individual stories to be permanent on Goodreads. It's likely the Tor.com stories will stay, but if they find De Bodard's story from the magazine Beneath Ceaseless Skies , they will delete it, as per their policy. 😒
I realize we haven't decided what to do about validating stories. For those likely not to be deleted by librarians, there aren't often sufficient GR reviews for moderators to validate. I think I'll add this question to January's monthly chat. Stay tuned for more details 😁
And good to know about Holy Sister! We are only adding up to two books per distinct series (for now). But if anyone reports issues in the latter editions, we will certainly discuss removal.
Thanks, Eva! I was wondering how the last decade or so of SFF/H stories compared to the content of SFF/H novels. I imagine that stories are safer territory, but I wouldn't want to assume...a good question for those partaking in our Wbtm 2021 short story challenge
I do wish Goodreads librarians would allow individual stories to be permanent on Goodreads. It's likely the Tor.com stories will stay, but if they find De Bodard's story from the magazine Beneath Ceaseless Skies , they will delete it, as per their policy. 😒
I realize we haven't decided what to do about validating stories. For those likely not to be deleted by librarians, there aren't often sufficient GR reviews for moderators to validate. I think I'll add this question to January's monthly chat. Stay tuned for more details 😁
And good to know about Holy Sister! We are only adding up to two books per distinct series (for now). But if anyone reports issues in the latter editions, we will certainly discuss removal.

The Trials of Koli - transphobia that is dealt with very nicely
The Space Between Worlds - domestic violence
Brown Girl in the Ring - violence
A Deadly Education - violence, mention of animal abuse
The Bone Shard Daughter - medical experiments, violence, dysfunctional family
Firewalkers - violence, dysfunctional family, ablism (shown as wrong)

I remember Provenance being safe, but I read it three years ago and could be wrong.
Ines wrote: "I'm 95% sure The Only Good Indians by Stephen Graham Jones can be on the bookshelf. I read it last year and did look through the reviews and I neither remember nor fo..."
Thanks, Ines! Our Horror shelf needs a little beefing up. 😉
I have completed the validation and found no mentions of SV, both have been added to our shelf. I appreciate your content warnings, and only found mention of a couple more.
Note to our members: pay particular attention to our bookshelf content warning tags for Horror, while they may not have SV, some contain other disturbing and graphic depictions.
Thanks, Ines! Our Horror shelf needs a little beefing up. 😉
I have completed the validation and found no mentions of SV, both have been added to our shelf. I appreciate your content warnings, and only found mention of a couple more.
Note to our members: pay particular attention to our bookshelf content warning tags for Horror, while they may not have SV, some contain other disturbing and graphic depictions.
Mary wrote: "Recommending second book in the Starfarers series Transition by Vonda N. McIntyre o SV or other TWs. I'm sad more people haven't read this series, a group of diverse ..."
I've added this one too 😉
Were you able to purchase this as an ebook? In my country it's only available as part of audible. No books for sale, just out of print mass market paperbacks.
I've added this one too 😉
Were you able to purchase this as an ebook? In my country it's only available as part of audible. No books for sale, just out of print mass market paperbacks.
Kristenelle wrote: "I think the following are safe: ..."
Thanks for the batch, Kristenelle! I'll check these out over the new few days.
Provenance made it to our shelves already 😉
Thanks for the batch, Kristenelle! I'll check these out over the new few days.
Provenance made it to our shelves already 😉

I got them used. I'm missing book 4 🤞 hope it surfaces somewhere
I don't think The Space Between Worlds qualifies to be added to our shelf, though: we decided to avoid books containing domestic abuse, right? And the book contains domestic abuse aplenty, described in fairly graphic details.
To elaborate, while (view spoiler)
To elaborate, while (view spoiler)



Piranesi by Susanna Clarke"
There is off screen heavy suspicion of sexual assault. (view spoiler)

I'm losing track of all the rules. Yeah, definitely it has really intense domestic abuse.
Kristenelle wrote: "Elena C. wrote: "Finally (FINALLYYYY!!!) I have a book to recommend for our shelf too! 🤗
Piranesi by Susanna Clarke"
There is off screen heavy suspicion of sexual assault. [spoile..."
*Warning folks, spoilers about Piranesi incoming!*
But that's simply mentioned, and never in explicit terms (the words (view spoiler)
Again, the terms used here ☝ are mine: Clarke's text never once addresses the matter in such an explicit way, and this whole sub-plot is a very minor one (at least, in the terms we've discussed here, because by then the reader knows what's going on and the author doesn't examine these allegations for more than a couple of lines).
If there are other members who'd read Piranesi that would like to weight in on the debate, please do so 😁 I personally don't feel this in enough to exclude the book from the shelf, but I won't further advocate for adding it to it either, if some of you aren't okay with it 😉
Piranesi by Susanna Clarke"
There is off screen heavy suspicion of sexual assault. [spoile..."
*Warning folks, spoilers about Piranesi incoming!*
But that's simply mentioned, and never in explicit terms (the words (view spoiler)
Again, the terms used here ☝ are mine: Clarke's text never once addresses the matter in such an explicit way, and this whole sub-plot is a very minor one (at least, in the terms we've discussed here, because by then the reader knows what's going on and the author doesn't examine these allegations for more than a couple of lines).
If there are other members who'd read Piranesi that would like to weight in on the debate, please do so 😁 I personally don't feel this in enough to exclude the book from the shelf, but I won't further advocate for adding it to it either, if some of you aren't okay with it 😉
Kristenelle wrote: "Elena C. wrote: "I don't think The Space Between Worlds qualifies to be added to our shelf, though: we decided to avoid books containing domestic abuse, right? And the book contains..."
I'm always keeping the first post of this thread close at hand myself 😁
I'm always keeping the first post of this thread close at hand myself 😁

Spoilers for what I do remember:
(view spoiler)
It boils down to whether a book should be excluded when suspicion of SV is mentioned but the theory is wrong.
I'm with Elena, I wouldn't exclude it if it was up to me, but if some of you are uncomfortable with it I'll absolutely step back.
Nefeli wrote: "I just read the book and can't remember many things about it 😑"
😂😂 what is wrong with us
If we do end up adding it, it definitely should come with a couple of CW for abusive and manipulative behavior.
😂😂 what is wrong with us
If we do end up adding it, it definitely should come with a couple of CW for abusive and manipulative behavior.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5...
It definitely has other forms of trauma, oppressed women, violence towards women, and a culture of men in power. However, I don't recall any sexual trauma. The overall message is one of women with power using that power together.

Piranesi by Susanna Clarke"
There is off screen heavy suspicion of sex..."
You know, when I read it I think I missed that that was (view spoiler)
In any case, I didn't find it triggering personally. So I'm neutral on whether it gets added to the shelf.


Silvana wrote: "I am recommending When the Tiger Came Down the Mountain by Nghi Vo to be in the shelf. In fact, the first book should be there too but would be good to confirm first."
Thank you, Silvana! Noted.
I have The Empress of Salt and Fortune on my tbr and since I'm on a novella / shorter books binge lately, I'd be happy to read it myself in a few days so that we're sure we can add it to the shelf 😉
Thank you, Silvana! Noted.
I have The Empress of Salt and Fortune on my tbr and since I'm on a novella / shorter books binge lately, I'd be happy to read it myself in a few days so that we're sure we can add it to the shelf 😉
Kaa wrote: "I think we said no to Empress because [spoilers removed] is a pretty important plot point."
Oof. Thank you for catching my mistake, Kaa: you're absolutely right, we included Vo's Empress in our latest "excluded books recap" (#4 in this thread https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...)
Oof. Thank you for catching my mistake, Kaa: you're absolutely right, we included Vo's Empress in our latest "excluded books recap" (#4 in this thread https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...)
Psst, Jo: whenever you have the time - I think we should add the CW Kaa mentioned (view spoiler) Thank you!

Silvana wrote: "I did not recall that at all, good to know. I hope the others can also confirm whether the sequel is eligible."
Do the two installment work as standalones, Silvana? We decided not to include single installments of a series if one of them contains SV so the exclusion of Empress would automatically mean that When the Tiger can't be added either. Unless the two books can be read and fully enjoyed on their own, like with Provenance (DB) and its main series (Not DB).
Do the two installment work as standalones, Silvana? We decided not to include single installments of a series if one of them contains SV so the exclusion of Empress would automatically mean that When the Tiger can't be added either. Unless the two books can be read and fully enjoyed on their own, like with Provenance (DB) and its main series (Not DB).
Silvana wrote: "Yep, can work as a standalone."
Good to know, thanks! Research didn't turn up any SV for When a Tiger: I'll stick to my plan of reading the novellas soon so if no one else does so in the meantime, I'll be able to second your rec myself 😉
Good to know, thanks! Research didn't turn up any SV for When a Tiger: I'll stick to my plan of reading the novellas soon so if no one else does so in the meantime, I'll be able to second your rec myself 😉

I would also recommend Remote Control for the shelf.
Hey all, thanks for your January submissions! We've gone though and validated what was submitted here and in our monthly chat thread...
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
@ Kristinelle - Thanks again for your suggestions! Here are the results of our research...
3 added to group shelves, one excluded, and one added to our pending list. Details are below
The Trials of Koli - ADDED
SV - None I could find
CW - Transphobia, acknowledged
REP: LGBT
Other Tags : Sequel, Friendship, Found family
AWARD? TBD
Brown Girl in the Ring - EXCLUDED
SV - exclude for "descriptions of domestic violence"
A Deadly Education - PENDING
SV - Pending, 2 out of 5000+ reviews felt a scene was triggering, felt it veered on (view spoiler)
CW - Racism, acknowledged
The Bone Shard Daughter - ADDED
SV - None I could find
CW - (view spoiler)
REP: Author, MC BIPOC, MC LGBT
Other Tags : friendship (human + animal 👍)
AWARD? TBD
Firewalkers - ADDED
SV - None I could find
CW - None I could find
REP: None I could find
Other Tags : Novella, friendship
AWARD? TBD
3 added to group shelves, one excluded, and one added to our pending list. Details are below
The Trials of Koli - ADDED
SV - None I could find
CW - Transphobia, acknowledged
REP: LGBT
Other Tags : Sequel, Friendship, Found family
AWARD? TBD
Brown Girl in the Ring - EXCLUDED
SV - exclude for "descriptions of domestic violence"
A Deadly Education - PENDING
SV - Pending, 2 out of 5000+ reviews felt a scene was triggering, felt it veered on (view spoiler)
CW - Racism, acknowledged
The Bone Shard Daughter - ADDED
SV - None I could find
CW - (view spoiler)
REP: Author, MC BIPOC, MC LGBT
Other Tags : friendship (human + animal 👍)
AWARD? TBD
Firewalkers - ADDED
SV - None I could find
CW - None I could find
REP: None I could find
Other Tags : Novella, friendship
AWARD? TBD
Please let us know if you have any questions or comments about the research
@ Eva - The Original - ADDED
SV - None we could find
CW - violence was listed but wasn't felt to be graphic
REP: One review mentioned BIPOC and non-binary, but not enough reviews commented on the quality of the rep for us to give this book those tags
Other Tags : none
AWARD? No
@ Xeni - Drowned Country - ADDED
SV - None we could find
CW - None we could find
REP: MC is LGBT
Other Tags : Romance, Sequel, Novella
AWARD? TBD
@ Caroline - Boneset & Feathers - PENDING
This is being added to our pending list. We require 75+ GR reviews for a book to be validated by a moderator, this will wait as pending until it has 75 reviews or another active group member opts to read it and report back.
@ Eva - The Original - ADDED
SV - None we could find
CW - violence was listed but wasn't felt to be graphic
REP: One review mentioned BIPOC and non-binary, but not enough reviews commented on the quality of the rep for us to give this book those tags
Other Tags : none
AWARD? No
@ Xeni - Drowned Country - ADDED
SV - None we could find
CW - None we could find
REP: MC is LGBT
Other Tags : Romance, Sequel, Novella
AWARD? TBD
@ Caroline - Boneset & Feathers - PENDING
This is being added to our pending list. We require 75+ GR reviews for a book to be validated by a moderator, this will wait as pending until it has 75 reviews or another active group member opts to read it and report back.

I just finished TJ Klune’s Green Creek series. Gay werewolves!
Pretty sure there is zero sexual violence.
There’s an age gap between two main characters who meet when one is a boy and one is a teen, but no sex till age of consent.
Rosie wrote: "Wolfsong
I just finished TJ Klune’s Green Creek series..."
Welcome Rosie! And thank you so much for your suggestion 😁 I'm glad to hear you enjoyed it.
I'm adding this to our batch of books to validate for March. We'll search its 4000+ GR reviews to confirm content.
I just finished TJ Klune’s Green Creek series..."
Welcome Rosie! And thank you so much for your suggestion 😁 I'm glad to hear you enjoyed it.
I'm adding this to our batch of books to validate for March. We'll search its 4000+ GR reviews to confirm content.

I'd like to submit a few of my own books for consideration, but I can not say with certainty that they'll be included or excluded.





I hope these might add to your collection. Best regards.


A really good book though! I need to get back to that series!

A really good book though! I need to get back to that series!"
Oh odd. I must have missed something then. Any particulars you can share?
@ Xeni/Melissa,
Thank you both for sharing 😁
With the question of SV, I jumped this one to the front of our queue. I just did the validation step on the GR member reviews and found 1 of 293 mentioned a (view spoiler) . However, I also found 1 of 293 that specifically said there was none. Interestingly, both were 5 star reviews, I don't see that often.
When we have this situation, we put the book onto our Pending list so another active DB member can read it, with an eye on SV content and report back to us with their opinion.
Here are the contradicting GR review comments I found....
(view spoiler)
Whether or not this book gets added to our shelf, I feel compelled to mention that many GR reviewer's go out of their way to state this book is free from the usual sexism and misogyny prevalent in Fantasy, especially back in 1989, when this was originally published.
Thank you both for sharing 😁
With the question of SV, I jumped this one to the front of our queue. I just did the validation step on the GR member reviews and found 1 of 293 mentioned a (view spoiler) . However, I also found 1 of 293 that specifically said there was none. Interestingly, both were 5 star reviews, I don't see that often.
When we have this situation, we put the book onto our Pending list so another active DB member can read it, with an eye on SV content and report back to us with their opinion.
Here are the contradicting GR review comments I found....
(view spoiler)
Whether or not this book gets added to our shelf, I feel compelled to mention that many GR reviewer's go out of their way to state this book is free from the usual sexism and misogyny prevalent in Fantasy, especially back in 1989, when this was originally published.

With the question of SV, I jumped this one to the front of our queue. I just did the validation step on the GR member reviews and found 1 of 293 menti..."
Oh! I remember that scene. Okay, so this is what happens: (view spoiler) I don't think this should count as (view spoiler) They are still pretty sucky wizards and get what is coming to them soon after this scene, so who knows what would have happened had she stayed captive longer.
Other than that, though, the only prejudice is that of class (richer people looking down their noses at those 'beneath them'). Even poorer women are not subjected to misogyny, soldiers are described as being of all genders, etc. Even the 'Steerswomen' have a few men in their ranks, and they discuss why this is at one point.
James wrote: "Hello. I appreciate what this group is trying to do.
I'd like to submit a few of my own books for consideration, but I can not say with certainty that they'll be included or excluded.:..."
Hey James, congrats in publishing so many novels!
One of the things the group mods do is validate all suggested books before they go on our bookshelf database. We search GR reviews for comments on SV and rep. We've agreed to a minimum of 75 GR member reviews for us to be able to effectively validate.
Thank for your submissions, we'll keep your post on this page for anyone who wants to check out your books.
All the best!
I'd like to submit a few of my own books for consideration, but I can not say with certainty that they'll be included or excluded.:..."
Hey James, congrats in publishing so many novels!
One of the things the group mods do is validate all suggested books before they go on our bookshelf database. We search GR reviews for comments on SV and rep. We've agreed to a minimum of 75 GR member reviews for us to be able to effectively validate.
Thank for your submissions, we'll keep your post on this page for anyone who wants to check out your books.
All the best!
♥Xeni♥ wrote: "..."Oh! I remember that scene...."
Thanks for clarifying, and since your recommendation stands, I'll go ahead and add it to our pending list 😁
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
Thanks for clarifying, and since your recommendation stands, I'll go ahead and add it to our pending list 😁
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...

It does deal with body autonomy as a secondary topic, but in a (probably spoiler for the story) (view spoiler) and not in any sexual way.
And I think The Man in the High Castle is also elligible, although I am not completely sure.

(view spoiler)
There is also the issue of the concubine, which is more oblique.
(view spoiler)
Melissa wrote: "Yes, I agree with the reviews that praise The Steerswoman for its gender representation. It has a lot of positive things going for it, and was eager to recommend it myself. Which was ..."
Melissa, thanks for finding the quote and sharing it with the group.
Melissa, thanks for finding the quote and sharing it with the group.
So we have a difference of opinion on The Steerswoman. Here is some context for any who are unfamiliar with how we handle this at DB.
When we started DB, our intention was to help others avoid what were unquestionable instances of "on-screen" SV. We quickly learned that our members felt this wasn't sufficient. In our town hall discussions we decided we'd broaden the scope to exclude brief mentions of SV.......Then, we quickly learned that brief mentions are sometimes open to interpretation. That's why we came up with the Pending Process which acts as an arbitrator.
Interpretation of text is just that, so in my mind both Xeni and Melissa's views on The Steerswoman are valid. We'll let the pending process (eventually) decide whether this book goes on/stays off the DB bookshelf.
When we started DB, our intention was to help others avoid what were unquestionable instances of "on-screen" SV. We quickly learned that our members felt this wasn't sufficient. In our town hall discussions we decided we'd broaden the scope to exclude brief mentions of SV.......Then, we quickly learned that brief mentions are sometimes open to interpretation. That's why we came up with the Pending Process which acts as an arbitrator.
Interpretation of text is just that, so in my mind both Xeni and Melissa's views on The Steerswoman are valid. We'll let the pending process (eventually) decide whether this book goes on/stays off the DB bookshelf.

---
In the mean time, I'd like to tentatively also suggest The Ruthless Lady's Guide to Wizardry. I read this book over the last month for a book club, and I did keep an eye out for any SV. However, I took my time reading it and my memory is not the best, so I may have glossed over or misremembered things. The main trigger warnings I'd give for this book are physical violence and substance abuse (with off-page childhood neglect as a tie in).
Books mentioned in this topic
A Prayer for the Crown-Shy (other topics)Stories of Your Life and Others (other topics)
A Pale Light in the Black (other topics)
Creative Surgery (other topics)
Creative Surgery (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
K.B. Wagers (other topics)Bindiya Schaefer (other topics)
Mike Brooks (other topics)
Charlie Jane Anders (other topics)
Aliette de Bodard (other topics)
More...