The Sword and Laser discussion
Do you see things when you read?
date
newest »

We had a discussion around this when we read Ninefox Gambit.
Yoo Ha Lee has Aphantasia (the condition you describe)
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
Dara also started a thread about this:
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
I always have images in my head while reading. Not always the same as the author describes. If I have seen the movie version then those images will replace my own made up image.
I can't read Lord of the Rings without seeing Peter Jacksons version in my head.
Yoo Ha Lee has Aphantasia (the condition you describe)
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
Dara also started a thread about this:
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
I always have images in my head while reading. Not always the same as the author describes. If I have seen the movie version then those images will replace my own made up image.
I can't read Lord of the Rings without seeing Peter Jacksons version in my head.

Yoo Ha Lee has Aphantasia (the condition you describe)
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/......"
And here I thought I was being original, lol. I was sure that I would not find a discussion on this topic nor did I think I could figure out how to find one if I searched. Thanks for the links!

One thing I do get, though, is a sense of scale, the bigger the better. It's no accident that I have preferred the "Cosmic" characters in Marvel comics - Dr. Strange, Warlock, Chaos and Order, Eternity, Galactus and the like. For SF, I like huge distances and contemplations of infinity. So Ringworld, any of Niven's "Ramship" books, and the incomparable Tau Zero, covering the largest possible distances of both time and space. Weapon Shops of Isher with one character swinging back and forth through time, eventually triggering the Big Bang. Stapledon's Star Maker. 2001, the rare instance where both book and film inspire.
I like to read in quiet, where my brain can settle and perceptions open wide.
For this apparently I sacrifice the ability to visualize text. I'll take it.


I tend to see a set of black symbols on a white background ;-)


Definitely check out the other threads linked above. Interesting stuff there.


https://ryanandrewlangdon.wordpress.c...


I converse with my inner voice far more than I do with outer people.

Now I'm curious about dreamers. Like I believe most people (although with the way these threads have gone, who knows), I typically don't remember my dreams, unless I'm having one as I wake up. That's where it gets interesting, if I'm slowly waking up, my mind seems to have some control of what I'm doing in the dream, not necessarily what else is happening (although sometimes), but decisions I make or things I do or say. I guess this is lucid dreaming? This usually doesn't last too long before I fully wake up. I still typically don't remember what happens in these dreams, but I know that I've had them. This can happen both in the middle of the night, or just before I'm waking up for good.
So is this more or less how others dream? And I wonder how it relates to those who visualize what the read, and have an inner dialogue, or a rich visual imagination? Or maybe there is no correlation at all.

More or less the same for me.
However, the other day I woke up and the solution to the project I was working on was sitting there in my brain. I’ve been working on this show for weeks (https://www.instagram.com/p/B7J--koBj...) and couldn’t crack it. But my subconscious mind figured it out. I got back in the editing suite that day and it worked perfectly.
Is that a dream? I don’t know. I recall visualizing the entire thing, but who knows if it played out in real time.


I haven’t. Just articles about dreams and REM sleep.




In doing just a brief google search after I posted my questions. I found that what Trike describes is common, and part of what people think dreaming is for. Going over the events of the day, committing them to memory, and then letting the sub conscious work on problems you've been stewing on.
Damn our minds are wonderfully crazy and diverse things. It shouldn't be, but each time I hear someone else's works slightly different then mine, I'm shocked. Hopefully I can think of that each time I'm trying to see someone else's point of view.

I went looking for a good link to this and couldn't find one. Jung is great, but his works are dense. I can highly recommend "Memories, Dreams, Reflections" as a readable entry point to his work. The Portable Jung is also good, but not particularly portable - it is pretty long. Much of the rest is written in a clinical format as he was writing psychology as a science. The works are revelatory, but take effort. They are not casual reading.
I'll close with the best of the quotes I found in this particular search: "Together the patient and I address ourselves to the two million-year-old man that is in all of us. In the last analysis, most of our difficulties come from losing contact with our instincts, with the age-old unforgotten wisdom stored up in us. And where do we make contact with this old man in us? In our dreams.
-C. G. Jung, Psychological Reflections

Pretty much how dreaming works for me. Occasionally, I remember that last bit of a dream.
I haven't spent the effort needed to develop full lucid dreaming.


Books mentioned in this topic
Echopraxia (other topics)Echopraxia (other topics)
I have lived my whole life with the words on the page just being words and envy those who actually see something. Though I think it has helped me in one regard when I watch a movie based on a book I have read I have no issue thinking of them as two different stories based on a similar premise. Because of this, I don’t have the “The book was better than the movie” feeling.
One final thought, my wife pointed out that my favorite movie, The Princess Bride, is really just what the grandson is seeing as the grandfather reads, blow my mind!