The Sword and Laser discussion
Podcasts
>
#372 - Hmmm... hmmm.

A possible trick with English place names is to remember that they have probably been around for 100s of years so any lip & jawbone gymnastics tends to get edited out by the locals.
This doesn't help with the actual pronunciation but if it feels awkward to say, you might be saying it wrong.
It is also possible that somebody decided to gussie-up the spelling of places so they would look cool and complicated on signs and maps.
So the fancily-spelled Leicester and Worcestershire have probably always been just said as "less-tuh" and "wuh-stuh-shuh"
Similarly the surnames Cholmondley and Featherstonehaugh are pronounced "chumlee" and "fanshaw"


The advantage could also be that you can usually get those novelettes for free somewhere online...
Just a thought.
EDIT: Oh god! I am blushing so hard right now! Thanks Veronica, thanks Tom!
--- NotDara

Sample this: Crash Test Dummies - Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTeg1...
We know you're really Dara, Jan!

Tamahome wrote: "Since Hugo can be fantasy too, just do it 6 months in a row, so each person only loses 3 choices. Or do Nebula instead. Then have a coop podcast with The Incomparable podcast to discuss them.
Samp..."
OMG I just made that joke on Twitter before seeing this!
Samp..."
OMG I just made that joke on Twitter before seeing this!
Richard wrote: "One possible wrench in the plan is if a nominee is a later book in a series, as two of last year's six were. I think ultimately we just need to wait for the list and see if it's doable."
good plan
good plan


Greg Egan did it years ago with Quarantine..
Note: The same effect can be gained more simply by tossing a coin.

That makes Arsenio Hall go "hmmm" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzzGj...
Iain wrote: "regarding the quantum "whooo" application, Ted Chiang has a short story on the subject in Exhalation: “Anxiety Is The Dizziness Of Freedom."
Greg Egan did it years ago with [book:Q..."
I'm not a fan of the multiverse theory. If it were true, then 99.999 (with 9 continuing to infinity) percent of all universes would not have any humans in it.
I look at the theory as nothing more than a crazy thought experiment.
I do believe there may be other universes. But completely independent of anything in ours (maybe even different physics) and not infinite.
Greg Egan did it years ago with [book:Q..."
I'm not a fan of the multiverse theory. If it were true, then 99.999 (with 9 continuing to infinity) percent of all universes would not have any humans in it.
I look at the theory as nothing more than a crazy thought experiment.
I do believe there may be other universes. But completely independent of anything in ours (maybe even different physics) and not infinite.

Greg Egan did it years ago..."
The professional term for theories like this is quite technical. (view spoiler)
In Theoretical Physics and Quantum Physics the cream of the ideas, usually, rises to the surface. But so do, unfortunately, the odd turd ;-)

I look at the theory as nothing more than a crazy thought experiment."
You don’t even need multiple universes to have a wacko gedankenexperiment.
Consider: the universe is infinite, but information isn’t. Which implies that patterns repeat exactly. So somewhere out there exists an Earth identical to ours in every detail where versions of us are having this exact same conversation. Maybe it happened a billion years ago or perhaps it will occur next Tuesday, but the math says it’s so.


Not necessarily. Maybe we just got lucky, first time out of the gate. That’s just as plausible. Also, an infinite number of failed universes means there’s also an infinite number of hunky-dory universes, which means the precise ratio of this’n’that suitable for life to arise is equally as common as any other mixture.
And within those innumerable “just so” universes there are Earths where dinosaurs never got wiped out and are still the dominant lifeform. Or Cro-Magnons became the surviving hominid. Or dinos *did* get the axe but mammals did, too, leaving birds as the rulers of the world. Or the mixture was such that silicon-based life arose instead of carbon-based. Or, or, or....

It just feels so ... unlikely? One shot, and infinitesimal chance - and we are still here?
Jan wrote: "Trike wrote: "Not necessarily. Maybe we just got lucky, first time out of the gate.
It just feels so ... unlikely? One shot, and infinitesimal chance - and we are still here?"
That's the Lottery Fallacy. The odds of me winning the lottery are millions to 1. The odds of someone winning is almost certain.
The odds of us being here, the universe and planet being just right to allow our existence, us becoming sentient and surviving are almost impossible. But the odds of something being here at this time is highly probable. We are just the lucky species that won the Earth based species lottery.
It just feels so ... unlikely? One shot, and infinitesimal chance - and we are still here?"
That's the Lottery Fallacy. The odds of me winning the lottery are millions to 1. The odds of someone winning is almost certain.
The odds of us being here, the universe and planet being just right to allow our existence, us becoming sentient and surviving are almost impossible. But the odds of something being here at this time is highly probable. We are just the lucky species that won the Earth based species lottery.

Yeah, that was exactly my argument FOR a multiverse ;-)
But the argument here was that there was only one shot which lead to the one universe that had all the constants at levels that allowed any kind of matter, stars, planets and life to develop.
Edit: Those Mirror Universes lack goatees!

It just feels so ... unlikely? One shot, and infinitesimal chance - and we are still here?"
You’re not here. This is all imaginary.

Of course you are. That's why Veronica always says Dera/Dara/Jan every time she mentions you.

“Then one day, I saw you set down. Another news item to share. But on Quick Burns that day, was a book. You picked it up, studied it. And I thought I saw a way. When you pretended to be Jan, posted here, I knew. You were in there, somewhere.”
https://youtu.be/aeNc6FjTNWs

It just feels so ... unlikely? One shot, and infinitesimal chance - and we are still here?"
That's ..."
The big problem with universes branching due to quantum choices is conservation of energy.
There are many physics ideas that lead to multiverses but this one doesn’t make much sense...
That's one of many problems. Also "in the theory" infinite universes would take the same branch, and infinite universes would take the alternate branch, and infinite universes would never have that branch at all. You can get away with a lot of quantum crap when you add infinity into the equation.
Just because maths says it's possible doesn't make it so.
Just because maths says it's possible doesn't make it so.

And by the way, even fantasy novels could win the Hugos (see NK Jemisin's trilogy) so not all will be SF. Some of the strong contenders this year is fantasy.
Consider novellas also as alternates/options for picks since they are shorter and many are standalones.
Some novels/novellas might be part of series so they are not ideal for monthly picks. I suggest having three books and maybe add a novella or two and take turns in picking them during the course of May to December.

And by the way, even fantasy novels could win the Hugos (see NK Jemisin's trilogy) so not all will be..."
The Fifth Season does not counts as straight fantasy as it has a very strong SF thread (far future earth genengineering, terraforming...)

Well, for me... you know what? Nevermind.

And by the way, even fantasy novels could win the Hugos (see NK Jemisin's trilogy) so not all will be..."
Could also say “we’re not reading anything by an author who’s already on the bookshelf.” That might cull a few from the list.

Well, for me... you know what? Nevermind."
Pokes sleeping bear with stick.


Well, for me... you know what? Nevermind."
+1
And yes let's read new authors not in the shelves!
I must admit I kind of zoned out a bit during all the plans for the how we might read all the hugo nominees, but I did hear something about "skipping March Madness" which would make me very sad if that happened.
Also thanks for the shout out about the S&L Worldbuilders group. And thanks again to everyone who donated!
Also thanks for the shout out about the S&L Worldbuilders group. And thanks again to everyone who donated!

Most of ‘em are between 12 and 18 hours long. So 6 nominees means somewhere between 72 and 108 hours. That just means BINGE WEEK.
No TV, no podcasts, no competitive dance parties from your Spotify playlist — just audiobooks 24/7.



I believe the only 2019 published S&L picks were Vessel and Seven Blades in Black.

My suggestion.
Once the list is finalised we narrow down the list.
-Remove any books we've already read.
-No sequels.
-No authors we've already read.
Then have a poll of the remainder and just read the top pick as a S&L pick. What ever's left we can read 1 per month as an alternate pick throughout the year.
Once the list is finalised we narrow down the list.
-Remove any books we've already read.
-No sequels.
-No authors we've already read.
Then have a poll of the remainder and just read the top pick as a S&L pick. What ever's left we can read 1 per month as an alternate pick throughout the year.
Books mentioned in this topic
A Boy and His Dog at the End of the World (other topics)Black Leopard, Red Wolf (other topics)
If, Then (other topics)
The Vela (other topics)
Vessel (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Ted Chiang (other topics)Ted Chiang (other topics)
Ted Chiang (other topics)
https://www.patreon.com/posts/33203318
http://swordandlaser.com/home/2020/1/...
https://soundcloud.com/swordandlaser/...