The Sword and Laser discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
What Else Are You Reading?
>
What Else Are You Reading - September 2019

I've always enjoyed this book but I wouldn't recommend it to first time Heinlein readers. His social, political, and moral views could be a bit of a shock and be a little off-putting to some.
On a personal note it was nice to see Canada and Winnipeg and Vancouver get some love.


"
Setting aside this book after 1/3 since it's rather tedious and switching to Reaper Man.


Don't read my review above until you're done, but...yeah.
I almost started a thread for this in the T..."
Not worth a thread.. I am lemming this one half way through. The tonal inconsistencies are really getting to me. The action and drama of the book belong in a grim dark fantasy with a touch of nazi death camps horror while the characters are straight out of a simplistic YA storyline.
I have better things to read and listen to (like Buck Godot: Zap Gun for Hire and The Slow Regard of Silent Things while I listen to Percepliquis which is much better fantasy den if it is very predictable).


Catching up a few (but not all of my reviews). Hopefully I'll catch up for real next week.
All in audio, because most of my reading these days.
First I did. Dark Age. I liked it better than Iron Gold but not nearly as much as Golden Son or Morning Star - ★★★★☆ - (My Review)
Next was Prince of Fools. I liked this much better than his Broken Empire trilogy, but not nearly as much as his Book of the Ancestor series. - ★★★½☆ - (My Review)
All in audio, because most of my reading these days.
First I did. Dark Age. I liked it better than Iron Gold but not nearly as much as Golden Son or Morning Star - ★★★★☆ - (My Review)
Next was Prince of Fools. I liked this much better than his Broken Empire trilogy, but not nearly as much as his Book of the Ancestor series. - ★★★½☆ - (My Review)

The narration was interesting. The decision was made to have the voice actor (Luke Daniels) give a very straight and calm reading most of the time (almost blase), but then doing interesting voices for side charcters, and intensifying at key points. I think this was done to show that the lead character is a very calm and controlled person himself, but before I realized this, it almost turned me off to his reading style. It's still not my favorite reading, but it did grow on me. And it was very obvious it was not the lack of skill of the voice actor, but a choice either made by him or the director.
I think I'll continue with the series at some point, but it's not something I feel I have to jump into the second book right away, maybe after a few other books.




"
Setting aside this book after 1/3 since it's rather tedious"
Yep. I managed to read the entire book but it was very tedious and didn't continue with the series.
I finished Record of a Spaceborn Few which was not nearly as good as the first book two books of The Wayfarers anthologies (The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet, A Closed and Common Orbit)
Next up I am starting A Little Hatred which was just released overnight. Woo-hoo!

I'm currently listening to Victoria Schwab's The Near Witch which I got from Hoopla after I finished off A Dangerous Collaboration (off genre) in a jiffy, and lemmed The Invasion of the Tearling.
Still have about 9 hours of Fool's Fate to finish on car rides with the spouse. Perhaps soon....


From there...well, it starts to drag quickly. The "Renegades" of the title are collected by a member of Pernese nobility denied the Lord Holder title she believes she deserves. She makes a good case for that, but going off to kill people in large numbers as "Lady Holdless" really isn't the way to redress youri grievances. Pern has a pretty big selection of rebellious characters who did good, so it's a different turn for McCaffrey. But this villain is so stereotypical as to be a cardboard cutout.
The storyline quickly palls as the "Lady Holdless" uses and throws away people ad nauseum. The book drags to such tedium that I thought about lemming it at the 40% mark.
But then after a series of improbable events we all wind up in the Southern Continent, revisiting events of White Dragon from different viewpoints, and filling in detail. Piemur takes a lead role here, F'Lar and Lessa show up, and Masterharper Robinton digs into the search for Pern's beginnings at the site of the original colonists' landing place. Other minor characters show up by the score.
The "Renegade" bit is a framing device for a series of vignettes that have little else in common. It's resolved in a fairly by-the-numbers fashion and includes some previously unknown strictures that don't allow Dragonriders to help Holders even if they're about to be killed. Gosh, it's almost like a weak-writing section thrown in for dramatic effect!
Welp, at least it eventually comes to a bangup ending. I've read All the Weyrs of Pern so knew what was coming, but it was still a lot of fun to read. I might be able to get through that book again without gagging when AIVAS shows up to Deus-Ex-Machina the plot.
Now it's on to Dragonsdawn before ATWOP. Dragons! Dragons! Even this uneven installment had enough Pern goodness to be palatable.


DNFed Infomocracy after 51%. I just did not care.
Starting The Fated Sky finally.

There's five followups of varying quality. Probably the next two at least are worth reading. After that it's a lot of rehash but if you like the universe it could be worth the effort.


That scene was indeed disturbing but I see it as part of the MC's pscyche journey - which is an element I did not expect to find so dominant in the book. As for the next books, my buddies told me no need to continue but I kiiiinda want a bit more? Let's see if I could get the next two books easily.

Basically it is a man walking from Highgate to Wimbledon through a post apocalyptic London.
The description of the walk appears detailed enough that an obsessive like me could reproduce it.


I found it just as fun as it was billed to be: gore, suspense, sword-fights, skeletons.
I just took a break from swords and lasers to read French Exit, which I thought was great, but not quite as good as the author's previous one: The Sisters Brothers. Now I'm back into the genre stuff since a co-worker talked me into starting the Rivers of London series.

It seems I need to take a break from all spacey stuff I have been reading lately so I choose The October Man as a palate cleanser. I guess Peter was not in it so I don't have any expectation.

Recently I've read:
The Wolf in the Whale which I wish had as much research done on gender and trauma as it did on Inuit culture. Lots of cool stuff, but more that made me very uncomfortable.
A Closed and Common Orbit which I LOVED.
No Time to Spare: Thinking About What Matters which I really recommend to any fans of Le Guin. They're short essays, but just as strong as any of her fiction or poetry.
I read all of Locke and Key and had so much fun with that as well. I'm beginning to think that Joe Hill is another I prefer in this format rather than his traditional novels.
I took a quick jaunt through So You Want to Talk About Race which is sort of a primer on discussing race--I think folks who chimed in on the ToL representation thread might find this of interest.
Emergency Skin was DELIGHTFUL. Gosh I love her writing. Highly recommended. The audio was also excellent.
and finally, Moon Over Soho...I like so much about this series, but in both books so far I think my enjoyment gets swamped by ridiculous plots, clunky endings, and Peter's peck...um...of pickled peppers.


About to start The Luminous Dead.
Allison wrote: "and finally, Moon Over Soho...I like so much about this series, but in both books so far I think my enjoyment gets swamped by ridiculous plots, clunky endings, and Peter's peck...um...of pickled peppers.
"
It is indeed one of the weaker book in the series. The next ones are better.

About to start The Luminous Dead.
Allison wrote: "and finally, Mo..."
Thanks Silvana! Maybe I'll add the next to my TBR then.

I wonder how much of my dislike for the MC was caused by the audiobook narrator because the MC ruined absolutely everything about the book for me. The narrator had such a wishy-washy, vaguely whiny voice about everything and was just so unlikable. It was a bummer because I really liked all of the BDO stuff and am still interested in continuing the series to see how that aspect plays out.
Started The October Country for my first Halloween read and was ready to get back into Bradford after not loving the Martian Chronicles but man the first story was just not great. Just very dated in a lot of ways. We'll see how this goes.
Also about halfway through Bury My Heart at Chuck E. Cheese's which I'm not super digging. It's supposed to be humorous but just seems snarky. I don't disagree with anything she writes about but the whole book just is so disjointed to me and all over the place. Essay collections are my jam too and this is one of the few that I'm just not connecting with so far.



The book is fan service through and through. There is a cornucopia of familiar names, as we meet the people that the places were later named after. And not just that. Familiar terms get a sly explanation as, for instance, the known term Holder from Dragonflight on is introduced first as a stakeholder, distinct from the "contract" people who bought on for smaller shares. From "stakeholder" to shortened "holder" and implicitly the small Holders and the major Lord Holders.
We see how the Watchwhers were created and why they are inferior to the dragons. The fire lizards flaming Thread, silly as it is as a plot point, showing the way to the dragons. And finally the first cohort of dragons to the rescue of a colony that barely escaped a volcano, flaming Thread out of the sky of their new home in Fort Hold.
It is corny and cheesy and how I love it so.



why only three stars?

Just started The Dragon Republic. I am liking the audio version though I am not sure I could stand the main character if she kept her antics.

That's too bad! Though to be fair, the MC was really, really unlikable, even in ebook format :D Still interesting though. I enjoy the psychology aspects of it.

why only three stars?."
Because I liked it. I don’t try to game the Goodreads rating system.
1 - didn’t like it
2 - it was okay
3 - liked it
4 - really liked it
5 - it was amazing
I think it’s perfectly valid to grade art on a pass/fail system (in this case, either 1 star or 5 stars with nothing in between), but that’s not how I roll.
That's pretty much how I score as well.
3 Stars is a good score for a book. To get a 5 a book has to be really special.
I'm not a fan of ratings systems (in life) where getting 4/5 is considered a fail.
3 Stars is a good score for a book. To get a 5 a book has to be really special.
I'm not a fan of ratings systems (in life) where getting 4/5 is considered a fail.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
A Boy and His Dog at the End of the World (other topics)A Night in the Lonesome October (other topics)
A Night in the Lonesome October (other topics)
A Night in the Lonesome October (other topics)
A Night in the Lonesome October (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Robin Hobb (other topics)R.J. Barker (other topics)
R.J. Barker (other topics)
R.J. Barker (other topics)
H.R.F. Keating (other topics)
More...
Rick wrote: "The Gurkha and the Lord of Tuesday was a fun read.
"
Good to know, I loved the sample and immediately bought it.