Litwit Lounge discussion
Lounge: OPEN, please come in...
>
What are you currently reading?
message 1451:
by
Werner
(new)
Apr 11, 2020 04:38PM


reply
|
flag

I'm coming to the end of Cards on the Table by Agatha Christie. I used to think she was rather literal and dull, but this one has quite a bit of humour in it. And she's clearly been reading Charles Dickens :)

I'd intended to devote time to Chekhov and Conrad. Instead, I've gotten distracted by Nietzsche, Dewey and Orwell. Oh well, Chekhov and Conrad will still be there When I'm ready for them.

I'd intended to devote time to Chekhov and Conrad. Instead, I've gotten distracted by Nietzsche, Dewey and Orwell. Oh well, Chekhov and Conrad will still be the..."
Nietzsche… interesting character, that one. What are you thinking of his work so far?

I'd intended to devote time to Chekhov and Conrad. Instead, I've gotten distracted by Nietzsche, Dewey and Orwell. Oh well, Chekhov and Conrad ..."
I find him exhilarating. The overt casting off of religious thought, the proclamation that God has died, the declaration that man no longer has to bow down before a part of his own intellect, sets mankind free to become the ubermensch. A lot of this was distorted and taken out of context as a subtext for fascistic thought, leading to Orwell's vision in 1984, based on the premise that man's goal is not 'happiness' a la Aristotle in The Nicomachean Ethics, but rather 'the will to power.'
Something I find particularly interesting is Nietzsche's idea that logic was invented so men could justify the decisions they reached by intuition. This is in line with much of Dewey's thought in Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. His pragmatic approach is that Aristotelian logic is purely formalistic, and that logic only makes sense as a tool to reach a warrantable assertion. But I think we're starting to tip toe into the deep end of epistemology here.
BTW, Steele, I notice your interest in fantasy. You might like to take a look at my novel The Devil's Workshop. In the first chapter God is being buried, and the book attempts to explore the ontological consequences. Finally Father Time has to step in and rectify the situation, but no spoilers here.

Also, my thanks for the insight on Nietzsche. Although I've yet to read his works myself (it's on my list), my overall impression of him, up to this point, from others and historical references to him, was a cynical, somewhat senile, anti-Christian philosopher. The way you described his ideas definitely puts a more.... sensible, spin on it.
Granted, I still don't AGREE with most of his ideas (first and foremost, I'm a man of faith--I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Later Day Saints), I can, at least, understand the rational (or lack thereof? haha) behind them. Thank you.

Also, my thanks for the insight on Nietzsche. Although I've yet to read his works myself (it's on my list), my overall impres..."
I'd suggest start with The Birth of Tragedy. If you find that to your liking, move on to Thus Spake Zarathustra.







Yes, both books will be good additions to the roster for the 2020 classics challenge!



Thanks for the tip about McCullers' novel. The Bluefield College library has it, so I'll keep it in mind.

In any case Lee and Mc..."
I'm sure they'd make an interesting comparison, and I've read reviews that praise McCullers' writing. Of course, for me the problem is that I already have 396 books on my to-read shelf (with another 142 on the "maybe to read" shelf!), and probably around 100 of them in stacked in my mountainous physical TBR piles. "So many books, so little time!" :-(

Since I started counting in 2014, my yearly total of books read has been between 33-38 (and was probably about the same in most of the years before, from about the beginning of the 90s). Like you, I usually read two books at a time, one to myself and another I'm reading to Barb; but I read to her in the car, and the pandemic has greatly cut down our time on the road. :-(





I'm still going through a strange distraction period of late (the last couple months)... admittedly, I am listening to classics I've already read as I fall asleep. Cyrano, however, is still on my night table.











I read the translation by Constance Garnett. I did not find it difficult to keep track of the characters. Dostoevsky is very good at characterization and brings each one individually to life, even if with only a phrase. I actually put the book down for several weeks after finishing part II, and had no trouble picking it back up again. I didn't suffer nearly as much from 'character soup syndrome' as I have when reading other Russian novels, such as War and Peace, in which there are a multitude of characters introduced at once early on which took me a while to get straight in my mind.



Anyway, thank you for the response, Donnally. I did have some of that trouble when I started The Brothers Karamazov some years ago. I may use a different translation for my next go-round though.




https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...






While out of town for the weekend, I came across the 1895 edition of The Complete Tales of Uncle Remus in the home we rented. I managed to squeeze a few tales in...




I've just finished Life of Pi, and hoping to see the movie soon as I was very affected by the story (just struggling to put it into words yet, lo).
I have a few hours to figure out my next read.
Books mentioned in this topic
Benito Cereno (other topics)Great Short Works of Herman Melville (other topics)
The House on Vesper Sands (other topics)
The Naming of the Birds (other topics)
Helsing: Demon Slayer (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Herman Melville (other topics)Liane Zane (other topics)
Francine Rivers (other topics)
Heather Day Gilbert (other topics)
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (other topics)
More...