Mystery/Thriller Reading Friends discussion
Miscellaneous Book Talk
>
Discovery of Witches on AMC
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Carol/Bonadie
(new)
May 20, 2019 05:27AM

reply
|
flag


Very amusing, Dan. I'm heading over to my cauldron now to cast a spell in your direction.

Oh that's interesting. I generally accept Matthew Goode as a romantic lead so even though he wasn't who I would have cast I didn't have a problem with him. I struggled more with the actress who plays Diana, but she's grown on me.

Carol/Bonadie wrote: "Anyone watching this? I finally got started on my DVR'd episodes (it's still airing) and am totally hooked. It threw me back into the world of Matthew and Diana."

Not necessarily Ann. I'm glad I read them first (there are 3 books in the series, but I'm guessing Season 1 only covers the first book); they of course provide a tremendous amount of detail and backstory, whereas the series accordions things into short timeframes. And introduces a lot of characters that don't instantly fall into place. But if you're not sure when you'll get to the books I'd say go ahead and watch the series. it might whet your appetite for the books.


Wiley wrote: "I have not watched this series yet but I loved the first three books. Have not read her latest yet, which I think also ties-in."

Me too. I forgot about it. I wonder if the plan to bring the series back.


Bonnie: So interesting how different people have different takes. Loved the books as you know. While I enjoyed the series, the casting of Diana and Matthew didn't fit my pictures. I saw Diana as a mature (emotionally) brunette with wild curly hair, and the actress cast struck me as being young and innocent--sort of the way you're describing her in the novel. As for Matthew Goode, well, I've seen him in too may movies to really believe him as our Matthew, although he did okay.
