The Mystery, Crime, and Thriller Group discussion
The 100 best thrillers of all time? You be the judge.
Desley (Cat fosterer) wrote: "Why do these lists always disappoint?"
When I saw Emma Cline's The Girls on this list I almost choked.
When I saw Emma Cline's The Girls on this list I almost choked.

On the other hand: reading a list like this is fun because next year it could be a completely different one.
I was, however, happy to see that The Dinner by Herman Koch is on the list. He is Dutch ;-). And I was happy to see The Highrise by Ballard, because that is one of my all time favorite SF-books (it is as much SF as a thriller).
The only comment made to the article was interesting. Among other things, she notes that Ruth Rendell's A Dark-Adapted Eye wasn't on the list, which she calls a "glaring omission." I have to agree with that (and I'll also add Adam and Eve and Pinch Me to the list of "glaring omissions"), and they didn't add a single book written by Rendell as Barbara Vine. How those got missed and Girl on the Train made it, well...hmm. Rendell ran rings around Paula Hawkins.

Gisela wrote: "Lucky for publishers we all like different books. I don't think there is such a thing as the 100 best books, but I like looking through them to see what I might have missed. And I like a good moan ..."
I look forward to the good moan. :)
I look forward to the good moan. :)

Well let's start with, what is Gone Girl doing there??? I admit I am one of the very few who didn't like it, but I REALLY didn't like it. So why is it on the list, nobody asked me!!!
However, just looked through it and there are some really good ones on there, which are now on my to read soon list.

I started the Clifton Chronicles this year, and then ended up buying Kane and Abel when it was on offer. I would like to finish the Chronicles, but not paying full kindle price for the next 4 books.

Agreed.

I'm not sure I would describe One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest as a thriller. That bothers me a lot, in fact.
Red Dragon is notably missing from this list.
I wouldn't even call The Girl on the Train one of the best 100 books I've read in the last year or so.
Tell No One is kind of bland and predictable, and also the author seems to have repeated himself several times after with a similar story.
I've only read one James Patterson book (London Bridges) and it was so bad I'll never read another.
Pattern Recognition was really boring and the other books in the series just got worse.
The Eight is the worst example I've ever seen of an author writing herself into her own book. Also it was sort of pretentious and dull.

There are some on the list I still want to read but forgot about, so it's a good reminder 😊.
Sera ~ Catty Reader wrote: "The girl on the train is one the worst books I've read in recent years. I hated it so much that I never even bothered with gone girl (because they kept being compared).
There are some on the list ..."
I couldn't stand Girl on The Train, and after that book, never went near another so-called domestic noir novel. I'm sure that many people enjoy that sort of thing, but it's just not for me.
There are some on the list ..."
I couldn't stand Girl on The Train, and after that book, never went near another so-called domestic noir novel. I'm sure that many people enjoy that sort of thing, but it's just not for me.

"Rendell ran rings around Paula Hawkins." Amen to that!

I enjoyed the first one after I got past the initial 100 pages or so which are really boring. The ending was an eye-roller though. And the sequels are awful. The author had a terrible obsession with describing every meal his characters ate, and they all ate the same thing: black coffee, burned toast, microwave pizzas. Good grief!

I enjoyed the first one after I got past the initial 100 pages or so which are really ..."
Again, this shows how you can't have a 100 best books, as everything you just described, especially the description of the foods (for reasons which are too long to write) I really liked. I loved Stieg Larsson's books.
Gisela wrote: "Randy wrote: "Jannelies wrote: "Stieg Larsson is on it... am I the only one that doesn't like this utterly boring book?..."
I enjoyed the first one after I got past the initial 100 pages or so whi..."
Someone in one of my other groups posted a list of NPR's best 100 horror stories of all time, and I had to laugh. The big moan goes on, no matter which genre you read.
I enjoyed the first one after I got past the initial 100 pages or so whi..."
Someone in one of my other groups posted a list of NPR's best 100 horror stories of all time, and I had to laugh. The big moan goes on, no matter which genre you read.

Vive la difference! :-)


We'd all probably come up with a different list.

We'd all probably come up with a different list."
I agree!


I suppose because tastes are so darn varied. I agree that the "Top 100 Whatever" lists are quite often not suited to my preferences. There was a "Top 10 Burgers in DC" list that came out in the Washington Post last year though, and I don't know if they were the best but they were good! The Prez Obama burger at Good Stuff Eatery was my fave. Oops, I've gone off-topic!
Richard wrote: "Desley (Cat fosterer) wrote: "Why do these lists always disappoint?"
To know if burgers or books are the best "of all time" requires that you have tried them all. With books it's okay to have read a ton. Not so much with burgers. :)
To know if burgers or books are the best "of all time" requires that you have tried them all. With books it's okay to have read a ton. Not so much with burgers. :)



Not to mention the fact that there are 2 Japanese novels and one by a Korean writer representing the non-"western" world on this list, when they produce some of the best crime out there.




My favorite book. But probably not a "thriller."




is one of the most unforgettable, disturbing, and overall best mystery/thrillers that I have ever read. I discovered the book decades ago and reread it when I purchased a Kindle back in 2014. The sequels that he wrote (Second, Third, and Fourth Deadly Sins) are exceptional in their own right. But aside from Sanders, there are any number of exceptional, complex and tightly plotted, "unputdownable" mystery thrillers out there to dwell exclusively on more recent novels that should not even be in the same library.

Since "Frankenstein" is here, I'd also propose "Dracula", which is a better book.
Have to agree with "Killing Floor" by Lee Child. Though his later novels featured more inventive plots and polished writing, the raw brutality of this first book is hard to match

Books mentioned in this topic
London Bridges (other topics)Pattern Recognition (other topics)
Red Dragon (other topics)
Adam and Eve and Pinch Me (other topics)
Tell No One (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
James Patterson (other topics)Pierre Lemaitre (other topics)
https://www.signature-reads.com/2018/...