Great Middle Grade Reads discussion
ARCHIVES
>
In need of a modern grade novel to wow my students
message 1:
by
Michelle
(new)
Jul 28, 2014 08:30PM

reply
|
flag






The Boy in The Striped Pajamas is very teachable and has a lexile of 1080. It will tear your heart out though.
I am reading The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time (lexile 1180) and I love it. It is on several 'Lists for Teens', but I question its appeal to American 8th graders. It is very British in setting and slang. It is a quirky book about a 15-year old boy with Asperger's who is trying to solve the murder of his neighbor's dog. The writer worked with Autistic students, and has done very thorough research, and it shows.



There are some things you just can't get thru people's heads. I agree with you whole-heartedly about lexile. We are dropping The Outsiders because of its lexile. 740 which is deemed more appropriate for 6th grade. I'm sure 6th grade parents don't want thier kid reading about other kids smoking, drinking, and the often missed in the book, teen pregnancy. But it's going and believe me, it's a sore subject.
I've spent hours looking for a dystopian book in the proper lexile for 8th grade. Most of the books I have found place a lot of these books back in the 700 range. Literally 6 hours or checking lexiles against goodreads ya dystopian list provided me with very few options.
And here's the thing, I do want to have great moral and philosophical discussions with my students, but I also want to show them what good writing looks like. I have really been struggling with that concept when looking at many of these new dystopian books.
So very frustrated. I can't change CC and my new expectations as a teacher, but I can make sure they have something teachable in their hands.

http://nerdybookclub.wordpress.com/20...








I really don't want to affirm your regret. :) We're friendly people here. You are so correct in stating that the CCSS specify skills that students should be mastering at a certain grade level. Conflicts can arise in schools when people are forced to adhere to Lexile levels. A Lexile level can be measured (within a range) to show student growth. This can be a great use of the Lexile tool. A student who reads at the upper level of their ability will be challenged with vocabulary and concepts that will allow them to increase their reading abilities. Sometimes, as a teacher, I will decide that it is OK (maybe even preferable) for a student/class to read a book at the low end of their ability (a bit below Lexile) because I want to expose the student to a particular, worthwhile book, or we will be practicing skills that are challenging. For instance, if students are struggling with determining theme I would probably choose a book that is not terribly challenging in vocabulary and not too lengthy so we can read the book easily while concentrating on the evidence of thematic development. Tom Sawyer is rated at 640, probably due to simple vocabulary, for instance. But I think that for many 21st century students, a lot of comprehension work would have to go into understanding the setting of a 19th century river town in the midwest, and to understanding the social problems that are so apparent, but that a child might have little experience with. This can become a problem when administrators adhere blindly to Lexile levels and unwittingly deny the use of good books that the teacher feels can benefit the class. There are also some reading experts who believe that forcing kids to ALWAYS read at the upper level of their ability can turn the kids off to pleasure reading We sure don't want to do that.
An example of a student reading below level that I would view as OK: I had a student who decided that he wanted to read the entire Magic Tree House series, in order. After a few books, he was really skilled enough to move on to something more challenging, but he still enjoyed the books and was really excited about achieving his goal. Someone else might think I should insist he move on to harder books, but I think letting him gain that joy from reading what he chose and working toward a goal that he set was more important. It can be difficult in a school setting to make administrators, and sometimes parents, happy with a choice like this if someone decides to make it an issue.

I couldn't agree with you more. There will be a lot of bumps in the road as teachers try to institute CCSS and still use our own skills to do what we know is best for our students.

Dystopian of another flavor: "Foundation" by Asimov. Lexile 760 (I think).
*shakes head* any admin reading common core standards as meaning every reader should be reading at a Lexile of 1000 by 8th grade is out if their minds. Especially without respect to content.




I have to chime in here--and agree with those who point out that the CCSS does NOT set rules like lexile level. Administrators do that. And I know to my sorrow that when districts are under pressure (i.e. from NCLB sanctions), one of the things they like is to standardize everything. I'm still working on my superintendent to allow teachers to use the old reading groups with different books, so kids can read at appropriate levels. When I first talked to him about getting novels back into the curriculum, his first instinct was to say we needed to select a single book per grade.
And this is a guy who's been a teacher, and is VERY bright--but those rules and sanctions are daunting. (But I've not heard from anyone in our District that they need to consider lexile levels for everything the kids read).
Totally agree, BTW, that kids need to be allowed to read below their level for fun. Of course, I consider that to be what you do at home, on your own time, for recreation. I realize looking even at my own kids that THAT ideal is pretty well shot. Sigh.
And this is a guy who's been a teacher, and is VERY bright--but those rules and sanctions are daunting. (But I've not heard from anyone in our District that they need to consider lexile levels for everything the kids read).
Totally agree, BTW, that kids need to be allowed to read below their level for fun. Of course, I consider that to be what you do at home, on your own time, for recreation. I realize looking even at my own kids that THAT ideal is pretty well shot. Sigh.





This is a fantastic discussion, even from the perspective of a teacher not having to think about the CCS - we have a different curriculum here in NZ. I have to say that the challenges presented have provoked some really interesting ideas for fresh new literature to use in the classroom.
I'm off to read Maze Runner and then to watch the DVD, as I have been looking for something new, worthwhile, challenging and current for my Year 8 students.
On the lexile thing, someone brought up the tension between finding books that leave enough cognitive space to really develop comprehension and a rich understanding of texts, without having to focus on decoding and too much unfamiliar vocab - this is such an important point, and often missed when the focus is solely lexile.
I have found Falling in Love with Close Reading: Lessons for Analyzing Texts--And Life very useful, as is Notice and Note: Strategies for Close Reading.

I know, Michelle, you said your admin also wants something current, but I actually just read a Heinlein MG book (didn't even know one existed so I had to) called Tunnel in the Sky. I was stunned NOT to find it dated in the way so much other vintage sci fi is (i.e., sexist, racist). On the contrary, it features three strong female characters and -- judging by surname only -- a multinational cast of characters (this is a pet peeve of mine so I was doubly pleased -- I prefer that authors do NOT mention skin color but am okay with other cues). Plus it makes use of space travel via wormhole though it calls the portals "gates" and "tunnels."
It also ties in with the mention of Lord of the Flies -- which I thought about several times while reading this book. Not to give spoilers (this is part of the jacket description) but this book is also about what happens when some kids are stranded (they're a bit older by and large than many of the L of the F kids), but it goes differently, so would be a great side-by-side read with L of the F. I am just putting it out there in case any of you or your students might be interested (and because I'd love to have someone to discuss it with!).
Lots of luck with your hunt.

I agree as well. In fact, the CCSSs specifically address a three-pronged approach to determining appropriate texts for readers. Appendix A of the CCSS, provides a three-part model for measuring text complexity in which we consider qualitative dimensions, quantitative dimensions and reader/task dimensions of a text to determine the overall text complexity level. In the appendix (at http://www.corestandards.org/assets/A...), there is a specific example where we see an excerpt from Grapes of Wrath. The quantitative level (which would equate to a lexile level) of the passage is grades 2-3, but, when qualitative and reader/task aspects are considered, the excerpt is deemed to be appropriately complex for grades 9-10. I have a slide show that walks through this process and it has been IMMENSELY helpful in "educating" my administrators about text complexity and not to get wrapped around the axle with the reading level alone. I would be happy to share- send me a message! And, for the record, I have nothing whatsoever to do with writing, promoting, or advocating CCSS. :-)




Michelle, are you teaching in the USA? I just today read that Helsinki, Finland is switching to teaching in integrated units of study across the curriculum. The old ideas keep coming back around. Be ready for this one. I feel your pain about the hired-gun. The only thing we can count on is that there will be more change. Our in-service yesterday emphasized again the need to teach with multi-media. Text books are just not engaging enough.
