Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

20 views
Serieses! > Separating erroneous series / comic book entry

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Alysa (last edited May 08, 2018 08:00AM) (new)

Alysa H. | 19 comments Someone has recently combined a collected work (a graphic novel containing all 5 issues of a comic book) with the listing for the single "Issue #1"

Here is the series page:
https://www.goodreads.com/series/1628...

Here is the editions page:
https://www.goodreads.com/work/editio...

It looks like some other librarian put in the following note at some point, which obviously went unheeded:
"Please do not combine this with Rivers of London Body Work #1, which is the first of the five individual comic issues that constitute this book. [ThomyZ]"

When I try separate it back out, I get the "Sorry, you can't separate the most popular edition of a work" message.

I just went ahead and flagged the error for review, but I thought I'd mention it here too in case some super librarian can fix it faster this way.


message 2: by Olivia (new)

Olivia (livka) | 7927 comments I separated 3 most obvious '5 issues' editions, but it's not clear for me which else should be separated
https://www.goodreads.com/work/editio...


message 3: by Alysa (last edited May 08, 2018 09:01PM) (new)

Alysa H. | 19 comments Olivia wrote: "I separated 3 most obvious '5 issues' editions, but it's not clear for me which else should be separated
https://www.goodreads.com/work/editio..."


Almost all of the “editions” are the collected work containing all 5 issues, published simply as “Rivers of London: Body Work” or “Rivers of London [Volume 1]: Body Work”
It is more properly the single issue #1 that should be separated, so as to minimize damage to the existing Goodreads organization of the larger series information.


These all appear to be just Issue #1, at least:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...

(In fact that last one, #23387877, should probably be deleted. It’s a “fake” entry from before publication, with projected cover art that never actually existed.)

ETA — I’ve moved a few more around, now that you have established separate entries. I will take another look tomorrow....


message 4: by Alysa (new)

Alysa H. | 19 comments Okay I think it’s all good now. Hopefully no one will muck it up again :)


back to top