Fantasy Buddy Reads discussion

164 views
Archive [General] > 2018 Team Competition Tracker/Google Sheet Central

Comments Showing 51-100 of 921 (921 new)    post a comment »

message 51: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Iain wrote: "Lundos is right... the 2nd Petrik is taking G7, which is the page count for one specific book without bonus points...

While we're on the topic, I double checked the rest, and Tania is missing from..."


fixed!


message 52: by Margret, Caladan Brood Face (new)

Margret | 3168 comments Mod
You are a life saver Rob


message 53: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Margret wrote: "You are a life saver Rob"

You're welcome.

Also everyone - don't be shy, if you have an edit or way of generating a cool stat, let me know or create a duplicate page to implement your idea and show everyone. (Without deleting the tracker entirely please!).

for those better at spreadsheets than me - trying to figure out a way to generate a self-updating list ranking the most popular reads from everyone on the scoreboard page. Getting a sense it is a time consuming process. aslo, if we added a rating column to everyone sheet, we could also get a sense of the favorite rankings too. Just a thought :)


message 54: by Choko (new)

Choko (chokog) | 12597 comments Yeah, this is amazing! I wish I could learn to do this spreadsheet thingy...


message 55: by Rob (last edited Jan 09, 2018 07:31AM) (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Choko wrote: "Yeah, this is amazing! I wish I could learn to do this spreadsheet thingy..."

Learn by doing :) I'm 97.5% self-taught. (Thank you Baseball).


message 56: by Lundos (new)

Lundos | 392 comments @rob take a look in my sheet. You might find some inspiration, though, it's obviously work in progress.


message 57: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Choko wrote: "Yeah, this is amazing! I wish I could learn to do this spreadsheet thingy..."

Yea... just save a backup and fiddle with things in your page... I figured out how they were adding book links, and it's 50% convenient...

1) Click a cell with a book title
2) Click the chain button on top right...

3a) Half the time one of the 2 auto searches is a goodreads link...

3b) Otherwise, you need to copy the link from another goodreads tab


message 58: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Feeling inspired, I got a page count working with a little google magic, and that SUMIF function Lundos mentioned...

=sumif(B4:B1000,"<>",C4:C1000)

can be seen in my sheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...

Added this line to get an idea of how many pages I've read, without all the bonus points... if we added these cells to all spreadsheets, we could play with it on the scorecard page to get an idea of what people are reading, regardless of how many Buddy Reads and challenges they do... the only "problem" is that it doesn't shrink graphic novels...


message 59: by jess (new)

jess (nu6586) | 1729 comments Is there some updating going on? Tome Raiders/Blood Eagles' scores arent updating.


message 60: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Are you sure?... they seem to be updating to me... when a book is added, it seems to take a few seconds or cell moves for the math to update, but that's the extent I've seen... I think Blood Eagles has closed the gap with House of Chains even more since last I looked at the page...


message 61: by Lundos (new)

Lundos | 392 comments Julia was moved from Unaligned. That made them almost catch us.


message 62: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
I meant since Jess added a graphic novel a little while ago for 2 points... but yea... that too... I thought it was me adding in a couple books at first, but that didn't explain the big jump...


message 63: by Lundos (new)

Lundos | 392 comments @Jess: Your points are registered.


message 64: by Bill (new)

Bill | 2150 comments I like the addition of total pages to the individual tabs. Thanks for the continued great work.


message 65: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Bill wrote: "I like the addition of total pages to the individual tabs. Thanks for the continued great work."

That was Iain's idea on his page. I merely did some copy and pasting :)


message 66: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Rob wrote: "Bill wrote: "I like the addition of total pages to the individual tabs. Thanks for the continued great work."

That was Iain's idea on his page. I merely did some copy and pasting :)"


I did have some fun with the scoreboard sheet though yesterday.


message 67: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
I've liked a lot of the added info...

if we want to take it a step further, we can do:

=countif(B4:B1000,"<>",C4:C1000) to get books read,

and then divide total pages by books read to get average book length, and figure out who is reading longer books...

Not sure there's a nice place to put these stats on people's pages tho... at least not mine...


message 68: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Rob wrote: "Bill wrote: "I like the addition of total pages to the individual tabs. Thanks for the continued great work."

That was Iain's idea on his page. I merely did some copy and pasting :)"


I actually started copying it into random people's pages without the formatting when I was looking at other people with a ton of books read, because I wanted to compare Page Counts... for example, me and Choko keep managing similar page counts, but she's got a few more Buddy Reads/points than me... cause she was playing the long game 4 months ago with the Tiger and Del Buddy Read and the like...


message 69: by Rob (last edited Jan 12, 2018 08:50AM) (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Iain wrote: "I've liked a lot of the added info...

if we want to take it a step further, we can do:

=countif(B4:B1000,"",C4:C1000) to get books read,

and then divide total pages by books read to get average..."


I'm not sure how meaningful it is considering our points are page generated already, not per book generated. It seems somewhat duplicative. It might be more fun just to see books read as a separate column since we don't have that on the scorecard already.

What I'd really like to see is a rating system so that it can be a tool to see what we all really like and give us all suggestions for things we might not have read yet.

Now if there was some way to consider font size/spacing, that might be more meaningful.

I am working on another thing for the scoreboard that is

Team total points - minus top reader. To see how close it really is without the team's anchorperson ;) (doing so it will update automatically though).


message 70: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
You can already see how much of an effect some people are having with that Team %... Choko is like 40% of Jaghut...

By the way, you just broke Team % with the sorted team leaderboard... you were dividing by a specific cell, and now that varies depending on who is leading...

House of Chains team member %s add up to 150% now, and meanwhile Tome Raiders totals 60%...


message 71: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Rob wrote: "Iain wrote: "I've liked a lot of the added info...

if we want to take it a step further, we can do:

=countif(B4:B1000,"",C4:C1000) to get books read,

and then divide total pages by books read t..."


I'd be interested in adding a ratings column and mining data from it, but I think you mentioned before that that seems like a lot of work for you...


message 72: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Iain wrote: "Rob wrote: "Iain wrote: "I've liked a lot of the added info...

if we want to take it a step further, we can do:

=countif(B4:B1000,"",C4:C1000) to get books read,

and then divide total pages by ..."


And for everyone else considering they'd have to go back and rate everything. We have a year to do this challenge, so I can work on it over that time (and then it's in place for next year should we do it again).


message 73: by jess (new)

jess (nu6586) | 1729 comments I wanted to again thank Rob and eveyone who has aided him in creating this spreadsheet!

If only we could find a way of motivating those on our team who havent contributed. Besides friending and messaging, that is.


message 74: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Jess wrote: "I wanted to again thank Rob and eveyone who has aided him in creating this spreadsheet!

If only we could find a way of motivating those on our team who havent contributed. Besides friending and me..."


Tis still early in the year and we all have different life constraints. All it takes is a single long book to jump up in the standings.


message 75: by Frank (new)

Frank | 828 comments I think I figured this out finally.
it's going to be a great tool.

thank you Rob.


message 76: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Haha I love that Jess is on the offensive. I'm giving my silent people through the month to get it together, then we're implementing Team Stalker mode. Nowhere is safe! Peer pressure for a good cause! (I'm kidding, mostly)


message 77: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
You need to up your game... that new stat showing which team member is raising the score the most isn't doing your team any favors... you need a Hacen.. she's the only person with 40+ points that still counts in that little experiment...


message 78: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
That's because we're spreading the awesomeness around evenly. ;P


message 79: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Actually, if we took this a step further, and just removed the top 5 scorers, and Miche for Team Tome Raiders, the scores would be pretty close... that would remove Hacen from Blood Eagles tally and Sha from House of Chains... leaving the scores as:

House of Chains = 156.8 (128.7 without Yanique, as well)
Blood Eagles = 139.9
Jaghut Guardians = 134.3
Tome Raiders =127.8


message 80: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Niki Hawkes wrote: "Haha I love that Jess is on the offensive. I'm giving my silent people through the month to get it together, then we're implementing Team Stalker mode. Nowhere is safe! Peer pressure for a good cau..."

The # of members/team is a bit off as well. Need to invite more people to make it more even.


message 81: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Niki Hawkes wrote: "That's because we're spreading the awesomeness around evenly. ;P"

Tome Raiders and House of Chains are both pretty evenly balanced (minus Bill)... it's just House of Chains has more people in the 20-35pt range...


message 82: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
With all the cool added stats, I'd like to put in a request for one for each team that automatically organizes by most points descending order. It's a competition within a competition and I think it would be fun to see. :) the leader on Team Tome Raiders switches a couple of times a day. I love it.


message 83: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Rob wrote: "Niki Hawkes wrote: "Haha I love that Jess is on the offensive. I'm giving my silent people through the month to get it together, then we're implementing Team Stalker mode. Nowhere is safe! Peer pre..."

That's supposed to be because some people only read 10-20 books / year and other read 40/80/160... so it takes more people to balance out... but that only works if everybody is around...


message 84: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Niki Hawkes wrote: "With all the cool added stats, I'd like to put in a request for one for each team that automatically organizes by most points descending order. It's a competition within a competition and I think i..."

I think this calls for a separate tab :)


message 85: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Rob wrote: "Niki Hawkes wrote: "With all the cool added stats, I'd like to put in a request for one for each team that automatically organizes by most points descending order. It's a competition within a compe..."

I was going to say... 4x the work, but more room to play with...


message 86: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
I predicted no-show probability when assigning teams, so I'm actually glad to see our participation numbers relatively even with 8,8,9, & 10 (which without lovely Julia would've been 9 as well).


message 87: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Iain wrote: "Rob wrote: "Niki Hawkes wrote: "With all the cool added stats, I'd like to put in a request for one for each team that automatically organizes by most points descending order. It's a competition wi..."

Well I'll listen to Gardens of the Moon while I do it...so not a total loss.


message 88: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Or you could maybe sort the individual tallies by team? Already on the first page, but it changes order as the number updates? I'm not sure if there's a simple way to do that by team with everything under one column or not haha. A separate tab also sounds good haha.


message 89: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Mad props if you can get anything else done while trying to listen to Gardens. I'm still on pg 60.


message 90: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Niki Hawkes wrote: "Or you could maybe sort the individual tallies by team? Already on the first page, but it changes order as the number updates? I'm not sure if there's a simple way to do that by team with everythin..."

Actually, I could just put in a filter and everyone could just check it out as they like. (as long as they put it back when they're done).


message 91: by Bill (new)

Bill | 2150 comments Iain wrote: "Niki Hawkes wrote: "That's because we're spreading the awesomeness around evenly. ;P"

Tome Raiders and House of Chains are both pretty evenly balanced (minus Bill)... it's just House of Chains has..."


Actually we have a 40+ points member who hasn’t added her books to the spreadsheet yet. 😁


message 92: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Also, rob thanks for inputting the random updates I've sent. :)


message 93: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
A filter would be cool. :)


message 94: by Liam (new)

Liam (leeman729) | 828 comments Niki Hawkes wrote: "I predicted no-show probability when assigning teams, so I'm actually glad to see our participation numbers relatively even with 8,8,9, & 10 (which without lovely Julia would've been 9 as well)."

The problem with the no-shows, is that even though there are even number of no-shows, the books read might still not be even haha. One person who no showed might have been reading 50 books a year, while the no shows on another team were only reading 10 books a year.

But fear not, it's only the 12th of the first month ;].

Honestly, just looking at the numbers, its completely insane how much we all read as a group - and just the few who are participating in this competition haha. We all read A LOT.


message 95: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Yep - filters work fine. :) have fun. Try not to blow it up :)


message 96: by jess (new)

jess (nu6586) | 1729 comments I think the members distribution wasnt based on number of people per team but on factors like how many books a year read. Im no mod, but it seems like that.


message 97: by Liam (new)

Liam (leeman729) | 828 comments Bill wrote: "Iain wrote: "Niki Hawkes wrote: "That's because we're spreading the awesomeness around evenly. ;P"

Tome Raiders and House of Chains are both pretty evenly balanced (minus Bill)... it's just House ..."


Whhaattttttttttttttttt


message 98: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Liam wrote: "Niki Hawkes wrote: "I predicted no-show probability when assigning teams, so I'm actually glad to see our participation numbers relatively even with 8,8,9, & 10 (which without lovely Julia would've..."

Astoundingly, I took that into account too. The biggest pitfall to that preparation is that I was incorrect on some of the people I thought would show up (who haven't) and vise versa lol.


message 99: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35338 comments Mod
Most of the people I think are behind on tallies are in House of Chains... I see you meant Laura, since she's in most of the Buddy Reads I do... and doesn't Saar have some points?... I'm not sure about the other zeroes...

And I'm not sure we can use those filters with the Scorecard tab locked... or I dunno how to follow instructions...


message 100: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Rob wrote: "Iain wrote: "Most of the people I think are behind on tallies are in House of Chains... I see you meant Laura, since she's in most of the Buddy Reads I do... and doesn't Saar have some points?... I..."

ah drat. so much for that solution. Probalby better off not letting anyone edits cells on the scoreboard page :) i'll do something different.


back to top