2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion

Now You Die (Bullet Catcher, #6)
This topic is about Now You Die
4 views
Now You Die > Question J

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Jonetta (ejaygirl) | 7669 comments Mod
Lucy killed her ex-husband for risking their child when he knew he was a wanted man. Your thoughts about what she did, even considering he turned out to be a double agent? Was she responsible for that school being blown up?


Anita (anitanodiva) | 849 comments Tough call. Lucy had a right to her revenge and I won't second guess her taking it. Would the school have been spared if she had killed the terrorist instead of her scum husband? It's too hard to know for sure if that would have been the outcome.


Lauren (laurenjberman) | 2240 comments While her husband was a traitorous jerk, taking the law into ones own hands leads to anarchy. By killing her husband, she became no different from him really.

As to the school, no. I don't she was responsible. Terrorists rarely work alone and if she had killed that one then another one would have blown up the school or some other target.


Jonetta (ejaygirl) | 7669 comments Mod
While her husband was a callous jerk for risking their child, Lucy was dead wrong for setting him up and killing him. The fact that he was later determined to be a double agent doesn't make what she did right.

No, she should release herself from the guilt over that school debacle and feel some contrition for having murdered her husband.


Lauren (laurenjberman) | 2240 comments Jonetta wrote: "The fact that he was later determined to be a double agent doesn't make what she did right. "

Exactly! Two wrongs don't make a right.


Robin (robinmy) | 1214 comments Taking the law into her own hands was just wrong. Yes, he was a scumbag, but she doesn't get to kill him (even if he deserved it.)


back to top