Mystery Lovers! discussion

251 views
Random Chats > Who needs to hang it up?

Comments Showing 51-100 of 126 (126 new)    post a comment »

message 51: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) I believe the saying "writers write," has a lot of truth, especially for those established in a genre, with a following already.

It's possible that if we as reader were more willing to read mystery short stories they would feel more like less the need to pump out novels.

Who is to say? What do the publishers demand of them?


message 52: by Bridgit (new)

Bridgit | 2 comments I have to agree about Patricia Cornwell and Evanovich. Though i have stopped reading Cornwell completely and still struggle on with Stephanie Plum - though i have stopped buying the hardcovers and have moved to either paperback or library books.

I also think some of the latest Kathy Reichs novels have been a little light on plot and character development and have started to pull back on reading those as well.

Also, after 20 something books, i think the JD Robb series needs to be put to bed.


message 53: by Annthelibrarian (new)

Annthelibrarian | 15 comments Shomeret wrote: "Re Hillerman-- Has nobody noticed that he died last year? It's almost a year ago now.

Shomeret"


Hi, Yes, I was going to respond the same way. That Tony Hillerman passed away. I think he did manage to keep his Joe Leaphorn/Jim Chee series fresh. I enjoyed all of his books.


message 54: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) It would explain why he hasn't put out a book in some time.


message 55: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) I agree, Kari. They are under pressure from publishers and fans, yet, an author should have the right to kill a main character. Andrea Camilleri has already written the final novel of his series, sent it to his publisher with the instruction to publish it after he dies. In that novel he kills his main character.




message 56: by Joseph (new)

Joseph  (bluemanticore) | 31 comments Kari wrote: "I agree an author has the right to kill the series but money and fan pressure is probably pretty strong.
I would think killing the main character is to insure that their agent does not hire a ghost writer to continue the series after their death like Ludlum and Sanders. ..."


That's exactly what happened with Doyle and Sherlock Holmes. Doyle wanted to stop and did kill off Holmes so no one else would continue his work, but unfortunately for him and good for the readers this time, neither plan worked.




message 57: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Ok, let's look again at Ian Rankin. Rebus and Big Ger should die together. They are two sides of the same coin. Rebus is law and order, almost to the limit. Big Ger is lawlessness but will not allow anyone to kill Rebus except himself!

The best thing Rankin could do is trap the two together and have them die together. Mutual hatred is also mutual love. Damn, mysteries are so complex when we think they are the simplest of all.


message 58: by Joseph (new)

Joseph  (bluemanticore) | 31 comments Stephen wrote: "Ok, let's look again at Ian Rankin. Rebus and Big Ger should die together. They are two sides of the same coin. Rebus is law and order, almost to the limit. Big Ger is lawlessness but will not ..."

Should Rankin have them both fall over the side of a waterfall? ;-)




message 59: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Haha, that would be great. You know, in the last book Rebus was the one that hopped on the hospital bed when Big Ger nearly died, saying, "don't you die on me you big bastard!"


Susanna - Censored by GoodReads (susannag) Or Dorothy L. Sayers, who grew bored with Lord Peter Wimsey long before her fans did, and married him off.


message 61: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Susanna wrote: "Or Dorothy L. Sayers, who grew bored with Lord Peter Wimsey long before her fans did, and married him off."

Different world then.


Susanna - Censored by GoodReads (susannag) Stephen wrote: "Susanna wrote: "Or Dorothy L. Sayers, who grew bored with Lord Peter Wimsey long before her fans did, and married him off."

Different world then. "


I'm not sure I understand you, Stephen.


message 63: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Marrying off a character now would hardly end a series. They would just fight together, or end up divorced. Marriage is no longer a dependable series end.


Susanna - Censored by GoodReads (susannag) Ah.

At the time, however, it had the same effect.

As she refused to write any more mystery novels.


message 65: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Haha, she was busy translating Dante in what I think is the finest English translation to date.


message 66: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) That's a very interesting idea, Kari. W is for Wedding!


message 67: by Gail (new)

Gail I think Busman's Honeymoon followed after Sayers married Wimsey off to Harriet. And I believe she left a couple of fragments which were finished (a many-sided word) by Jill someone years later and published to a tiny bit of success.


message 68: by Bill (new)

Bill | 5 comments Stephen, I'm not sure I agree with you about Hill. What I find interesting about him is that over the years, my allegiences have shifted. At first, I sided more with Pascoe and found Dalziel a bit of a buffoon. Now, I find as Pascoe has aged, I find him a bit of a prig and a bore, while Dalziel is still surprising me. Also, Hill has other concerns that play into his writing,often playful, that I find keeps him interesting, such as Butcher's Meat playing off an unfinished Jane Austen novel. With Hill, it's more the writing that keeps me interested than the characters.


message 69: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Bill wrote: "Butcher's Meat playing off an unfinished Jane Austen novel"

That's exactly what made me mad. I don't think he's ever read a word of Austen.


message 70: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Kari wrote: "Stephen wrote: "That's a very interesting idea, Kari. W is for Wedding!"

Shhh. do not give her any ideas. I do not think I would like it if she married Kinsey."


So it will go on to AA is for Alcoholic Anonymous for Murder? LOL JK


message 71: by Annthelibrarian (new)

Annthelibrarian | 15 comments Kari wrote: "I think having Kinsey Millhone marry might end Grafton's Series.
Does anyone know if she plans on ending with Z? "


I'm pretty sure I read that she plans on ending the series with Z. I sort of doubt that she'll have Kinsey get married.




message 72: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Z is for what then? Z is for Zebra with an Axe? hehehe


Susanna - Censored by GoodReads (susannag) Z is for Ze End?


message 74: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Susanna wrote: "Z is for Ze End?"

lolol Very good.


message 75: by [deleted user] (new)

Kinsey will never marry. She's much too independent. Look what happened when Nevada Barr married off Anna Pigeon. She took off across the country -- alone -- and I think they have been together since. Same with Dana Stabenow's Kate Shugack. Independent women don't need to marry. Look at Oprah. It's more acceptable for women not to marry now. Doesn't mean they can't have a healthy relationship, but after a certain age, there's just no need to marry. Stephanie will never marry Joe. These strong women characters would have to completely change in order to become wives, and frankly, I think the stories wouldn't survive.


message 76: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Kate Shugack wreaked an awful vengeance on those who killed Jack. I was fine until you brought Oprah into the discussion. lol


Susanna - Censored by GoodReads (susannag) I think that's why we were thinking the series might end with a marriage, Sandra.


message 78: by C.J. (new)

C.J. Lyons (cjlyons) | 19 comments I'm enjoying this discussion so much that I made it the topic for my post today on Criminal Minds (http://7criminalminds.blogspot.com/) I've decided that the length of the series may depend upon the type of main character and how/why they change over time.

Probably spending waaaay too much time thinking about this when I should be reading or writing, but the discussion really made me think about my own characters, so thank you all for the great insights!
CJ
CJ Lyons
http://www.cjlyons.net
URGENT CARE, coming October 27, 2009
WARNING SIGNS, "Lyons is a master within the genre." ~Pittsburgh Magazine
LIFELINES, "A breathtakingly fast-paced medical thriller."~Publishers Weekly



message 79: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) CJ, I don't recall anyone mentioning that you should hang it up.


message 80: by C.J. (new)

C.J. Lyons (cjlyons) | 19 comments Stephen wrote: "CJ, I don't recall anyone mentioning that you should hang it up." LOL! I hope not, I only have my third book coming out in a month! One of the questions that began this thread was how much should/could series characters change over time and how that impacted the longevity of the series and that inspired me to think about the different types of successful long-running series characters.

Sorry for any confusion!
CJ
CJ Lyons
http://www.cjlyons.net
URGENT CARE, coming October 27, 2009
WARNING SIGNS, "Lyons is a master within the genre." ~Pittsburgh Magazine
LIFELINES, "A breathtakingly fast-paced medical thriller."~Publishers Weekly




message 81: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Yeah, I went to your site and almost mentioned you've only just begun (think Carpenters song) but I thought it might be rude to say.

I will hunt down your books though.


message 82: by C.J. (new)

C.J. Lyons (cjlyons) | 19 comments Stephen wrote: "Yeah, I went to your site and almost mentioned you've only just begun (think Carpenters song) but I thought it might be rude to say.

I will hunt down your books though."
Not rude at all--it's the truth! And the nice thing about my Angels of Mercy series is that it revolves around an ensemble cast, so it has the potential to be long running (fingers crossed!)

But I'm starting a new series with a single main character was wrestling with the question of how to keep things from getting stale and how much change a character can experience--or if they shouldn't change but rather the world around them change.....anyway, great food for thought from everyone's comments here!!!

Thanks again,
CJ
CJ Lyons
http://www.cjlyons.net
URGENT CARE, coming October 27, 2009
WARNING SIGNS, "Lyons is a master within the genre." ~Pittsburgh Magazine
LIFELINES, "A breathtakingly fast-paced medical thriller."~Publishers Weekly




message 83: by Jim (new)

Jim | 101 comments I think Jeffrey Deaver is at his end
loved his stuff early on but I just don't get excited about his books any more like i do about Michael Connelly, Peter Robinson, Val McDermid


message 84: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Peter Robinson has been at it a long time too. I was disappointed in his last outing, but that won't stop me reading his next.

Val McDermid just got too brutal for me.


message 85: by Gail (new)

Gail Uh-huh. And I hope I won't be publicly stoned, but Elizabeth George really needs to change gears. About the only thing left to her is to kill the detectives, brutally and without any rationale.


message 86: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) I agree with you. Elizabeth George has become an echo of her former self. Killing Lady Helen was a stupid and pointless thing for her to do. I agree, kill Lynley.


message 87: by Renee (new)

Renee (elenarenee) I have gotten very bored with Patterson's books. I used to love them but now they just seem light.


message 88: by Barbara (new)

Barbara (cinnabarb) Stephen wrote: "I agree with you. Elizabeth George has become an echo of her former self. Killing Lady Helen was a stupid and pointless thing for her to do. I agree, kill Lynley."

It would be a shame to kill Lynley...good looking, smart guy! I will admit though I was pretty fed up with him in the last book where he wandered around like a tramp in his terrible grief after losing his wife and then - pretty quickly- sort of looked ready to hook up with the doctor lady.


message 89: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Well Lynley was something of a naughty boy pre Lady Helen.


message 90: by Barbara (new)

Barbara (cinnabarb) Stephen wrote: "Well Lynley was something of a naughty boy pre Lady Helen."

yeah, that's true :)


message 91: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) In so many ways it was Lady Helen who made him bearable.


message 92: by [deleted user] (new)

Renee wrote: "I have gotten very bored with Patterson's books. I used to love them but now they just seem light."

I hate that I have to read a James Patterson (Maxine Paetro) book to find out what's going on with The Murder Club. I detest these short little chapters with no real plot development, but I like these characters. Does Maxine Paetro write solo?


message 93: by Jo (new)

Jo Lee | 2 comments Sandra - you said just what I have been feeling about Patterson's books lately! They are.....just to predictable, too action figures, just too MUCH! I started out loving The Murder Club books - now I put off reading them until I have nothing else available. :(


message 94: by Bluedaizy (new)

Bluedaizy | 97 comments Matthew Pearl should give it up. I keep reading his books hoping they will get better but I just can't seem to finish the Poe one. Great premise for the books, but boooooring.

I have no intention at all of reading the Agatha Raisin series. yuck.


message 95: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Agatha Raisin is funny, and there are some precarious situations she gets herself into. The thing about men is strictly a sideline. And ALWAYS gets her into trouble.


message 96: by Joseph (new)

Joseph  (bluemanticore) | 31 comments Bluedaizy wrote: "Matthew Pearl should give it up. I keep reading his books hoping they will get better but I just can't seem to finish the Poe one. Great premise for the books, but boooooring.

I have no intent..."


Bluedaizy, you might want to give Pearl another chance. I agree, his second book, The Poe Shadow, was not as good as his first, The Dante Club, but his third one, The Last Dickens, was pretty good. Not as good as his first, but much better than his second, IMO.


message 97: by John (new)

John I vote for Tamar Myers - both of her series have jumped their sharks for me.


message 98: by Renee (new)

Renee (elenarenee) Ahhh Bluedazy I loved the Poe one it was wonderful. And Agatha is my go to lady for a fun light make me laugh break. Thats why there are diferent books out there


message 99: by John (new)

John I had thought so about Agatha a couple of books back, but kept going and she seems to have a bit of life left in her (series) yet.


message 100: by Bluedaizy (new)

Bluedaizy | 97 comments I've been trying to read the Poe book for about 3 months now. I'm giving it up. I love Edgar Allen Poe and can't help thinking he would be turning over in his grave (after trying to claw himself out).

I think the premises for Pearl's books are really clever, but the books don't deliver in characterization for me. I really want to like it, but have decided life is too short to waste any more time on it.


back to top