The Diary of a Young Girl
discussion
Anyone else hate this Diary
message 51:
by
Carolina
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jun 10, 2014 10:20AM

reply
|
flag




I'll bet it didn't have a lot of appeal for Anne while she was writing it. I think she'd rather have been back at home instead of waiting in constant fear for her family's inevitable arrest by the Nazis.


Memoirs, autobiographies and 'diaries' such as Anne Frank's, provide more than a story for some-they awaken healing...and in cases in which the individual is not ready to face deep rooted fears and feelings, the timing is the issue.
I am guessing...but you left out so much, in particular, you did not name a single reason for your 'hate' of the book,so I am left to suppose it may be personal issues behind your strong aversion to the diary. Please take the time to step back and use introspection to uncover what it is about this book that creates such strong emotion in you.
Sara

We know, Anamika, we know. But why did you start a discussion post if you just wanted to take a poll? Don't be mad when you get people discussing on your discussion topic. Look, here : Go to the book's page. Scroll down to the bar that says "community reviews". Hover your cursor over "rating details". It will show you all the numbers regarding how many people on Goodreads liked or disliked this book. No reasons, just numbers. You're Welcome.

No. Not at all.

your excused"
Had you written "You'RE excused" I could have respect enough to find this funny.

Why is the need to have people agree with you so important? You're not going to get it with
a) this particular book
and
b) the approach you have taken, declaring, without reason, your hatred.
You need to grow up and think before you make such sweeping statements.



Dee wrote: "sounds like she is doing some kind of research project on Anne Frank and needs an opposing POV from those who enjoyed it"
If that is the case, maybe the moderators should shut down this thread... because using Anne Frank's diary in this way isn't really appropriate, I don't think. Anne deserves more respect than having her diary torn apart. She was brave young woman caught in extraordinary circumstances. And, again, this is her diary, her private thoughts, feelings, dreams - she didn't write her words to have them critiqued.
If that is the case, maybe the moderators should shut down this thread... because using Anne Frank's diary in this way isn't really appropriate, I don't think. Anne deserves more respect than having her diary torn apart. She was brave young woman caught in extraordinary circumstances. And, again, this is her diary, her private thoughts, feelings, dreams - she didn't write her words to have them critiqued.


Ah the attention span of boys is legendary unless it has to do with bikinis.
Mark wrote: "Ah the attention span of boys is legendary unless it has to do with bikinis. "
Yeah... not too much frolicking on the beach in this book... (and for the reviewers of her book who said she was whining... if I had been in her shoes, I would have been in a fetal position in a corner of that attic room, possibly sucking my thumb...)
Yeah... not too much frolicking on the beach in this book... (and for the reviewers of her book who said she was whining... if I had been in her shoes, I would have been in a fetal position in a corner of that attic room, possibly sucking my thumb...)

well its not wrong that her thoughts have been criticized because that was her dads choice when he decided to publish the book. i mean, its a book that should be read in schools because i think it really inspires and also shows us that we are very lucky to be living in this time period and that there is more to life than we think and that we should appreciate every second. but yeah, im not being mean or anything, im just sayin. :)


Personally I don't care enough to wait for an explanation - I have a life to live, more books to read, trips to plan....



You mention that the thread shouldn't have been created. But it was. And people are replying. In the world of social media, it is almost impossible to state "Those who like,please don't comment" essentially those who disagree, I don't want to hear your opinion. That is a red flag to get those who disagree to speak up. Though I think Animika meant it.
On a positive note for Animika, it seems like she is taking this thread seriously and evaluating her thoughts. And this subject in particular, is one that needs to be reassessed if you are hating a certain little girl for no particular reason. There are way too many people - who think the Holocaust was a hoax and was used as propaganda for some political means. Many of those are the extreme Christian Right, here in the USA. Unfortunately, I know some personally. No matter the evidence you use to support the facts, they dismiss is as government cover up. Much like the people that say 911 attacks were staged by the US government or Sandy Hook shootings were fake. These are usually the same group of people.
We do not know Animika's upbringing or religion. Maybe she does not connect to this time in history as actually being real. But being romanticized in the media. Maybe the brain is just having a problem connecting the reality of the situation. But I am encouraged that she kept the thread up and it seems like she has been reading comments as they go along. And she is taking the time to think it over. Yes, she was defensive in the beginning, but who wouldn't be. I jumped right on that wagon with everyone else.
Maybe this thread will be a watermark in her life. Something that makes her go "hhmmmmm." And re-think the worlds politics, religions and general ability to get along with one another.
Amika, take as long as you need. As long as the retrospection is heart felt and open minded.
*steps off soap box*

As for seeing this thread as a "watermark" - I doubt she will; if my guess at her age is correct - she's probably less than twenty years old - she'll shrug it off and not take it too seriously, which is probably for the best.

In Animka's defence - she did not say she hated Anne Fr..."
Thank you Joodith for pointing out the typos. =) They have been corrected. We can only hope this will make people think. If not, well then we tried. Though, I began thinking she was just trolling, but since she has not been as present as the usual troll. Maybe this will make her think. You never know when something may click and change your thinking. And maybe I am being too optimistic.

I think this is a young girl who hasn't thought through what she wanted to say, and unfortunately it has stirred up a hornet's nest. I shudder to think what might have happened had she been in a face-to-face situation; fortunately for her she has the shelter of the internet.

Go to the book's page.
Scroll down to the bar that says "community reviews". Hover your cursor over "rating details". It will show you all the numbers regarding how many people on Goodreads liked or disliked this book. No reasons, just numbers. You're welcome.
I wasn't sure you saw that the first time I said it.
Joodith wrote: "I think this is a young girl who hasn't thought through what she wanted to say"
I think this is very accurate. I also think that with the passage of time, people (especially younger people, i.e., those under 20) may not realize that this book is NON-fiction. Oh, and it doesn't have a ghostwriter, like many "celebrity" autobiographies, to jazz it up. So, what we are getting is a raw vision of what a young woman lived through with her family in an attic in Holland during World War II. Whether Otto Frank was right in publishing it or not, we should be glad he did. This book offers an important look at what happened, and what we should never forget happened. Frankly (no pun intended), I'm glad for this discussion because we shouldn't sweep this horrible time in history under the rug. And if this discussion sparks renewed curiosity in Miss Frank's diary, then it was worth it. :)
I think this is very accurate. I also think that with the passage of time, people (especially younger people, i.e., those under 20) may not realize that this book is NON-fiction. Oh, and it doesn't have a ghostwriter, like many "celebrity" autobiographies, to jazz it up. So, what we are getting is a raw vision of what a young woman lived through with her family in an attic in Holland during World War II. Whether Otto Frank was right in publishing it or not, we should be glad he did. This book offers an important look at what happened, and what we should never forget happened. Frankly (no pun intended), I'm glad for this discussion because we shouldn't sweep this horrible time in history under the rug. And if this discussion sparks renewed curiosity in Miss Frank's diary, then it was worth it. :)


thats a really rude thing to say.

nope, just very sarcastic.
But she undoubtedly will give her reasons for doing so in a few days when Anamika will explain her hatred.

lol. your picture is creepy as shit...i like it. :)


I think I might be able to guess the subject of your possible research topic, Anamika. Well, as I said before, I pray this sparks a renewed interest in that era and the brave souls who lived then. Blessings to you.

message 99:
by
Orinoco Womble (tidy bag and all)
(last edited Jun 13, 2014 05:55AM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars

As for hating a person we don't know or who is long dead, it doesn't harm them a particle; however, it can be like drinking acid to the person suffering such a powerful emotion without purpose.

Yes, I am part Jew and 100% human.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Born a Soldier: The Times and Life of Larry Thorne (other topics)
Mannerheim: President, Soldier, Spy (other topics)
The Winter War (other topics)
The Quiet American (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
The Diary of Mary Berg: Growing up in the Warsaw Ghetto (other topics)Born a Soldier: The Times and Life of Larry Thorne (other topics)
Mannerheim: President, Soldier, Spy (other topics)
The Winter War (other topics)
The Quiet American (other topics)
More...