Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Questions (not edit requests)
>
Batch of ingram additions with impossible ISBN
date
newest »


Given that they exist, I'm not sure if this is a "problem" or if it is, what the "solution" might be. I mean seriously, what would a solution be? NAB them all? You might be in search of a solution which has no matching problem.

ETA; NVM, I just realised this is an import from 2012. Probably still worth reporting in Feedback, they may be able to just clean them all up.


Krazykiwi: Well, it can't hurt to report it, all the better if they can do something about it.
Emy: I followed up on your suggestion to look into VitalSource, and I came up with this record:
https://www.vitalsource.com/products/...
eText ISBN: 9785WDTE00056
This is certainly not a valid ISBN. The valid ISBN is noted on the page though as: 9780470060674.
It seems perhaps that these group-5 ISBNs are actually faux-ISBN identifiers used internally by ingram?
Books mentioned in this topic
Grits: Girls Raised in the Sou (other topics)Zits Unzipped (other topics)
Perfect Storm (other topics)
Dearest Dorothy, Are We There Yet? (other topics)
I Want to Be the Kitty ( Mutts (other topics)
More...
So, I looked into this weird ISBN earlier today 9785558805048.
It's a perfectly valid ISBN, but what's weird about it is the book it's connected to: Rosy Is Rose. The reason this is weird is because the region code in this ISBN (first digit after 978) is 5 (indicating former USSR), instead of 1 or 0. What was even weirder was that ingram was the one to add it to GR.
No information turns up for this ISBN from a google search, or Worldcat search, or direct amazon search.
Following a hunch, I then checked the ISBNs preceding and following this, and hit jackpot:
9785558804980
9785558804997
9785558805000
9785558805017
9785558805024
9785558805031
9785558805055
9785558805062
9785558805079
9785558805086
9785558805093
9785558805100
All of these books:
- were imported in the same batch from ingram (June 6 2012, 09:40 PM GMT+2)
- were imported without publication dates or covers (where these exist they have been added by a librarian)
- have not been improved upon by other bots or ingram since creation.
How these ISBNs are not like normal ISBNs:
- Group 5 publisher code for what seem to be English editions
- Despite crediting various publishers, these hypothetical group-5 books would all have the same publisher code.
- There would have then had to be some sort of arrangement amongst all these publishers sharing this publisher code so that they would not use the same product code and create ISBN conflicts.
All-in-all, I think this is impossible. This must be a messed up import, or else these aren't really ISBNs, but some other identifier that GR accepts and that I'm not aware of.
I was hoping to hear people's thoughts about this before I put in a request to see if this can be sorted out by staff. These can't really be valid, right?