Arenda
#47 done #48 covers are not identical, marked as ACE #50 done #52 done #57 covers are not identical, marked as ACE #59 done #61 done
#60/31 since they have valid isbns/asins and have been on Goodreads since 2013/2014, I am not deleting them. You might contact Goodreads Support: https://www.goodreads.com/about/conta...
Philip
#64 - Since those were released books (Weather questionable or not) it would have to go through Support to be removed, if they are even willing to do that.
They are not on the other Author's page, so they are not linked to him on GR.
Philip
#65 - The cover does not match any of the other editions, so it must stay. There is different positioning of the title on that cover compared to the other editions.
Arenda
#63 both Amazon and Tealibri (publisher, via Google search, general author page on publishers site) have the more faded cover. There is also line on the darker cover. I am (still) not convinced they are identical.
DeeArenda wrote: "#63 both Amazon and Tealibri (publisher, via Google search, general author page on publishers site) have the more faded cover. There is also line on the darker cover. I am (still) not convinced the..."
They look identical to me. The line around the dark cover seems very much like an artifact from whichever site the file was downloaded from rather than part of the image.
Elizabeth (Alaska)Philip wrote: "#65 - The cover does not match any of the other editions, so it must stay. There is different positioning of the title on that cover compared to the other editions."
I disagree, but I guess it doesn't matter. We can leave it as a duplicate.
letheElizabeth (Alaska) wrote: "Philip wrote: "#65 - The cover does not match any of the other editions, so it must stay. There is different positioning of the title on that cover compared to the other editions."
I disagree, but I guess it doesn't matter."
They do, really. The word 'fiction' is positioned higher than on three of the other covers, and the fourth cover has a blurb that your edition doesn't have.
Philip
#77 - If you remember post a reminder about this one in 2 days (after the giveaway ends). It is the edition that is being used for the giveaway, and we do not like to play with those because it can screw up the giveaway.
I honestly think it's a duplicate (to tell you the truth it was created by a user that does this all the time - creating duplicates of editions with ISBN without checking first - so that's one of the reasons I'm still convinced).
I honestly think it's a duplicate (to tell you the truth it was created by a user that does this all the time - creating duplicates of editions with ISBN without checking first - so that's..."
Considering how much colour difference there can be between two images of the same cover I am inclined to agree with you.
Philip
#92 - Is the 1960 or 1955 edition the one that you should not have created, because it was not valid? I am not seeing any that are duplicate other than those with the same cover but different dates.
Can you delete in this process also these: Strohm, Leo & Wood, Tom (That's what left after replacing author and translator with correct notation - two empty author pages)