The Sword and Laser discussion
What Else Are You Reading?
>
The 100 Science Fiction and Fantasy Books You Must Read Before You Die, According to Amazon
42 from that list. So apparently the Ultimate question to life, the universe, and everything is "How many books has Rob read from this random Amazon list".
Kind of a letdown really...
Kind of a letdown really...



ETA: Just checked for books I don't know. One. YOWTCH! (Red Rising by Pierce Brown.) Where did this list COME from?

I'm at around 40, and I agree with Rick that the mix is a little heavy on past 5 year stuff. Like most lists like this we have talked about over the years.

That's like having a list of Beethoven, Mozart, Tchaikovsky, Bach and John Mayer.
Trike wrote: "57. But come on, Ready Player One?
That's like having a list of Beethoven, Mozart, Tchaikovsky, Bach and John Mayer."
To be fair. There are a few John Mayers (ie duds) on that list ;-)
I liked Ready, Player One but it wouldn't make my Top 100 (or 1000) either.
That's like having a list of Beethoven, Mozart, Tchaikovsky, Bach and John Mayer."
To be fair. There are a few John Mayers (ie duds) on that list ;-)
I liked Ready, Player One but it wouldn't make my Top 100 (or 1000) either.
I've probably recommended Ready Player One to more people than any of the other books. It's one of my favorites personally.
This is books to read before you die, not best written or whatever. I think that's why the newer 'John Mayer' books make a lot of sense personally.
This is books to read before you die, not best written or whatever. I think that's why the newer 'John Mayer' books make a lot of sense personally.

Not the list I would've come up with but shows a good balance.


Did anyone else notice that "Vote on Goodreads" link in the image at the top? That list is a bit different.
Ben wrote: "I managed 40, if I counted right.
Did anyone else notice that "Vote on Goodreads" link in the image at the top? That list is a bit different."
That's because people added books to the list.
Did anyone else notice that "Vote on Goodreads" link in the image at the top? That list is a bit different."
That's because people added books to the list.

Huh. Scott Westerfeld's Uglies is on there. That's YA.

Huh. Scott Westerfeld's Uglies is on there. That's YA."
So are Harry Potter, The Hunger Games, The Golden Compass, and others. Could still be they're worth reading.

The only one I'd never heard of was Angela Carter's Nights at the Circus and I added that one. (I thought she only wrote short stories for some reason)


De gustibus, but I expect any book I must read before I die should be a life changing event. I don't think Ready Player One qualifies unless you're Natalie Portman's character in Garden State. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone wasn't born between 1955 and 1990 and exposed to heavy amounts of American culture in the '80s.
And some of the other choices -- Shannara, Thomas Covenant Rapist -- I wouldn't even recommend to people who are already dead.

..."
Brilliant. :)
I agree - books like RP 1 etc are fine, it's just the way the list is pitched. Even things like The Rook, Red Rising... are they really books I need to read before I die? Nah, probably not (to me, such a book needs to be re-readable or at the least, something that sticks with me). Had they pitched it as "100 Books That will give you a feel for SFF", yeah. But of course one of the reasons people talk about lists like this is that they're pitched as Best/Need to read before dead and the like. Which is good - it gets people talking about books, after all.
I really do think they started out this list and realized that they were filling it up with recognized classics - The Martion Chronicles, Lord of the Rings, Neuromancer, etc - and added some lesser know stuff (the Butler, others) and then felt they needed to add in some other, more recent works. In other words, it feels like a balancing act.
Too, remember that this is an Amazon list. It's partially there to spur sales.


Another odd thing about the list is the duplication of titles. 23. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (Chronicles of Narnia, #1) 83. The Magician's Nephew (Chronicles of Narnia, #6) Butn then 58. The Chronicles of Narnia (Chronicles of Narnia, #1-7). Then there is: 79. The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, the Unbeliever (The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, #1-3) And, 81. Lord Foul's Bane (The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever, #1)
I don't think this is a curated list, or even one given editorial review. Just something generated by votes, sales, tweets, or something like that.
I don't think this is a curated list, or even one given editorial review. Just something generated by votes, sales, tweets, or something like that.

You're looking at the Goodreads list as opposed to the Amazon list. I believe that you're right that the Goodreads list is just generated by votes so you get the weird duplication you're noticing.

The Time Machine is there.


This is books to read before you die, not best written or whatever. I think that's why the newer 'John Mayer' books make a lot of sense personally. ."
It's a list of science fiction books you MUST read before you DIE.
That kind of implies they should be transcendent in some way, not stuff to kill time while waiting at the doctor's office that you'll forget a week later. This is like a list of "Places you must visit before you die" and it's the Grand Canyon, Eiffel Tower, the Great Wall and Iowa's Third Largest Ball of Twine. Not third largest in the world, third largest in Iowa.
Not exactly a memorable experience equal to the others.

This is books to read before you die, not best written or wh..."
Depends on how big a fan you are of architecture compared to twine and Iowa.

Nobody is that big a fan of twine.
A list of science fiction books you MUST read before you DIE. At 100 books that's way too long. I'm sure that the romance, crime, spy, travel, adventure, gothic, Bible, biographic, comedy, erotic, gangster, horror, superhero, etc. readers could all come up with lists of 100 books you MUST read before you DIE. I don't have time for that. I might look at a top 10 list. Top 3 or 5 make more sense. But it is a bit presumptuous to think anyone NEEDS to read 100 books in any genre.
Even better is if you like X then Y in this genre might appeal to you.
Even better is if you like X then Y in this genre might appeal to you.

What? You can get that done in a year. It's no big deal.
Sean wrote: "David wrote: "A list of science fiction books you MUST read before you DIE. At 100 books that's way too long."
What? You can get that done in a year. It's no big deal."
Ah, but do you want to spend a year reading the 100 western romance novels you MUST read before you DIE? Or how about a year reading the 100 robinsonade plays you MUST read before you DIE? Or the 100 sacred texts you MUST read before you DIE? Life is too short.
What? You can get that done in a year. It's no big deal."
Ah, but do you want to spend a year reading the 100 western romance novels you MUST read before you DIE? Or how about a year reading the 100 robinsonade plays you MUST read before you DIE? Or the 100 sacred texts you MUST read before you DIE? Life is too short.

To give a concrete musical example, let's say we're coming up with a list of 100 pieces of classical music to hear before you die. And we get down to: should we include Beethoven's 8th symphony, or Scriabin's 'Vers la flamme'?
Almost everybody would agree that B's 8th is better than VLF. If you're making a 'best of all time' list, you put the symphony on it, not the piano piece. But if you're making a real 'make sure you listen to these' list... after you've put Beethoven's 3rd, 5th, 6th, 9th, and maybe 7th symphonies on the list, does the hearer really gain all that much by listening to the 8th as well? On the other hand, most people may have no time for 'Vers la flamme' at all... but it's different, and it helps show what music is capable of, and some small minority of people will respond to it powerfully.
I'd rather have '100 books to read before you die' list were a list of books like Vers la flamme, rather than a list of books like Beethoven's 8th symphony or Rachmaninov's 3rd piano concerto (it's good, but once you've heard the 2nd do you reall NEED the 3rd?)...


This is the INTERNET. Everything is of equal importance here.



Books mentioned in this topic
Nights at the Circus (other topics)Red Rising (other topics)
http://www.amazon.com/s?rh=i%3Aenglis...