Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archives
>
Which LIST book did you just start?
message 2801:
by
Karina
(new)
Aug 11, 2010 02:08PM

reply
|
flag
I just started Jane Eyre and it is...ok. I have issues with the writing - there were mistakes on the first page (one very poorly worded sentence with incorrect pronouns that was very confusing)! I have heard the story is good, so I will continue, it just bugs me when that happens!


Ex Lit Prof
www.the-reading-list.com


Another one I somehow missed in younger years. I understand it is considered the "Huckleberry Finn" of the British Isles!
Started on The Garden Party last night.

I thought this gave a good insight into autism. I would be curious as to what you think after reading this book.


I thought this gave a good insight into autism. I would be curious as to what you think after reading this book."
Well to be honest, I went into it not expecting to like it at all. I'm half way through almost, and I can't believe how much I'm enjoying it. No doubt will review this one when I'm done. :) First good book in a while so long overdue..

Austen's great. Have Mansfield park on my shelf but still haven't managed to get around to it. Loved Emma though.



It's been years since I reviewed this story.
Hoping to contribute to the group discussion before it is over this month!

I also started the Master of Ballantrae by Robert Louis Stevenson. I am thinking it is on at least one version of the list, but could be wrong.

I'm amazed at how much I like the first few chapters!
I've put this one off for years thinking it was so over-rated. Now that I have read more of the modern and post modern novels on the Lists, I may find I have a higher opinion of this author than I'd expected.

two of my favorite novels! the third one, Titus Alone, is quite different and the writing is pretty terrible. from what i've read, the lessened quality was due to peake's challenges with his mental health. he also wrote an excellent novella "Boy in Darkness" that takes place between the 2nd & 3rd books.
the series has always been lumped under 'canonical British fantasy' but i'm not sure why. there is very little that could be considered 'pure fantasy' in any of the novels (excluding Boy in Darkness). if anything, i've found peake's style & thematic concerns to be more similar to dickens than any english fabulist.

I just finished it yesterday. It does begin slowly, but once I got the background of all the characters I really enjoyed it. Flaubert doesn't give anybody a break, and I found that incredibly amusing. Good luck!

two of my favorite n..."
Thanks for the words of encouragement. I am about halfway through Gormenghast now, and I am enjoying it. I agree with the Dickens comparison (especially the wonderful character names), but I also think there is a lot of Tristram Shandy in Peake's approach to plotting.


an excellent comparison. interesting food for thought the next time i read it.

Stick with it. I recently finished this one and I had a hard time sticking to it at the beginning but I was glad I kept reading it.

So far I'm intrigued, I find it interesting but am not completely into it yet.


meh. I didn't find it that great either. The movie is way better.



I'm listening to Robinson Crusoe and finding it really boring, probably because I know the plot through pop culture.


You've actually hit upon the issue, Amanda. Today's readers in such genre; especially those under 30, have no concept of where their "Twilight..," and other vampirish JA genre originated. They are all actually off-shoots of Anne Rice novels about Lestat, Louis, Armand, and the Others. While AR didn't invent the whole concept of vampires, she did bring them into the 20th century and her novels paved the way..."grandmothered" the way for the great vampirish books we read today.
I suppose I'm really saying that I think she and her novels deserve serious attention and respect. At Harvard this year one of the professors will be teaching an English course on vampire literature. Guess whose book is at the top of the list?? :]
"Interview with a Vampire," may seem dry and a bit uninteresting in light of the quick/flash -and-dash-with-movie-and-media that we see from the "Twilight" series now. Just imagine when all we had were books we had to hold, newspapers where we read reviews, and not any interest at all in vampires per se---the Anne Rice timeframe of her early vampire novels.
Yes, they are older and different but seriously consider the depth and difference in the writing, language, ambiance, historical background, art and music descriptions, sense of place and their descriptions, and even in the depth of the characters.
Lestat and Claudia and Louis, alone, have more depth than some of the more recent books I've been reading.
"Interview with a Vampire," is modern, classic American fiction. It is just as unfair for some to call it out-dated and unworthy of intelligent reading as it would be to say that "Anna Karinina," is old fashioned and unworthy, and that anyone who reads such stuff is just "dating themselves!"

Deborah, do you have the full list of books that will be taught in this course? I'd love to see it!


Deborah, do you have the ..."
I do have the list, Christina! I can send you a copy if you email me...or if others are interested, I can just list the books here on our Group discussion. Please advise. :] interiorsbydeb2@aol.com Deb
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
City of Bones (other topics)Bouvard and Pécuchet (other topics)
Lolita (other topics)
O Homem Sem Qualidades (other topics)
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Barack Obama (other topics)Mario Vargas Llosa (other topics)
Iain Banks (other topics)
Chinua Achebe (other topics)
V.S. Naipaul (other topics)
More...