Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archives
>
Which LIST book did you just start?

I'm about to start Middlesex and Empire of the Sun.

You are my reading soulmate if you feel that way about Faulkner. I just get lost in his stories, and I've never read anything he wrote that I didn't get into. Of course, I'm a southerner, which helps; but he was just a superb writer any way you look at it.
Read on!

I have a list of such reads that just didn't "take" when I first read them. All of them years ago except.....
"A Home At the End of the World" I read it not that long ago, and I cannot remember the plot! It's amazing! I must have sleep-read that one!
I think one possible negative of pressing reading goals is just reading so fast that we don't take enough time to digest and reflect on each book. At least I've recognized that a little in my quest for 60 to 100 this year. I think I maybe should be satisfied with 50 well chosen instead.


Just adding that I DO remember "A Home At The End of the World" is about twentysomethings ending up in a manage a trois. That much stuck with me!

I wouldn't call it a menage a trois. :-) I think it is a bit more complicated/simple than that (depending on how you look at it). I think it is an important book about the idea of "family" and "home" and how we so often have to make those things for ourselves. The plot itself I didn't find that important relative to the relationships between the characters so maybe that's why it didn't stick as well. I also saw the movie (which wasn't bad, but I didn't like the changes in the ending) which probably also helped.


Tell me, did you think they were well-developed in the novel, Rebecca?

I'm taking a breather from his novel, "The Wizard Knight," because I've hit a slump and can't get myself to finish the last hundred pages or so. Hopefully this situation will work itself out soon enoug.

Interesting question. I thought some of the characters were more well-developed than others, but I found the interaction between the main three characters most intriguing and it sort of made up for some of the lacking character development. I enjoyed the book more than the movie, although I have to say Sissy Spacek was FABULOUS as the mother. I would have liked to see her character developed more in the book.


Thanks for the insights, Rebecca!



I'm going to try to get this done so I can hand it off at the Boston Area 1001 Meetup! :-)

"All right, I said. You have a key. Let's go in."
"Who said I had a key?"
"Don't kid me son. The fag gave you one."
"...I took plenty of the punch. It was meant to be a hard one, but a pansy has no iron in his bones, whatever he looks like."
Ok, I understand this was published in 1939. But such gross homophobia turns me completely off.
Any thoughts? I wasn't sure where to post this, so let me know if I need to move it.


Technically started it a while ago but set it down for a long time - Cider House Rules. I got about 1/4 of the way into it over a month ago and then my attention wandered. Finally picked it back up again recently. It's hard to explain why I'm taking so long to finish this since it is definitely not a difficult read - I find it enjoyable but it hasn't really sucked me in and made me feel compelled to finish so far.

Cider House Rules is the only John Irving novel I really enjoyed, but I did really enjoy it. It has his trademark quirkiness without being completely fantastical like his other novels. I'm looking forward to hearing what you think of it in the end, Ladyfunk.


Regardless, I think it can be eye-opening to read about prejudice in older books - for learning about the everyday reality of prior times, it can't be beat. Also, if we refused to read racist, sexist, or homophobic books, there wouldn't be much of a canon left. It might be "101 Books" instead of a 1001.
Of course, this polarization of strength, masculinity, and machismo, versus homosexuality, femininity, and weakness is still rife today, and those crude words remind us that there is actually a lot of this exact brand of crudeness in movies and books today. And where it's not as crude, the ideas may still be implicit. Know thine enemy, definitely!
Of course, some books are just unpleasant to read, and I've put down quite a few in my time, so I would completely understand if you toss this one and start something else more your style.

"Kara & Natalie, I'd be curious to hear whether you feel that, in this case, the author was expressing homophobia, or whether it is, rather, part of the character? Sometimes it's easy to get confused between the two, but, for me, it makes a difference."
I agree Inder; it makes ALL the difference. When we read things from the 40s we have to realize that the attitude towards the homosexuals and other races were what they were. A realistic portrayal of that doesn't put me off it just makes me darned thankful that things have changed as much as they have. Even if we all know there are still changes that need to be made. There are still raging bigots out there but they aren't the socially accepted norm as they were then. Even here in good-ol-boy central (also known as Oklahoma) I don't know anyone who seriously uses the word "fag" anymore. There are laws (that are actually often enforced, wow!) against hate crimes. Back then, they were considered justified by the majority. Nowadays we are still battling the much more insidious and subtle little versions of bigotry. "I don't mind blacks but I wouldn't want my sister to marry one." "I have lots of friends who are black/homosexual/middle-eastern/fill-in-the-blank but... " It's the "buts" that kill us, isn't it.
Anyway, sorry for the digression. Books that were for, by and about bigots, homophobes, whatever, that is another story. I really don't feel this is the case here. The fact is, in the 40s, a guy like Marlowe would, in all likelihood, have had those sorts of views about homosexuals. In fact, they handled it pretty mildly for the day. It was pretty amazing that Chandler even included any homosexual characters, really. Back then, more often than not, authors just avoided the subject or referred to it VERY euphemistically.
Sorry if I am off on any of my facts, it has been a long while since I read this book. I was really hoping for a great read and was so disappointed that I didn't even finish it. Well, about halfway through I just skimmed the rest and then read the ending; I can't stand to start a book and not learn the ending no matter how much it sucks;o) My problems with it was that the characters all seemed like caricatures to me. I love the private eye genre and I'm really thankful to Chandler for being one of the founding fathers of a really fun genre but boy am I thankful for the evolution of that genre. It wasn't just the homosexuals that were treated one dimensionally, it was the gangster, the nympho, the rich guy... all of them. That said, I still understand why it is on the list. If I was reading it now instead of in my 20s, who knows, I might actually enjoy it. Maybe later.


Thanks so much for your thoughtful comments! They really made me step back and think about why I really disliked the book. Lol
I understand what you’re saying about determining who is the homophobe, the character or the author. To be honest, I really couldn’t tell. There was so little character development in this book. It was very difficult to gain any insight about who any of the characters were below the surface.
I think I overreacted to the homophobia thing, actually. Those two terms, “fag” and “pansy,” were both on the same page, within a couple of paragraphs, so I guess it kind of slapped me in the face. I have a roommate, and he’s one of the best people I have ever met, really. He’s a wonderfully sweet and thoughtful guy. But he uses the word “fag” to refer to all kinds of people and behaviors. It seems like whenever he has anything negative to say about anybody, he uses the word fag. When I was a kid my friends and I did that because we thought it was “cool,” but we didn’t even really know what the word meant. We just knew it was derogatory. My roommate is 18, and it seems like the word has made a comeback with that age group, which just makes me sad. So I think that page of the book hit a nerve on that day.
I found Chandler’s story to be pretty bland overall, and I really didn’t find any of the characters to be particularly intriguing. I kept mixing the 2 sisters up and would have to go back and reread to make sure I knew who I was reading about. That happened with a couple of the other characters also. Chandler didn’t really let me get to know any of them (including Marlowe) well enough to distinguish one from another.
I’m glad I finished the book, and I understand its significance to the genre. It just wasn’t my cup of tea. :)



Now I see that several are already on my to be read pile. Other books themselves are not on my list but other books by the same authors are on my list.

Is May's book "Empire of the Sun"?
Angie


I'm finishing yet another Graham Greene book, Brighton Rock, which isn't as good as the past few that I have picked up but is at least engaging enough to keep my attention.
After I finish it this afternoon I will probably be moving on to David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest.

I figure I'll have to get them out of the way eventually; at least the awful book I'm about to read is about 170 pages, whereas the awful book you're about to read (smiles) is over 1000.
Good luck!


*having a child (and even more so an autistic child) narrator seemed a bit gimmicky and I didn't want a disappointment especially after loving Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. I must relate well with children.
(I guess I don't know how to do italics here. If anyone wants to fill me in, I'd love to learn.)


I'd still like to hear what others have thought of it it before I make the purchase though!

The Mezzanine by Nicholson Barker for book club. It seems to have gotten good reviews, generally. Anyone have any opinions?
I see that Waiting for Godot is listed above. That's another one I'll be reading for book club, but in November.
I see that Waiting for Godot is listed above. That's another one I'll be reading for book club, but in November.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
City of Bones (other topics)Bouvard and Pécuchet (other topics)
Lolita (other topics)
O Homem Sem Qualidades (other topics)
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Barack Obama (other topics)Mario Vargas Llosa (other topics)
Iain Banks (other topics)
Chinua Achebe (other topics)
V.S. Naipaul (other topics)
More...
this time around. Maybe I hallucinated reading it, but it's certainly been on my shelf for years!