The Bell Jar
discussion
The Catcher in the Rye vs. The Bell Jar vs. The Perks of Being a Wallflower
date
newest »




The Perks of Being a Wallflower is a good book but its more in the YA lit pool than actual literature imo. And it totally ripped off Catcher in the Rye. No question.


In terms of narrative style:
1. The Bell Jar
2. The Catcher in the Rye
3. The Perks of Being a Wallflower
Story:
1. The Perks of Being a Wallflower
2. The Bell Jar
3. The Catcher in the Rye
Overall writing:
1. The Bell Jar
2. The Catcher in the Rye
3. The Perks of Being a Wallflower

The catcher in the rye all the way!! love Holden (the best character ever! he was as complex as real people are, I mean he was sad at times and he made me laugh too)
I liked the bell jar but I didn't loved it...
And the perks... was good but Charlie was so annoying(he cries all the time and I dont like that in characters)

I will say, however, that there is much more to be discovered in a second, or third, or tenth reading of the Bell Jar or The Catcher in the Rye whereas The perks of being a Wallflower wheres its heart on it's sleeve, so to speak, but there is not much more to dig into.

The Bell Jar fascinated me because here you have a woman whose only real mental disorder is her sexual inexperience. Of course, this is blown out of proportion by a pop-culture devoid of understanding, so in lieu of counseling she's electrocuted. Excellent! It's a powerful testament to man's ignorance, and the fact that Sylvia Plath never wanted this book published only adds to it's already raw overtones of melancholy.
This is a book you're not invited to read, and it doesn't use any gimmicks to capture the reader's interest. It's a book you must desire, nay long, to read or you just won't get it.



yeah me too"
ditto

1. Bell jar
2. The catcher in the rye
3. The Perks of Being a Wallflower
I think that 1 and 2 are very similar, just that Holden can understand the world he lives in and can accept it and move on, he didn't get so close to suicide or madness
Anyway, the bell jar is more profound and the character's feelings are described better, It's like you are one with her, you go crazy, are angry with world and feel abandoned and alone like her...


Charlie represents hope and simplicity but how those feelings and the beauty of the world is struck down by the darkness of it all. Much like Holden Caufield. The idea of seeing life through the grey area and getting right down the black and white He has this idea of what he wants to be, but the trauma of past experiences bubble to the surface. He's relateable especially to a younger generation.
I'd still pick Holden if i had to choose between the three, but I love perks of being a wallflower.

Maybe its just the way i conmected so much with Esther, i dont know, but Charlie and Holden didnt do it enough for me.
Even Plaths writing in general trumped the others for me too. It just seemed to subtly pull me in and hold me there without me noticing.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
The Catcher in the Rye (other topics)
The Bell Jar (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Franny and Zooey (other topics)The Catcher in the Rye (other topics)
The Bell Jar (other topics)
Perks, and Charlie, just annoyed me.