Vintage Tales discussion
Post-1900s
>
The Evolution of Dystopia
date
newest »



A Clockwork Orange is a particularly stand out novel for me, not least because of Burgess' genius use of language.
I have to say, I prefer the older style of dystopian fiction, as I think they tend to be more political and have more to say about society than their more modern cousins, as you identify in your article, Michael. That's not to say that I don't think the newer works don't have something important to say, or aren't worth reading (many clearly do and are). It's just a preference on my part for that different emphasis.

Never Let Me Go was an infuriating book for me... It just didn't explain things enough, and while it was relatively readable, it got to the end and I just wanted to throw it against a wall...
I prefer older dystopian fiction too, although Margaret Atwood's more modern ones have really stood out for me. (The Year of the Flood is next on my to-read list). I've generally avoided many YA dystopian books, mainly because I don't see them as dystopian. I guess it's because I've read so much 'classic' dystopian fiction, I just feel as if they're writing about it because it's the norm now for Young Adult fiction, not because they want to write a dystopian novel.


What frustrates about YA Dystopian literature is that it's far too focused on romance between two characters. Yes, in 1984, you have the romance between Winston and Julia, but that's because it's not allowed. There are some YA books where love is banned (eg.Delirium) which works really well. Other than that, the strong focus on romance annoys me because to me it isn't needed...


Now that would be a plot twist!

What I find really interesting as I look at those titles is that, as much as I love the idea of dystopian fiction, I love very few of these books. They felt more like chores. And I think the reason for that is the way politics can so often slip into this genre. I remember hating both Atlas Shrugged and The Handmaid's Tale, for example, because it felt like I was being lectured at.
I did love Fahrenheit 451, but it's been over thirty years since I read it. And Never Let Me Go breaks my heart every time (both the book and the movie), although Ishiguro has always been an author whose books I enjoy much more once I've finished them—they're not so much fun while I'm reading them.
One that I might add to the list is Samuel R. Delaney's Dhalgren, a book I read at fourteen and never really recovered from.


Probably it is not a proper Dystopia, but it describe a fictional british colony which gained indipendence and established by law a fixed period to live, after which - 67 year - people have to get into a college for a year and then be cremated, all for the good of menkind.
I was astonished that such an author as Trollope could think of something like this!
Books mentioned in this topic
Islandia (other topics)The Fixed Period (other topics)
Logan's Run (other topics)
Make Room! Make Room! (other topics)
We (other topics)
More...
Obviously, you have the 'big 3': 1984, Brave New World and We. But there are plenty of other great novels out there. Although relatively modern, 'The Handmaids Tale' (written in the 1980s) formed the new subset of Feminist Dystopia, while the likes of Philip K. Dick's 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?' debated reality vs created-reality.
It's definitely a genre I'm fascinated by, and it's a subject I'd love to do for a dissertation/coursework piece.
Is there any Dystopian novels you really love?