Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Serieses!
>
Is this a series?

?
I'm inclined to delete"
It looks like it is being used to group parts of a book together, which is allowed. It should not have the whole book attached

Agreed. Removed the full book."
Has the book numbering been removed on purpose?
Currently it says "book part x of n" on all books and parts. Also this seems to be more then one book separated in parts, Are all full books to be removed? Are we making separate series now for series that contain different numbers of books?
Ellie, this is not a typical series, but a way to collect a book that was broken into parts for foreign publication. Therefore, the full book is not part of the series, and the parts are broken up that way.


I would say imprint.
The books do not share character(s) or location. The theme is only thing that connects the books, and that would be more imprint by GR standards.

For instance, if the above is really an imprint, would there be a way to tell, as it looks like a series to my untrained eye.
Another example that I would think would be an imprint, but seems to be a series:
My Name is America
Thanks!
Angela wrote: "Are imprints notated somehow differently than a series?"
One major difference: if an imprint is incorrectly added as a series, librarians who notice will delete it.
One major difference: if an imprint is incorrectly added as a series, librarians who notice will delete it.

Is it as simple as putting them on a Listopia (since I'm a nice guy) and deleting the series, or does something more need to be done to make it go away?

Is it as simple as putting them on a Listopia (since I'm a nice guy) and deleting the series,..."
It looks like a magazine anthology series like Analog or Fantasy & Science Fiction Magazine.
Robert wrote: "Is it as simple as putting them on a Listopia (since I'm a nice guy) and deleting the series"
Yup.
Yup.

is part of this series: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
or not. If it is I don't know what number it is. Any advice? :)

is part of this series: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
or not. If it is I don't kn..."
Since it is a compilation of the books in the series, think of it as an omnibus edition. I went ahead and added this one.
For the future:
Yes to adding it to the series
It would be numbered with the volumes in the book (1-3 in this case)
Uncheck the primary work box

These two books
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
that I am about to edit are both (supposedly) book two in a series. What do I do about that? They were both published on the same dates so I don't know which one to put first. :)

These two books
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2......"
I would label them both as book 2 (doesn't really matter which is which, though I'm partial to alphabetical). But make sure you add a series description, so that users understand that there what amounts to 2 options for book 2.
Here is the author's webpage about the books:
http://www.lillianaanderson.com/drawn...
I would just copy what she wrote.

Practice makes perfect :)
Those of us answering questions have asked our fair share, and still do.


https://www.goodreads.com/series/1025...
If it's ok, maybe at least the complete novel should be deleted from the series? At the moment it's "book #1", so that EVERY edition, even if it's the complete work, it's "Les Miserables #1"...


Ok, I removed the complete editions from the series, now I don't about the order (book 3, 4, ect)
No, definitely an imprint. Someone probably wants to remove the "series" data from titles and maybe create a listopia before it gets zapped though.

https://www.goodreads.com/series/1005...
https://www.goodreads.com/series/1005...
Also I think that here single volumes are combined with editions with all the tragedies together

https://www.goodreads.com/series/1445...
https://www.goodreads.com/series/6753...
Neither reflected the publication order, which, from Worldcat and Wikipedia was:
1) Don't Point That Thing At Me
2) Something Nasty In The Woodshed
3) After You With The Pistol
But I believe that stemmed from the fact that the first date of publication was listed incorrectly for #2 and #3. I've corrected those, and left one series in the order they "should be read in" according to the note that was there (and which matches the trilogy omnibus order) and the other at date of publication. But my question is, do we normally allow two series with the exact same books, or make a decision on the "correct" order?

https://www.goodreads.com/series/1005...
https://www.goodreads.com/series/1005...
Also I t..."
What exactly is your question ?

https://www.goodreads.com/series/1005...
https://www.goodreads.com/series/1005...
Also I t..."
https://www.goodreads.com/series/1005...
This one I think is ok, it appears to be linking vols of one work together which is allowed, although I edited the description as that implied an imprint series
The other was not - it appeared to be collecting specific imprint books together that where not vols of the same work




is the follow-up to this book: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
and they were later published together in one volume:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Planet of Slums (other topics)Love & Other Detours: Love & Gelato / Love & Luck (other topics)
The Blind Geometer (other topics)
Tequila (other topics)
Fastest Girl in Town (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Jane Aiken Hodge (other topics)Jane Aiken Hodge (other topics)
Илья Франк (other topics)
Have tidied up the ordering, but does anyone want to take it over to Listopia if it's to be deleted?